Contents
Foreword
Preface
The Invaders 1540-1542
The New Mexico: Preliminaries to Conquest 1542-1595
Oñate's Disenchantment 1595-1617
The "Christianization" of Pecos 1617-1659
The Shadow of the Inquisition 1659-1680
Their Own Worst Enemies 1680-1704
Pecos and the Friars 1704-1794
Pecos, the Plains, and the Provincias Internas 1704-1794
Toward Extinction 1794-1840
Epilogue
Abbreviations
Notes
Bibliography
|

The Pueblo in 1776
As for the pueblo itself, the only entrance through
the long low peripheral wall from the outside, said Domínguez,
was a gate facing north.
A short distance from the entrance are some house
blocks, or tenements all joined at the corners (cuarteles o lienzos
todos unidos por las esquinas), [53]
which form a little plaza within. One enters through a gate in the
middle of the tenement facing east. Of these four tenements the two that
face east and west are very wide. On top in the center they have
dwellings that overlook both the little plaza inside which they enclose
and the outside and are like the top section of a long and narrow
tomb.
Beyond this little plaza to the south is another
tenement, or house block, like the two described. The only difference is
that it stands alone and is very long, extending from north to south.
Farther beyond to the south are the church and convento. [54] Everything appears very large and can only
be seen in perspective up from the north and down from the south.
|
Pecos from the north: main pueblo, south
pueblo, church and convento. An artist's restoration by S. P. Moorehead.
Kidder, Pecos, New Mexico
|
By comparing Domínguez' word picture, as
sketchy as it is, with the house blocks Father González listed in
his 1750 census, and with the maps of A. V. Kidder's excavations, it is
possible to correlate the lot. The two wide "tenements" on the east and
the west of Domínguez are the "east side of plaza house block"
and "plaza" of González, that is, the east and west sides of
Kidder's main Pecos "quadrangle." The entrance midway along the east
side, cited by Domínguez, shows clearly on the maps of Kidder.
The third of Domínguez' "four tenements," which he did not
describe, probably because it was a less impressive extension of the
first two, is the "placita" of González and the U-shaped
extremity at the south end of Kidder's quadrangle.
The Domínguez tenement that "stands alone and
is very long, extending from north to south" would seem to be the
"community house block" of González and the mysterious "south
pueblo" of Kidder. From the vantage of a hawk circling high over the
elongated mesilla of Pecos in 1776, one would have seen the main pueblo
complex at the northern tip, the long thin south pueblo in the middle,
and the mission compound at the southern end. The two pueblos,
evidently both occupied when Alfonso Rael de Aguilar destroyed the kiva
halfway between them in 1714, had continued to house the Pecos through
most of the eighteenth century, even though the people's diminishing
numbers would have permitted consolidation in one or the other. [55]
Father Domínguez counted one hundred
"families" at Pecos, or 269 persons. Their language, he observed, was
one with Jémez. "It is very different from all the other
languages of these regions, and its pronunciation is closed, almost
through clenched teeth." Rather matter-of-factly, and without
commentary, he added that the Pecos spoke Spanish "very badly." Availing
themselves of wood from the sierra, most of them were good
carpenters.

Fray Francisco Atanasio Domínguez, Minister
The Pecos as Christians
Regarding their observance of the Christian faith,
Domínguez, surprisingly enough, deemed the Pecos "devout and well
inclined," which hardly squares with what he had to say later about the
Pueblos in general. Alcalde mayor José Herrera assured the
visitor that even though the Pecos had no missionary, they understood
that their children "must go to the church daily to recite the catechism
with the fiscal." On Saturday mornings and on feast days, everyone went
to say the rosary. For baptisms and marriages, they journeyed up to
Santa Fe where the friars would keep the Pecos books until a missionary
returned to their pueblo. "With regard to burials," Domínguez
noted, "if an Indian dies, the others perform the offices, etc."
Devout or not, the Pecos were in a bad way. Comanche
raiding had forced them to give up their irrigated fields northeast of
the pueblo along the Pecos River. Out of fear of this enemy, they no
longer hauled the good water half a league up from the river, where
swam, according to Domínguez, "many delicious trout." They relied
instead on "some wells of reasonably good water below the rock." Even
arable land dependent on rain, if it lay at a distance from the pueblo,
was too dangerous to work.
Therefore, but a very small part remains for them.
Since this is dependent on rain, it has been a failure because of the
drought of the past years, and so they have nothing left. As a result,
what few crops there usually are do not last even to the beginning of a
new year from the previous October, and hence these miserable wretches
are tossed about like a ball in the hands of fortune.
Governor Mendinueta had given them a dozen cows,
which, taken with the eight the Comanches had left them, brought their
herd to twenty. Once the Pecos had been rich in horses. Now they had
twelve in all, "sorry nags" Domínguez called them. "Today these
poor people are in puribus, fugitives from their homes, absent
from their families, selling those trifles they once bought to make
themselves decent, on foot, etc." [56]
Back in Santa Fe, Domínguez filled in briefly
as minister of the villa, and thus as missionary of Pecos in absentia.
In mid-June, he had a new book of baptisms begun for Pecos and on July
23, six days before he and Father Vélez de Escalante set out on
their "splendid wayfaring" into the Great Basin, he made the first
entry. Domingo Aguilar, of the prominent Pecos Aguilar clan, and his
wife María Rosa had appeared at the church door in Santa Fe
carrying a three-month-old son. Why had they delayed so long, the Padre
inquired. They had been away from their pueblo, they told him, "looking
for something to eat." [57]
Dominquez Characterizes His
Brethren
The actions of some of his brethren had scandalized
Father Domínguez, probably more than they should have. When he
listed for his superiors all twenty-nine friars resident in the custody,
including himself, he made no comment about thirteen who apparently were
doing their job. Eight he classified as old and ill, or just ill, and
one as blind. Two were drunks. Another, he alleged, lived openly with a
married woman and another was an unruly, brawling trader "at the cost of
the Indians' sweat." One each he characterized as "ungovernable and
living in scandal," "not at all obedient to rule and a trader with
heathens," and "not at all obedient to rule and an agitator of Indians."
[58]
The timely advent of forty-six friar recruits from
Spain aboard the warship El Rosario in 1778, enabled the
superiors to dispatch seventeen new men to the custody straight-away.
Replacing the ailing and the unsuited, they brought the total to
thirty-five, "leaving three as extras on hand to fill vacancies as has
been customary." A neat listing, drawn up soon after, matching men and
missions showed Fray José Manuel Martínez de la Vega at
Pecos. If he really served there, it was only on the fly, and he
baptized no one. He was soon at Albuquerque. Fray José Palacio,
who signed himself "ministro de esta misión de Pecos," celebrated one
baptism at the pueblo in 1779 and three in 1780. He may even have been
resident for a time. [59] Then,
unexpectedly, the smallpox hit, carrying off so many people that the
royal governor urged reducing the number of missions.
Smallpox Ravages the Province
The toll was ghastly. At Santo Domingo in February
and the first week of March 1781, at least 230 Indians died. Up and down
the river the count at several pueblos exceeded a hundred. The plague
spread. Evidently many died at Pecos, but the burial records are lost.
[60] Two censuses of the eastern pueblo, one
before and one after, tell the tale:
1779 94 men, 94 women, 23 boys, 24 girls, or 235 persons
1789 62 men, 58 women, 6 boys, 12 girls, or 138 persons
Reporting on May 1, 1781, the governor put the total
number of men, women, and children dead in the contagion of
1780-1781, probably the worst ever, at 5,025, a quarter or more of
the entire population. Under these circumstances, why, the governor
asked, should not some of the desolated missions be joined together and
the total number subsidized by the crown reduced proportionately, say to
twenty.
Consolidation of Missions
Ever since the visitation of Bishop Crespo in 1730,
consolidation had been a dirty word with the missionares of New Mexico.
Now the governor, the highly touted, economy-minded, military hero Juan
Bautista de Anza, had them against the wall. His superior, the Caballero
de Croix, first commandant general of the Provincias Internas and
vice-patron of the church in this recently formed northern jurisdiction,
liked the idea. No matter that the friars protested. Croix cut their
missions to twenty. [61]
|
Teodoro de Croix, the Caballero de
Croix. Thomas, Teodoro de Croix
|
In the case of Pecos, consolidation was merely a
clerical matter. For the previous two decades, while maintaining the
status of a mission and thus its claim to a full-time missionary
supported by royal allowance, Pecos had been treated in effect as a
visita, or preaching station, of Santa Fe. Since the stipend went to the
man and not to the mission, as was confirmed several times in the 1780s,
it was up to the custos to place his men wherever he thought they would
do the most good. By formally attaching Pecos to Santa Fe as a visita in
1782, consolidation simply acknowledged a fact of long standing. Given
the hard times, Pecos, with its steadily declining native population and
no nearby Hispanic communities, no longer warranted the services of a
full-time minister.
It worked as before. To regularize certain human
relations in the eyes of the church, Fray Francisco de Hozio, minister
at Santa Fe and "pro ministro" of Pecos, ordered chief catechist Lorenzo
to bring all the people who needed marrying up to the villa. Ten Pecos
couples showed and, on January 4, 1782, in mid-winter, all were duly
married. Three weeks later, Custos Juan Bermejo, who also served as
chaplain of the Santa Fe presidio, rode over to Pecos with a military
escort to baptize two new babies. Soldiers stood as godfathers, and the
friar signed as custos and pro ministro of Pecos "for lack of a
minister." While he was there, Bermejo married one more couple and, at a
nuptial Mass, veiled all ten previously joined in Santa Fe on the
fourth. [62]
|
A 1784 Spanish real, the size of
a dime, found at Pecos during excavations in 1966. National Park Service
photo by Fred E. Mang, Jr.
|
Pecos Exempted from War Tax
Later in 1782, because of their poverty and their
losses to smallpox the year before, the Pecos, along with Zuñis
and Hopis, missed their chance to contribute to the war against England
and, indirectly, to the independence of the United States. The king had
decreed that all free subjects of the colonies donate something to the
war chest, each Indian and mixed-blood one peso, and each Spaniard two.
But after Governor Anza and Custos Bermejo had visited Pecos in August
of 1782, they conceded that the poor people of that pueblo should be
exempt. And the commandant general agreed. [63]
Interference Charged by
Missionaries
Preoccupied as they were with personal Indian
diplomacy and defense, subjects of the next chapter, both Anza and his
successor don Fernando de la Concha still managed to keep a close eye on
mission affairs, much too close to suit the friars. The governors chided
the missionaries about the Indians' ignorance of Christian doctrine and
urged stricter enforcement of attendance. In turn, Custos José de
la Prada, in 1783, bewailed Anza's interference, especially in placing
missionaries. The following year, a delegation of New Mexico friars
turned up in Arizpe to complain about Anza before Commandant General
Felipe de Neve and to answer charges the governor had preferred against
them. They resented everything from his consolidation plan and his
juggling of mission allowances and boundaries to his partisan judgments
and false accusations.
Franciscans Divided
Unfortunately, the Franciscans themselves were too
badly divided to do much about the meddling of the governors. This
disharmony ran deeper than the routine lack of fraternal charity
deplored by their superiors from time to time. This was criollo versus
peninsular Spaniard, americano versus gachupín, a malady
that pervaded all of colonial life, as old as the first generation born
in the Americas, yet now, in the age of revolutions and independence,
all the more virulent.
Under Anza, a rare criollo governor, and Custos
Bermejo, a Spaniard who allied himself with Anza, the gachupín friars in
New Mexico charged blatant discrimination. In 1782, they cited nine
specific cases. This tension between American and European friars, a
tension that built during the years leading up to independence, explains
their preoccupation with an old policy of the province known as the
alternativa. It provided rotation of office, with superiors
chosen alternately from americanos and gachupínes, as well as equality
of representation on the definitory and even throughout a missionary
field like New Mexico. When they should have been pulling together, some
of the friars were instead competing, concerned during the 1780s and
1790s with a growing imbalance in favor of the gachupínes. [64]

Fernando de la Concha
Governor Concha Inspects
Pecos
The Pecos had already assembled, as many of them as
there were in October 1789. Don Fernando de la Concha, flanked by
soldiers and his secretary, listened without understanding as the
interpreter intoned in Towa the threefold purpose of his visitation. The
royal governor would hear their claims, he would take a census, and he
would review their weapons and accoutrements of war. The Pecos alleged
no injuries by government officials, neither to their lands nor to
their possessions. They did make certain petty claims which the governor
settled forthwith. Of the 138 Pecos enrolled, Concha judged forty men
well mounted and armed and fit for military service. Even though they
confessed only on their deathbeds and did not understand Spanish, he
concluded that the Pecos were "not among the worst instructed in the
Christian doctrine." After he had delivered the usual sermon, the
Spanish governor departed as quickly as he had come. [65]
The arrival in Santa Fe of Custos Pedro de Laborerta
and a band of missionaries "to be employed in the missions," late in
August 1790, put pressure on Concha to raise the number of missions
again. He compromised. In consultation with Laboreria, he came up with a
plan "altering in a small way the consolidation Col. don Juan Bautista
de Anza, my predecessor, effected in 1782." He reelevated Pecos and
three other pueblos from visitas to full-fledged missions, and he
approved the assignment of missionaries. With some reservations, he
recommended two extra missionary allowances. The viceroy, he knew, was
for holding the line. After all, Anza's consolidation had been saving
the crown 3,695 pesos annually, while, in the viceroy's words, "all the
goals of service to God and king continue to be achieved." [66]
The Census of 1790
That same year, 1790, while federal marshals counted
people in the new United States of America to determine representation
and taxation, the Viceroy Conde de Revillagigedo also called for
population counts from every corner of New Spain. They were to show
name, ethnic group, age, family status, and occupation of adults, as
well as the number and ages of all dependent children. That fall, Father
Severo Patero and Alcalde mayor Antonio José Ortiz, both of Santa
Fe, compiled the rolls for their district which also embraced the
missions of Pecos and Tesuque.
The Pecos census of 1790 differed from the one of
1750 in several ways, other than the very obvious two-thirds drop in
total population, from 449 to 154. For one thing, Father Patero made no
effort at all to list native names. He put down only the Spanish given
name, supplying in six cases a Spanish surname: José Miguel de la
Peña, Tomás de Sena, Domingo Aguilar, Lorenzo Sena, Antonio Baca, and
Matías Aguilar. He gave their ages, most of them doubtless guesses, but
he provided no hint where anyone lived in the pueblo. Considering all
Pueblos farmers, he did not bother with occupation. Although he titled
the roll "Census of the Indians of Pecos," he listed first "don
José Mares, Spaniard, age 77, widower, one son, 13." Evidently
Mares, a retired soldier and plains explorer, was living at Pecos in
1790 as an Indian agent or local administrator of the Comanche peace
signed four year earlier. [67]
Four years later, in 1794, there were 180 Indians at
Pecos, including some Tano families, a rare increase of nearly twenty
percent, but no Spaniards were listed. [68]
|
Viceroy the Conde de Revillagigedo II,
1789-1794. Rivera Cambas, Los gobernantes, I
|
Religious Coexistence in New
Mexico
When Viceroy Revillagigedo sent off to Spain late in
1793 his 430-paragraph report on the missions of New Spain, including
the 1790 census figures from New Mexico, he lamented the spiritual
backwardness of the Pueblo Indians. "The saddest thing," he wrote.
is that after the more than 200 years the Indians of
New Mexico have been reduced they are as ignorant of the Faith and
religion as if they were just starting catechism, giving evidence of
this regrettable truth in many notorious cases and in fact.
It is true that they baptize the recently born
Indian, but it is also true that they never use any other name than the
one his parents gave him from the first thing they saw after the
infant's birth, for example Mouse, Dog, Wolf, Owl, Cottonwood, etc. And
thus everyone calls him in their language, and he forgets entirely the
saint's name given him at baptism.
When the Indian reaches the age of six or seven he
must attend instruction morning and afternoon. But this is achieved only
with difficulty, and as a result, since the beginnings of their
Christian education are so feeble and cease the day of their marriage or
in the first years of their youth, they forget very rapidly the little
they learned, abandoning themselves to their evil inclinations and
customs and dying not much different than heathens.
They are heathens underneath and very given to the
vain respect and superstitions of their elders. They have a natural
antipathy for everything to do with our sacred religion. Few confess
until the moment of death, and then the majority by means of an
interpreter, and in order to get it over they do no characteristic
Christian works nor do they contribute a thing in gratitude to God and
king. [69]
At least the viceroy had no favorites. The customs of
the Spaniards and mixed-bloods of New Mexico, he allowed, were not much
better. Father Domínguez would have said amen to that.
Whatever the reasons, the friars had failed to impose
upon the Pueblos more than a patchy veneer of Christianity. For all
their zeal, they had not stamped out kivas or kachinas, neither by
violent suppression nor by gentle persuasion. They had not broken the
Pueblos' pagan spirit. They had not learned their languages. In fact,
during the eighteenth century, they had come grudgingly to accept
coexistence. They kept on baptizing and marrying, but by now they
recognized that spiritual conquest had eluded them, that the ultimate
salvation of the Pueblo Indians lay beyond their means. "May God Our
Lord destroy these pretexts so completely," Father Domínguez
prayed, "that these wretches may become old Christians and the greatest
saints of His Church." [70]
El Vado Grant
Late in 1794, as the Spanish-born minister of Santa
Fe, Tesuque, and Pecos advocated the use of "more rigor than gentleness"
to enforce Indian attendance at Mass and catechism, one Lorenzo Marquez,
citizen of Santa Fe, stood before Lt. Col. Fernando Chacón, the
new governor of New Mexico. Marquez and fifty-one other men, finding
their present lands and waters insufficient for the support of their
growing families, formally petitioned for a grant of vacant land on the
Pecos River at a place "commonly called El Vado." [71]
For the pueblo de los Pecos the settlement of that
grant was the beginning of the end.
|