Contents
Foreword
Preface
The Invaders 1540-1542
The New Mexico: Preliminaries to Conquest 1542-1595
Oñate's Disenchantment 1595-1617
The "Christianization" of Pecos 1617-1659
The Shadow of the Inquisition 1659-1680
Their Own Worst Enemies 1680-1704
Pecos and the Friars 1704-1794
Pecos, the Plains, and the Provincias Internas 1704-1794
Toward Extinction 1794-1840
Epilogue
Abbreviations
Notes
Bibliography
|

The Scourge of Epidemic
Disease
Less newsworthy than the Comanche assault of 1748,
but more lethal, was an unnamed epidemic that swept New Mexico late that
summer. Sixty-eight persons died at Santa Fe between July and September.
Father Urquijo was ordered to the villa to help. During his absence, at
least fifteen Pecos children expired as well as three single men
"without receiving the sacraments because," in the words of Fray
Andrés García, "it is the custom of these mission Indians
to notify the Father when there is no chance." The bunching of deaths in
the Pecos burial books, more-or-less complete for the years
1695-1706 and 1727-1828, reveals major epidemics almost every
decade:
1696 (fever)
1704
1728-1729 (measles)
1738 (smallpox, in 18 weeks 26 young children died)
|
1748
1759
1780-1781 (smallpox)
1800 (smallpox)
1816 (smallpox)
1826
|
And there were others. Over the years, epidemic
disease claimed many more lives at Pecos than did the violent assaults
of Plains raiders. [22]
Against the Comanches, hero Codallos had won some and
he had lost some. At a junta convened in 1748, the consensus was that
this now formidable Plains people, despite their barbarous perfidy,
should be permitted to trade at Taos. New Mexicans were not prepared to
do without the skins, meat, horses, and captives only the barbarians
could supply. Besides, it brought them within the sphere of Christian
influence and saved their captives from probable death. [23]
Vélez Cachupín Takes Over
In the spring of 1749, Governor
Codallos, praised by Fathers Estremera, Menchero, and Varo
for his defense of Pecos, yielded to his successor. Young, full of
ambition and not a little impetuous, don Tomás Vélez Cachupín was
already in the habit of exaggerating his own merits and the faults of
others. Writing to the viceroy after a year in office, Vélez
Cachupín claimed that Comanches had killed one
hundred and fifty Pecos Indians during the administration of his
predecessor, between 1743 and 1749. [24]
Picked up by two fervent Franciscans, equally prone to exaggeration and eager to
embarrass the
governors any way they could, suddenly the Pecos dead exceeded one
hundred and fifty, and now at one blow!

Tomás Vélez Cachupín
A Massacre that Never Happened
According to Fathers Juan Sanz de Lezaun and Manuel
Bermejo, whose avowed purpose was to defend the persecuted and
calumnated church and lay bare the incompetence and malice of New
Mexico's governors,
soon after the arrival of Codallos as governor, the
Pecos came to ask him for permission to go to the country of the
Comanches to prepare buffalo meat. Aware of the great danger and warned
by experienced persons, nevertheless, guided by his own self-interest,
he granted them the permission. It is assumed that beforehand they did
various carpentry jobs for him at his house.
Permission granted, with the proviso that they bring
him [buffalo] tongues, almost the entire pueblo of Pecos set out. At a
short distance an ambush of Comanches fell on these Pecos. The dead
exceeded 150. Few escaped, the reason this pueblo is destitute of
people.
Immediately don Manuel Sáenz, lieutenant of the
presidio, set out with fifty men, citizens and soldiers. An ambush of
these Comanches set out after them and killed ten Spaniards. The rest,
some afoot and others on horseback, fled for the pueblo of Pecos. As a
result, this fierce enemy has the Spanish troops in such a state that
merely on hearing their name all tremble. And for all this, who is to
blame but the governors? Not only do they favor the enemy, but when it
is time to muster the troops to punish them, they have them diverted to
other things in their personal service. They do not punish them because
of the interest they have in their trading activities. [25]
There are, no doubt, elements of truth in this tale.
The buffalo hunt and the carpentry have a valid ring. The account of
Lieutenant Sáenz de Garvisu's chase squares precisely with the pursuit
of June 1746. Some of the other stories the two friars told can be
verified elsewhere. The Comanches, they said, had sent word early in
1750 that they were coming to Taos to trade. Warned that he should
protect Galisteo and Pecos, the impulsive Governor Vélez Cachupín,
"carried away by his caprice and greed," headed straight for Taos with
all his soldiers. "In an instant the enemy struck Galisteo killing nine
or ten Indians." In the Galisteo burial book, there is an entry of
December 12, 1749, for eight men killed by Comanches attacking the
pueblo. But nowhere is there corroborating evidence that more than a
hundred and fifty Pecos died in a cleverly laid Comanche ambush." [26]
In fact, there is evidence to the contrary. Father
Menchero had estimated the population of Pecos at 125 families in 1744.
Father Francisco de la Concepción González counted everyone in 1750, a
total of 449 persons. The discrepancy is not great enough, nor does the
1750 census show an abundance of widows. If indeed "almost the entire
pueblo of Pecos" had walked into a Comanche ambush in the 1740s, Father
Manuel de San Juan Nepomuceno Trigo, who visited the pueblo as
vice-custos in 1750, should have known about it. If he did, his
statement in 1754 was a travesty. "The mission is invaded daily by the
barbarians," wrote Trigo, "but the Pecos are such valiant warriors that
the enemy is always defeated." [27]
Still, the extravagantly heightened story that more
than a hundred and fifty Pecos perished at one Comanche blow has
persisted. It is the easiest way to explain the demise of the once
populous puebloeasy but erroneous. An example of the mid-century
polemics of friars and governors, this exaggeration, suggested by
Governor Vélez Cachupín and avidly embellished by the two Franciscans,
should be taken for what it wasa blatant piece of
propaganda. [28]
|
The kivas of Pecos (not all in use
concurrently). Four "guard house kivas" marked H, I, J, K. Kidder,
Pecos, New Mexico
|
The Defense of Pecos and Galisteo
After the assault on Galisteo in December 1749,
Governor Vélez Cachupín took the Comanche grudge against Pecos and
Galisteo seriously. Like his predecessor, he provided, on paper at
least, detachments of fifteen soldiers at each pueblo. The large
compound west of the Pecos convento, the so-called "presidio," probably
dates from the 1740s and 1750s. Alcalde mayor José Moreno and a squad of
soldiers had stood as marriage witnesses at Pecos as early as February
1747, although they may simply have been passing through on patrol. The
friars confirmed that Governor Codallos had left troops to
guard the pueblo after his heroics there in January
1748. That April, the military-minded Father Menchero wrote of
fifteen-man detachments at both Pecos and Galisteo. Like others posted
on outlying New Mexico frontiers, these detachments rotated and, like
the parent presidio in Santa Fe, rarely if ever mustered at full
strength.
Vélez Cachupín, in his letter of March 1750, to the
viceroy was the first to mention that he had fortified Pecos and
Galisteo "with earthworks (trincheras) and towers
(torreones) at the gates." Just what form the earthworks took is
difficult to say, but the towers at the gates have been well
substantiated at Pecos by archaeologist A. V. Kidder. In the north or
main pueblo, he excavated four of them and identified a likely fifth,
all "strategically placed" to command the four entrances. He termed them
"guardhouse kivas," and he recognized that they were of late
construction. But because he surmised that they were entered by a
hatchway in the roof, because they were fitted out like kivas, and
because they seemed not "to have been mentioned in the early Spanish
accounts," Kidder refused to assign them a primarily defensive role.
Probably he was right about their ritual significance, albeit secondary.
The kiva-like fire pit, deflector, and ventilator simply provided
the best heating system for these chambers. These, it would seem, were
Vélez Cachupín's defensive torreones. [29]
For the next half-century, until the Spanish
settlements took hold at the river ford beyond, the governors guarded
the Pecos gateway as best they could. To back up the arms of the Pecos
Indians, which in 1752 consisted of 107 fighting men with 3,313 arrows,
seventeen lances, four swords, and no cueras, they garrisoned the place
sporadically and provided a small arsenal. In 1762, Alcalde mayor
Cayetano Tenorio was responsible at Pecos for "1 small campaign cannon,
3 pounds of powder, and 250 musket balls." Somewhat expanded, the Pecos
arsenal in 1778 included "18 muskets, 9 pounds of powder, 300 balls, 1
bronze cannon of two-pounder caliber with its carriage and other
accessories, 4 balls of grape-shot, ramrod, and wormer." [30]
|
An 18th-century Spanish escopeta, a
light musket widely used on the northern frontier. Brinckerhoff and
Faulk, Lancers
|
Comanches Hurl Themselves at Galisteo
After treating and trading with Comanches at Taos in
July 1751 and cautiously accepting their promises of peace, Governor
Vélez Cachupín four months later saw his defenses tested by Comanches.
The Indian scouts he employed to watch the approaches to Pecos and
Galisteo had grown lazy. At dawn on November 3, 1751, without warning, a
hell-bent army of three hundred Comanches or more "hurled themselves at
the pueblo of Galisteo in an attempt to enter and sack it. The squad of
ten soldiers which I had as a precaution there," Vélez reported,
together with the Indians, positioned themselves behind an earth work
and fired upon the enemy. They repulsed the assault, killing six and
wounding others badly. The enemy made a second attempt, but likewise
were repelled. Chastised, they did not renew the
attack, but remained an hour in the neighborhood of
the pueblo, a musketshot away, firing the sixteen muskets they had and
shooting their arrows at the entrance to the earthwork where the squad
was. The latter answered their fire. Having achieved nothing except the
killing of twelve cows that happened to be outside the pueblo, the enemy
withdrew suddenly, as is their custom in such cases.
Vélez Cachupín was furious. "My heart leaped," as he
put it, "with an ardent desire to give them a taste of our arms and show
them something else than the kindness with which I had treated them and
dealt with them at Taos." Taking personal command of the punitive force,
the brash young governor caught up with the Comanches on the sixth day,
and by his own account handed them such a drubbing, killing a hundred or
so and releasing the others after firm but kind words, that they
contented themselves with peaceful trade for the remainder of his
term. At this time, too, he learned that not all Comanches shared the
grudge against Pecos and Galisteo, only certain
leaders. [31]
|
The Virgin of the Immaculate Conception
by Bernardo de Miera y Pacheco, a panel from the altar screen of the
former 18th-century church of Nambé pueblo. Museum of New
Mexico.
|
Diplomacy of Vélez Cachupín
Despite the nasty things the friar partisans of
ex-governor Codallos said about Vélez Cachupín, he, like Vargas before
him and Anza after him, seemed to grasp intuitively the key to peace
with the raiders: an active personal diplomacy backed by proven prowess
in battle and a supply of gifts or trading opportunities. In his
instructions to his successor, Vélez cautioned that the heathens would
test him to see what manner of man he was. He must go to the fairs at
Taos, conveying both confidence and friendship, and he must see to the
Comanches' protection from the other tribes while trading, particularly
from the Utes who had broken with them late in the 1740s. He must sit
down and smoke with them, even "permit their
familiarities and take part in their fun at suitable
times."
As for the displaced Plains Apaches, the Carlanas,
Palomas, Cuartelejos, and Chipaynes, they should also be wooed. During
the winter of 1751-1752, three hundred men of these tribes had
taken refuge near Pecos. Although the friars baptized and buried some
of their young and their infirm, these Apaches camped outside the pueblo
and were never counted on Pecos censuses. Viewing them as a ready
reserve in the event of Comanche hostility, Governor Vélez Cachupín had
succeeded in keeping them there. He had sought to prevent a close
alliance between them and the horse-thieving Faraones and Natagés, or
Mescaleros. When the men ventured out onto the plains to hunt or
rendezvous with relatives, they left their women and children in the
safety of Pecos. These Apaches, he noted, made much better plains scouts
than the Pueblos.
The natives of Pecos and Galisteo who ably guarded
the approaches to their pueblos should be kept alert. To insure the
continuation of his successful policies at the eastern gateway, Vélez
Cachupín recommended to the next governor that he retain Alcalde mayor
Tomás de Sena, "who, because of his kindness, is greatly loved by the
Indians. If he should be separated from them," Vélez counseled, "you
could not find anyone who would wish to serve in that
office." [32]
Marín del Valle Wrecks the Comanche Peace
But his successor did. Eager to put his own stamp on
New Mexico affairs, Francisco Antono Marín del Valle, a vain, less bold
individual who governed from 1754 to 1760, soon broke Vélez Cachupín's
delicate web of alliances. The Apaches left the vicinity of Pecos. The
Comanches took to raiding again. And the new alcalde mayor of Pecos and
Galisteo went out on campaign.
Don Bernardo de Miera y Pacheco, lured north from El
Paso by the offer of an alcaldía mayor, was an "engineer," soldier,
merchant, painter, and, most important to Governor Marín, an
accomplished map maker. After he had accompanied the governor on his
visitation, Miera drew in 1758 an elaborate, illuminated map of the
entire kingdom of New Mexico, one of a number he would compile and draw
over the next quarter-century. On it, northeast of Pecos and north of
the Río Colorado (the Canadian), he sketched a village of tipis. Below
it, he wrote the words "tierra de Cumanches," and above it, drew a
delightful leaping buffalo. Well to the south, on the west side of the
Río Pecos not far from modern Fort Sumner, he labeled another cluster of
tipis "Apaches Carlanes." [33]

Francisco Antonio Marín del Valle
While he held the office of alcalde mayor of Pecos
and Galisteo between 1756 and 1760, don Bernardo claimed to have gone
out on three campaigns against the Comanches. He also tried
unsuccessfully to refound old cannon. He stood several times as
godfather to Plains and Pecos Indians, as did his wife and his son, don
Manuel. Before Governor Marín, his patron, stepped down, Miera painted
for him a very special map in color showing New Mexico and "the
provinces, enemy and friendly, that surround it." Replaced as alcalde
mayor by Marín's successor in 1760, don Bernardo Miera remained in New
Mexico for the rest of his life pursuing his varied interests, a
prominent citizen who was never quite as prominent as he
wished. [34]
French Threat to New Mexico
No problem exercised the governors of New Mexico more
during the eighteenth century than defense against the heathen peoples
on her borders, unless perhaps it was convincing the bureaucrats in
Mexico City and Spain, who did not know a Comanche from a Pecos, how
serious it was. It galled them that mere rumors of a few exotic
Frenchmen somewhere out on the plains brought a more excited response
than ten Apache raids. Diego de Vargas had used vague reports of a
French threat in 1695 to win additional military aid for the colony.
Other governors too were quick to relay every shadow of a Frenchman,
real or imagined.
They were out there, to be sure, trading guns and
liquor and working their Indian diplomacy westward from the Illinois
country and from the lower Mississippi Valley as well. A real scare came
in 1719 when the European War of the Quadruple Alliance and the
Valverde expedition to the Arkansas coincided. Although he never saw a
Frenchman, the cautious Valverde reported what the friendly Apaches told
him about French forts, guns, and milltary advisers among their
Pawnee enemies. The next year when Pawnees
annihilated the follow up expedition of Lt. Gov. Pedro de Villasur, some
of the survivors swore that there had been Frenchmen among their
assailants. [35]

Bernardo de Miera y Pacheco
The Mallet Brothers
Thanks to the diplomacy of Étienne Véniard de Bourgmont among the
Plains Apaches in 1724, the door to New Mexico lay open. But Bourgmont's
return to France, Comanche-Apache warfare, and lingering resentment
over the Villasur massacre intervened. Some illicit trade may have got
through. For sure, in 1739, when Pierre and Paul Mallet and six or seven
companions from the Illinois country dropped down via Taos to Santa Fe,
they and their French contraband were cordially welcomed. Two of them,
"Petit Jean" and Moreau, decided to stay, becoming Juan Bautista Alarí
and Luis María Mona, the first a good citizen and the second an alleged
rabble-rouser and sorcerer sentenced to die in the plaza of Santa
Fe.
The others, after months of riotous hospitality,
returnedseveral back to Illinois and several down the Canadian, the
Arkansas, and the Mississippi to New Orleans. The latter, departing
through Pecos late in the spring of 1740, carried a letter from a friend
in Santa Fe, don Santiago Roybal, the vicar, to his counterpart in
Louisiana. Roybal wanted French goods badly, and he enclosed a list. He
thought a lucrative trade could be got up between the two provinces
across the plains "because we are not farther away than 200 leagues from
a very rich mine, abounding in silver, called Chihuahua, where the
inhabitants of this country often go to trade." That kind of talk
excited the Sieur de Bienville, governor of French Louisiana. [36]
The party Bienville sent to Santa Fe with a letter to the governor
aborted, but a lone Frenchman, evidently a deserter from Illinois,
dragged into Pecos early in June 1744. Governor Codallos told Sgt. Juan
Felipe de Rivera to take a couple of
soldiers to the pueblo of "Nuestra Señora de la
Defensa de Pecos," enlist four Pecos Indians, and bring this
unidentified intruder in "well secured." Interrogated in Santa Fe, he
gave his name as Santiago Velo (Jacques Belleau, Bellot, or Valle?) and
confessed that he was a native of Tours who had served as a soldier in
Illinois. Codallos had no use for him. Dispatching the Frenchman's
statement directly to the viceroy and Velo himself to the governor of
Nueva Vizcaya, he washed his hands of the matter. [37]
|
A knot of presidial soldiers besieged,
perhaps members of Pedro de Villasur's ill-starred expedition to the
plains in 1720. After an 18th-century painting on hide (Segesser II) in
Gottfried Hotz, Indian Skin Paintings from the American Southwest
(Norman, 1970)
|
Meanwhile, out on the plains, other Frenchmen were
working for peace between the Wichitas, their allies, and the
Comanches. With that accomplished in 1746 or 1747, the way
again lay open to Santa Fe. By early 1748, Codallos
had word that thirty-three Frenchmen had come to the Río de Jicarilla
and traded quantities of muskets to the Comanches for mules. The next
three Frenchmen, deserters from the Arkansas post who turned up at a
Taos fair in the spring of 1749, were Governor Vélez Cachupín's
problem. Two were carpenters by trade, the other a tailor, barber, and
bloodletter. Vélez put them to work in the governor's palace and
requested of the viceroy that they be allowed to stay.
|
A friar in trouble, perhaps Fray Juan
Mingues, the chaplain killed in the massacre of Villasur's command in
1720. After an 18th-century painting on hide (Segesser II) in Gottfried
Hotz. Indian Skin Paintings from the American Southwest (Norman,
1970)
|
Another pair arrived with an errant refugee Spaniard.
Vélez cursed Gov. Gaspar Domíngo de Mendoza for entertaining the Mallet
party, "the first who entered," and permitting them to return to French
territory with favorable reports of New Mexico. [38] In November
1750, that mistake came home to roost. Four Frenchmen appeared at Pecos.
One was no stranger. It was Pierre Mallet.
He had set out from New Orleans with trade goods and
letters from the governor and merchants of Louisiana. Only six days
short of Pecos, the party had run into some Comanches who were spying on
Pecos hunters. These jovial theives proceeded to despoil Mallet and his companions of most
of their goods. With a dozen spent horses, they had made Pecos, where
Lt. Gov. Bernardo de Bustamente y Tagle met them.

Bachiller Santiago Roybal
Taken into custody, they were escorted to Santa Fe
and then on down to El Paso where Governor Vélez was waiting. He
declared them illegal aliens and confiscated what goods they had left.
These were evaluated and cried three times at public auction. Since no
one bid on them, the El Paso merchant who had appraised them bought them
himself for 420 pesos, six reales. The buyer was also a soldier, a
painter, and a map maker, don Bernardo de Miera y Pacheco, later alcalde
mayor of Pecos and Galisteo. Vélez Cachupín used the money to send the
prisoners to Mexico City, and that was that. [39]
Poor Chapuis and Feuilli
Just at noon on August 6, 1752, four days after the
Pecos patronal feast, Fray Juan José Toledo was roused from his cell by
a commotion. One of the servants motioned for him to come quickly.
Outside the cemetery wall stood a couple of
bedraggled-looking Europeans, one of them holding a
French flag, or as Toledo described it, a piece of white linen on a
stick with a cross on it. They and their guide Manuela, a run away Aa
Indian servant of Esteban Baca, had been brought in from the Río de las
Gallinas by Jicarilla and Carlana Apaches. [40] They had with
them a string of nine horses carrying packs of sealed trade goods. Fray
Juan, a thirty-six-year-old native of Mexico City knew no French. Jean
Chapuis sounded to him like Xanxapy, very close if one sounds the
Mexican x's, and Louis Feuilli, like Luis Fuixy. Ordering the goods
unloaded and placed in the convento, Toledo saw to his guests, and then
wrote a hasty note to Governor Vélez Cachupín, who had it the same
evening.
|
Charles III, king of Spain, 1759-1788.
Brinckerhoff and Faulk, Lancers
|
Next day, Alcalde major Tomás de Sena reined up
outside the convento. With sign language, he communicated as best he could
that the Frenchmen had been summoned to appear before the lord governor
in Santa Fe. Sequestering goods and horses, he packed the lot to the
villa. The French tailor, who after three years in Santa Fe had picked
up some Spanish, interpreted.
The story the two told of sanction by French
officials, their grand plans for opening trade, and the invoices of
their merchandise, convinced Governor Vélez Cachupín that this was a
matter for the viceroy. Their wares, all manner of dry goods, hardware,
and fancy items, from silk garters and lace, hawk bells and mirrors, to
embroidered beaverskin shoes and ivory combs, the governor sold at
auction. When the viceroy decided that this was a matter for the king,
hapless Chapuis and Feuilli, professing all the while their ignorance
that such trade was illegal, were shipped off to Spain. Their attempt to
open the Santa Fe Trail had been precisely seventy years too
soon. [41]
If other Frenchmen tried the Pecos gateway, their
fates are not recorded. A decade later, as the Seven Years War wound
down, France transferred Louisiana to Spain. Not only did the Spaniards
inherit the elaborate French system of Indian diplomacy and subsidies,
which would influence their own less liberal Indian policy, but also a
vast and vulnerable new frontier. The contest for North America had come
down to Spaniards and Englishmen.
In New Mexico, meantime, it all hung on war and peace
with "the barbarous Indians."
|