Historic
Glass Number 2
Repair and Rehabilitation of Historic Sidewalk Vault Lights
Cas Stachelberg
Higgins & Quasebarth
Historic Preservation Consultants
Chad Randl
Technical Preservation Services
National Park Service
552-554 Broadway
New York, New York
Introduction
Beginning in the 1850s, sidewalk vault lights became a common feature
amidst the burgeoning manufacturing districts of America’s urban streetscapes.
These cast-iron panels, fitted with clear glass lenses, were set into the sidewalk
in front of building storefronts. They permitted daylight to reach otherwise
dark basements (or “vaults”) that extended out beneath the sidewalks,
creating more useable or rentable space for building owners.
Vault lights typically extended
four to five feet out from the building line toward the curb. Each
panel was screwed to a cast-iron saddle and
the iron
framework that spanned the basement vault. They were cast with molded iron
knobs set around each lens to protect the glass and improve the footing of
passers-by. Originally simple glass lenses were set in the panels, usually
with a cement grout. Advances in daylighting technology including the development
of prismatic glass pendants that refracted the sun’s rays further into
basement areas, and the use of reinforced concrete panels made vault lights
popular through the 1930s.
Located in New York City
within the SoHo Cast-Iron Historic District, 552-554 Broadway is a
six-story loft building detailed with Italianate
ornamentation
on the upper floors (see figure 1). Designed by the architect John B. Snook
and originally constructed in 1855 as two separate buildings, 552 and 554
Broadway were joined internally and unified in 1897 with a new two-story,
cast-iron
storefront and sidewalk vault installation. It is likely that the building’s
basement was used historically for a combination of light manufacturing
and storage.
The original vault lights
stretched approximately fifty-four feet across the full width of the
ground-floor storefront. They were made up of twenty-one
individual panels extending five feet from the building line and varying
in
width from 1’10” to 2’8” (see figure 2). The cast-iron
panels were fitted with 1-1/2” diameter glass lenses. Raised lettering
on the panel frame, “Jacob Mark, 7 Worth Street, New York,” indicated
the foundry’s name and address in Manhattan. Over one hundred years
of pedestrian traffic, deliveries and environmental exposure took a toll
on the
vault lights at 552-554 Broadway. With use of the basement for merchandise
storage, the current ground-floor retail tenant initiated a vault-light
restoration program in 2002 to return the historic sidewalk feature to
its original function
and appearance.
Problem
At the outset of the project, the vault lights at 552-554 Broadway were
in poor condition (see figure 3). As with many old vault light installations,
broken glass lenses and deteriorated seals allowed considerable water
infiltration through the individual panels and the surrounding framework
(also referred to as “saddles”). A majority of the glass
lenses were either cracked, missing or replaced with a variety of materials
including wood, concrete and asphalt (see figure 4). Of the twenty-one
cast-iron panels, six sections had areas which were cracked or missing
altogether. Two original vault light panels had been replaced with
steel diamond-plate hatchway doors to the basement and a variety of
materials had been applied over the remaining panels in repeated attempts
to prevent further leaks. Worn and lacking a protective coating, the
cast iron panels were exposed to the elements. Displaced panels and
uneven asphalt and concrete patches presented trip hazards at sidewalk
level.
Repairing and restoring the historic vault lights presented a number
of obstacles. These included finding an experienced contractor, locating
suppliers and fabricators for the glass lenses and missing cast-iron
panels, and keeping the overall cost of the restoration program reasonable.
Consideration of building codes, and load requirements in particular,
is part of any vault light restoration project. At 552-554 Broadway,
loading issues were addressed in 1995 when the current retail tenant
took over the space and installed a supplemental steel framing system
beneath the deteriorated vault lights. This system involved the installation
of a series of beams set beneath the edges of the individual cast-iron
panels and supported by a large girder running parallel to the storefront.
To meet stringent New York City loading requirements, other vault light
restoration projects have included pulling up the vault lights for restoration,
pouring a recessed concrete slab and setting the restored vault lights
on top of the slab at the sidewalk level. Unfortunately, this treatment
removes the basement daylighting character of the vault lights, but it
does minimize water infiltration and maintains the historical character
of the sidewalk.
Improving performance, safety and appearance were the main goals of the
current restoration program. Water leakage into the basement and trip
hazards at the sidewalk had produced a dangerous and unacceptable situation.
Meanwhile, the deteriorated condition of the vault lights presented an
unattractive entrance to the storefront and building.
Solution
An investigation of the vault lights and their support structure indicated
that the assembly was repairable. Despite the appearance of the vault
lights, physical deterioration was limited and the steel structure
was in excellent condition. The project architect and preservation
consultants contacted a specialist experienced in rehabilitating cast-iron
who developed a plan to return the lights to their historic appearance
and function. This eliminated the need for a concrete slab which would
have cut off the light to the lower level.
To facilitate treatment and
allow the sidewalks to remain unobstructed, the panels were removed
and temporary steel plates were installed
over the vaults.
In the cast-iron contractor’s workshop, the surviving deteriorated
glass lenses were removed, the cast iron stripped, cleaned and repainted,
and new
lenses set into the openings. Replacement lenses were cast by a specialty
glass manufacturer, Blenko. The company had created glass molds for a vault
light
restoration several years prior and were now a regular supplier of various
sized lenses for similar projects. A cast-iron foundry was contracted to
fabricate two new panels to match the missing historic panels. Both new and
repaired
panels were delivered to the building site where the cast-iron specialist
reinstalled them.
Repair Work
The first step in repairing the vault lights at 552-554 Broadway was to dismantle
and remove the panels from the sidewalk. Over two days, a crew of five experienced
workers drilled the heads off of the panel bolts and gently pushed them through
the holes in the cast-iron framing. After the bolts were removed, one corner
was loosened by inserting a chisel between the saddle and the panel. Other
chisels were worked around the other sides of the panel. Then, two workers
raised the panels, each weighing approximately three-hundred and fifty pounds.
Each panel had to be lifted straight up out of its frame because any uneven
pressure could have cracked the cast-iron. A tag with an identification number
keyed to a drawing was secured to each panel, to ensure reinstallation into
the same opening after repair. The twenty-one panels were packed upright
into the back of a truck and delivered to the repair shop.
The sidewalk at 552-554 Broadway
had to remain accessible to pedestrians while the vault lights were
restored offsite, so a 3/4” thick plywood sheet
topped with 3/16” steel diamond plate was placed over the openings.
The temporary covers were tack welded into the corners of each hole and
the seams
were sealed with a flexible polyurethane-based caulk.
When the vault lights arrived at the repair shop they were placed upside down
and the surviving glass lenses were knocked out by hand. A variety of materials,
used in the past to fill holes where lenses were broken or missing, were also
removed. Next, each panel was sandblasted. This cleared off the paint, chewing
gum, tar, asphalt, concrete, corrosion, grout and other grime that accumulates
on a New York City sidewalk over the course of a century, without pitting or
otherwise damaging the cast-iron. Then, workers hand cleaned each of the panels
with small chisels and drills fitted with wire brush attachments to remove
any material missed during sandblasting (see figure 5).
At the outset of the restoration program, six of the twenty-one vault light
panels were found to be cracked. Rather than replace them with newly cast panels,
the contractor chose to repair the damaged units using two different techniques:
welding cracked sections and splicing in replacement pieces. Due to inconsistent
heating and the presence of impurities in the blast furnace mixture, historic
cast-iron is a notoriously brittle material. This brittleness makes historic
cast-iron susceptible to cracking and a challenge to properly weld.
The contractor had developed a system for repairing cracked or damaged vault
covers. Primary considerations were to ensure that the pieces to be welded
were correctly positioned and level and that the cast-iron was properly preheated.
Then, using a wire-feed MIG (metal inert gas) welder, the two pieces were joined
together (see figure 6). The welded seam was ground down to the level of the
adjacent panel surface so that the repair would not be visible after painting.
The result was a strong, durable and complete cast-iron panel. When replacement
pieces were required, the contractor drew from a small stockpile of salvaged
panels identical to those at 552-554 Broadway.
When repairs to the cast-iron
were completed, two coats of primer were applied, followed by three
coats of gloss black paint to match the existing
paint
color (see figure 7). The contractor used a Benjamin Moore system including
an “ironclad” oil-based
metal primer and alkyd gloss enamel (Impervo) top coat that offered high
abrasion resistance. A rust conversion coating system would also be suitable.
Painting
was followed by the resetting of new glass lenses.
After ensuring that the panels were dry and free of oils, dirt, dust and other
contaminants, a bead of silicone was applied at the bottom of each of the round
openings in the cast-iron panel (see figure 8). This preliminary seal would
keep the glass centered during the grout application. Replacement lenses were
obtained from a specialty glass manufacturer that has supplied new lenses for
a number of vault light rehabilitation projects. The glass lenses were set
into place and a two-part epoxy grout was used to seal them in the panel and
waterproof the joint (see figure 9). The gray, chemically-resistant material
was the same used for grouting floor brick, quarry tile pavers and ceramic
mosaics. Workers mixed the compound, placed it in a caulk gun and squeezed
it into the areas adjacent to the lenses. Before it hardened, excess grout
was removed using a dampened sponge. After twenty-four hours, the grout cured
sufficiently to complete the reglazing process (see figure 10). The panels
were turned over and workers used a razor blade to cut away excess silicone
that had dripped out of the space between the lens and the cast-iron along
the underside of the panel. Then, the panels were shipped back to New York
City.
Replacement Panels
Because vault lights are no longer manufactured, new custom panels
had to be fabricated to replace the two missing when the project
began. The
contractor
chose a surviving panel that was in good condition and sent it to a foundry
in Alabama for use as a pattern. The foundry, which had worked on a number
of vault light projects in the past, cast two new panels using techniques
that had changed little in the past century. The original sample was
packed in a bed of casting sand to make a three-dimensional mold. To
account for
shrinkage in the casting process (1/8” per foot), the mold was
made slightly larger than the pattern ensuring that all panels, original
and
new, would be the same size. Vents and gates were created in the mold
to allow
the flow of molten iron and gas.
Although the method of casting new panels was nearly identical to the
historical process, the composition of the cast-iron was altered to improve
the material’s
tensile strength. To produce what is referred to as ductile iron, the iron
was combined with a slightly higher percentage of carbon (+/- 3.75% in
the new cast-iron versus +/- 3.5% in the historical). Very small amounts
of magnesium
and graphite were also added to produce a material two to four times stronger
than that of historical cast-iron. Following fabrication, the new panels
were shipped to the contractor who set the new glass lenses and transported
them
to
New York City for
installation alongside the repaired panels.
Reinstallation
Reinstalling the panels
at 552-554 Broadway was straightforward because the substructure that
supported
the vault lights and saddles
had been reinforced with steel members approximately seven years
earlier (see figure 11). Where leaking panels had led to the deterioration
of the original stringers and support structure, the previous contractor
shored up the substructure by replacing the deteriorated stringers
with cast-iron T-beams spaced beneath each joint between adjacent
panels
(see figure 12). Additionally, newly cast frame sections were bolted
together and installed beneath the sidewalk surface. As part of
the current restoration, the contractor examined the substructure at
552-554 Broadway and determined that the previously rebuilt assembly
did not
require additional strengthening or modification.
To reinstall the panels, a bead of flexible polyurethane caulk
was applied around the perimeter of the support frame. The panels
were
positioned
on top of the sealant, in the same order they were set before removal,
ensuring that the bolt holes would align (see figure 13). Four stainless
steel flat-headed machine screws secured each panel to its framework.
A flexible foam backer rod was inserted into the seam around each
panel filling much of the gap. The same grout that was used to
seal the glass
lenses was also applied to the top of the backer rod to form the
final surface seal. Again, excess grout was carefully cleared from
the joint.
The last step was to touch up paint on any area that was scratched
during transportation or reinstallation.
Evaluation
Historically, when vaults lights deteriorated, a building owner would often
cover them over with asphalt or steel diamond plate or replace them with
a standard concrete sidewalk. By obscuring or removing vault lights from
the sidewalk, an owner eliminated a significant architectural feature from
the streetscape.
The project at 552-554 Broadway
suggested another, more appropriate alternative: the sensitive repair
and replication of the historic vault
lights (see figure
14). The result was the return of a historically significant feature that
exhibited a high degree of craftsmanship and complimented the building
and streetscape.
Furthermore, the repaired vault lights once again serve their original
function of illuminating basement space beneath the city’s sidewalk.
Similar projects that included restoring vault lights have been able to recapture
the basement beneath for restaurant, office and storage space, providing additional
leasible floor area for the owner. They are showing that proper installation
techniques and periodic maintenance can ensure the long-term performance of
vault lights.
Vault lights can be repaired using relatively simple, traditional technology.
The tools and materials are commonplace: sanders, brushes, glass, paint and
grout. The cast-iron, though often appearing beyond repair when covered with
asphalt and rust, is usually sound and capable of restoration. Cracked historic
panels, can be welded back together or new patches seamlessly introduced. Damaged
lenses can be replaced with new lenses cast in custom molds by specialty glass
manufacturers. When historic panels are missing, new ones can be fabricated,
utilizing the same methods used to cast ornamental iron features and replacement
pieces for cast-iron facades.
Stripping the cast-iron and reinstalling the hundreds of glass lenses
are labor intensive undertakings that, depending on the size and condition
of the panels,
can be expensive. Additional costs would be incurred if the substructure
of the installation requires reinforcement, repair or replacement. When
part of a building rehabilitation, costs associated with the vault light
work may be eligible for state or federal tax incentives.
The project
described here took eight weeks from removal to reinstallation to complete.
It involved a crew of three men to restore the panels offsite and a
crew of four to reinstall them onsite.
Part of the reason that the fabrication of cast-iron-and-glass vault
lights was discontinued was their propensity to leak. This problem
was exacerbated
by infrequent, misguided or nonexistent maintenance programs. After
any vault light assembly is rehabilitated, it requires regular inspection
and periodic
maintenance. A small stock of lenses should be kept by the building
superintendent. When a lens is cracked, the glass should be removed,
the remaining grout cleared
from the hole, the surface repainted and a new lens set in the same
way as described above. Leaks that develop along the edge of the panel
should likewise
be repaired with the old material removed and new backer rod and grout
applied. Lens and waterproofing repairs can often be completed without
removing the
panel from the sidewalk, and are neither expensive nor time consuming.
Conclusion
Vault lights are an important architectural features that are frequently
overlooked and under maintained. Historically considered advantageous
for the way in which they manipulated light and improved dark, potentially
usable space, vault lights were also a visual complement to a building’s
entrance and façade. Today, whether severely deteriorated, buried
under layers of asphalt or missing altogether, this feature need not
be lost forever. As the restoration project described in this Preservation
Tech Note shows, sensitively rehabilitated vault lights can continue
to provide rchitectural and historic character to the urban streetscape
while serving their original function of naturally illuminating basement
spaces.
Vault Light History Sidebar
Cast-iron vault lights were originally patented by Thaddeus Hyatt in
1845. As envisioned by Hyatt, the system incorporated small glass lenses
set into cast-iron panels. The panels were modular, allowing for installation
over large areas. Vault lights, sometimes referred to as “Hyatt
Patent Lights,” became widespread through the second half of the
nineteenth century, paralleling the rapid development of cast-iron architecture
(see figures a and b). As detailed in numerous historical trade catalogues
of the time, vault lights were marketed to building owners and architects
as a safe, inexpensive daylighting system that allowed for the conversion
of previously “unusable” basements into “rent-earning,
productive work space.” Prismatic pendant (or “saw-tooth”)
lenses were often used in place of the basic lenses because the angled
projections on the underside of the prism bent light rays directing them
to the inner reaches of the lower levels (see figure c).
Vault lights were also widely employed in the early 1900s construction
of New York City’s first subway system (see figure d). Purposefully
employed by the designers of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company’s
(IRT) subway, vault lights were constructed in the ceilings above the
platforms to create an inviting underground space for a public unaccustomed
to subterranean travel. Along with decorative amenities and the promise
of rapid transit, the subway depended largely on pure, natural light
to attract its riders.
With the emergence of Portland Cement as a new building material at the
end of the nineteenth century, the vault lights used in the IRT subway
system were constructed with round, translucent glass lenses set into
reinforced concrete. The new concrete-and-glass version improved durability,
waterproofing and slip-resistance while producing the same illuminating
effect.
Concrete Vault Lights Sidebar
Although this publication focuses on cast-iron vault lights, it is also
possible to replace deteriorated or even missing historic reinforced
concrete vault lights. Beginning in the early 1900s, this type of installation
supplanted cast-iron panels. When three existing concrete panels in
the sidewalk in front of Smith Tower in Seattle, Washington, were damaged
by a construction truck, owners turned to a local concrete precaster
to replicate the panels. The two inch thick, 4’ x 9’ panels
dated to the first decade of the twentieth century and contained 180
Luxfer glass lights with saw-toothed prisms extending below. To cast
new panels, measurements were first taken of the surviving panels and
used to build a wood formwork (see figure a). Styrofoam cubes were
set in the form to act as block outs for the square glass lights. A
quarter inch, twisted square, steel rod was embedded in the original
panels to reinforce the concrete. To obtain even greater strength in
the new panels, a grid of steel reinforcing bars and standard 4” x
4” wire mesh was secured between the styrofoam blocks. Then concrete
was poured into the mold. After the concrete set, workers removed it
from the form and dug out the styrofoam placeholders (see figure b).
New 1-3/4” square by 1” thick glass blocks with a pinkish
tint to replicate the historic solarized lenses, were obtained from
a local glass caster and set in the square voids with an epoxy (see
figure c). Then, the panels were transported to the building site and
installed with a backer rod and caulk (see figure d).
Project Data
Building:
552-554 Broadway
New York City, New York
Project Date:
2002
Contractor:
Rocco V. DeAngelo - Antique Cast Iron, Inc.
Cherry Valley, New York
Replacement Glass Supplier:
Blenko Glass Company
Milton, West Virginia
Replacement Panel Fabricator:
Talladega Foundry and Machine Company
Talladega, Alabama
Cost
The total cost of the vault light rehabilitation project at 552-554 Broadway
was approximately $70,000 or about $318 per square foot. Forty-five percent
of this total was attributed to labor costs for sandblasting, hand cleaning,
repainting, resetting glass lenses, grouting, touching up the panels,
as well as welding the cracked or damaged panels and the two newly cast
panels. Thirty percent of the total cost was for dismantling and reinstalling
the panels, including transportation. The remaining twenty-five percent
was for materials, primarily new glass lenses. This project did not include
structural work, which would have added to the overall cost of the project.
Photo of Bleecker Street station in “Vault Light History” sidebar
is courtesy of New York Transit Museum Archives, Brooklyn, New York.
Photos in “Concrete Vault Lights” sidebar are courtesy of
Fred R. Beyers, Master Precaster Inc., Puyallup, Washington.
All other photos by the authors unless noted.
THIS PRESERVATION TECH NOTE was prepared by the National Park Service.
Charles E. Fisher, Heritage Preservation Services, National Park Service,
serves as the Technical Editor of the PRESERVATION TECH NOTES. Information
on the 552-554 Broadway vault light project was generously provided
by Rocco De’Angelo of Antique Cast Iron, Inc. Special thanks
are extended to Elise Quasebarth of Higgins and Quasebarth, David M.
Look at the Pacific Great Basin Support Office of the National Park
Service, and Jo Ellen Hensley, John Sandor, Shannon Dodge and Sharon
C. Park of the National Park Service’s Heritage Preservation
Services for their review and comments. Thanks also go to Alan Weiskopf
of Perfido Weiskopf Architects.
PRESERVATION TECH NOTES are designed to provide practical information
on traditional practices and innovative techniques for successfully maintaining
and preserving cultural resources. All techniques and practices described
herein conform to established National Park Service policies, procedures
and standards. This Tech Note was prepared pursuant to the National Historic
Preservation Act, which direct the Secretary of the Interior to develop
and make available to government agencies and individuals information
concerning professional methods and techniques for the preservation of
historic properties.
Comments on the usefulness of this information are welcomed and should
be addressed to PRESERVATION TECH NOTES, Technical Preservation Services,
National Center for Cultural Resources, National Park Service, 1849 C
Street, NW, (2255) Washington, DC 20240.
ISSN: 0741-9023 PTN 47 November 2003
Introduction

Contents
|