Debate over Proportional Representation
"We have been in a Committee of the Whole for some time, and have under consideration a number of very important propositions…[We] are very desirous that you should join us immediately.The importance of the business really demands it."
-David Brearley to Jonathan Dayton
Elbridge Gerry (MA) moved to reconsider the method of electing the Executive, and to have the Executive elected by the governors of the states with their votes weighed in proportion to the vote of their state in the Senate (this was before the decision for an equal vote in this body). Edmund Randolph (VA) argued strongly against this motion and it lost, ten states no, Delaware divided.
William Paterson (NJ) moved to resume consideration of the clause concerning suffrage in the national legislature. David Brearley (NJ) seconded in a speech which bristled with arguments as to the injustice of proportional representation. James Wilson (PA) and Hugh Williamson (NC) then spoke in favor of proportional representation. At that point, at Paterson's request, the vote was postponed until the next day.