.gif)
Cover Page
MENU
Contents
Preface
Letter
SECTION I
Orientation
Summary
SECTION II
History
Needs
Geography
Historic Sites
Competitors
Economic Aspects
SECTION III
Federal Lands
State and Interstate
Local
SECTION IV
Division of Responsibility
Local
State
Federal
Circulation
SECTION V
Educational Opportunities
|
|
Recreational Use of Land in the United States
SECTION IV
PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATION'S RECREATIONAL RESOURCES
4. FEDERAL COMPONENTS
Biological Reservations
Because wildlife cannot be adequately conserved, i.
e., perpetuated and used, by the establishment of wildlife reservations
alone and because wildlife is one of those recreational resources which
permeate the entire country, it must be considered in all forms of land
utilization and should be dealt with as a national resource.
One locality within one State may have a surplus of
antelope, buffalo, or grizzly bear, whereas these same animals may be
practically extirpated from the entire remaining area of our country. In
such cases, it is hardly justifiable to permit the local viewpoint to
deprive the Nation of a valuable and irreplaceable resource. In
addition, therefore, to the establishment of numerous wildlife
reservations, there should be a national coordination of wildlife
conservation.
Such a program of conservation should include all
types of wildlife utilization consistent with perpetuation of the
resource and the realization of its various types of values. For
example, referring to the definitions of different types of wildlife
reservations given on page 4, all reservations should not be of the game
preserve or game refuge types only, but should include all kinds of
reservations in order to provide for all types of wildlife utilization,
according to their function. But national coordination of wildlife
conservation should rest in one agency.
A specific conservation measure of apparent merit is
suggested by McAtee. It is as follows:
Sentiment has been aroused and action taken to
preserve objects of outstanding natural interest other than birds. Among
the national monuments, for instance, Muir Woods was established to save
a noted redwood grove, and the Papago Saguaro to reserve characteristic
desert flora, primarily the giant cactus, while among national parks the
Sequoia is intended to insure the perpetuation of the big trees. We have
national monuments even to protect petrified trees and fossil dinosaurs.
Then let us do as much for threatened forms of wildlife lest they join
the fossil world.
The sequoia and the redwood are wonderful native
plants, the survivors of an evolutionary series known to have great
antiquity. Their continued existence hangs by a slender thread, and we
have done well to strengthen it. We may equally as well insure the
preservation of such interesting birds as the road runner, the anhinga,
and the pelican. The road runner is confined to the southwestern United
States and northern Mexico and is absolutely unique; if we allow its
extermination, it will be gone for ever, like the great auk and the
passenger pigeon. The anhinga, snakebird or water turkey, is one of the
very distinct family of birds of which there are only three or four
species in the world; our bird is restricted chiefly to cypress swamps,
and the number of breeding places available to it is constantly
decreasing. There are only about six species of pelicans in all, of
which two occur in the United States, and they are restricted in the
breeding season to widely separated colonies, in most of which they have
been terribly persecuted.
All of these stand alone among our birds, and their
loss, whether from the standpoint of science or of popular natural
history, would be irreparable. Birds of wonderful structure, the last
remnants of their lines, and not only of national but of international
interest and value, they are subjected to wanton raiding by small
minorities for petty reasons. Classing them as vermin could be termed as
childish, if it were not a monstrous absurdity. Rather than being dealt
with so shamefully, they are just as much entitled to preservation as
some of the objects that have national monuments devoted to them. Living
pelicans or anhingas certainly equal, if they do not surpass, in
interest, fossil dinosaurs, and road runners are just as characteristic
and precious an element of desert life as the giant cactus. If we should
carry out the logic of our own previous actions or should follow the
enlightened example of Japan, we would in outstanding cases establish
the birds themselves as national monuments. This step would all the more
be warranted in the case of migratory birds, the pelicans, as protecting
the breeding colonies alone is only of seasonal
effectiveness.18
18 McAtee, W. L., A
Little Essay on Vermin (in Bird Lore, vol. 66, pp. 381384,
December 1931).
Continued >>>
|
|