EPILOGUE:
Valley ForgePast,
Present, Future
No battles were fought at Valley Forgeuntil
after the soldiers marched out. It was after the Revolution that Valley
Forge became the scene of intermittent quarrel and strife. Each new
trend in historiography and historic preservation brought up new issues
for those who held its story dear. Each new trend left documentary
remains and contributed to a second history of Valley Forge, equally
worthy of attention.
It took the Romantic Era of the nineteenth century to
create a Valley Forge worth fighting over. Before professional
historians had a chance to dwell much on the winter encampment,
antiquarians promoted and glorified the Valley Forge experience. The
Colonial Revival Movement intensified America's love affair with its own
past, and in its wake organizations were formed to celebrate the Valley
Forge experience and preserve its Washington's Headquarters.
The early record of the Centennial and Memorial
Association of Valley Forge is one of cooperation with other patriotic
groups, such as the Patriotic Order Sons of America and the Daughters of
the American Revolution (DAR). They made Valley Forge a tourist
attraction that drew pilgrims to the sacred soil where, it was believed,
so many had suffered and died, and this new role for the town, following
its decline as an industrial area, actually gave it a renaissance.
The long battle of Valley Forge can be said to have
begun when a second lasting entitythe Valley Forge Park
Commission, with its mission to establish a park and its power to
condemn propertywas organized. Private-property owners disputed
the amounts they were offered for their dwellings, and business owners
complained even more bitterly about actions that inhibited their
operations and expansion. Yet the prevailing spirit of nationalism in
America put public opinion on the side of the park commission, even when
it condemned the property of its rival organization, the Centennial and
Memorial Association of Valley Forge.
At the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the
twentieth century, the park commission transformed Valley Forge into a
memorial park. Monuments sprang up, and the grounds were beautified with
flowering dogwoods and attractive vistas. Additional relics of the
Colonial and Revolutionary periods were preserved. There were conflicts
over where monuments should be located and what they should look like,
but consensus that such tributes were appropriate for Valley Forge.
The Rev. Dr. W. Herbert Burk was initially able to
coexist peacefully with the park commission. His establishment of the
Washington Memorial emphasized the sacred and holy nature of Valley
Forge in a period when history and religion both were employed to foster
morality. His modest first attempts to interpret the Valley Forge
experience, as in his museum collection and his publication of
interpretive guides, were not resented.
As the 1920s and 1930s brought a new emphasis on
historical accuracy, leaders of the park commission increasingly came
into conflict with Burk. Burk objected to expanding the park and to
destroying the living communities that expansion entailed. The park
commissioners objected to Burk's plans to overwhelm Valley Forge with a
cathedral, since there had been no cathedral at Valley Forge in the
winter of 17771778. The concurrent predilection for tasteful
historic sites ensured conflict also over perceived attempts to
commercialize Valley Forge. Battles were waged over the specter of hot
dog stands, and the mere name of a brewery on a guidebook raised
alarm.
As the re-creation of Williamsburg changed tastes in
historic preservation, Valley Forge followed suit with its "complete
restoration" project, originally planned to give the visitor the feeling
of visiting the actual winter encampment. At first, only a few people
questioned whether attempts to re-create the past were preferable to
merely preserving what was really left of it. As time passed and tastes
and styles changed once more, the major projects of the complete
restoration drew more and more criticism.
The Cold War brought intensified twentieth-century
attempts to use the Valley Forge experience to inspire visitors to
greater patriotism and loyalty. Entities then active at Valley Forge
seemed almost to enter into competition over which one could achieve
this objective best. The new Freedoms Foundation emerged as the clear
winner. The most recent conflicts have come about from new professional
research done at Valley Forge largely after the park's transfer to the
National Park Service. Was the Valley Forge Report unnecessarily
iconoclastic? Did it in turn overly influence the new interpretive
exhibit at the Valley Forge Historical Society's museum?
As times change and trends continue to develop, the
surviving major institutions at Valley Forge must keep pace by adjusting
their agendas to serve new constituencies. At the moment, they are at
peace with one another and going about their business in a spirit of
unprecedented cooperation and respect.
On May 3, 1992, there was a special celebration of
Evensong at the Washington Memorial to commemorate the alliance between
France and the United States that had contributed so materially to
America's victory in the Revolution. Because news of the French alliance
had come while Washington was at Valley Forge, the Valley Forge
Historical Society generally hosts an annual celebration, but this one
was special because it was jointly sponsored by the historical society
and the chapel. At the end of the service in the Washington Memorial
Chapel, Dr. Richard Stinson, the new rector, took Meade Jones, president
of the historical society, on his arm, and together they officially
unlocked the door that had been closed since 1969. They intended their
action to symbolize the dawn of a new age for their two organizations.
Each of them shook hands with all guests as they passed from the chapel
to the museum for a reception hosted by the historical society.
On June 5, 1993, the Valley Forge Historical
Society held its annual meeting in the library at the Washington
Memorial, an elegant complex tucked away behind the chapel, but a
location so unfamiliar that someone was posted outside to direct the
members to its door. In his remarks Dr. Stinson emphasized, "This is
your room as well as the chapel's room." Pointing out that on the
shelves lining the walls books on history and religion are "co-mingled,"
he continued: "Our organizations are co-mingled, too." Meade Jones
continued the theme, commenting on how Dr. Burk had envisioned a
"comprehensive memorial." The cooperation and goodwill established one
year earlier was definitely the goal for the future.
In a 1992 interview, Stinson discussed his mission as
one of developing the Washington Memorial Chapel as a national shrine.
He said he admired the significant achievement of Sheldon M. Smith in
making the parish live and function, and like his predecessor wanted to
increase attendance through a new "Committee on Growth, Evangelism and
Communication." He had been in touch with the park service about joint
archaeological investigations, and as a dedicated naturalist he said he
would like visitors to appreciate the beauties of nature along with the
lessons of history when they visit the Washington Memorial. Stinson was
formerly rector at Saint James' Church at Mount Vernon and served a tour
as a chaplain in Vietnam. In his mind, the Washington Memorial was no
anomaly. "If you've read Ivanhoe," he said, "if you believe in
the ideals of Christian knighthood, then the Washington Memorial makes
perfect sense." [1]
Over the last few years, the Valley Forge Historical
Society has been reaching out to new audiences with new programs. The
most successful of these is an active Elderhostel programin fact,
the largest such program in the stateadministered by C. Robert
Gruver, who coordinated the wagon-train event back in 1976. The society
also sponsors an annual art exhibit and participated in the popular
annual Philadelphia Open House program. In 1993, architectural
improvements to the museum portion of the complex made certain areas
brighter, more inviting, and more up-to-date in terms of visitor
expectations.
West of the park, the Freedoms Foundation underwent a
transition during the 1970s when Ken Wells retired and Robert W. Miller
was installed as president in 1975. In a 1983 article for the
Philadelphia Inquirer Magazine, Chuck Bauerlein wrote: "The
foundation is, indeed, drifting into a new emphasis on education and
spending less of its time and energy 'promoting America.'" [2] In 1992 Miller defined the Freedoms
Foundation as "basically an educational institution." [3] The premise that the nation's youth had
failed to realize that freedom entails certain responsibilities inspired
the foundation's Annual Youth and Leadership Workshops, in which
students were instructed in traditional American values and principles.
A recent foundation publication comments:
Although initially the long range value of these
programs was open to question, their significance now has become
indisputable. Not only do elementary programs provide an important
learning activity supplemental to the school curriculum, but there is an
even more important result, namely, the acculturation of children who
are immigrants or whose parents are immigrants. Freedoms Foundation
programs have helped to mainstream ethnic populations in American
history and familiarize children with the nature of American
institutions. [4]
Recently the foundation offered some courses for
which several universities granted graduate credit. Some of them focused
on the history of the American Revolution and the Civil War, and in some
the word "freedom" figured prominently in the course titlessuch as
"Rights, Responsibilities, and Freedom" and "Freedom and the American
Presidency."
In October 1994, as this book goes to press,
President Robert W. Miller of the Freedoms Foundation has announced his
retirement. A search is being conducted for a new president. One of
Robert Miller's key accomplishments was the development of a companion
to the Bill of Rights called the "Bill of Responsibilities," based on
nearly two years of work by American scholars directed by a steering
committee. Miller was also proud of the organization's program of Leavey
Awards for Excellence in Private Enterprise Education. Endowed by the
Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Foundation in 1982, these awards honored those
who developed innovative ways to teach about the free enterprise
system.
The focus of the organization changed a great deal
since Cold War days. In fact, a recent Freedoms Foundation newsletter
carried a photograph of Professor Valentin Petrovich Fyodorov, who had
been promoting free enterprise in the former Soviet Union. Fyodorov's
likeness was captured as he posed next to a copy of the Bill of
Responsibilities, which he learned about at a Leavey Awards symposium in
1989. Once the old enemy was gone, foundation administrators appeared to
want to put their Cold War heritage behind them. In a 1992 report, a
foundation vice president wrote:
The central purpose of the organization is
notand never wasfighting Communism and socialist theory.
Rather, Freedoms Foundation illuminates the advantages of a free society
with the purpose of reminding Americans of the blessings and
responsibilities of freedom. In the course of fulfilling this mission,
it naturally compares the workings of the society dedicated to the idea
of freedom with those of societies dedicated to other purposes. [5]
Warren D. (Denny) Beach has been superintendent at
Valley Forge National Historical Park since the spring of 1990. Very
much a "people person," he enjoys meeting visitors and the members of
various organizations active at Valley Forge. "But this is no popularity
contest," he states. "We are here to serve the resource. Not everybody
understands that." [6] To Beach has fallen
the unenviable job of enforcing the provisions of the General Management
Plan and balancing the interests of the resource with the demands of the
local community. In the summer of 1992, paratroopers from the
Eighty-second Airborne Division requested permission for a mass jump
into the park as a part of their annual reunion. A similar jump had been
permitted in 1989, but Beach denied the requestwhich, he
maintained, did not serve the resource and may have posed a threat to
the safety of visitors. Beach stood firm against a host of complaints,
like one letter to the editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer in
which the writer denounced Beach's decision as "just one more step in
successive attempts to keep the public from using this historical park."
[7] Beach also had to deal with the angry
owners of homes adjacent to the park who complained about deer
destroying their shrubbery and, most recently, with structural problems
in the arch. Probably the biggest park controversy in recent years was
the discovery that gay men were using one area of the park for open
sexual activity, something that led to a sting operation resulting in
more than sixty arrests.
Will the park expand again? Beach says probably not.
Instead of buying land, the National Park Service now secures scenic
easements to protect the park's remaining buffer areas from any drastic
developments. It is hoped that scenic easements will protect much of the
privately held land in what used to be Valley Forge village, so that the
area retains what remains of its old village flavor. [8]
Recent research in historic preservation at Valley
Forge has been done by historic architect Tom McGimsey at a ruined
dwelling on the former Walnut Hill Estate on the north side of the
Schuylkill River, which had been protected by a hastily erected fence
during the Boy Scout activities of 1985 and 1986. McGimsey produced a
lengthy multidisciplinary study revealing that this structure, much of
it destroyed by fire in 1967, had a wing built in the mid-eighteenth
century, and might well have played a part in the winter encampment.
According to McGimsey, the house also has "significant building fabric
from each of its periods and can help interpret building construction."
[9] According to Denny Beach, "We used to
have a house and a barn, now we have an historic house and barn. We have
to treat them a little differently. [10]
In 1993, Valley Forge National Historical Park hosted
a centennial celebration that had been in the works for approximately
two years to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the existence of a
public park at Valley Forge. Authorized by Denny Beach but coordinated
by Joan Marshall Dutcher, this celebration, like all anniversaries,
acknowledged the past but really revealed the attitudes of the present
and hinted at plans for the future.
Marshall-Dutcher started by organizing a steering
committee and a number of subcommittees. For months, trial balloons were
floated and reviewed. At one point, an appearance and speech by the
President of the United States was contemplated. Eventually the
celebration was limited by the amount of funds that could be raised from
corporations and the local community, because the decision had been made
to use no federal (taxpayer) dollars. The original plan for a single,
elaborate celebration evolved into a year of special events beginning on
December 19, 1992 ("March-In Day") and culminating on the weekend of
June 19, 1993 ("Evacuation Day").
Marshall-Dutcher's goals included raising the profile
of Valley Forge and involving new people in its events. The steering
committee had many new faces including local corporate executives and
known movers and shakers from other organizations, such as the Junior
League and the Friends of Independence Park. One centennial event was an
entry in the popular Philadelphia Flower Show, which entailed the
organization of a garden groupanother first for Valley Forge. The
black sorority Delta Sigma Theta participated by funding and dedicating
a monument honoring patriots of African descent. The 1993 National
Council on Public History was hosted by Valley Forge National Historical
Park, and the extremely popular Chester County artist Richard Bollinger
created a painting, Forging a Nation, set in Valley Forge in
December 1777
Another goal was to make it clear that history did
not begin and end at Valley Forge with the winter encampment, so the big
weekend celebration held June 19 and 20, 1993, had two focal points. At
one location, hundreds of people participated in hourly reenactment
programs on eighteenth-century military and camp life, making this the
largest reenactment organized at Valley Forge in recent years. In the
area around Washington's Headquarters, the focus was different. There,
interpreters in Victorian dress explained the layout and life of the
now-vanished 1890s Valley Forge village. A special exhibit on the park's
nineteenth- and twentieth-century history was mounted in the 1913 train
station, and bands playing turn-of-the-century American music
performed.
Visitation in the park that weekend alone was
estimated at more than 15,000 people. An aggressive publicity campaign
resulted in Valley Forge press releases being picked up by the wire
services, and the appearance of Valley Forge information in publications
as distant as the Kansas City Star and the Chicago Tribune
and as national as Family Circle magazine and the Washington
Post.
Comments overheard at the centennial celebration
indicated that this blending of the story of the encampment with other
aspects of Valley Forge history was refreshing to some but
incomprehensible to others. An emphasis on Valley Forge's "second"
history may well spark new controversy, start another battle, and add
yet another chapter to that same tale.
|