Top of Page
EA Now Available for Abbotts Lagoon Dune Restoration Project
The Seashore has released the Abbotts Lagoon Area, Dune Restoration Plan and Environment Assessment (EA) (4,607 KB PDF), which focuses on improving and restoring coastal dune habitat directly south of Abbotts Lagoon, for public review.
Part of project planning is the examination of environmental impacts through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. Because no significant impacts are expected to occur, the Seashore has prepared an environmental assessment, rather than an environmental impact statement.
In the National Park Service, the public is asked to comment on the EA or any other aspect of the proposal in an early 45-day comment period. Your comments can be submitted through the NPS Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) website, or in writing via fax or letter. The PEPC website is . Letters should be addressed to: Superintendent:
Coastal Dune Restoration Project
Point Reyes National Seashore
1 Bear Valley Road
Point Reyes Station, CA 94956
You may also fax your comments to 415-663-8132, or you may email your comments. Your comments will be most helpful to us if we receive them no later than March 20, 2009.
In addition, to facilitate public input, the Seashore held a public information meeting on Wednesday, March 11, at 6:00 p.m. in the Red Barn.
Top of Page
Options for treating different subsets of the 300-acre project area now slated for Ammophila removal were initially developed after public scoping and refined using value analysis. Alternatives presented in the project EA evaluate different approaches to achieving restoration within the 300-acre project area. Alternative C would achieve restoration objectives using mechanical excavation treatments with potential re-treatment of resprouts with minimal use of herbicides through spot spraying of herbicides, and Alternative B that would treat all 300 acres using use a combination of treatment methods including fire and herbicides in addition to mechanical excavation. Alternative A is the No Action Alternative and would continue the present program of small-scale eradication projects.
The preferred alternative is Alternative C, which emphasizes Mechanical Control Methods. The preferred alternative was selected after initial assessment and comparison of the potential impacts associated with four alternatives. Both Alternatives B and C would equally improve the condition of resources in the long term, but Alternative C would have fewer adverse impacts and therefore result in less loss of resource during implementation. Cost was considered as well, but was secondary to the alternative’s ability to meet the primary objective of resource protection.
Previous work on experimental plots in the Seashore and elsewhere have indicated that the most effective treatment to restore dunes where these invasive species exist is to remove all biomass and bury it deep under a cap of clean sand. This requires the use of heavy motorized equipment. Small scale hand removal to protect resources (where Ammophila is interspersed with wetland or rare vegetation for example) and the minimal use of herbicides to minimize resprouts would also occur. (Herbicide is being included as a potential retreatment option, because other projects have demonstrated that Ammophila removal is not as effective without some use of herbicide.) Small experimental burns are also possible.
Top of Page
Any restoration work would be accomplished within the constraints imposed by laws, policies and sound management practices including environmental protection measures. For example, no heavy equipment would be used within 500 feet of where snowy plovers are nesting, and surveys and flagging would prevent impacts from excavators to sensitive plant and animal species. In addition, a minimal amount of herbicides would be used only in selected areas with protective buffers established adjacent to wetlands, rare plants, nesting areas, and adjacent land uses and would involve only a very controlled application of herbicide directly to resprouts.
Consultation on potential impacts on to listed special status species will be conducted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. In addition, because the project area is located within the coastal zone, and will result in modification to wetland resources, the project will also require review of by, and permits from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, US Army Corps of Engineers, and federal consistency review by the California Coastal Commission.
Please note that names and addresses of people who comment become part of the public record. If you wish to withhold your name and or address from the public record for this project, you must state your request prominently at the beginning of your comments. Anonymous comments may not be considered. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals who identify themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public inspection in their entirety. Individuals not representing business or organizations may request that the NPS withhold their name and/or address from the record.
Abbotts Lagoon Area Dune Restoration Plan Environmental Assessment – January 2009 (4,607 KB PDF)
Letter to Interested Parties - February 9, 2009 (43 KB PDF)
Restore Critical Dune Habitat Flyer - October 14, 2005 (220 KB PDF)
Adobe® Acrobat Reader® is needed to view PDF documents.
Top of Page