Contrary to Popular Belief

Arrows, Guns, and Buffalo

by Dana Dick, Student Conservation Association Intern

 
Stone arrowheads and metal points
American Indians made projectile points out of materials such as Knife River flint, Swan River chert, and Porcelanti (top row). Once metal points became available (bottom row), they quickly replaced stone points.

Top to bottom, from left: Knife River flint oxbow point (FOUS 49993), Swan River chert besant point (FOUS 3909), Porcellanite plains side-notched point (FOUS 99186), iron point (FOUS 16782), copper point (FOUS 98266), brass point (FOUS 16795). NPS photo.

The bow and arrow was an indispensable tool for American Indians living on the Great Plains by CE 250 at the latest. When Europeans emigrants founded Jamestown in 1607, the Plains Indian peoples had long ago perfected their bows and arrows into powerful weapons for hunting game and waging war. The bow and arrow worked so well, in fact, that American Indians relied on this traditional weapon long after they adopted firearms from the Europeans. Despite popular belief, they preferred them to the gun even into the late 1800s. How could that be?

The Gun’s Popularity

On the Northern Plains, American Indians obtained the gun through exchange at posts such as Fort Union. Imported from England, Belgium, France, and the American Colonies (later, the states), the gun became a popular trade item for tribal members. Possibly the most iconic fur trade firearm was the Northwest Trade Gun. This weapon was manufactured specifically for the fur trade and marketed to American Indians. For nearly two centuries after its introduction, this gun was sold by almost every company involved in the fur trade. Fort Union’s inventories, correspondence, and orders indicate that the post kept large quantities in stock and placed large orders for more every year. Edwin T. Denig, the Fort Union Bourgeois, or manager (1848–1854), specifically mentioned the Assiniboine people’s use of the Northwest Gun in his 1850s report on the Plains Indians for the Federal government. “The bow and arrow is used altogether by all these tribes when hunting buffalo on horseback,” Denig wrote, “and the Northwest shotgun is the only arm employed in killing any and all game on foot.” Once guns became available—they could not make their own—they wanted ones that were cheap, light, serviceable, and reliable in any season. The Northwest Trade Gun supplied just that. But even with the popularity of firearms, American Indians still depended on their bows and arrows.

 
Six stone arrowheads found at Fort Union.
Stone projectile points found during the Fort Union excavations range in age from 7,800 BP to 200 BP. These points could have been used to hunt bison and other animals or for warfare against enemy tribes. The broken tips illustrate the fragility of stone points. NPS photo, left to right from top:

In addition to the oxbow, besant, and plains side-notched points on the right side are a Knife River flint corner-notched Pelican Lake (middle, FOUS 3911), Porcelanti side-notched (left, FOUS 71265), and plains side-notched (middle, FOUS 99187) point.

Their Weapons and Trade

Up to the time of the fur trade, hunters and warriors had made bows and arrows from locally sourced or traded natural materials. For arrowheads, or projectile points, they relied on a variety of resources, primarily stone, bone, and antler. Chert, flint, and obsidian were the types of rock most often obtained to manufacture these early lithic points. Because they could not be found everywhere in North America, these rocks were traded across vast distances over well-established trade routes. Knife River flint is one point-making stone that traveled great distances. For the most part quarried in central-western North Dakota, Knife River points have been found in archeological sites across North America – from southern Canada to the Texas Panhandle and from the Rocky Mountains to Ohio. Another lithic material traded over great distances was obsidian from the Obsidian Cliff in Yellowstone National Park. Archeological evidence indicates that American Indians quarried that site for more than 10,000 years. Archeologists have found that obsidian as far north as Canada, south into Colorado, west into Washington, and east into the Ohio River Valley. The intense mining activities at these two sites, as well as the great distance the stones traveled, indicate the importance of both projectile points and the existing trade networks used by North America’s earliest peoples.

 
George Catlin painting of a Hidatsa Village
George Catlin’s “Hidatsa Village, Earth-covered Lodges, on the Knife River, 1,810 Miles above St. Louis.” Catlin painted this scene during his 1832 journey up the Missouri River. This painting captures the plains village life of the Hidatsa.

Image provided courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr. 1985.66.383.
http://americanart.si.edu/collections/search/artwork/?id=4105.

Complex systems of intertribal exchange flourished as a result. People used these trade systems for thousands of years, if not longer, and the concept was nothing new. The Mandan and Hidatsa’s semi-permanent villages along the Missouri River in central North Dakota had thrived as trading centers long before Europeans arrived. At these farming villages, nomadic Northern Plains tribes could trade items of the hunt for ones produced by the village agriculturists. In the early 1800s, the American Fur Company and individual posts like Fort Union tapped into these existing trade systems. Along these ancient routes, new fur trade–supplied goods spread rapidly across the continent. Guns came west with the French and English from the Great Lakes and farther east, while horses came north from Spanish territories in today’s Southwest. The Assiniboine traded guns to the Mandan as early as 1738, by which time nomadic tribes from the south possessed horses. In this way, distant tribes acquired European goods before the American Fur Company established its Upper Missouri River trading posts.

 
Metal kettle.
Far from the urban centers of Eastern America, American Indians living on the plains did not always have access to pre-made metal goods. Innovative individuals began to rework worn out metal objects into wanted or needed ones such as knifes, tinkler cones, and arrowheads.

Can you see the hole in this kettle bottom (FOUS 98273)? Most likely, that piece was removed and made into something else. NPS photo.

What Does Change?

Trade items Europeans brought, including guns, had long-lasting impacts on North America’s existing tribal cultures. In what some scholars call a cultural exchange, items made by American Indians began to be replaced by European goods. The arrival of metal kettles, for instance, lessened the need for pottery making. American Indian women’s acquisition of colorful beads, meanwhile, led to a decline in porcupine quill work and a rise of bead embroidery. Even the bow and arrow changed with metal’s introduction.

Rather than rely solely on stone, bone, or antler to produce arrowheads, American Indian men increasingly adopted and relied on metals such as iron, copper, and brass. The Hudson Bay Company had brought factory-made arrowheads to North America as early as 1671. Soon thereafter, hunters and warriors began to make their own metal arrowheads out of scrap and sheet metal such as barrel hoops, broken pieces of Euro-American machinery, and brass kettles. As early as 1805, the Crow were regarded as expert makers of metal tools from scraps. John James Audubon, an American ornithologist, naturalist, and painter, noted how American Indians made their own metal points to hunt buffalo. “The different Indian tribes hunt the Buffalo in various ways: some pursue them on horseback and shoot them with arrows,” Audubon observed, “which they point with old bits of iron, or old knife blades.” For an American Indian to make his own metal arrowhead he needed only a few Euro-American tools such as a file, cold chisel, or a hacksaw. Once these tools were available, the metal point quickly replaced those made from stone or bone because of the form’s durability and workability. Unlike a lithic point, which was liable to shatter on impact, a metal point could be repaired and sharpened. It is little surprise, therefore, that tribes quickly adopted metal arrowheads.

 
Bone and metal arrowheads
The Fort Union excavations have only yielded one bone projectile point (top, FOUS 787). Archeologists believe it may have been a template for making metal points. The three points beneath look strikingly similar and were all found at Fort Union. Arrowheads not shown to scale.

Top to bottom: bone projectile point, ferrous projectile point (FOUS 84275), metal projectile point (FOUS 58276), and iron projectile point (FOUS 16788). NPS photo.

By the middle 1800s, posts such as Fort Union were a major source for metal arrowheads. However, unlike the Hudson Bay Company that placed orders for factory-made metal points, Fort Union’s clerks appear not to have ordered pre-made metal points. Although known fort invoices omit mention of metal arrowheads, Fort Union’s archeological excavations unearthed several metal points. How could that be? The discovery of the one bone projectile point at Fort Union (FOUS 787) may provide an answer. This bone point looks almost identical to a number of metal ones that archeologists found. These similarities suggest that the bone point may have been a template for making metal ones. A Fort Union blacksmith could have accomplished this task by placing the bone template on top of a piece of barrel hoop and then cut around it with a chisel.

But was there always a blacksmith available to make such points at Fort Union? Edwin Denig, the Fort Union Bourgeois, wrote that “We [the American Fur Company] have kept in constant employment, mostly for their [American Indians] benefit, a blacksmith, a gunsmith, and a tinsmith at all the forts for 20 years past. . . .” Accepting Denig’s word, it seems that people living near Fort Union at least had access to metal points made by the post’s blacksmiths. Even if this was the case, it remains likely that many nomadic Plains Indians also manufactured metal points themselves. Incredibly, tribes’ adoption and use of metal projectile points is the only significant change they made to bows and arrows following European contact and the arrival of fur trade posts.

 
George Catlin’s “Buffalo Chase”.
George Catlin's “Buffalo Chase, a Single Death” (1832–1833). During his visit to the Upper Missouri, Catlin witnessed numerous buffalo hunts, seeing firsthand the mounted hunter’s skill with a bow and arrow.

Image provided courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr. 1985.66.408.
http://americanart.si.edu/collections/search/artwork/?id=3952.

Why They Favored the Bow and Arrow

Why did the guns fur traders introduced not eliminate the use of bows and arrows until after repeating rifles like the Winchester carbine that appeared in the 1870s? Up until then, both young men and poor warriors used the bow almost exclusively while those who could afford guns still used the bow. A powerful weapon, the bow and metal-pointed arrow could kill a man or buffalo as easily as an early gun. On the northern plains, however, the bow was the weapon of choice for hunting buffalo. Early guns were difficult to load while on horseback and could not be fired with the same speed and agility as the bow and arrow. George Catlin, an American painter who visited Fort Union to observe and record the ways of American Indians, participated in several buffalo hunts and was able to see the power of the bow first hand. “Such is the training of men and horses in this country,” Catlin tells us, “that this work of death and slaughter is simple and easy . . . [W]hen the arrow is thrown with great ease and certainty to the heart; and instances sometimes occur, where the arrow passes entirely through the animal’s body. An Indian, therefore, mounted on a fleet and well-trained horse, with his bow in his hand, and his quiver slung on his back, containing an hundred arrows, of which he can throw fifteen or twenty in a minute, is a formidable and dangerous enemy.” The hunter’s ease and ability to discharge arrows rapidly was a clear advantage over the early single-shot long arm, or musket. This was one reason why American Indians kept the bow and arrow in their arsenal until the arrival of more advanced firearms like the repeating rifle.

 
Four metal projectile points found at Fort Union.
These metal points could have been mass-produced in a factory, made onsite by the Fort Union blacksmith, or fabricated in camp by an American Indian.

Left to right: iron projectile point (FOUS 1403), iron projectile point (FOUS 84275), iron projectile point (FOUS 85666), and a metal projectile point (FOUS 58276). NPS photo.

The tribes’ eventual adoption of the metal-tipped arrow and gun is just one aspect of a larger cultural exchange that occurred in North America following Europeans’ arrival. Such cultural exchanges can be described often as cultural reciprocity, with ideas and goods moving back and forth between two or more cultural groups. This idea of a cultural exchange is one commonly used to explain the relationship between Euro-Americans and American Indians. Tribes’ adoption of metal-tipped arrows and firearms is but one example of how Euro-American culture influenced and at times changed American Indian cultures. For a true reciprocity to exist, however, American Indians also had to affect Euro-American cultures. What influences did American Indian societies and cultures have on Euro-Americans? What knowledge and technologies have Euro-Americans gained from the nation’s first peoples?

Last updated: April 19, 2017

Contact the Park

Mailing Address:

15550 Highway 1804
Williston, ND 58801

Phone:

(701) 572-9083

Contact Us