TPS graphic header with link to ParkNet

 

PRESERVATION TECH NOTES     HISTORIC GLASS NUMBER 2

 

Project Evaluation
Historically, when vaults lights deteriorated, a building owner would often cover them over with asphalt or steel diamond plate or replace them with a standard concrete sidewalk. By obscuring or removing vault lights from the sidewalk, an owner eliminated a significant architectural feature from the streetscape.

The project at 552-554 Broadway suggested another, more appropriate alternative: the sensitive repair and replication of the historic vault lights (see figure 14). The result was the return of a historically significant feature that exhibited a high degree of craftsmanship and complimented the building and streetscape. Furthermore, the repaired vault lights once again serve their original function of illuminating basement space beneath the city’s sidewalk.

Similar projects that included restoring vault lights have been able to recapture the basement beneath for restaurant, office and storage space, providing additional leasible floor area for the owner. They are showing that proper installation techniques and periodic maintenance can ensure the long-term performance of vault lights.

photo of vault light panels after restoration
Figure 14. The restored panels after work was completed.

Vault lights can be repaired using relatively simple, traditional technology. The tools and materials are commonplace: sanders, brushes, glass, paint and grout. The cast-iron, though often appearing beyond repair when covered with asphalt and rust, is usually sound and capable of restoration. Cracked historic panels, can be welded back together or new patches seamlessly introduced. Damaged lenses can be replaced with new lenses cast in custom molds by specialty glass manufacturers. When historic panels are missing, new ones can be fabricated, utilizing the same methods used to cast ornamental iron features and replacement pieces for cast-iron facades.

Stripping the cast-iron and reinstalling the hundreds of glass lenses are labor intensive undertakings that, depending on the size and condition of the panels, can be expensive. Additional costs would be incurred if the substructure of the installation requires reinforcement, repair or replacement.

The project described here took eight weeks from removal to reinstallation to complete. It involved a crew of three men to restore the panels offsite and a crew of four to reinstall them onsite.

Part of the reason that the fabrication of cast-iron-and-glass vault lights was discontinued was their propensity to leak. This problem was exacerbated by infrequent, misguided or nonexistent maintenance programs. After any vault light assembly is rehabilitated, it requires regular inspection and periodic maintenance. A small stock of lenses should be kept by the building superintendent. When a lens is cracked, the glass should be removed, the remaining grout cleared from the hole, the surface repainted and a new lens set in the same way as described above. Leaks that develop along the edge of the panel should likewise be repaired with the old material removed and new backer rod and grout applied. Lens and waterproofing repairs can often be completed without removing the panel from the sidewalk, and are neither expensive nor time consuming.

Conclusion
Vault lights are an important architectural features that are frequently overlooked and under maintained. Historically considered advantageous for the way in which they manipulated light and improved dark, potentially usable space, vault lights were also a visual complement to a building’s entrance and façade. Today, whether severely deteriorated, buried under layers of asphalt or missing altogether, this feature need not be lost forever. As the restoration project described in this Preservation Tech Note shows, sensitively rehabilitated vault lights can continue to provide architectural and historic character to the urban streetscape while serving their original function of naturally illuminating basement spaces.

 

PROJECT DATA

Building: 552-554 Broadway,
New York City, New York

Contractor:
Rocco De’Angelo - Antique Cast Iron, Inc.
Cherry Valley, New York

Preservation Consultant:
Higgins & Quasebarth Historic
Preservation Consultants
New York, New York




Replacement Glass Supplier:
Blenko Glass Company
Milton, West Virginia

Replacement Panel Fabricator:
Talladega Foundry and Machine Company
Talladega, Alabama

Project Date: 2002

 


Project Cost:
The total cost of the vault light rehabilitation project at 552-554 Broadway was approximately $70,000 or about $318 per square foot. Forty-five percent of this total was attributed to labor costs for sandblasting, hand cleaning, repainting, resetting glass lenses, grouting, touching up the panels, as well as welding the cracked or damaged panels and the two newly cast panels. Thirty percent of the total cost was for dismantling and reinstalling the panels, including transportation. The remaining twenty-five percent was for materials, primarily new glass lenses. This project did not include structural work, which would have added to the overall cost of the project.


Photo of Bleecker Street station in “Vault Light History” sidebar is courtesy of New York Transit Museum Archives, Brooklyn, New York. Photos in “Concrete Vault Lights” sidebar are courtesy of Fred R. Beyers, Master Precaster Inc., Puyallup, Washington.

All other photos by the authors unless noted.

THIS PRESERVATION TECH NOTE was prepared by the National Park Service. Charles E. Fisher, Heritage Preservation Services, National Park Service, serves as the Technical Editor of the PRESERVATION TECH NOTES. Information on the 552-554 Broadway vault light project was generously provided by Rocco De’Angelo of Antique Cast Iron, Inc. Special thanks are extended to Elise Quasebarth of Higgins and Quasebarth, David M. Look at the Pacific Great Basin Support Office of the National Park Service, and Jo Ellen Hensley, John Sandor, Shannon Dodge, and Sharon C. Park of the National Park Service’s Heritage Preservation Services for their review and comments. Thanks also go to Alan Weiskopf of Perfido Weiskopf Architects.

PRESERVATION TECH NOTES are designed to provide practical information on traditional practices and innovative techniques for successfully maintaining and preserving cultural resources. All techniques and practices described herein conform to established National Park Service policies, procedures and standards. This Tech Note was prepared pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act, which direct the Secretary of the Interior to develop and make available to government agencies and individuals information concerning professional methods and techniques for the preservation of historic properties.

Comments on the usefulness of this information are welcomed and should be addressed to PRESERVATION TECH NOTES, Technical Preservation Services, National Center for Cultural Resources, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, (2255) Washington, DC 20240.

ISSN: 0741-9023 PTN 47 November 2003

 

Introduction

Introduction


Contents

Print Version