Part of a series of articles titled The Constitutional Convention: A Day by Day Account for August 1 to 15, 1787.
Previous: August 14, 1787: Preventing Corruption
Article
"We grow more and more skeptical as we proceed. If we do not decide soon, we shall be unable to come to any decision."
--Oliver Ellsworth
Strong (MA) moved that tax bills and appropriations should originate in the House, leaving the Senate free to amend. Mason (VA) seconded the motion, and a fight was on. After debate Williamson (NC), who favored the motion, thought the issue might be placed in a better perspective if it were postponed until the Senate’s other powers were more carefully defined. The convention voted postponement by 6 to 5.
Next, Madison (VA) moved that both the President and the Supreme Court should have veto power, with a two-thirds vote of each House to override if either branch vetoed a law. Wilson (PA) seconded. Mercer (MD) approved in part because he “disapproved of the doctrine that the Judges as expositors of the Constitution should have authority to declare a law void. He thought laws ought to be well and cautiously made, and then to be uncontrollable” by the judiciary. Charles Pinckney (SC) disliked how this proposal violated the separation of powers principle, and Gerry (MA) accurately noted that the motion was very near one that had already been voted down. Madison’s idea lost, 3–8, with Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia in favor.
Gouverneur Morris (PA) expressed his regrets that the motion was defeated. He favored an absolute veto power by either the Executive or Judicial Branches, which he thought would act as a strong barrier against legislative instability. Dickinson of (DE) was appalled by Mercer’s observation that the judiciary could overturn legislation it deemed unconstitutional, thinking “no such power ought to exist.” And yet he was, “at the same time, at a loss what expedient to substitute” for judicial override of unconstitutional laws.
Carroll (MD) wanted the issue postponed until the executive branch was better defined. Gorham, much irritated, said there was “no end to these difficulties and postponements. Some could not agree to the form of government before the powers were defined. Others could not agree to the powers till it was seen how the government was to be formed.” Rutledge (SC) was also “strenuous against postponing; and complained much of the tediousness of the proceedings” and Ellsworth feared these postponements were eroding the delegates’ ability to make decisions. The motion to postpone lost with only Delaware and Maryland in favor.
Williamson moved to require three-fourths of each house of Congress to override a veto instead of just two-thirds. Wilson seconded, and the measure passed 6–4–1 with New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Georgia opposed and Pennsylvania divided.
After a quick a motion to give the President ten days to veto legislation, and after what Madison described as “a short and rather confused conversation” over wording issues, the Convention passed the article as amended and adjourned.
Part of a series of articles titled The Constitutional Convention: A Day by Day Account for August 1 to 15, 1787.
Previous: August 14, 1787: Preventing Corruption
Last updated: September 22, 2023