Chapter 6:
The Development of Policy: 1889-1894
THE ADMINISTRATION of Captain Moses Harris proved
rather tranquil, in the absence of partisan politics, and was marked by
close cooperation between the Acting Superintendent and the Secretary of
the Interior. That of the second military superintendent was almost the
opposite. Conflict between the Secretary of the Interior and the Acting
Superintendent scarred the administration of Harris' successor, politics
were introduced into administrative affairs, and unprincipled men,
prompted only by motives of monetary profit, attempted ingress into the
Park. Despite these disruptive influences, the new Acting Superintendent
was able to continue the policies begun by his predecessor and to
introduce new programs and policies designed to better protect and
preserve the Yellowstone Park.
Captain Gustavus C. Doane, the officer who had
provided military escort for the Washburn-Langford-Doane Expedition of
1870, had tried to be named the first military superintendent of the
Park. He was, indeed, the logical man for the job. He was thoroughly
acquainted with the Park area and it was due, in part, to his lucid
report of the 1870 Expedition that Congress had established the Park in
1872. When Congress provided for military management, Doane was in the
Southwest campaigning against Geronimo and was not considered for the
Park detail, although he had previously requested the assignment. In
1889 Doane, now a Captain assigned to the Presidio, San Francisco, began
his intensive letter-writing campaign. Recommendations from generals and
politicians, in addition to numerous petitions from private citizens,
poured into the Interior office. [1] These
efforts were in vain, however, and Troop "K," 1st Cavalry, Captain F. A.
Boutelle commanding, was relieved of duty at Fort Custer, Montana
Territory, and ordered to march to Camp Sheridan, Wyoming to relieve
Troop "M" and Captain Harris. [2]
Captain Boutelle assumed the duties of Acting
Superintendent on June 2, 1889, and almost immediately entered into
small disputes with the Secretary of the Interior. He found that lack of
proper equipment hindered the extinguishment of the many fires started
by careless campers, and he requested, by telegraph, funds for the
purchase of "twenty axes and twenty rubber buckets." Three letters
followed the telegram, but none were acknowledged by the Secretary's
office. [3] Boutelle had earlier requested
advice about the proper disposal of property confiscated from
trespassers; this request, too, was unanswered. Authorization for the
installation of a telephone in the Superintendent's office had been
delayed a month, and in the interim Boutelle had been forced to "run a
half mile distant" to a telephone in the hotel. Perhaps this unnecessary
exercise, or the fact that he had been "personally fighting forest fires
for some days and nights," made Boutelle write a hurried note to the
Secretary of the Interior:
If you do not think it proper to give me such things
as I ask for, I certainly am entitled to recognition. I take the liberty
of enclosing this letter under personal cover, in order that I may feel
sure that it reaches you in person and wish . . . that in the future I
shall not be ignored. In the Department in which I have served for
twenty-eight years I have been accustomed to have some respectful
actions taken on my papers. [4]
Action was taken on this letter, but it was less than
respectful. The Secretary suggested that perhaps the Acting
Superintendent was disposed to be "troublesome" and was altogether too
"quick to attribute delinquencies to others." Boutelle indignantly
retorted that he had "waited for days" for a reply to his telegram and
letters informing the Secretary that fires were raging in the Park, and
that the requested "rubber buckets were indispensable." This was so
apparent that a "Mr. Lesvis of Pennsylvania" had donated, "from his
pocket," forty dollars for the purchase of buckets. Boutelle maintained
that he was working every hour and that he thought that he was entitled
to "fair recognition." [5] With this
statement the water bucket episode was dropped, but it reappeared a year
later.
The next conflict between Boutelle and the Secretary
of the Interior culminated in an apparent victory for Boutellea
victory that, while establishing a precedent for later Park policy, was
partially responsible for his transfer from the position of Acting
Superintendent. Sensing the possibilities of profit, D. B. May of
Billings, Montana, in March, 1889, applied to the Secretary of the
Interior for permission to erect an elevator at the lower falls of the
Yellowstone River, "to enable tourists to descend to the bottom of the
Canyon, thereby getting a much more favorable view of the Falls." May
agreed to construct the proposed elevator under the supervision of the
Superintendent, whose selection of the site would be final and
conclusive. [6] The Secretary of the Interior
requested that Professor Arnold Hague, United States Geologist, then in
the Yellowstone Park, join with Captain Boutelle in examining the May
application and report upon the feasibility of the project. [7] Boutelle subsequently reported, after a
careful examination made by Hague and himself, that the "scheme is
believed to be perfectly practicable" and that an elevator so
constructed would be entirely out of view and "in no way objectionable."
It was his considered opinion that the construction of an elevator would
"add materially to the pleasure of a visit to the canyon." [8] This favorable report was forwarded to the
Secretary in October, 1889; a contract to construct the proposed
elevator was granted to D. B. May by the Secretary on May 17, 1890. [9]
When the contents of the elevator contract were made
known to Boutelle, he regretted that approval had been given before he
had had the opportunity to examine it, for it provided for the
construction of the elevator in a place different from the one suggested
by Hague and himself. Reversing his earlier position, he was now
convinced that the "whole matter has been a mistake" and was "mortified
that at any time, in any way, I approved of it." It was now his opinion
that no matter how carefully the elevator was constructed, it would
"destroy the wild view from the head of the great falls, one of the
grandest in the Park," and advised the Secretary that, "if not too late
. . . the lease should be cancelled." [10]
Secretary Noble reminded the Captain that he had originally approved the
scheme, that the elevator could be constructed so as to not be in
general view, and that the construction of a shelter at the elevator's
base "could scarcely appear as a blot on the scene" because of the great
distance from which it would be viewed from the top of the canyon.
Boutelle was directed to inform May that the elevator track should be
constructed so as to not mar the view or "deface the canyon to any
appreciable extent." [11]
In his annual report to the Secretary of the Interior
Boutelle again protested the elevator lease, maintaining that if it were
allowed, a policy of "commercialization" would result, and the original
purpose of the Park would be prostituted. The fire bucket episode was
recalled in an attempt to display the handicaps under which any Acting
Superintendent was forced to operate. His sharply critical report was
immediately returned "for reconsideration" by the Secretary, who thought
that Boutelle had done the Department and himself a "great injustice" by
including in the report statements concerning the purchase of buckets
and his revised opinion on the elevator. Boutelle agreed to revise the
report and admitted his error in relation to the elevator lease, an
error which he considered the "greatest mistake in the past two years of
my life except perhaps my entering upon this duty without an effort to
avoid it."
I was selected for it without being consulted and
came here against my wish. My selection may have been unfortunate but
being here I take great interest in my work, and, as has been the rule
of my life, do as well as I can. It is not the first time I have paid
the penalty of efficiency . . . While my interest in the Park is great
and I have here an importance which I should not enjoy at an ordinary
frontier post . . . I shall for many reasons be glad when my relief
comes. I should be glad to remain and see some of the work I have
inaugurated carried to a successful termination, but at a military post
I am able to please my Commanding Officer while here I have the world to
consider and appear to be about as successful as the old man with the
ass in the fable. [12]
Captain Boutelle's stubborn objection to the
"commercialization" of any element in the Park had a lasting effect. On
October 15, 1890, the permission granted to May to erect an elevator was
revoked, and another element of national park policy was established.
[13]
While Boutelle's administration was short and stormy,
other innovations were introduced under it that ultimately became
recognized as national park policy. When the Acting Superintendent
discovered that the fish of the Yellowstone Lake were infected with
parasitic worms, he notified the United States Fish Commissioner and
requested information concerning a remedy. The remedy came eventually
from Boutelle himself, who suggested that the barren streams of the Park
be stocked with healthy trout as a replacement for the infected fish; on
September 25, 1889, he reported young trout all planted in perfect
order." [14] Subsequent stocking of the
Park's waters was carried on by the United Stares Fish Commission under
the direction of Boutelle's successors and the Yellowstone National Park
ultimately became known as a Mecca for trout fishermen.
During the summers of 1889 and 1890 Boutelle's troops
were mainly engaged in fighting and extinguishing fires started by
careless campers. In an attempt to prevent this, he established regular
campgrounds and limited campers to those places designated. The system
of specifically designated campgrounds, subsequently established in all
national parks, was thus inaugurated. [15]
|
Soldiers and others at post Exchange,
Mammoth (Fort Yellowstone). National Park Service.
|
The policy of patrolling the isolated areas of the
Park during the winter months by small detachments of soldiers mounted
on "Norwegian skiis," in an attempt to prevent the poaching of game, had
been initiated by Acting Superintendent Harris. These detachments were
forced to live as did their quarry, carrying provisions on their backs
and constructing temporary shelters when they stopped for the night. In
order to alleviate its worst hardships and systematize this winter
scouting, Boutelle requested authority and funds to construct "five or
six log cabins" spaced throughout the Park "for shelter of snow shoe
parties scouting the Park in winter. Authorization for the construction
of six cabins "not to exceed $100 each," complete with tin boxes for the
preservation of provision, was eventually received from the Secretary of
the Interior. [16] This system of utilizing
patrol cabins, termed, then and now, "showshoe cabins," was adopted by
the rangers of the National Park Service and continues to the present
day.
The farsighted Boutelle also opposed both the
granting of a railroad right-of-way into the Park and the alternate
proposal of eliminating the northern portion of the Park to allow a rail
access to Cooke City. When a proposal was made in Congress to extend the
southern boundary of the Park, Boutelle informed the Secretary of the
Interior that he thought "it would be well to go a little further south"
than had been suggested, so as to include within the Park "Jackson's
lake country and the Teton peaks." Had this suggestion been followed,
the government would have avoided much of the later litigation and
expense concurrent with the formation of Grand Teton National Park.
Realizing that the few remaining bison were rapidly nearing extinction,
Boutelle implored the Governor of Wyoming and the Secretary of the
Territory of Idaho to work for the passage of laws that would protect
the animal from continued slaughter. He continued to request from
Congress legislation that would provide punishment for persons who
wilfully violated the regulations of the Park. [17]
Boutelle also demonstrated his awareness of his
duties as Acting Superintendent by the character of expulsions from the
Park during his term of office. A Mr. Imes of Bozeman was expelled for
his "unsufferable insolence to a Non Commissioned Officer"; a butcher in
the employ of the Yellowstone Park Association was expelled for
"wantonly killing a bear." A similar fate befell a woman from Utah who
"persisted in throwing stones into a Geyser after repeated
remonstrances," and "every tramp who found his way inside Park limits"
was also ejected. [18] E. E. VanDyke, a
notorious poacher, had been expelled for killing game within the
boundaries of the Park, and when he requested readmittance to accept a
job in the Park, Boutelle informed him that he was "an infernal rascal"
or a "damned fool," and in either case, "not a proper person to be
employed in the Park." Readmittance was refused. [19]
Military guardianship of the Park was not, however,
above reproach. On two occasions Boutelle recommended that "the
carnivorous animals of the Park be destroyed" in order to protect the
game animals but this unfortunate policy was not inaugurated until
Theodore Roosevelt's day. [20] In addition
to charges of "harsh and arbitrary rule" voiced by miscreants who had
been expelled for violation of the rules, the Omaha World stated
that the soldiers guarding the Park had established a system of
"espionage" and were "levying blackmail" upon visiting tourists. The
anonymous correspondent maintained that the tourists were "annoyed by
the boys in blue" until they were given money, and that if no money was
handed over the tourist was arrested on a "trumped up charge." Boutelle
maintained that he cared "nothing for . . . untruthful vaporings . . .
and would not take the trouble to reply" to some charges made in the
Omaha paper, but he did take steps to disprove the accusation of
extortion. He was sure that the charges were false, and solicited
statements from various visitors to the Park to support his belief. One
Judge S. T. Corns stated that "we received from them [soldiers] only
courtesy and kindness throughout our journey"; E. Hofer wrote that he
had never "heard one disparaging word against the soldiers," and
maintained that they "had always been polite and gentlemanly in the
discharge of their duties"; F. B. Riley found that he could "honestly
state . . . that the soldiers conduct themselves well and are deserving
of commendation"; W. W. Wylie, a man who conducted camping parties
through the Park, had "yet to learn of a single instance whereby the
boys in any manner insisted on being recompensed," and he had never
"seen any ill treatment or want of courtesy by any of the troops." [21] Nevertheless it is probable that some of
the soldiers were not always "polite and gentlemanly" to tourists. Many
disliked the duty thrust upon them, and failed to recognize the
sublimity of the mighty wonders of nature. It is only natural that some
would vent their dislike of army life upon the sometimes exasperating
tourist with his endless questions and propensity to destroy what the
soldier was charged with protecting.
The activities of a group of unhappy and self-deluded
Indians finally extricated both the Secretary of the Interior and the
Acting Superintendent from their increasingly difficult relationship.
The Teton Sioux of South Dakota, displeased with their life on the
reservation, forsook all labor and began practicing a religion preached
by "Wovoka," a Paiute messiah who promised the disconsolate Indians that
the white man could be made to disappear and their ancestral lands
returned to them, if they would but perform certain rites, dances, and
ceremonies. Eager to achieve what they had been unable to win by
fighting, a large number of the suffering Sioux began dancing; the
whites became apprehensive, and a call for military troops went out.
Troop "K," 1st Cavalry, Captain F. A. Boutelle commanding, was ordered
to the field to take part in the "Sioux Campaign of 1890-1891. A
detachment of nine men was left at Camp Sheridan to protect the Park and
its government property. The Secretary of the Interior immediately
requested that the Secretary of War detail "another officer with a
company of the same number as Captain Boutelle had, for duty in the
Park." [22]
Captain Gustavus C. Doane, now stationed at Fort
Bowie, Arizona Territory, again began a campaign to be appointed
Superintendent of the Yellowstone Park. He devised a plan of overland
marches that would obviate transportation expense and called upon his
friends to intercede on his behalf. Identical letters were written to
the Secretary of War by Senator W. F. Sanders of Montana and General
William E. Strong recommending the appointment of Doane, and both
received identical replies: "The Department does not deem it advisable
to order him [Doane] on this duty." The Secretary of War then informed
the two men that the Sixth Regiment of Cavalry was then serving in a
section of the country nearer to the Park than Fort Bowie, and that
Captain George S. Anderson of that regiment, then on duty at Fort Meyer,
Virginia, had been selected as Acting Superintendent. In explanation,
the Secretary added, "the selection of this officer [Anderson] involves
no expense other than his transportation from this city to Pine Ridge
Agency where the troop to which he has been assigned is now stationed."
[23]
Obviously the decision not to appoint Doane to the
position was based upon more than the somewhat specious explanation
given by the Secretary. Doane had planned his march from Arizona to the
Park so that no expense would be entailed, and the weakness of the
Secretary's explanation was illustrated by Major General Nelson A.
Miles, Commanding General, Division of the Missouri, who objected to the
transfer of Anderson and Troop "I" to duty in the Park. The troop chosen
had been in the field nearly two months, and the distance from Pine
Ridge to Camp Sheridan was 630 miles, "which to march in midwinter would
cause great suffering," while the distance by rail was 1,662 miles.
Furthermore, according to Miles, there were "other good reasons why
Troop "I" should not be detailed for the Park duty. [24] Notwithstanding these protestations,
Captain George S. Anderson, Sixth Cavalry, was appointed Acting
Superintendent of the Yellowstone Park and assumed his duties on
February 15, 1891.[25]
The new Acting Superintendent was ideally suited for
his position. He had many friends in Washington, was extremely
interested in the preservation and protection of the Park, and was
responsible for the formulation of many new policies and programs that
were later adopted by the National Park Service. During his
six-and-a-half-year administration, the present road system was
completed, the Park was saved from the threat of commercialization and
dismemberment, the last serious threat of railway ingress was thwarted,
and legislation providing for legal machinery within the Park was passed
by Congress.
When Captain Anderson and his troop of cavalry
arrived in the Park, the troops were still being quartered in the
"temporary" shelters constructed some five years before and designated
as Camp Sheridan. Captain Boutelle had recommended that a permanent
military post be constructed in the Park, and this recommendation was
accepted. Land necessary for the establishment of a permanent post was
granted by the Department of the Interior to the United States Army. On
February 27, 1891, the Fort Yellowstone military reservation was
established. The first buildings, constructed of quarried stone and
designed to accommodate one company of cavalry, were completed and
occupied in the autumn of 1891. These, and buildings later constructed
for military purposes, form the nucleus of the present Yellowstone
National Park headquarters. [26]
The problems of protection and police were becoming
more complicated and difficult as towns grew up around the borders of
the Park, vandals and poachers increased in number, and the construction
of hotels and roads enabled the increasing number of visitors to spread
over a greater area. In 1890 Company hotel visitors numbered 3,800; in
1895, the first year records were kept, 5,348 persons visited the Park.
Congress still refused to pass legislation necessary to enforce the
rules. Confiscation of trespassers' property was ruled illegal by the
Attorney General, [27] and the military
authorities were forced to fall back upon their own ingenuity. Not
surprisingly, sometimes illegal procedures were invoked. Captain
Anderson found the main problems were the "propensities of women to
gather 'specimens,' and of men to advertise their folly by writing their
names on everything beautiful within their reach." He placed small
squads of soldiers on guard at every main geyser basin and instructed
them to arrest and threaten with expulsion anyone found breaking off
material, gathering specimens, or writing names. Any arrested person was
escorted to the Acting Superintendent, who administered a tongue lashing
as only a seasoned cavalry officer could, and then released with the
warning that a second arrest would be followed by expulsion from the
Park.
This method proved to be unsuccessful, for Anderson
still found that the "names of the vain glared at one from every bit of
formation, and from every place where the ingenuity of vanity could
place them." He then instituted a process whereby every person found
guilty of carving his or her name in one of the geyser formations was
ordered back to the scene of his crime, where, amid the taunts and gibes
of his fellow tourists, and under the watchful eyes of an armed escort,
he was forced to "obliterate the supposed imperishable monument to his
folly" with the aid of soap and brush. [28]
This method had some effect according to one observer from Missoula,
Montana, who wrote Anderson that he had seen a bride and groom busily
writing their names wherever they could find a smooth place on one
particular formation. The observer informed the youthful couple that "as
their names were on the hotel register they would be known and the
soldiers would take them in charge and march them out of the Park." Upon
hearing this, the "bride nearly fainted" and begged the groom to wipe
their names off, which he did, but the Montanan thought "it was as good
as a circus to see him on his knees rubbing away at the writing for dear
life."[29]
Yet the military commander found that despite the
sharpest watch, new names were constantly being added and it became
increasingly difficult to distinguish these new signatures from the old
ones. Finally, in the early part of the 1892 season, all of the
inscriptions were removed from the various formations with the aid of
hammer and chisel and the Park and its protectors "started even with the
world." Writing in 1894, Anderson could claim that his remedy was
"heroic and successful," for the geyser basins were then "practically
free from this disfigurement."[30]
As the popularity of the Park increased, the problem
of fire prevention grew in proportion to the increased number of Park
visitors, and Anderson found that ever-increasing vigilance on the part
of fire patrols was necessary to protect the forests from destruction.
He insisted upon rigorous enforcement of the regulation requiring
expulsion from the Park of any campers who left their fires
unextinguished. Anderson found that "one or two expulsions each year
served as healthy warnings," and that these, reinforced by a system of
numerous patrols by the soldiers, had "brought about the particularly
good results of which we can boast." [31]
An even more serious problem was the protection of
wildlife. When Captain Anderson assumed control of the Park there was
still no law under which poachers could be punished, and consequently
they plied their trade with increasing intensity. The last remnants of
the great wild bison herds that had previously wandered the plains now
found refuge in the Park; beaver, relatively scarce in other portions of
the West, were fairly common in the Park, and great numbers of deer and
elk were still to be found there. An enterprising poacher could make a
good living preying upon these animals, and if he were apprehended,
expulsion usually meant little more than a slight inconvenience. With
the virtual disappearance of the great bison herds, the meat and hide
hunting of the previous decade was no longer possible, but the head of
the shaggy animal was still valuable. Mounted bison heads, Anderson was
told by one taxidermist, were "worth $1500.00 in the market," but if one
could find a "rich and anxious customer, they might bring a good deal
more." Taxidermists from Livingston, Billings, or Helena would pay $500
and up for an unmounted average head. [32]
For these and other reasons Anderson recommended that
Fort Yellowstone be enlarged to accommodate two troops of cavalry on a
year-round basis, and that the troop customarily detailed for service in
the Park during the summer months be assigned there permanently.
Military orders were issued making the requested change. [33] Aided by a civilian scout who knew both the
topography of the Park and the most notorious poachers living in the
surrounding communities, Anderson was now ready to wage war upon the
transgressors.
During the winter months the majority of the two
troops of cavalry were necessarily billeted at Fort Yellowstone, but at
least five outposts were garrisoned during the entire year. In addition,
scouting parties were sent our patrolling the entire Park and, traveling
on skis, were instructed "not to follow the regular trails, but to go to
the most unfrequented places," so that they "might happen on a malicious
person. The "snowshoe cabins" constructed during Boutelle's
administration were utilized for shelter, and "dressed in fur caps,
California blanket coats, leggings, and moccasins," [34] these strangely uniformed cavalrymen soon
became a nemesis to the poacher slipping into the Park in search of
beaver or bison.
During the summer months these back-country patrols
were increased in both number and scope, and four additional outposts
were garrisoned. One observer, who accompanied a cavalry patrol over
fallen timber and through "frightening morasses," found this "typical
manner" of policing the Park, "monotonous, toilsome, and uneventful
work"; but it was useful because it left the track of the cavalry
horseshoe in the most remote parts of the preserve, where the poacher or
interloper could see it and become apprehensive. It was this person's
opinion that "two regiments could not entirely prevent poaching in the
mountain wastes of the great reservation," but he thought that the two
troops were "successful enough at the task." [35]
In his attempt to end poaching, Anderson was hindered
by the resentment of the American pioneer toward game laws and game
preservation. The settlers surrounding the Park refused to recognize the
fact that the protection of game within the Park would profit them as
the surplus of animals thus protected spilled over into the surrounding
areas. A greater hindrance, however, was the continued failure of
Congress to provide legal machinery. Anderson was advised by the
Secretary of the Interior that trespassers could be punished only by
expulsion, there being "no legal jurisdiction . . . by which their
property can be confiscated." The Secretary also informed him that if an
offender returned to the Park after expulsion, he could then "take
possession of all means of transportation and equipment reporting the
same for disposition," but admitted that such a process may be a fine
point to decide" and one that would necessarily be left to the military
commander's "sound discretion." [36] Faced
with the choice of adhering closely to the law and simply expelling
offenders, or of going beyond the law and devising extralegal
punishment, the Acting Superintendent chose the latter course.
One especially pernicious poacher was apprehended
while illegally trapping, his property was confiscated, and, contrary to
all rules of law, he was confined in the guard house at Fort Yellowstone
pending advice from the Secretary of the Interior, advice which for some
reason was very slow in arriving. Ultimately his release was ordered,
but in Anderson's opinion "this imprisonment for a month" had done more
to break up trapping and poaching "than all the other arrests made since
the park was established." He realized that he had no authority to
imprison the poacher but he thought that his actions were justified
since "simple removal had absolutely no effect on such characters." The
property confiscated from this poacher was not returned to him in spite
of his repeated requests. Two years after his arrest and release from
confinement the man wrote, "Now don't you think I hay bin a very good
boy ever saince you gave me your lesson at the Springsnow as I
have quit hunting and gon to ranchingI will ask you to please send
my field glass up to meas it comes very handy to hunt horses and
cattle with [sic]." A year later the man wrote again, explaining
that he was no longer in the vicinity of the Park and asked that
Anderson "give my field glass and six shooter up to me." [37] Another hunter was found "with two buffalo
calves" which he claimed had been captured outside of the Park, an
explanation that Anderson refused to believe. His equipment, too, was
confiscated and he was imprisoned in the guard house. The Secretary of
the Interior was not informed of the situation until a month had passed
and he then immediately telegraphed orders for the prisoner's release.
[38]
Individuals with a known propensity to enter the Park
to pursue game animals were closely watched, cooperation was obtained
from law enforcement officers of the neighboring states, private
detectives were hired to gather information about planned poaching
expeditions, and letters of private individuals were intercepted. One
piece of correspondence opened by the military authorities contained the
instruction: "You had better get a bottle of strychnine and poison some
of those cross and silver grey fox at the Canyon this winter their hides
can be sent by mail." [39] All of this
served to reduce poaching, but did not prevent it. Congressional
legislation was still needed.
In an attempt to bring law and order to this area
neglected by the lawmakers, Anderson determined to make expulsion as
unpleasant as possible. When a transgressor was apprehended in the
southern part of the Park, he was marched on foot, accompanied by a
mounted escort, to the extreme northern entrance to the Park and there
"expelled." The process was reversed if apprehension occurred in the
northern portion of the Park. Usually the culprit's belongings, if not
confiscated, were deposited at the opposite boundary. The process was
admittedly extralegal, but it was effective. In one case, when notified
that one Max Caufman, staying at the Lake Hotel, had attempted assault
upon a chambermaid, Anderson sent an order to the officer in charge
there to have the alleged offender "marched our of the Park." In
reporting the incident to the Secretary of the Interior, Anderson
stated, "He was brought as far as Norris yesterday, arriving near
midnight, nearly exhausted. He was allowed to ride a saddle horse to
this point [Headquarters, Mammoth Hot Springs] today, and was marched on
to Gardiner, where he was set at liberty." [40]
Revision of the rules was often found necessary.
Suggestions for revision originated with either the Acting
Superintendent or the Secretary of the Interior. All suggested changes
from the Secretary were passed down to the Acting Superintendent for
approval before being promulgated, and it was only through the efforts
of Captain Anderson that Rule Number 9 ("No drinking saloon or bar room
will be permitted within the limits of the Park") was not revised to
completely prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages within the Park
proper. His continual insistence that such beverages were necessary,
from the medicinal standpoint, finally overcame the complaints of
temperance advocates and the predilection of the Secretary of the
Interior. Anderson emphasized the injurious effect of the altitude upon
travelers and related the story of "a distinguished surgeon" who was
traveling with him. The surgeon "came into my room at 2 a.m. saying,
'I'm dying, for God's sake get me some whiskey,' and quite probably the
immediate production of it saved his life." Continuing his medical
defense of alcoholic stimulants, the Captain stated that "most of the
waters of the Park affect the bowels of many tourists and the most
temperate need brandy medicinally. I think they should be able to get
it." On another occasion he maintained that "stimulants are held by high
medical authority to be often necessary and the bar rooms . . . are
intended to supply this want." [41] Whatever
the validity of his arguments, the Captain won the battle, and
"spiritous liquors" were dispensed to hotel guests until national
prohibition terminated the practice.
Anderson's motives were probably not altogether
unselfish. John W. Meldrum, the first United States Commissioner
appointed with jurisdiction over the Park, remarked that when he was
introduced to Anderson the Acting Superintendent replied, "right off the
bat: 'Good to see you, let's have a drink.'" When describing his first
residence in Yellowstone, Meldrum stated that "on the other side of the
hall was the bar room. There was music every night until midnight . . .
the chief trumpeter in there would always be Captain Anderson." [42] A strong defender of the imbiber, Anderson
was an enemy of the gambler, and it was he who established the rule that
"under no circumstances will a gambling establishment of any kind be
permitted within the park." [43]
Anderson also stipulated an element of later National
Park policy when he determined that it was not "necessary or advisable,
to limit the season of fishing." He continued the process of fish
planting begun by his predecessor and obtained permission to "prohibit
fishing for two years in any waters newly stocked." [44] During his administration, also, live
trapping of animals in the Park for shipment first to the Smithsonian
Institution in Washington and later to zoos throughout the United States
was begun. [45]
|