Last updated: March 8, 2022
Article
Women in Landscape-Scale Conservation: Elsa Haubold
How did you get started working in landscape-scale conservation?
I started working in seascapes – the first half of my career was spent working on marine mammals (specifically cetaceans, such as whales and dolphins). My research found they were exposed to a range of pollutants such as various plastic debris found in the stomach of some of the stranded dolphins and whales I studied, to toxic chemicals such as organochlorines (e.g., PCBs) and heavy metals that accumulated in their tissues. As I transitioned to working with another marine mammal, Florida manatees, I learned that my traditional scientific educational background (BS, MS, PhD, MBA) was lacking. I should have taken social science classes that involved how to work with and understand people as much as I learned about the wildlife and habitats. The systemic issues affecting manatees across the aquatic-scape have to be solved collaboratively by people working together across different specific interests to help improve the entire aquatic ecosystem. My education did not prepare me for that.What does the term connected conservation mean to you?
The words “connected conservation” stimulate many thoughts! Humans, wildlife, and habitat are all intertwined, and the health of each is dependent on the others in so many different and amazingly complex ways. An often used, related phrase made popular by Disney is “the circle of life,” but that doesn’t really capture it completely. Drilling down from the big picture – most wildlife is dependent on habitat that is continuous rather than fragmented even though the wildlife may only occupy a fragment of the continuous habitat and for only part of their life cycle – for example, corridors that allow species to move between important sites. The human connection to nature is integral to our well-being and mental health, so considerable effort is being made to ensure that conservation is relevant to humans – that they are connected to nature and its conservation. And one more dive into the human side – when thinking about connected conservation, I think about some of the relatively recent work on “social network analyses” that demonstrate, with complex spaghetti-like diagrams, how important coordinators are in the field of conservation. These coordinators tend to know “everyone” and facilitate conservation by connecting people and encouraging collaboration. One complicating issue related to coordination, as essential as it is, is that it tends to be one of the hardest things for which to secure funding.Tell us about a project that you have worked on that you are especially proud of.
Most recently I’m proud of being a part of the USFWS Workplace Culture Transformation team that developed recommendations now being implemented to make the Service a better place to work. A recent landscape-scale project I had the honor of being a part of with colleagues from state fish and wildlife agencies, other federal agencies, and non-governmental organizations was developing a framework to enhance landscape-scale and cross-boundary conservation through coordinated State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs). These SWAPs are foundational to conserving our nation’s fish and wildlife within each state, territory, and the District of Columbia. Our recommendations, adopted by state fish and wildlife agency directors at the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies annual meeting in September 2021, provide a framework for how SWAPs can become even more effective at improving range-wide conservation of species by leading or contributing to not just state, but also regional and national, landscape conservation priorities.