Expansion of the National Park Service in the 1930s:
Administrative History
Chapter Five: New Initiatives in the Fields of
History, Historic Preservation and Historical Park Development and Interpretation
|
|
S. Interpretation: 1935-1941
During the late 1930s efforts were made to upgrade the
interpretive activities in the historical areas of the National Park
System. Improvements were made in various types of field exhibits,
including sample "restorations," outdoor relief maps, orientation maps,
trailside museums, and markers An example of such sample restoration
projects was the reconstruction of the Continental Army hospital,
together with reproductions of a soldier's hut and officer's hut, at
Morristown National Historical Park in 1936-37. As part of the
interpretive program field historians began to give public lectures
sponsored by outside groups and to participate in numerous radio
broadcasts in the vicinity of their parks. [105]
In April 1940 a historical technicians conference was
held at Richmond, Virginia, with Ronald F. Lee as chairman and Roy E.
Appleman, Regional Supervisor of Historic Sites, Region I, as vice
chairman. The purpose of the conference was to consider interpretive
problems relating to the development and presentation of historical and
archeological areas. The subjects discussed included the objectives and
standards of interpretive policy and park literature and the use of
markers and material objects in museums and trailside exhibits. The
objectives and standards of interpretive policy were:
That care should be exercised to prevent the
interpretation of historical areas from becoming too technical. . . .
The visitor . . . should be given a concise statement of major events and
an interpretation of their significance in our national story.
That simplicity in presentation does not imply
superficial knowledge. Rather, it implies and urges the complete mastery
of history and period culture of historical areas. . . . Technical
personnel should meet visiting scholars on a basis of equality
That the technician should have complete knowledge and
appreciation of all historical objects and interpretative devices
displayed in the park museum in order that he may meet properly an
inquisitive public.
The principal objective of park literature
should be to provide a description of historical and
archaeological remains to be found within an area, to give accurate,
objective narrative and expository accounts of the events which cause
the area to have significance in American history. . . .
Relative to the use of markers it was determined
that it is desirable to hold the quantity of markers to a minimum.
that narrative markers be used with discretion
that brevity is desirable in all narrative markers
that trailside and field exhibits be used to replace
narrative markers or groups of markers
that troop positions on battlefield areas be
permanently and unobstrusively marked; and that since the older type of
marker existing on many battlefield areas is obstrusive, such markers
where practicable, be lowered, or supplanted.
Concerning the use of material objects in museums and
trailside exhibits, the conferees agreed
That the paramount importance of museums for the
twofold purpose of preservation and interpretation of and through
material objects should be stressed. Objects of historical and
cultural value should be systematically sought for and
collected with the specific needs of each historic area in mind, both by
gift and by purchase as they may become available. To effect the
foregoing objectives it is desirable to have each park prepare and
maintain a list of desired material objects based on the approved
exhibit plans. [106]
Chapter Five continues with...
Publications: 1935-1941
|