"Both. One goes with the other."

"It's my job to be truthfully accurate. Accuracy can't be separated from the truth."

"Interpreters present facts with clarity and purpose. They don't taint or twist facts to give a story emotional punch."

"I'm not sure what the difference is."

"My job is to be accurate and to tell the truth — as many as there are."

"Truth is subjective."

"It is my job to be as accurate as possible based on known facts and scientific theories. The truth is up to philosophers and an individual's convictions."

"My job is to be accurate with ideas supplemented with facts."

"I try to be as accurate as possible with the knowledge we have today. Truth can change from culture to culture, from time to time, as attitudes change or new discoveries are made. Accuracy includes presenting these older truths by setting the context of earlier times and behavior."

"Accuracy is one of the underpinnings of our profession. We have many truths and multiple points of view. It is my job to accurately present material with as little bias as possible."

"My job is to be accurate and balanced enough to hopefully give an opportunity to find the truth."

The word sovereign refers to power. A queen or a king is sovereign because they wield power over their realm. A country is sovereign when it defends its borders and makes its own policy.

Watch Part 5 of the video, The Visitor is Sovereign, or read Section Four of An Interpretive Dialogue.

"Her enthusiasm and love was contagious, and caused us to open our hearts and minds and listen."

"They would say they learned something or they enjoyed themselves."

"Someone might say simply 'You made me feel welcome. You helped orient me and move me on my way to discovery.' Someone else might say, 'I never thought of the canal or river or bald eagle that way before.' Each person hopefully had the opportunity to connect to a personal meaning."

"That I had background knowledge to answer questions and get them information in a timely manner. I knew the resource and could tell them where to see wildlife. I made them feel welcome."

"I allowed them to say and think what they wanted."

"They might say that I engaged the whole audience and brought a different perspective to an issue which caused them to look, think, and feel in a whole new way."

"In my program about wolves I think they would say they are now able to perceive that individual wolves have struggles and work out solutions to problems in a way in which visitors can emphasize. I think they'd say they are more familiar with and more understanding of wolves as a result of my story. They would certainly say they'd experience an interaction with specific wolves that they probably would not come by on their own."

"She made history come alive."

"That they hadn't seen the resource as important before but now they do."

"I'm not sure. Some would say nice things, but the deeper feelings, inspirations, and motivations are private to most people and perhaps would only be shared with those closest them."

"As long as the resource is undamaged, both views of stewardship are good."

"Any stewardship is better than none."

"No way is wrong as long as they care."

"The one that preserves the system as a whole, not just the parts we like the best."

"It's not for me to make value judgments about stewardship. Any stewardship that supports the mission of the agency is deemed appropriate by the agency."

"Neither (although I personally view my opinion as more environmentally friendly.)"

"I'm always going to think that my kind of stewardship is better than those I disagree with, but I realize that is only an opinion."

"Mine, because it is more ecologically in tune with our planet."

"Those I agree with because they are based on the truth."

"Different perspectives aren't comparable. They're just different."

"For this exercise I'm supposed to say neither but if a site is used for evil I have an issue. Think about Nazi's use of cultural and historical sites for propaganda and to promote racial superiority."