NPS logo

Science in the Parks
home
current projects
final reports
items in the news
related sites
proposal and report guidelines

 

VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING
OF
HOPEWELL FURNACE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE

Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2005/012

Greg Podniesinski
Stephanie Perles
Lesley Sneddon1
Bill Millinor2


Pennsylvania Science Office
The Nature Conservancy
208 Airport Drive
Middletown, PA 17057


1NatureServe
11 Avenue de Lafayette, 5th Floor
Boston MA 02111

2 North Carolina State University Center for Earth Observation
5112 Jordan Hall
Box 7106 Raleigh, NC 27695


March 2005 (revised October 2005)


U.S. Department of the Interior
National Park Service
Northeast Region
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

________________________________

Executive Summary

The vegetation of Hopewell Furnace National Historic Site was mapped during 2002 and 2003 as part of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) / National Park Service (NPS) Vegetation Mapping Program. The goal of the mapping effort was to produce an up-to-date digital geospatial vegetation database for the park. New aerial photography was obtained for the park in spring 2002 by Kucera International and converted to a digital orthophoto mosaic image by the North Carolina State University Center for Earth Observation in early summer 2002. The Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy (PSO/TNC) interpreted the photography and developed a digital formation-level vegetation map. PSO/TNC sampled 35 vegetation classification plots during the summer of 2003. Data analysis identified 12 natural or semi-natural vegetation types. Vegetation analysis information was used to reclassify formation-level polygons to develop an alliance-level vegetation map. Accuracy assessment of the alliance-level map constituted a complete census of natural and semi-natural vegetation polygons. Overall accuracy, as measured by the Kappa Index, was 88.77% ± 8.16% (90% C.I.). The majority of mapping errors were associated with Tulip Poplar Forest and Modified Successional Forest. NatureServe provided crosswalk information between park vegetation types and National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS) alliance types as well as alliance descriptions. The resulting vegetation mapping product represents current vegetation types within the park and is consistent with the standards of the USGS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program.

Natural vegetation types that are relatively undisturbed were easily crosswalked to the corresponding NVCS alliance. Disturbed vegetation types, especially the modified successional forest, had no NVCS equivalent and were noted as park-specific types. The Eastern Red Cedar Woodland was crosswalked to the Eastern Red Cedar Forest Alliance as no NVCS woodland alliance currently exists for a red cedar woodland. Anthropogenic vegetation types were not crosswalked to the NVCS, with the exception of managed grasslands, which were crosswalked to the Orchard Grass–Sheep-sorrel Herbaceous Alliance.

The most common vegetation types were the Dry Oak–Heath and Dry Oak–Mixed Hardwood Forests which, combined, covered approximately 203 ha of the park (approximately 56% of park). Of the upland forests, these two forest types tended to be the most intact with respect to low invasive and exotic species abundance. The least common natural vegetation types included the Birch Rocky Slope Woodland (limited to a single [0.75 ha] patch on a bouldery slope in the southwest corner of the park). Other uncommon vegetation types included shrub wetlands (Buttonbush Wetland and Highbush Blueberry–Meadowsweet Wetland). The single occurrence of the Buttonbush Wetland is within the active pasture and is very degraded. None of the vegetation types described at Hopewell Furnace NHS are rare in Pennsylvania.

Natural vegetation quality within the park ranged from fair (dry oak forests) to poor (Buttonbush Wetland, some Red Maple Palustrine Forest), reflecting the relative ease with which invasive species can colonize wet and mesic soils. In addition, all portions of the park, especially forests of all types, appear to have heavy deer browse damage visible on tree regeneration and shrubs.

___________________________

The entire report is available to view or download in PDF file format. Using PDF files requires the free Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not already have it installed on your computer, you may download it now. Download Reader.

To download a pdf file, click on this icon in the toolbar of the pdf window: . This will allow you to save the file on your computer. If you want to copy or print only a small part of the saved file, click on this icon to select the desired text: .

The file for this report is large, therefore it has been divided into several pdf files. Click on a file to open it.

Report and Appendices A-E

Appendix F: Photos of vegetation classification sampling plots with index to photos
photos 1-6
photos 7-16
photos17-26
photos 27-36