ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT FOR THE INTEGRATED
JOHN
DAY FOSSIL BEDS
NATIONAL
MONUMENT
January
2005
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................ iv
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. iv
Environmental Assessment...... iv
PLANNING
OBJECTIVES.......................
v
I.
BACKGROUND......................................
1
II.
PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PLAN
2
Planning
Concerns.........................
3
A. Disease Concerns................................ 3
B. Wildlife and Plant Safety Concerns.... 3
C. Pesticide Concerns............................. 4
Planning
Issues..................................
4
Effects on Vegetative Resources............. 4
Effects on Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plant
Resources.
5
Effects on Wildlife Resources.................. 5
Effects on Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive
Wildlife Resources. 5
Effects on Water Resources..................... 5
Effects on Visitors...................................
6
Effects on Human Health and Safety...... 6
Effects on Maintaining Structures, Historic Districts,
and Museum Collections
6
Issues Dropped From Further Analysis.. 6
Pertinent
Laws, Policies, and Procedures
7
Authority
For Action.....................
7
A.
Federal Laws and Regulations.......... 8
B. NPS
Policies and Guidelines..............
9
C. State
Regulations on Pesticide Use.
10
III.
Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action
10
Alternative
A – No Action Alternative – Do Not Develop a Complete Integrated Pest Management
Plan...........................
10
Alternative
B – The Preferred Alternative
11
Develop An Integrated Pest Management Plan With The
Complete Range Of Treatment Options 11
A.
Guidelines for the IPM Plan........... 11
B. IPM Process......................................
13
C. General Review of the Proposed IPM Actions
15
E. Documentation................................. 18
Actions
Common To Both Alternatives
19
Summary
of Actions For Each Alternative 20
IV. The Affected Environment.. 20
Nonnative
Plants...........................
20
Vegetative
Resources...................
22
Threatened,
Endangered, and Sensitive Plant Resources
22
Wildlife
Resources.........................
22
Threatened,
Endangered and Sensitive Wildlife Resources 23
Water
Resources.............................
23
Visitors.................................................
23
Human
Health and Safety.......... 23
Structures,
Historic Districts, and Museum Collection
24
V. Environmental Consequences......... 25
INTRODUCTION....................................
25
Cumulative Impacts Common to Both Alternatives
25
ALTERNATIVE
A – No Action Alternative
25
Issue –1. Vegetative Resources............. 25
Issue – 2. Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plant
Resources.
26
Issue – 3. Wildlife Resources................. 26
Issue – 4. Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive
(TE&S) Wildlife Resources
26
Issue – 5. Water Resources.................... 26
Issues – 6. Visitors................................. 26
Issues –7. Health and Safety................. 26
Issue-8.
Maintaining Structures, Historic Districts, and Museum Collections 26
Cumulative Effects................................ 27
Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of
Resources
27
Precedent Setting..................................
27
Conclusion.............................................
27
ALTERNATIVE
B - Develop an Integrated Pest Management Plan with the Complete Range of
Treatment Options..... 27
Issue -
1. Vegetative Resources............
27
Issue – 2. Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive plant
resources.
28
Issue -
3. Wildlife Resources.................
28
Issue – 4. Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive
Wildlife Resources
28
Issue – 5. Water Resources.................... 29
Issue – 6. Visitors..................................
29
Issue –7. Health and Safety................... 29
Issue-8.
Maintaining Structures, Historic Districts, and Museum Collections 30