PRESERVATION
TECH NOTES
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS NUMBER 1
Replicating
Historic Elevator Enclosures
Marilyn Kaplan
PRINT
VERSION
Guaranty
Building
Buffalo, NY
Louis Sullivan's Guaranty Building, constructed in Buffalo,
New York, between 1895 and 1896, is one of pre-eminent examples of early highrise
building design. Particularly notable is Sullivan's skillful integration of
the technical requirements and architectural opportunities presented by the
advancement in elevator engineering with the related systems comprising the
building's vertical circulation. The 3 year restoration of this National Historic
Landmark, completed in 1984, included the replication of the historic elevator
enclosures on the first two floors within the significant lobby spaces. When
constructed, the 165' building was the tallest in the City of Buffalo. Its
first floor was a rectangle 116' by 93' containing a spacious and richly detailed
circulation space that connected the two main entrances and lobbies, central
elevator and stair core, and retail spaces. The upper 12 'stories were U-shaped
to maximize the penetration of natural daylight. With the exception of the
centrally located core that contained the electric elevators and single stairway,
the entire building perimeter was occupied by offices entered from a double-loaded
corridor.
The genius of Sullivan's design is reflected in the building's
ability to transmit light throughout the interior. The openness of the first
floor plan was enhanced by 15' high, glazed interior partitions and large
art-glass skylights. On upper floors, translucent florentine
glass at corridor walls maximize the light available to the corridor and offices
as well as to the elevators and stairs.
The design of the elevator assembly skillfully integrated the
complex daylighting scheme and an efficient vertical circulation system. Although
the original cabs were removed in 1962, it is believed they were constructed
with iron frames and glazed walls. Sullivan's solution included the placement
of elevators within a shaft containing a skylight, white reflective glazed
brick, and windows that provided the occupants of the elevator cabs views
outside the building, including Lake Erie.
The elevator doors and walls that enclosed the elevator shaft
and faced the elevator lobbies were part of a cast iron enclosure assembled
from vertical and horizontal members: posts, friezes, cornices, base moldings,
and pierced infill grilles. All were detailed with an ornate organic pattern
based on the growth and emergence of a germinating seedpod, and finished with
electro-plated bronze.
On each floor other miscellaneous cast metal elements followed
the building's organic theme. These included ornamental call button plates
and mail chutes, and above the elevator doors, medallions placed on wire-welded
mesh "veils" intended to obscure the elevator equipment behind.
On each floor, one medallion served as the floor indicator.
Problem
The four original elevators performed poorly with respect to
both travel and response time. In 1903, less than ten years after the building's
construction, the original Sprague electric system was replaced with the Standard
Plunger hydraulic system. Although this conversion required little change
to the decorative elevator enclosure, subsequent alterations had major impacts.
Between 1954 and 1962, the main stair and elevators were fully enclosed and
fire-rated sheet rock was placed over the first floor glazed partitions. In
1962, the elevators were again replaced, apparently in response to code requirements
and leakage at the seals of the water-based hydraulic system that sprayed
water on those waiting for the elevator at each floor.
The 1962 changes had a major impact on Sullivan's
original design. The four 1903 cabs were replaced with a 3-cab, electrically
powered system, with the remaining shaft left vacant for future use. The glazed
elevator cabs were replaced with fully enclosed ones, and the open elevator
shaft and single stairway were enclosed with two-hour, fire-rated masonry
walls. Throughout the building, almost all elevator ornament
was re moved, leaving only a small piece of the elevator framework exposed
within the stair to the west of the elevator bank. Window openings within
the elevator shaft were infilled with concrete block, and the shaft's skylight
was removed to provide space for a new elevator penthouse.
Subsequent changes and damage to the building
occurred as a result of a fire and the lack of a general and consistent maintenance
program. The loss of major tenants in the 1970s gave rise to efforts to demolish
the building, fortunately thwarted by the sale of the building in 1981. The
new owners embarked upon a project to rehabilitate the Landmark building for
its original office and commercial use. Since the project was to receive a
federal UDAG grant and take advantage of the federal tax incentives allowed
for the rehabilitation of historic properties, review and approval by the
State Historic Preservation Office, Advisory Council for Historic Preservation,
and National Park Service were required.
By 1981, building and fire codes had introduced
standards of safety far beyond those in existence in either the 1890s or the
1960s. An exact restoration of the 1897 elevator would not have met the City
of Buffalo's fire, egress or handicapped accessibility requirements. In case
of fire, the glazed elevator cab and non-fire rated shaft would allow the
spread of flames, smoke and noxious gases through the building. The lack of
either a mechanical ventilation or smoke control system within the shaft prevented
smoke and gases from being vented to the outside, and building occupants and
fire fighters from moving safely through the building. Further, glazing inserted
in the elevator cabs and shaft-way windows could explode from the heat causing
injury or damage to building occupants, pedestrians, or adjacent buildings.
Reconstruction of the original elevator controls
(designed to be operated by elevator attendants) would have made it difficult
for those with limited mobility or dexterity to use. Reconstruction would
not have allowed installation of safety mechanisms to prevent injuries such
as those caused by the impact of closing elevator doors or by catching fingers
in pierced elevator grilles.
Solution
For reasons of safety, operation, and budget, as many elements of the existing
elevator system as possible were reused, and the elevator enclosures were
restored only at the first and second floors. This approach had to be integrated
into the overall goal of restoring Louis Sullivan's original design in the
primary interior spaces and on the entire exterior, while creating a first-class,
efficient, speculative office floor plan. The solution also had to meet or
exceed current code requirements, and fit within a project budget that included
other highly specialized restoration work on the art glass skylights and marble
flooring and friezes.
Historic
Research and Physical Evidence
Recreation of the spirit and overall appearance
of Sullivan's design required extensive research of historical records and
physical evidence contained within the building. Although original drawings
of the elevator enclosure were never located, historical photographs and documents
in the possession of a previous building owner proved to be invaluable. These
records were an essential complement to the actual architectural fragments
discovered in the building: a decorative column on each floor left exposed
when the stairway was enclosed in the 1960's, structural and cornice elements,
sections of grille, and one of the original medallions.
Rehabilitation
of Elevator Cabs
The decision to reuse the existing elevator
cabs, in concert with the fire-rated shaft and penthouse equipment introduced
in the 1960s, limited the degree to which the building's original transparency
and day- lighting scheme could be recaptured. The cab interiors were refurbished,
however, and the 1960s hardware and laminate finishes were replaced with more
compatible raised mahogany panels.
Evaluation
Rehabilitation
and Restoration of Elevator Enclosures
At the first and second floor levels the elevator
enclosures and original lobby floor plans were restored. Replication
of all elements comprising the enclosures required the recasting of new elements
in molds taken from original samples. Cast iron was used (as had originally
been specified by Sullivan), and throughout the casting and finishing processes
the architects worked closely with the artisans at the foundry. Only a few
surviving elements were able to be refinished and reused.
Some modifications to the original design
were necessary for a variety of safety and operational reasons. For example,
to allow for proper registration between the replicated enclosures and the
reused cab doors (fixed with respect to location and dimensions), small cast
iron spacers were discreetly added to the enclosure assembly. At all locations
where the cast metal elevator enclosures was fixed, 1/4" wire glass was installed
on the shaftway side with a specially designed, concealed glass gasket. The
portion of the enclosure that opened with the elevator doors was double faced
with wire glass installed on the lobby side as added protection.
Although the entire building retrofitted with
sprinklers, double coverage was used at the elevator and first floor where
glazing was installed or retained in lieu of solid fire-rated walls (2 hours).
Sprinkler heads were located 6' on center (o.c.), selected and located to
minimize their impact on the elevator enclosure. At the elevator shaft, two
heads were placed at each 6' o.c. location, one directed upwards to protect
the glazing above and the other directed horizontally to protect the lobby
area below. Sprinkler heads were connected to piping located in the elevator
shaft. To ensure an unobtrusive installation, sprinklers and piping on the
lobby side of the enclosure were finished to match the decorative metal; piping
within the shaft was painted black to match the shaftway walls.
Conclusion
Overall
Safety Plan
In 1981, the City of Buffalo still used its
own code, the Buffalo Building Code, 1979 edition. Early consultation with
the city code official and fire marshall revealed significant code compliance
issues concerning the open elevator and the building's single stair.
Successful resolution was reached in part
due to the involvement of the code official, fire marshall, and architect
from the State Historic Preservation office from the earliest stages of architectural
planning through to project completion. With respect to code and safety Issues,
this relationship proved essential, since the solution for the elevator enclosure
evolved as a part of the overall safety plan for the building.
The acceptance of the wire glass and sprinkler
solution as an alternative to fire-rated walls around the elevator enclosure
and stairway followed the approval of a similar scheme for the restoration
of a nearby historic building that contained glazed doors and transoms in
corridors adjacent to a large open atrium. As had been the case with that
structure, the rehabilitation of the Guaranty included an improved exiting
design for the entire building.
New stairs exiting directly to the outside
were unobtrusively added at the southeast and southwest corners of the building. The stairs at the southwest connected to the building's original
open stair; at the south wall of the open stair's intermediary landing between
the second and third floor, a fire separation and door to a new half-flight
of stairs were added. This half-flight was considered part of the new fire-rated
corridor that led directly to the southwest exit stair. Other fire safety
elements added to the building included a fire detection annunciator and alarm
system, standpipes, and a sprinkler system throughout the building.
Project
Data
Building
The Guarantee Building
Buffalo, NY
Developer
Prudential Associates
Buffalo, New York
Project
Date
1981-1984
Architect
Cannon
Buffalo, New York
Elevator Cab Work
Gallagher Elevator
Buffalo, New York
Elevator
Enclosure
Foundry-Robinson Iron Company
Alexander City, Alabama
Cost
The overall development costs for the project were $12.7 million.
Excluding electrical, plumbing, and sprinkler work, rehabilitation of the
elevators is estimated at $112,500 for rehabilitation of the elevator cabs,
and $144,000 for replication of elevator grillage.
|
This PRESERVATION TECH NOTE was prepared by National
Park Service. Charles E. Fisher, Technical Preservation Servies, National
Park Service, serves as the Technical Coordinator for the PRESERVATION
TECH NOTES. Special thanks go to Peter T. Flynn, Javier Salazar and Bernadette
Sykes of Cannon and William Scott for their help in the writing of this
Tech Note. Thanks also go to the following people who contributed to the
production: Michael J. Auer, Brenda Siler, Kaye Simonson, and Theresa
Robinson, Preservation Assistance Division, National Park Service, Cover
Photo: Guaranty Building after 1980s Rehabilitation/Patricia Layman Bazelon.
Kay D. Weeks serves as coordinator and designer for the PTN Online
series.
All photos and drawings by the author, unless indicated.
PTN-24
September 2001
PRESERVATION TECH NOTES are designed to provide practical information
on innovative techniques and practices for successfully maintaining and
preserving cultural resources, All techniques and practices described herein
conform to established National Park Service policies, procedures and standards.
This Tech Note was prepared pursuant to the National Historic Preservation
Act Amendments of 1980 which direct the Secretary of the Interior to develop
and make available to government agencies and individuals information concerning
professional methods and techniques for the preservation of historic properties.
Comments on the usefulness of this information are welcomed
and should be sent to Chuck Fisher at the e-mail link below. This publication
is not copyrighted and can be reproduced without penalty. Normal procedures
for credit to the author and the National Park Service are appreciated.
|