|
|
|
.gif)

Fauna Series No. 4
MENU
Cover
Contents
Foreword
Introduction
Population and Mortality
Habits
Food
Elk
Deer
Antelope
Bighorn
Other Larger Mammals
Small Mammals
Birds
Misc. Diet
Conclusions
Bibliography
|
|
|
|
Fauna of the National Parks No. 4
Ecology of the Coyote in the Yellowstone
|
|
CHAPTER VI:
MULE DEER IN RELATION TO COYOTES
LOSS OF FAWNS
Losses during winter of 193738.The
latest large counts for the different range units have been placed in
one table for convenience. See page 72. Most of these counts were made
in April, many late in that month. Limited fawn losses probably occurred
after some of these counts were made, but on the whole the figures for
the fawns are close to the proportion that came through the winter.
Since these counts probably represent about 75 per cent of the
population, the numbers of fawns and does in the counts are not far from
the actual numbers on the ranges.
The total of the late counts made over the main range
units is 485 does, 174 fawns, 136 bucks, and 41 deer unidentified. The
fawn-doe ratio in these counts is 35 percent. The percentage increase
over the doe and buck populations combined is 28 percent. It is known
that relatively fewer bucks than does are counted, so to be really
conservative the number of bucks might be doubled. Then the increase in
the herd due to the fawn crop becomes about 22 percent. This includes
the population along the Yellowstone River where scarcely any fawns
survived, so it appears that there was a healthy increase in the deer
population as a whole, even though the winter over part of the range was
more severe than usual.
Since large counts of deer were not secured when they
first came to the winter range and therefore some mortality had already
occurred when the first extensive counts were made in January, figures
are not available which would give a good clue to the actual loss of
fawns during the winter. Counts made in January (one) and in February
total 355 does and 176 fawns for Reese Creek, the Game Ranch, along
Gardiner River and Lava Creek, below Deckers Flat, between Deckers Flat
and Blacktail Deer Creek, and between Blacktail Deer Creek and Little
Cottonwood Creek. Counts made in March (one) and in April on the same
ranges total 424 does and 148 fawns. If the early fawn ratio was true
for the whole population, then the April count shows a loss of 62 fawns
or 29 percent of the fawns since February. There was, of course,
considerable loss previous to the February counts, especially on the
Yellowstone River range. There fore the actual winter loss of fawns was
much higher than 29 percent, being almost 100 percent along the
Yellowstone River.

Figure 25 The two fawns on the left side
are feeding on greasewood (Sarcobatus). Much of the heavily
browsed sagebrush has been killed. Slope near Gardiner River,
March 25, 1938.
Fawn mortality higher than doe
mortality.In practically all of the areas there was a downward
trend in the ratio of fawns to does. Where the mortality was not so
heavy this differential mortality was not great, but along the
Yellowstone River, where the mortality was drastic, the ratio dropped
almost to zero.
FawnDoe Ratio, Winter of 193738
Locality |
Early count |
Late count |
Date | Ratio | Date | Ratio |
Reese Creek
Game Ranch
Gardiner River-Lava Creek
Below Deckers Flat
Deckers Flat-Blacktail Creek
Blacktail-Little Cottonwood Creek
|
Feb. 20 Feb. 21 Feb. 22 Jan. 25 Feb. 4 Jan. 25 |
Percent
60 56 53 78 46 83 |
Apr. 20 Apr. 28 Apr. 21 Mar. 21 Mar. 21 Apr. 26 |
Percent 43 41 38 37 20 3 |
Fawn mortality correlated with winter range
conditions.The Reese Creek, Game Ranch, and Gardiner
River-Lava Creek winter ranges, and that below Deckers Flat, are not
very different in quality, but the first named is the best of the three,
being the least overbrowsed. The Game Ranch range I would rate as
slightly superior to the Gardiner River-Lava Creek range because of the
greater availability of Douglas fir browse, and the range below Deckers
Flat is similar to the others in quality. The differences between these
ranges are hardly large enough to expect a corresponding difference in
fawn survival, but the last deer counts on three of these ranges showed
a correlation of range quality and fawn survival, the ratios being 42
percent for Reese Creek, 41 percent for the Game Ranch, and 38 percent
for the Gardiner River-Lava Creek area. The range below Deckers Flat had
a fawndoe ratio of 60 percent but this was higher than usual
because of a low count of does so that 47 percent is probably a much
better figure. The differences in the fawn ratios are too small to be of
any significance. What is significant is the similarity of fawn survival
on these rather similar ranges.
The range along the Yellowstone River above Deckers
Flat was a strikingly inferior and less favorable winter range than the
previously mentioned four ranges, because of severe overbrowsing,
scattered distribution of food plants, and especially crusted snow. On
the section between Deckers Flat and Blacktail Deer Creek a rather small
count made on March 21 showed a 2-percent faw-doe ratio and as some
mortality resulted after this date, survival on this range was
undoubtedly very low.
On the section of this range between Blacktail Deer
Creek and Little Cottonwood Creek 72 does and 11 fawns were counted on
February 16, 88 does and 13 fawns on March 5, and 63 does and 2 fawns on
April 26. The survival of fawns on this range was almost nil. Apparently
a good fawn crop arrived on this range but heavy losses commenced in
January. Between Hellroaring and Tower Falls, a range covered with
crusted snow, the survival of fawns was also low. On April 2, I counted
9 does and 1 fawn, the latter appearing to be very weak. The correlation
of the fawn survival and condition of the winter ranges was very
pronounced in the winter of 193738.
Losses during winter of 193839.In
the fall of 1938 deer were observed between November 11 and November 23
but during this period only a few of the deer had returned to the winter
range so the counts were not entirely representative. The following
counts suggest that a fairly large proportion of fawns arrived on the
winter range. The faw-doe ratio of the total number recorded is 83.
Date | Location | Doe | Fawn | Buck | Total |
Nov. 12 Nov. 13 Nov. 15 Nov. 22
|
Game Ranch Undine Falls Gardiner River Terrace Hot Springs
Total
|
3 2 11 21 37
|
3 4 8 16 31
|
2 2 3 8 15
|
8 8 22 45 83
|
In the spring of 1939 the following deer counts were
made but the samples were too small to give the full picture:
Date | Location | Doe | Fawn |
Buck | Total |
Feb. 26 Feb. 27 Do. Feb. 28 Mar. 3
Do. Mar. 5 Do. |
Gardiner River-Lava Creek
Mount Everts Lower Gardiner River
Reese Creek Checking Station Tower Falls Deckers Flat
Hellroaring to Deckers Flat
Total |
75 6 7 45 3 9 36 38 219 |
14 5 2 17 2 7 9 3 59 |
6 3 0 ... ... ... 1 17 27 |
95 14 9 62 5 16 46 58 305 |
The fawn-doe ratio of all counts combined is 26, a
lower ratio than existed during the winter of 193738. The figures
are too incomplete to make detailed comparisons with those of the
previous winter. Fawn survival apparently was extremely low in the
winter of 193839 along the Yellowstone River from Hellroaring to
Deckers Flat, just as it was in the winter of 193738. The fawn-doe
ratios on the other ranges, except at Tower Falls, were lower in the
winter of 193839 than in the previous year although more complete
counts might have shown less difference. In 193839 there was more
snow over parts of the deer ranges in the Reese Creek, Game Ranch, and
Gardiner River sections. This additional snow, along with continued
deterioration of the range, may have been a factor in the apparent lower
fawn survival that winter over the above-named deer ranges, but more
complete counts and closer observation would be necessary for
certainty.
Along the Gardiner River on February 26, 1939, I
noted two carcasses of deer, one cleaned and the other partly eaten by
four coyotes. One carcass was that of an old buck, the other of an old
doe with teeth worn to the gums. Ranger Grimm found remains of three
adult bucks in the Reese Creek area which apparently had died from
wounds received during the hunting season. No bucks were seen on Reese
Creek near the edge of the park adjacent to the area where considerable
hunting took place the previous fall. The apparent scarcity of bucks in
this region may be due to this drain.
On March 5, 1939, hair remains of two deer were found
near Blacktail Deer Creek and Crevice Creek and the mandible of a fawn
below Crevice Creek. The general impression received in walking from
Hellroaring Creek to Gardiner along the Yellowstone River was that deer
were as numerous as during the winter of 193738. They occupied a
somewhat wider range, being found near Hellroaring cabin where they were
not found in the winter of 193738. The fawn increase in 1939 is
apparently sufficiently large to maintain or possibly increase the deer
population in the park.
Fawns killed by coyotes on the winter
range.Although healthy adult deer do not seem to be subject to
coyote predation, it appears that fawns are occasionally killed by
coyotes on the winter range. Tracks in the snow near fawn remains
indicated in several instances that the fawns had been killed by
coyotes. Since our knowledge of the circumstances under which prey is
killed by predators is scant, it seems desirable to give the evidence
found at carcasses which showed indications that coyotes had made the
kill.

Figure 26 Cedar with low branches heavily
browsed. The deer, a cripple, was left behind while 5 others ran at
observer's approach. Gardiner River, January 16, 1938.
1938
January 26 . . . |
At Crevice Lake some ravens were seen circling over a
spot high up on a steep slope. As I neared the spot two coyotes ran off,
one of them carrying a piece of hide. The stomach, a lower mandible,
hair, and a few pieces of hide were all that remained of a fawn carcass.
On some ledges just above tbe beginning of a 300-yard trail made by the
sliding carcass were four deer beds. Tracks showed that the fawn had
made two jumps from its bed down the precipitous slope, and had fallen
on the third jump and started its slide from which it never rose. Above
the deer beds were a few coyote tracks. It seemed probable that coyotes
had startled the deer and that the fawn had been attacked by coyotes
after it had slid down the steep slope. This fawn may have fallen
because it was weak, and possibly it was unable to rise after sliding
down even before the coyotes finished it.
A short distance below Crevice Lake along the trail I
found the remains of a fawn that had been killed recently. Two leg
bones, a shoulder blade, an innominate bone, a few pieces of skin, and
the stomach contents were all that were left; the flesh had been
completely eaten. Just above the remains were fresh tracks of four deer
which had been jumping down the hillside. It seemed probable that the
dead fawn bad been one of the jumping deer.
|
January 28 . . . |
Along the Yellowstone River about a half mile below
the mouth of Lamar Creek, a little after noon, my attention was
attracted by some ravens flying in small circles over scattered Douglas
firs. As some of the ravens were alighting, it was apparent that they
were at a carcass. Coming over the last ridge, I saw five coyotes run
away from the carcass in different directions. They had been feeding on
a male fawn deer, having eaten most of the hind quarters, the meat off
the mandibles, and the ribs on one side. The fawn had been killed but a
few hours previously for it was not frozen and still steamed a little.
The tracks on the slope above the carcass showed that before the fawn
had fallen it had been jumping in a zigzag course. For a distance of 100
yards on the back trail of the deer, a little blood appeared in places.
Apparently the coyotes had been chasing the deer but there were so many
tracks in the snow that I could not determine how the coyotes had
maneuvered. The fawn had been running down hill before falling. About
400 yards from the dead fawn there were four adult deer feeding
unconcernedly on the open slope.
|
January 29 . . . |
At the mouth of Cottonwood Creek I saw where three or
four deer had been jumping down a steep slope. Parallel to the deer
tracks were coyote tracks, so it seemed that coyotes had been chasing
the deer. One of the latter, a fawn, had fallen and had been dragged
down the slope several yards and eaten. Little remained but some hair
and the entrails.
About one-fourth of a mile below the mouth of
Cottonwood Creek were hair and stomach remains of another fawn. Coming
off the hillside immediately above the fawn were tracks of four jumping
deer. Possibly the deer had been chased and the fawn had fallen.
|
February 13 . . . |
Below Undine Falls along the Creek I found hair and
stomach remains of a fawn that had died the day before. The snow had
been tracked up by the coyotes and short trails led off to spots where
the animals had brought pieces of the carcass to eat. The tracks
indicated that the deer had been chased by four or five coyotes. On an
open flat 30 yards above the remains were some bunches of deer hair and
the area was tracked up as though the deer had been brought to bay. The
drifting snow had covered the tracks too much to be sure of what had
taken place. From this spot the deer had jumped toward the creek and
descended an almost perpendicular bank, more than 20 feet high, which
was one side of a short narrow draw. The deer had fallen at the base of
the bank, and here it had been devoured.
|
February 15 . . . |
Along the Yellowstone River below the mouth of
Crevice Creek in a shallow ravine I found the carcass of a female fawn
that had probably been dead only a few hours. The carcass was still limp
although the temperature was about 20° below zero. Most of one side,
including front and hind quarters, part of the intestines, and the heart
and liver had been eaten. The coyotes apparently had eaten their fill,
for on the fresh snow could be seen where they had been rolling and
cleaning their muzzles and throats. There was not a trace of fat on the
carcass, not even around the intestines. The animal had not been ham
strung. There was a deep bite near the base of the neck, which had
chipped part of a dorsal process of a vertebra. The tracks indicated
that three coyotes had chased the fawn down a steep slope of jumbled
boulders covered with a light fall of loose snow. One track followed
that of the fawn, the other two were 6 or 7 yards to one side. I was
able to back track the chase only about 60 yards to an area where elk
and deer tracks were too numerous to permit further tracking. The fawn
had been making 10- and 11-foot jumps. On a large boulder with a drop of
10 feet below it, the fawn had fallen as it struck, judging from the
marks in the snow and the hair hanging on the gooseberry branches
spreading over the rock. Below the rock the fawn had made five more
jumps before falling. From here the carcass had been dragged over the
rocks a dozen yards to the place where I found it. Lack of any fat on
the animal suggests a weak fawn. On March 4 the carcass was still
untouched by coyotes, probably because I had handled it considerably,
but it was eaten later.
|
February 18 . . . |
On a slope of Mount Everts a little below Undine
Falls late in the afternoon I saw two ravens circling over a draw and
then lighting on a tree in the area over which they had circled. Their
actions indicated that a carcass lay in the draw so I followed a ridge
leading to it. In the ravine to one side of me I caught a glimpse of two
coyotes also traveling toward the spot pointed out by the ravens. Later
these two coyotes got my scent and ran up a ridge above the carcass
where they joined two others, one of which seemed to be leaving. One of
the coyotes picked up the leg of a deer lying on the ridge but dropped
it when another approached with arched back, lowered head, and wide open
snarling mouth. A third coyote then picked up the leg and started up the
ridge unmolested. Either the second coyote was interceding for the third
one, or else the lordship of the third one was recognized by the others.
In the ravine I found a fawn partially eaten. The carcass had slid from
near the top of Mount Everts, several hundred yards down a precipitous
draw filled with hard packed drifted snow. In one place where the
carcass had struck some cedars bordering the draw, branches 1 inch in
diameter had been broken by the impact. There were too many tracks to
decipher what had taken place but it is probable that the fawn had been
chased toward the draw, lost its footing, and then taken the long slide.
It undoubtedly was unable to rise when it stopped sliding because of the
injuries it must have received en route. There were coyote tracks above
the steep gully and all the way down to the carcass. Two nosefly larvae
were found in the nasal passages. Since the gular pouch and adjacent
parts had been exposed, possibly most of the larvae had been eaten by
magpies. The fawn was in poor condition for there was not a trace of
fat, not even on the mesenteries. The stomach contents consisted of
about 99 percent Douglas fir needles and twigs.
|
February 20 . . . |
The following incident brings out several points so I
will tell it in full even though there is some doubt that a coyote did
the killing. About 10 p. m. a resident of Gardiner knocked at my door. I
opened it, and was confronted by a tragic face and a breast bursting
with righteous indignation. He asked if I was the man studying the
coyote. "Well," he said, "I just wanted to tell you that a deer, still
warm, is on the Mammoth Road near the upper bridge, which the coyotes
have killed. If the coyotes act that way, I don't think much of
them."
I thanked him for the information without offering
any comments on the morals or amorals of the coyote and told him how
happy I was to know about the deer for I wanted all possible information
on coyote predation, and that I would investigate. I drove toward
Mammoth and found the fresh carcass along the road and saw a coyote
cross the road near it. The carcass was half eaten and the heart, lungs,
and liver were missing, but the head was intact. I examined the carcass
in my cabin. There was no fat on the animal. In the gular pouch, frontal
sinuses, and nasal passages I found 104 botfly larvae, most of which
were about 1 inch long. The nasal passages were packed with the larvae
so that it was difficult to see how the animal managed to breathe. If
the coyotes had killed this deer, they had eliminated an animal which
unquestionably was unfit. There is a possibility that the fawn had been
hit by a car, although I saw nothing that looked like bruises on the
parts of the carcass available for examination. In any event this deer
was in such poor condition that it would have been easy prey for the
coyotes. I saved the larvae which filled a small olive jar and showed
them to my informant, who had not realized that animals in Nature could
be so afflicted.
|
Continued >>>
|
|
|