MENU The Field Of Education In The National Parks The Educational Program And Its Place In National Parks Administration Administration Of Park Museums Scientific Aspects Of The Park Protection Program The Research Program In The National Parks Use Of Recorded Scientific Data Libraries In The National Parks Photography And Visual Education General Administrative Problems |
THE FIELD TRIP AS A METHOD IN EDUCATION By H. C. Bryant The national parks have several millions of visitors annually. What do these visitors seek when they go to a national park? Though there may be many answers to this question, certainly an answer in general terms might be: Self-improvement. Many park visitors would be satisfied with a jazz program and with no urge to improve themselves mentally. Should an educational program in the parks meet this low ideal, or should it choose to have a program planned by experts? In ether words "what they should get" while they are in a park is not merely what they want. The aims of educational work have already been discussed in this conference. Now is a good time to discuss how these aims are to be attained. In other words, what methods are most effective in actually teaching the visitor about the outstanding phenomena of a park and so stimulating his interest that he will continue to study nature? In general, we have used the following as methods: lectures, museums, field trips. Personally, I believe that the field trip constitutes one of the very best methods of attaining the objectives toward which we are working. Originally an educated man was judged by the number of books he had read. A well read man was the educated man. During the last generation, the lecture method has been heavily stressed in our universities. The man who had attended enough lectures and showed he had assimilated what was said, was considered the educated man. Now there is a turn to an emphasis on experience, on doing or seeing rather than reading or hearing. Personally I think this is a splendid step in advance. The man with first-hand information is most useful to himself and to others. A study of the field trip as a method in education shows that here we have the finest opportunity to emphasize a study of the real thing rather than a study of printed or spoken descriptions of it. Let us line up some of the advantages to be found in this particular method. They may be summarized as follows:
Among the disadvantages which may be listed are:
I am sure there are several geologists who are willing to say that two weeks of direct study at Grand Canyon will furnish a better under standing of geology than a year spent in university class rooms. To be able to utilize all five senses in comprehending a subject establishes usable concepts in the brain which cannot be secured by any one of the senses, particularly when the information is second-hand. In my opinion, the field trip constitutes the best method of attaining the ideals set in connection with educational work in national parks. A round table discussion on the general principles of guiding followed the presentation of Dr. Bryant's paper. Continued >>> |
||||||||||
Top |
|