NPS logo

Science in the Parks
home
current projects
final reports
items in the news
related sites
proposal and report guidelines


AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE
BIOASSESSMENT PROGRAMS
THROUGHOUT THE EASTERN RIVERS
AND MOUNTAINS NETWORK REGION:
Commonalities among Regulatory Authorities

Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR—2008/001

Caleb J. Tzilkowski

Centre Aquatic Consultants
5412 Winchester Road
Petersburg, PA 16669

January 2008

U.S. Department of the Interior
National Park Service
Northeast Region
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

___________________________________

Abstract

The Eastern Rivers and Mountains Network (ERMN) selected benthic macroinvertebrates (BMI) as one of the 10 vital signs in the ERMN Inventory and Monitoring Program. To maximize benefits of the Program, data collected by the ERMN monitoring programs must be comparable to data collected by environmental protection agencies in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. This report summarizes and compares the BMI bioassessment and biomonitoring protocols used or advocated by state and federal agencies in the ERMN region. The report also includes access information for agency representatives, in addition to recommendations for the ERMN to develop a broadly applicable BMI sampling protocol that meets data quality criteria of agencies with jurisdiction in the ERMN region.

The Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA) provides states, tribes, and territories the legal authority to use biological assessments and criteria in their water quality programs. States must have water quality standards that consist of designated uses (e.g., Aquatic Life Uses [ALUs]), criteria to protect those uses, and an antidegradation policy. Measures of BMI assemblages and other ALUs help protect intact stream communities from degradation and are used to establish restoration goals for impaired ecosystems. Because the EPA is the primary entity charged with achieving goals of the CWA, that agency has been a primary source for development of bioassessment methods. Most notably, the EPA produced and updated several volumes of Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBPs) for habitat, periphyton, BMI, and fish that all states within the ERMN region have used (to varying extents) to develop their BMI bioassessment and biomonitoring protocols.

All states in the ERMN region use some component of the RBPs for part(s) of their BMI monitoring programs, but the programs are much more dissimilar than alike. One major difference among state BMI biomonitoring programs throughout the ERMN region is the structure of the sampling design. Although all states in the region use some kind of tiered approach to determine sampling coverage and frequency, the designs differ considerably. For example, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has one program for BMI monitoring, and Pennsylvania and West Virginia agencies have three main categories; whereas, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) has five subprograms (including tissue analysis) in its BMI monitoring program. In addition to differing at the broadest scale (i.e., program goals and sampling stratification), state BMI monitoring programs differ at all lower levels (e.g., sampling intensity, sampling gear, taxonomic resolution). The state program details are described extensively and compared in this report.

The design of a BMI monitoring program for the ERMN should be based on the national and network goals of the I&M program. The primary motivation for state BMI and water quality monitoring programs is to comply with standards set forth by their respective governments and, ultimately, by the CWA. This report includes general recommendations for the design of an ERMN BMI monitoring protocol that would meet data quality standards of state-level regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over water resources in the ERMN region. Although the BMI data collected in the ERMN could (and should) aid state agencies in complying with regulatory water quality standards, the ERMN may want more sensitivity from its BMI program, which would require more effort at most program levels (e.g., sampling frequency, taxonomic resolution).

________________________

To download a pdf file, click on this icon in the toolbar of the pdf window: . This will allow you to save the file on your computer. If you want to copy or print only a small part of the saved file, click on this icon to select the desired text: .

go to report