Vail Agenda
Recommendation: The National Park Service should assess its capabilities for decentralized
management. Effective decentralized organization will require: functions of support and
service to the park, liaison with non-Service parties, systems of accountability and
control, training in management principles, and broader grants of authority to
superintendents and staff in line operations.
Strategic Objective
4: Proactive Leadership
Vail Agenda
Recommendations: 1) The National Park Service should implement a comprehensive program of
broad-based, mission-driven employee training. 2) National Park Service training should
focus on development of present and future management and leadership capabilities, as well
as appropriate professional and technical skills.
Strategic Objective
6: Professionalism
|
 |
|
In spring 1994 NPS Chief of Training and
Development Gil Lusk convened a task force to deliberate several recommendations that had
arisen from two of the strategic objectives (proactive leadership and professionalism) of
the Vail Agenda.(1)
One of the subgroups of the task force(2) designed a
program for improving leadership competencies. The concept of leadership seminars,
including a delivery format and an outline of the issues and topics to be covered, was
developed. The seminars were not to be conducted using traditional training techniques,
and they were not to be used as skills training. The intent was to apply contemporary
learning approaches while providing introspective, consciousness-raising experiences. The
idea was to invite each participant to accept the seminar as a nonthreatening and
constructive learning experience. Each participant was expected to contribute to the
success of the seminar.
The initial workgroups proposed objectives for the
leadership seminars were:
- Formulate (through discussion and exposure to diverse
thinking) a mental image of the kind of organization where people would like to work.
Identify steps that could be taken to move the National Park Service in that direction.
Define individual participation in this change.
- Develop a willingness to cast off routine, typical thought
(organizational gravity) and open minds and spirits to exploration and innovative thinking
and behavior.
- Recognize and accept that improvements in the organization and
in individual assumptions, values, beliefs, and behaviors are realistic and possible.
- Examine the assumptions on which NPS systems, practices, and
processes are built. Determine the extent to which those assumptions should be questioned
and modified.
- Examine individual assumptions, mindsets, values, beliefs, and
behaviors that determine leadership styles and methods. Develop a personal commitment plan
to improve leadership techniques.
- Contribute to the creation of an atmosphere (during the
seminar and back on the job) that will enhance open discussion and draw out opinions and
responses from others.
- Examine ways to constructively provoke others and the
organization (during the seminar and back on the job) to improve ways of thinking and
performing.
- Recognize and appreciate the advantages to the organization
and to individual employees that can result from a diverse workforce.
- Explore current leadership principles and the issues facing
the National Park Service and establish a process through which personal efforts
contribute to improvement.
- Examine the growing complexity of issues and changes in
influences on the National Park Service, and consider how leaders, at all levels, must
respond more effectivelyOriginally, five major provisions for the leadership seminar
program were recommended.(3) The NPS restructuring implementation (and budget and
new administrative initiatives) delayed the start of the seminar program. After consulting
with the National Leadership Council, Deputy Director John Reynolds approved the program
in February 1995, and an invitation (training announcement) for seminar facilitators was
distributed shortly thereafter. At a 2½-week facilitators seminar at Albright
Training Center in September 1995, the program was modified from what was originally
intended and approved by the National Leadership Council.(4)

|
|