A Study of Virginia Indians and Jamestown: The First Century
NPS Logo

Bacon's Rebellion, 1676: A Review of the Sources and Interpretations

Thane Harpole

Bacon's Rebellion has given rise to an extensive historiographical dialogue during the three centuries since the events so named transpired. Most sources agree on the character of the events themselves, and the primary participants, but there is little uniformity of agreement about the ultimate causes and effects of this episode, and the motives of the people involved. It has engendered wildly varying interpretations about the social, economic and political situation of Virginia during the 1670s, and equally disparate views about the impact of the rebellion on later generations. This depth of historical inquiry and popular interest underscores the importance of studying Bacon's Rebellion. Despite the extensive research, much remains to be discovered about these important events. The paucity of documentation relating to seventeenth century Virginia reiterates the need to examine all available sources of information, including public and family records, land patents and transactions, archaeological investigations, and oral history in order to arrive at a richer understanding of the events and implications of Bacon's Rebellion. The following paper summarizes the rebellion and reviews the available sources that interpret its events and impacts on Virginia's peoples.

There is little doubt that Bacon's Rebellion was a pivotal event in the history of Virginia. It has long been prominent in the annals of Virginia historiography. It has been memorialized in novels and hailed as an event that foreshadowed the American Revolution. Though the rebellion was short-lived, according to its many chroniclers it had rippling effects that variously changed the nature of Virginia colonial government, altered westward settlement practices, fostered ideas of democracy and English liberties that were drawn on during the American Revolution, and radicalized colonial relations with Virginia Indians. Most contemporary accounts of the rebellion were clearly biased, and many later histories were just as weighted towards one side or the other, casting doubts about their reliability. However, the rebellion probably dramatically altered the relationship between Virginia Indians and the colonists, deepening the mistrust and marginalization on the part of the surviving Indians, and exacerbating racial hatred and violence against Native groups by the colonists.

Ostensibly the events known as Bacon's Rebellion began in the spring of 1676, when Nathaniel Bacon, Jr. agreed, without obtaining a commission from Governor William Berkeley, to lead an attack on some Indian groups that had been raiding farmsteads along the fall lines of Virginia's rivers. However, a series of clashes between frontier colonists and several Indian tribes had begun in July 1675, and the violence was escalating. Both Indians and colonists led raids and attacks and committed atrocities for various reasons, emphasizing the fragility of their peaceful coexistence. It was a pattern continuously replayed during the seven decades of English settlement and expansion in Virginia. It was not an arrangement that could long endure. However, the events that become known as Bacon's Rebellion differed from earlier wars with the Indians.

Virginia's English population expanded rapidly during the 1650s and 1660s, with settlers pushing the borders in every direction. The economic motivations of the colonists and the continued influx of new arrivals ensured that conflict would occur. Once the raids began, both sides contributed to the violence, and the colonists often confused, or plainly disregarded the differences between friendly Indian tribes and those outside the bounds of any treaties. The Susquehannahs were ranging from the Potomac to the falls of the James River, displaced from their more northern territory, and colonists responded by attacking them, or sometimes friendlier tribes such as the Piscattaways, Appomattox, or Pamunkey. Governor Berkeley had authorized a force to deal with the problem on the Northern Neck, but the colonists murdered five chiefs who apparently had come out to make peace (Carson 1976:1-11; Morgan 1975:250-255).

Worried that more of this would cause a general rebellion among all the Indians, Berkeley was restrained in addressing the Indian threat at the falls of the James. He called a special session of the assembly and they took measures for the erection of several forts along the frontier to be manned with a standing force of 500 soldiers. These measures would be extremely costly, especially to the poor farmers, and many felt that they would be unlikely to have much effect on the Indians (Morgan 1975:253). Farmers on the Southside and on the upper parts of the James River requested a force to subdue the Indians, and when it was not forthcoming, they were compelled to take matters into their own hands.

When Bacon agreed to lead an angered band of settlers in an attack against the Indians in April 1676, he defied the governor, but seemed to be taking an action that many settlers on the periphery of English colonization felt was necessary. He may or may not have underestimated Berkeley's disapproval, but his actions led to an open war on Virginia Indians and an internal struggle for control of Virginia and its citizens. The subsequent events of 1676 are recounted in numerous sources and need not be detailed here. Bacon's untimely death in October allowed Berkeley to quickly recapture the reigns of power and launch a zealous campaign to punish the participants and recoup any losses. When the royal commissioners arrived in January 1677 order had largely been restored, but Berkeley's departure soon after marked the beginning of a new era.

The ultimate causes of this violent outbreak are numerous and necessary for understanding the reasons and implications of this conflict, and are also objects of contention among historians. The roots of the rebellion seem to have been borne of two primary forces: the continued expansion of English colonists onto Indian lands, and the economic and political oppression wrought by Virginia's wealthy planter elite upon the vast number of small farmers, servants and slaves comprising the bulk of the population. Expansion led to increased contact and increased friction with neighboring Indian tribes. Treaties were either poorly enforced, or flagrantly violated. Colonists living along the so-called frontiers balked at the low level of protection afforded them by the governor and his council, and resented the burden of levies and fees that fell disproportionately on them from the General Assembly, county courts, and vestries (Carson 1976:2-3; Morgan 1975:246-49). The policies that encouraged these results were those of Governor William Berkeley, who had ruled the colony for decades prior to 1676, as well as his small circle of long-serving members of the Council and General Assembly. Corruption and favoritism were key components of Virginia's seventeenth century government, and many in the colony had great cause for complaint. But did they have reason for rebellion?

There are dozens of books and articles addressing the issues of Bacon's Rebellion, but only during the latter half of the twentieth century have historians seriously probed the underlying causes and effects of these key events. The contemporary accounts are strongly biased and influenced by the opinions and atmosphere of Virginia during the 1670s. Historical works of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries tended to either criticize Bacon for subverting the rightful authority of the governor, or conversely praise him for rebelling against tyrannical leadership, without objectively balancing all the evidence on hand. Several of the modern sources have been examined in depth to summarize the dominant viewpoints and interpretations.

In her detailed overview of sources both historical and fictional concerning Bacon's Rebellion, Jane Carson thoroughly reviews the various contemporary accounts, historical works, plays, and novels, analyzing their diverse opinions and conclusions regarding the events and implications of the rebellion. Though not an exhaustive bibliography, Carson's work comes closer than any other to assembling and categorizing the rich literature concerning the events of 1676, and provides the reader with an indispensable tool for conducting further research. Carson provides a fair and objective account of the sources, but stops short of synthesizing the motives of those involved and the legacy of Bacon's Rebellion.

Wertenbaker, in Bacon's Rebellion, 1676, and other books, places much of his emphasis on the actions of Governor Berkeley, and his role as servant of the king and leader of the colony. He places blame for much of the discontent on the Navigation Acts, which limited colonial trade and decreased the profitability of tobacco. He also blamed Berkeley for reinforcing a system of political favoritism that enriched a few select men through political positions, lucrative fees and levies, and large tracts of land. Wertenbaker concludes that this forced many small farmers, who did not want to work as servants, to acquire property on the frontier and encroach on Indian lands (1957:2-16). Though Bacon took up arms against the Indians, and then led an assault against Berkeley and his supporters, he is commended as a reformer who sincerely wanted to redress the grievances and oppression of Berkeley's administration. Wertenbaker concludes that the rebellion was "a landmark in the development of self-government in Virginia," and that is persuaded future governors and kings to act cautiously in their management of colonial government, lest they awaken the supporters of "English liberty" yet again (1957:58).

In American Slavery American Freedom, Edmund Morgan devotes more than a chapter to the rebellion, from its origin to its implications. His analysis of wealth and social class and structure revealed a number of grievances among the poorer farmers and servants that, if not addressed, could and did threaten the security of the colony. He concludes that the rebellion began as a campaign against Indians that morphed into a rebellion and civil war, and then mostly a looting fest. It did not have many immediate results, but it eventually helped people realize that "resentment of an alien race might be more powerful than resentment of an upper class" (Morgan 1975: 269-270). It influenced the notion of white solidarity against and racism towards other races, namely Indian and African, in order to undermine any feeling of class similarities among the laboring multitude. Racism legitimized slavery and enforced the hegemony of the planter class by labeling poor, Euro-American colonists as better than non-Europeans. It eventually created a cause and an enemy that most white, Euro-Americans could rally around. For Indians and Africans, this realignment of views marginalized them even further, and helped foster an intense emotional enmity towards these groups that continues to be a factor in American society today. The previous system of order in seventeenth century Virginia, based primarily on enforcing deferential attitudes towards the ruling class and created to legitimize its narrow hold on Virginia's economy, was a precarious position which, as Bacon proved, could easily fall to rebellion.

1676, The End of American Independence charts a different course in its explanation of the events of that year. Stephen Webb writes that Bacon's Rebellion was in fact a revolution against the old order, and that its failure ended an era of political independence that would not be achieved again until the American Revolution. He argues that Bacon's Rebellion and other significant events ranging up and down the eastern seaboard, such as King Phillips War, were part of a much more extensive realignment of power between the imperial forces of the Iroquois Confederacy and England, through the administration of Edmund Andros in New York. The Indian tribes caught between the two opposing powers were largely destroyed or subjugated, and the intensity of the conflict wreaked havoc on all sides. It took several generations to return to a level of prosperity that had been achieved by 1676 Webb 1984:xv-xviii, 3-7). His emphasis on the larger sphere of English imperialism seeks to locate Bacon's Rebellion within a more holistic framework of the struggle for control of eastern North America, and emphasizes the roles of both the English and the numerous Indian tribes.

There are many other histories which discuss Bacon's Rebellion, beginning with a lengthy treatment by Robert Beverly in 1705. Most of the early histories are critical of Bacon, but after the American Revolution, numerous nineteenth century American historians praise Bacon's actions and see in him a foreshadowing of 1776 and an independent United States. For a thorough review of these many histories see Carson's, Bacon's Rebellion, 1676-1976. Carson chronicles each work, summarizing the viewpoints they express and the origins of their various conclusions.

In addition to historical works, soon after the conclusion of the rebellion, fictional works began to fill the popular imagination with stories of Bacon and Berkeley. As with nonfiction works, early plays, poems, and stories were often critical of Bacon. With the formation of the United States, authors began to see in Bacon's Rebellion an earlier source for patriotic fervor, and Nathaniel Bacon was turned into a popular hero. They draw a common thread linking Bacon's Rebellion directly to the American Revolution and the ideals of liberty and democracy. A surge of novels appeared in the late nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century, all of which, in one way or another, praised Bacon. These romanticized views of colonial life often utilize real characters and events, but most of the stories are highly imaginative. Details of seventeenth-century life, settlement, warfare, and government, are generally inaccurate and have helped to distort the events in the popular imagination. With some exceptions, many of these works also present unflattering views of the Indians and African slaves. In his preface to The Birth of Liberty , Lane summarizes some of this sentiment when he states that Bacon was "a patriot of the highest order, and a born leader of men (Lane 1909:3). Again, Carson provides a very thorough overview of the fictional literature concerning Bacon's Rebellion.


In summary, most sources agree on the general chain of events and immediate implications of Bacon's Rebellion. However, there are vastly disparate views about the substance and long-term effects of this event. Some argue that is was struggle for power between the old governing class and a new group of landowners. Others say it was more of a class struggle between the rich and the masses. Warfare with the Virginia Indians played a major role in the conflict, and the struggle may have been about English dominance over a perceived lesser race, and the lands on which they lived. Finally, some view Bacon's Rebellion as a wellspring of democratic principals and the antecedent to events and ideas that would eventually lead to a much larger rebellion and the formation of the United States. These views often have more to say about the authors and the times in which they lived, than they do about Bacon's Rebellion itself. One viewpoint that is largely lacking in the literature, however, is the role that the Virginia Indians played in this conflict, and the effects that this had on their culture and settlements.

Most of the works written about Bacon's Rebellion are Euro-centric, and they take for granted the ultimate control of the land by European-Americans and the diminishing importance of Indians in colonial and later society. This view minimizes and marginalizes the critical role of Indians in the processes of settlement and conflict, and has allowed historians to largely ignore their contributions. As colonial and American expansionism manifested itself across North America, the Indian inhabitants were removed, either in fact or in print, erasing their roles from the American cultural consciousness. The Euro-centric viewpoint distorts, to some extent, the actual events and fails to show how Bacon's Rebellion affected all of Virginia's cultural and economic groups. The economic exploitation of land and people that drove European colonization of the New World was antithetical to the way of life of most Native Americans. On a smaller scale, many English settlers who came to Virginia for land and profit, settled in a frontier zone where interaction with Indians was commonplace. Differences in language, appearance, foodways, religion, and especially land use and economic motivation, were readily apparent, and perhaps inevitably led to conflict between the different groups.

Based on this review, it appears that there is a lack of consensus among historians about the effects of Bacon's Rebellion. On the one hand, it did usher in a new era of imperial control, but it did not radically change the power structure within the colony. The frontiers shifted further west and Virginia Indians lost more of their lands, power and independence. Though it imparted a disastrous toll on the lives, crops, and livestock of colonial Virginians, Bacon's Rebellion quickly receded behind waves of new English settlement.


Andrews, Charles M., ed.
1915 Narratives of the Insurrections, 1675-1690. Scribner, New York.

Bayne, Howard R.
1904 "A Rebellion in the Colony of Virginia." Historical Papers of the Society of Colonial Wars in the State of New York, No. 7. New York.

Berry, Sir John, Francis Moryson, and Herbert Jeffreys
1677 "A True Narrative of the Rise, Progresse, and Cessation of the Late Rebellion in Virginia, Most Humbly and Impartially Reported by His Majestyed Commissioners Appointed to Enquire into the Affaires of the Said Colony." Reprinted in Andrews, Narratives of the Insurrections, 1675-1690 (Scribner, New York 1915), p. 105-41.

Beverly, Robert
1705 The History and Present State of Virginia. London.

Billings, Warren M.
1968 "Virginia's Deplored Condition," 1660-1676: The Coming of Bacon's Rebellion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.

1975 The Old Dominion in the Seventeenth Century: A Documentary History of Virginia, 1606-1689. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Blathwayt, William
1649?-1717"The William Blathwayt Papers at Colonial Williamsburg, 1631-1722." Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.

Burk, John Daly
1804-16 The History of Virginia. Petersburg.

Carson, Jane
1976 Bacon's Rebellion, 1676-1976. The Jamestown Foundation, Jamestown, Virginia.

Cotton, Ann
1676 "An Account of Our Late Troubles in Virginia, Written in 1676, by Mrs. An. Cotton, of Q. Creeke," in Peter Force, ed., Tracts and Other Papers Relating Principally to the Origin Settlement and Progress of the Colonies in North America from the Discovery of the Country to the Year 1776 (Washington D.C., 1836), I, No. 9.

Cotton, John?
1677 "The History of Bacon's and Ingram's Rebellion in Virginia, in 1675 and 1676." Massachusetts Historical Society, Proceedings (1866), 299-342. Reprinted in Andrews, Narratives of the Insurrections, 1675-1690 (New York, 1915), p. 47-98.

Craven, Wesley Frank
1949 The Southern Colonies in the Seventeenth Century. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

1968 The Colonies in Transition 1660-1713. New York.

Dowdey, Clifford
1957 The Great Plantation: A Profile of Berkeley Hundred and Plantation Virginia from Jamestown to Appomattox. Berkeley Plantation, Charles City, Virginia.

Duck, Lloyd
1966 Indian Relations in Virginia during Bacon's Rebellion. Unpublished Honors Thesis, College of William and Mary.

Finestone, Harry
1956 Bacon's Rebellion, The Contemporary News Sheets. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Flannagan, Roy
1952 The Forest Cavalier: A Romance of America's First Frontier and of Bacon's Rebellion. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis.

Force, Peter
1836-46 Tracts and Other Papers Relating Principally to the Origin Settlement and Progress of the Colonies in North America, from the Discovery of the Country to the Year 1776. Washington, D. C. 4 vols.

Frantz, John B.
1969 Bacon's Rebellion; Prologue to the Revolution? Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts.

Fuller, Hulbert
1897 Vivian of Virginia; Being the Memoirs of our First Rebellion, by John Vivian, esq., of Middle Plantation, Virginia. Lamson, Wolffe and Company, Boston.

Grantham, Sir Thomas
1716 "An historical account of some memorable actions, particularly in Virginia; also against the admiral of Algier, and in the East Indies." J. Roberts, London. Reprinted with an introduction by R. A. Brock, by C. McCarthy & Co., Richmond, Virginia, 1882.

Hamlin, P. G.
1940 "Pathological Implications in Bacon's Rebellion." Virginia Medical Monthly, Vol. 67, Feb. 1940.

Harrah, Madge
1997 My brother, my enemy. Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers, New York.

Hening, William Waller
1809-23 The Statutes at Large: Being a Collection of All the Laws of Virginia. 13 volumes. Richmond.

Heslep, James William
2001 The development of slave participation in Bacon's Rebellion of 1676 . Unpublished Honors Thesis, College of William and Mary.

Jones, Spotswood Hunnicutt
1991 The World of Ware Parish in Gloucester County, Virginia: A Chronicle of an Episcopal Community in Tidewater Virginia from the Mid-Seventeenth Century to the Present. The Dietz Press, Richmond, Virginia.

Kennedy, J. P. and H. R. McIlwaine, eds.
1905-15 Journal of the House of Burgesses. 12 volumes. Richmond.

Lane, John H.

1909 The Birth of Liberty; a story of Bacon's Rebellion. The Hermitage Press, Richmond.

McCartney, Martha W.
2001 Jamestown An American Legacy. Eastern National, Hong Kong.

McIlwaine, H. R., ed.
1924 Minutes of the Council and General Court of Colonial Virginia. Richmond.

Middlekauff, Robert
1964 Bacon's Rebellion. The Berkeley Series in American History. Rand McNally, Chicago.

Morgan, Edmund S.
1975 American Slavery American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

Morton, Richard L.
1960 Colonial Virginia. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Neville, John D.
1976 Bacon's Rebellion: abstracts of material in the Colonial Records Project. The Jamestown Foundation, Jamestown, Virginia.

Osgood, Herbert L.
1904-7 The American Colonies in the Seventeenth Century. New York.

Scruggs, Philip Lightfoot
1942 Man cannot tell. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis.

Silver, Timothy
1990 A New Face on the Countryside: Indians, Colonists, and Slaves in the South Atlantic Forests, 1500-1800. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Sherwood, William
1676 "Virginia's Deploured Condition: Or an Impartiall Narrative of the Murders commited by the Indians there, and of the Sufferings of his Majesties Loyall Subjects under the Rebellious outrages of Mr. Nathaniell Bacon Junior to the tenth day of August Anno Domini 1676." Published in Collections, Massachusetts Historical Society, 4th ser., 9 (1871), pp. 162-76.

Smith, James Morton, ed.
1969 Seventeenth Century America. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Sprinkle, John Harold
1992 Loyalists and Baconians: the participants in Bacon's Rebellion in Virginia, 1676-1677. Unpublished Thesis (Ph. D.), College of William and Mary.

Stanard, Mary Newton
1907 The Story of Bacon's Rebellion. Neale Publishing Co., New York.

Sublette, C. M.
1926 The Bright Face of Danger; a Tale, wherein are related the adventures of Captain Francis Havenell, of Hookset Hundred in Henrico County, Virginia, during the days of Bacon's Rebellion. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

Swem, E. G., and John M. Jennings
1957 A Selected Bibliography of Virginia, 1607-1699. Historical Booklet, Number 1. Virginia 350th Anniversary Celebration Corporation, Williamsburg, Virginia.

Tate, Thad and David Ammerman, eds.
1979 The Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

Trigger, Bruce, ed.
1978 Northeast. Volume 15 of the Handbook of North American Indians, edited by William C. Sturdevant. Washington.

Tucker, St. George
1857 Hansford: a Tale of Bacon's Rebellion. G. M. West, Richmond, Virginia.

1677 "Strange news from Virginia: being a full and true account of the life and death of Nathaniel Bacon, who was the only cause and original of all the late troubles in the Country. With a full relation of all the accidents which have happened in the late War there between the Christians and Indians." William Harris, London. Reprinted in Finestone, Bacon's Rebellion, The Contemporary News Sheets (Charlottesville, Virginia 1958).

1677 "More News from Virginia, Being a True and Full Relation of all Occurrences in that Countrey, since the Death of Nath. Bacon. With An Account of thirteen Persons that have been tryed and Executed for their Rebellion there." William Harris, London. Reprinted in Finestone, Bacon's Rebellion, The Contemporary News Sheets (Charlottesville Virginia 1958).

Warner, Charles Willard Hoskins
1961 Road to Revolution; Virginia's Rebels from Bacon to Jefferson, 1676-1776. Garrett and Massie, Richmond, Virginia.

Washburn, Wilcomb E.
1957 The Governor and the Rebel: A History of Bacon's Rebellion in Virginia. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

1962 "The Effect of Bacon's Rebellion on Government in England and Virginia." Contributions from the Museum of History and Technology, Paper 17, United States National Museum Bulletin 225. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.

Webb, Stephen Saunders
1984 1676, The End of American Independence. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

Wertenbaker, Thomas. J.
1914 Virginia Under the Stuarts. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

1940 Torchbearer of the Revolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

1957 Bacon's rebellion, 1676. Historical Booklet, Number 8. Virginia 350th Anniversary Celebration Corporation, Williamsburg, Virginia

<<< Previous <<< Contents >>> Next >>>

Last Updated: 22-Nov-2006