Cold Winter Weather: Caution ! Park Roads Are Snow-packed and Icy.
A very cold air mass will settle across Northern Arizona through the remainder of the week... with high temperatures in the 20s & 30s (-6 to 3 C) for most locations. Another storm system will bring a chance of snow to the area Saturday & Sunday. More »
Check Dam Erosion Control at Palisades
Palisades Erosion Control Project Grand Canyon National Park
Novemeber 2, 1995 - Video Clip Duration 04m:40s
Palisades is one of the largest river terraces along the Colorado River formed by debris flows from Palisades Creek and abundant sand left by Colorado River floods.
This broad, relatively flat delta is rich in cultural resources, containing the remains of numerous pueblos, fire features, wall alignments, and artifacts.
Their condition has been deteriorating due to severe erosion caused by arroyo and gullying cutting and the loss of sediment due to the existence of the Glen Canyon Dam.
The greatest amount of impact occurs from run-off channels that cut through these cultural deposits on their way to the Colorado River.
These drainages that empty directly into the river are referred to as river-based streams.
These streams constantly expose new features and destroy others.
Because of this continued erosional downcutting, remedial actions were warranted to decrease the erosional process and the loss of cultural material.
A team approach was adopted by the signatories to the Programmatic Agreement. Three years of discussions and visits to the area by Programmatic Agreement representatives and National Park Service archaeologists” resulted in a plan of action.
In May, 1995, a four day stabilization workshop at Lee’s Ferry was organized, centering on a remedial action plan for Palisades.
The general thought was that Palisades needed erosion control measures that would enable sediment from the drainage systems to be captured, thus stabilizing the cuts.
A sediment catchment system would, theoretically, not only lessen the erosion of exposed features, but also preserve features and materials below the surface.
On-site evaluations and implementation of these erosion control measures were scheduled for September, 1995.
The video clip shown on this page begins here:
In total, 26 people were involved with this “hands-on” erosion control project.
The group walked through each arroyo and discussed where and what type of action should be taken.
After a consensus was reached, the location for each checkdam was numbered and described on flagging tape. Detailed descriptions were recorded and photographs were also taken.
National Park Service archaeologists made certain that all dams were built with culturally sterile materials found in the vicinity, and that no subsurface cultural features were disturbed.
Materials gathered for checkdam construction included: camel thorn, low brush, and arrowweed. Also collected were driftwood logs and branches.
River cobbles and boulders, limestone and sandstone boulders, and lava cobbles were carried in buckets, or on rock litters.
Over 100 tons of rocks were used to complete the project.
The sediment catchment structures were made in five varieties:
rock alignment, log checks, rock checks, “horseshoe” checks, and “basket weave” checks.
The “basket weave” check was the most elaborate type to be built. First, driftwood posts were cut and shaped.
Then, the posts were pounded into the ground to form the outline of a rectangle.
An abundance of brush was then placed on the floor of the arroyo between the posts.
Then, the arrowweed was forced into the side walls of the arroyo and woven through the driftwood posts.The weave was repeated until it almost reached the top of the posts.
Large and small rocks were selectively placed inside the basket to give additional support.
To finish the check, rock grades were placed on both sides of the basket.
In three days, a total of 70 checkdams were built. The amount of labor necessary was considerable.
The Palisades erosion control project represents the first, and the most intense, of several erosion control assignments to be completed along the river corridor.
The effects of these measures will be monitored in the future, and if they prove to be successful, similar methods will be employed on highly impacted sites.This archaeological preservation effort is unique because it utilized the expertise of both Native conservators and federal agency preservationists.
Grand Canyon National Park Archeological Resources
The River Monitoring Program
generates data regarding the effects of Dam operations on historic properties, identifies ongoing impacts to historic properties within the APE [Area of Potential Effect], and develops and implements remedial measures for treating historic properties subject to damage.
Did You Know?
There are approximately 1,737 known species of vascular plants, 167 species of fungi, 64 species of moss and 195 species of lichen found in Grand Canyon National Park. This variety is largely due to the 6,000 foot elevation change from the river up to the highest point on the North Rim. More...