Chapter Eight:
Controlling Development: How Much Is Too Much? (1947-1972)
(continued)
Retreat: Hard Times and Tough Questions
|
The postwar era began for the Park Service with a
flood of optimistic enthusiasm. Park planners expected a speedy return
of visitors and with them funding at prewar levels. Thousands of
structures built by the CCC as well as many more built during earlier
years desperately needed renovation or reconstruction. Miles of roads
and trails also demanded major repairs. Most postwar park planners hoped
for a return of CCC type work camps from which they could draw labor to
continue the parks' progress. It was time to get on with plans and
dreams, time to reevaluate park resources, redesign facilities, and
redouble efforts to make each visitor's experience educational and
fulfilling. [1]
In Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks, the staff
shared this service-wide optimism. Cedar Grove promised to be a new and
exciting area to develop, a second Yosemite Valley. Giant Forest might
finally be freed from its half century of crowds and clutter to become
again the spiritually and emotionally uplifting reserve park planners
knew it could be. Elaborate remodeling of structures at Grant Grove,
Lodgepole, and Ash Mountain awaited attention, as did hundreds of miles
of winter-ravaged backcountry trails. Along with all this development,
Colonel White and his successor Eivind Scoyen hoped to reassess park
management and study the problems of resource use and concomitant
preservation.
To the dismay of the Park Service, its allies in the
preservation movement, and such public as visited and used the parks,
these hopes were dashed for more than a decade after the war. Although
the number of visitors to the park system rose more than 250 percent
between 1940 and 1955, funding lagged far behind with an increase of
only 56 percent. [2] All over the nation
superintendents reported decaying structures, potholed roads, tawdry
visitor displays, and gross understaffing of popular areas. Laws and
regulations went unenforced in backcountry areas. Virtually all
acquisition of inholdings ceased, as did negotiations for elimination of
grazing permits. By 1955, noted historian and popular author Bernard De
Voto penned an article in Harpers calling for a drastic solution
to these problems. Specifically, he suggested closing some of the larger
parks because "they have the largest staffs in the system but neither
those staffs nor the budgets allotted them are large enough to maintain
the areas at a proper level of safety, attractiveness, comfort, or
efficiency. They are unable to do the job in full and so it had better
not be attempted at all." [3]
Back in the two Sierran parks, the problems of
insufficient funds and manpower were keenly felt. Over the decade and a
half after 1940, annual visitation rose from 483,743 to 1,074,134 or 122
percent, but funding failed to increase even half that percentage.
Colonel White complained in 1947:
Despite our best efforts, our public camps are run
down, our scenic spots improperly protected, our park buildings and all
facilities inadequately maintained, and the public neither protected nor
advised, or educated, as should be possible in these great heritages and
builders of national pride and morale. [4]
His successor, Superintendent Scoyen, reiterated such
sentiments in succeeding years and added that a doubling of
appropriations would not overcome the years of neglect.
One example of the irksome effects of diminished
funding occurred with the road from Cedar Grove to Copper Creek. Even as
San Joaquin Valley newspapers reported a promised completion time of
late 1948, actual construction bogged down due to paltry funding and
contractor problems. By 1952, annoyed Fresno citizens demanded that the
Park Service fulfill its promise. Yet four years later, the winter of
1955/56 brought flood damage to a still incomplete road. Work on a
bridge over the Kings River dragged into late 1956, and six months later
the contractor suffered bankruptcy. Finally, in September 1957, the road
was completed ending a decade of frustration and confusion arising from
what had begun as a relatively simple one-year project. [5]
Elsewhere in Sequoia and Kings Canyon, conditions
were equally worrisome. Giant Forest and other visitor areas suffered
from overuse and a lack of vegetative regeneration. The replanting
program and the Ash Mountain Nursery had been early casualties of
wartime and postwar funding cuts. Crying for repair were tumbled-down
visitor contact stations, dirty and undersized amphitheaters, and
campgrounds sporting tire-damaged sites, wrecked camp facilities, and
nearly denuded forests. In the backcountry some trails became
impassible; meadows turned to muddy bogs as a few overtaxed work crews
and rangers tried to care for more than 1,100 square miles of territory.
Park employees, many of them recent veterans of World War II and Korea,
crammed into grubby and substandard tent cabins. [6]
|