| 18 | |
|
Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic BuildingsIdentifying and Preserving Character-Defining Elements H. Ward Jandl
»Identifying and
Evaluating...
A floor plan, the arrangement of spaces, and features and applied
finishes may be individually or collectively important in defining
the historic character of the building and the purpose for which
it was constructed. Thus, their identification, retention, protection,
and repair should be given prime consideration in every preservation
project. Caution should be exercised in developing plans that
would radically change character-defining spaces or that would
obscure, damage or destroy interior features or finishes.
While the exterior of a building may be its most prominent visible
aspect, or its "public face," its interior can be even
more important in conveying the building's history and development
over time. Rehabilitation within the context of the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation calls for the preservation
of exterior and interior portions or features of the building
that are significant to its historic, architectural and cultural
values.
Interior components worthy of preservation may include the building's
plan (sequence of spaces and circulation patterns), the building's
spaces (rooms and volumes), individual architectural features,
and the various finishes and materials that make up the walls,
floors, and ceilings. A theater auditorium or sequences of rooms
such as double parlors or a lobby leading to a stairway that ascends
to a mezzanine may comprise a building's most important spaces.
Individual rooms may contain notable features such as plaster
cornices, millwork, parquet wood floors, and hardware. Paints,
wall coverings, and finishing techniques such as graining, may
provide color, texture, and patterns which add to a building's
unique character.
Virtually all rehabilitations of historic buildings involve some
degree of interior alteration, even if the buildings are to be
used for their original purpose. Interior rehabilitation proposals
may range from preservation of existing features and spaces to
total reconfigurations. In some cases, depending on the building,
restoration may be warranted to preserve historic character adequately;
in other cases, extensive alterations may be perfectly acceptable.
This Preservation Brief has been developed to assist building
owners and architects in identifying and evaluating those elements
of a building's interior that contribute to its historic character
and in planning for the preservation of those elements in the
process of rehabilitation. The guidance applies to all building
types and styles, from 18th century churches to 20th century office
buildings. The Brief does not attempt to provide specific advice
on preservation techniques and treatments, given the vast range
of buildings, but rather suggests general preservation approaches
to guide construction work.
Before determining what uses might be appropriate and before drawing
up plans, a thorough professional assessment should be undertaken
to identify those tangible architectural components that, prior
to rehabilitation, convey the building's sense of time and place--that
is, its "historic character." Such an assessment, accomplished
by walking through and taking account of each element that makes
up the interior, can help ensure that a truly compatible use for
the building, one that requires minimal alteration to the building,
is selected.
A review of the building's history will reveal why and when the
building achieved significance or how it contributes to the significance
of the district. This information helps to evaluate whether a
particular rehabilitation treatment will be appropriate to the
building and whether it will preserve those tangible components
of the building that convey its significance for association with
specific events or persons along with its architectural importance.
In this regard, National Register files may prove useful in explaining
why and for what period of time the building is significant. In
some cases research may show that later alterations are significant
to the building; in other cases, the alterations may be without
historical or architectural merit, and may be removed in the rehabilitation.
Interiors of buildings can be seen as a series of primary and
secondary spaces. The goal of the assessment is to identify which
elements contribute to the building's character and which do not.
Sometimes it will be the sequence and flow of spaces, and not
just the individual rooms themselves, that contribute to the building's
character. This is particularly evident in buildings that have
strong central axes or those that are consciously asymmetrical
in design. In other cases, it may be the size or shape of the
space that is distinctive.
Primary spaces, are found in all buildings, both monumental and
modest. Examples may include foyers, corridors, elevator lobbies,
assembly rooms, stairhalls, and parlors. Often they are the places
in the building that the public uses and sees; sometimes they
are the most architecturally detailed spaces in the building,
carefully proportioned and finished with costly materials. They
may be functionally and architecturally related to the building's
external appearance. In a simpler building, a primary space may
be distinguishable only by its location, size, proportions, or
use. Primary spaces are always important to the character of the
building and should be preserved.
Secondary spaces are generally more utilitarian in appearance
and size than primary spaces. They may include areas and rooms
that service the building, such as bathrooms, and kitchens. Examples
of secondary spaces in a commercial or office structure may include
storerooms, service corridors, and in some cases, the offices
themselves. Secondary spaces tend to be of less importance to
the building and may accept greater change in the course of work
without compromising the building's historic character.
Spaces are often designed to interrelate both visually and functionally.
The sequence of spaces, such as vestibule-hall-parlor or foyer-lobby-stair-auditorium
or stairhall-corridor-classroom, can define and express the building's
historic function and unique character. Important sequences of
spaces should be identified and retained in the rehabilitation
project.
Floor plans may also be distinctive and characteristic of a style
of architecture or a region. Examples include Greek Revival and
shotgun houses. Floor plans may also reflect social, educational,
and medical theories of the period. Many 19th century psychiatric
institutions, for example, had plans based on the ideas of Thomas
Kirkbride, a Philadelphia doctor who authored a book on asylum
design.
In addition to evaluating the relative importance of the various
spaces, the assessment should identify architectural features
and finishes that are part of the interior's history and character.
Marble or wood wainscoting in corridors, elevator cabs, crown
molding, baseboards, mantels, ceiling medallions, window and door
trim, tile and parquet floors, and staircases are among those
features that can be found in historic buildings. Architectural
finishes of note may include grained woodwork, marbleized columns,
and plastered walls. Those features that are characteristic of
the building's style and period of construction should, again,
be retained in the rehabilitation.
Features and finishes, even if machine-made and not exhibiting
particularly fine craftsmanship, may be character defining; these
would include pressed metal ceilings and millwork around windows
and doors. The interior of a plain, simple detailed worker's house
of the 19th century may be as important historically as a richly
ornamented, high-style townhouse of the same period. Both resources,
if equally intact, convey important information about the early
inhabitants and deserve the same careful attention to detail in
the preservation process.
The location and condition of the building's existing heating,
plumbing, and electrical systems also need to be noted in the
assessment. The visible features of historic systems--radiators,
grilles, light fixtures, switchplates, bathtubs, etc.--can contribute
to the overall character of the building, even if the systems
themselves need upgrading.
In assessing a building's interior, it is important to ascertain
the extent of alteration and deterioration that may have taken
place over the years; these factors help determine what degree
of change is appropriate in the project. Close examination of
existing fabric and original floorplans, where available, can
reveal which alterations have been additive, such as new partitions
inserted for functional or structural reasons and historic features
covered up rather than destroyed. It can also reveal which have
been subtractive, such as key walls removed and architectural
features destroyed. If an interior has been modified by additive
changes and if these changes have not acquired significance, it
may be relatively easy to remove the alterations and return the
interior to its historic appearance. If an interior has been greatly
altered through subtractive changes, there may be more latitude
in making further alterations in the process of rehabilitation
because the integrity of the interior has been compromised. At
the same time, if the interior had been exceptionally significant,
and solid documentation on its historic condition is available,
reconstruction of the missing features may be the preferred option.
It is always a recommended practice to photograph interior spaces
and features thoroughly prior to rehabilitation. Measured floor
plans showing the existing conditions are extremely useful. This
documentation is invaluable in drawing up rehabilitation plans
and specifications and in assessing the impact of changes to the
property for historic preservation certification purposes.
If the historic building is to be rehabilitated, it is critical
that the new use not require substantial alteration of distinctive
spaces or removal of character-defining architectural features
or finishes. If an interior loses the physical vestiges of its
past as well as its historic function, the sense of time and place
associated both with the building and the district in which it
is located is lost.
The recommended approaches that follow address common problems
associated with the rehabilitation of historic interiors and have
been adapted from the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings.
Adherence to these suggestions can help ensure that character-defining
interior elements are preserved in the process of rehabilitation.
The checklist covers a range of situations and is not intended
to be all-inclusive. Readers are strongly encouraged to review
the full set of guidelines before undertaking any rehabilitation
project.
1. Retain and preserve floor plans and interior spaces that are
important in defining the overall historic character of the building.
This includes the size, configuration, proportion, and relationship
of rooms and corridors; the relationship of features to spaces;
and the spaces themselves such as lobbies, reception halls, entrance
halls, double parlors, theaters, auditoriums, and important industrial
or commercial use spaces. Put service functions required by the
building's new use, such as bathrooms, mechanical equipment, and
office machines, in secondary spaces.
2. Avoid subdividing spaces that are characteristic of a building
type or style or that are directly associated with specific persons
or patterns of events. Space may be subdivided both vertically
through the insertion of new partitions or horizontally through
insertion of new floors or mezzanines. The insertion of new additional
floors should be considered only when they will not damage or
destroy the structural system or obscure, damage, or destroy character-defining
spaces, features, or finishes. If rooms have already been subdivided
through an earlier insensitive renovation, consider removing the
partitions and restoring the room to its original proportions
and size.
3. Avoid making new cuts in floors and ceilings where such cuts
would change character-defining spaces and the historic configuration
of such spaces. Inserting of a new atrium or a lightwell is appropriate
only in very limited situations where the existing interiors are
not historically or architecturally distinguished.
4. Avoid installing dropped ceilings below ornamental ceilings
or in rooms where high ceilings are part of the building's character.
In addition to obscuring or destroying significant details, such
treatments will also change the space's proportions. If dropped
ceilings are installed in buildings that lack character-defining
spaces, such as mills and factories, they should be well set back
from the windows so they are not visible from the exterior.
5. Retain and preserve interior features and finishes that are
important in defining the overall historic character of the building.
This might include columns, doors, cornices, baseboards, fireplaces
and mantels, paneling, light fixtures, elevator cabs, hardware,
and flooring; and wallpaper, plaster, paint, and finishes such
as stenciling, marbleizing, and graining; and other decorative
materials that accent interior features and provide color, texture,
and patterning to walls, floors, and ceilings.
6. Retain stairs in their historic configuration and to location.
If a second means of egress is required, consider constructing
new stairs in secondary spaces. The application of fire-retardant
coatings, such as intumescent paints; the installation of fire
suppression systems, such as sprinklers; and the construction
of glass enclosures can in many cases permit retention of stairs
and other character-defining features.
7. Retain and preserve visible features of early mechanical systems
that are important in defining the overall historic character
of the building, such as radiators, vents, fans, grilles, plumbing
fixtures, switchplates, and lights. If new heating, air conditioning,
lighting and plumbing systems are installed, they should be done
in a way that does not destroy character-defining spaces, features
and finishes. Ducts, pipes, and wiring should be installed as
inconspicuously as possible: in secondary spaces, in the attic
or basement if possible, or in closets.
8. Avoid "furring out" perimeter walls for insulation
purposes. This requires unnecessary removal of window trim and
can change a room's proportions. Consider alternative means of
improving thermal performance, such as installing insulation in
attics and basements and adding storm windows.
9. Avoid removing paint and plaster from traditionally finished
surfaces, to expose masonry and wood. Conversely, avoid painting
previously unpainted millwork. Repairing deteriorated plasterwork
is encouraged. If the plaster is too deteriorated to save, and
the walls and ceilings are not highly ornamented, gypsum board
may be an acceptable replacement material. The use of paint colors
appropriate to the period of the building's construction is encouraged.
10. Avoid using destructive methods--propane and butane torches
or sandblasting--to remove paint or other coatings from historic
features. Avoid harsh cleaning agents that can change the appearance
of wood.
Buildings undergoing rehabilitation must comply with existing
building, life safety and fire codes. The application of codes
to specific projects varies from building to building, and town
to town. Code requirements may make some reuse proposals impractical;
in other cases, only minor changes may be needed to bring the
project into compliance. In some situations, it may be possible
to obtain a code variance to preserve distinctive interior features.
(It should be noted that the Secretary's Standards for Rehabilitation
take precedence over other regulations and codes in determining
whether a rehabilitation project qualifies for Federal tax benefits.)
A thorough understanding of the applicable regulations and close
coordination with code officials, building inspectors, and fire
marshals can prevent the alteration of significant historic interiors.
Rehabilitation and restoration work should be undertaken by professionals
who have an established reputation in the field.
Given the wide range of interior work items, from ornamental plaster
repair to marble cleaning and the application of graining, it
is possible that a number of specialists and subcontractors will
need to be brought in to bring the project to completion. State
Historic Preservation Officers and local preservation organizations
may be a useful source of information in this regard. Good sources
of information on appropriate preservation techniques for specific
interior features and finishes include the Bulletin of the Association
for Preservation Technology and The Old-House Journal; other useful
publications are listed in the bibliography.
Architectural features and finishes to be preserved in the process
of rehabilitation should be clearly marked on plans and at the
site. This step, along with careful supervision of the interior
demolition work and protection against arson and vandalism, can
prevent the unintended destruction of architectural elements that
contribute to the building's historic character.
Protective coverings should be installed around architectural
features and finishes to avoid damage in the course of construction
work and to protect workers. Staircases and floors, in particular,
are subjected to dirt and heavy wear, and the risk exists of incurring
costly or irreparable damage. In most cases, the best, and least
costly, preservation approach is to design and construct a protective
system that enables stairs and floors to be used yet protects
them from damage. Other architectural features such as mantels,
doors, wainscoting, and decorative finishes may be protected
by using heavy canvas or plastic sheets.
In many cases, the interior of a historic building is as important
as its exterior. The careful identification and evaluation of
interior architectural elements, after undertaking research on
the building's history and use, is critically important before
changes to the building are contemplated. Only after this evaluation
should new uses be decided and plans be drawn up. The best rehabilitation
is one that preserves and protects those rooms, sequences of spaces,
features and finishes that define and shape the overall historic
character of the building.
There are few books written exclusively on preserving historic
interiors, and most of these tend to focus on residential interiors.
Articles on the subject appear regularly in The Old-House Journal,
the Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology, and
Historic Preservation Magazine.
Ferro, Maximilian L., and Melissa L. Cook. Electric Wiring and
Lighting in Historic American Buildings. New Bedford, Massachusetts:
AFC/A Nortek Company, 1984.
Fisher, Charles E. "Temporary Protection of Historic Stairways
During Rehabilitation Work." Preservation Tech Note. Washington,
D.C.: Preservation Assistance Division, National Park Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 1985.
Jennings, Jan, and Herbert Gottfried. American Vernacular Interior
Architecture 1870-1940. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,
1988.
Johnson, Ed. Old House Woodwork Restoration: How to Restore Doors,
Windows, Walls, Stairs and Decorative Trim to Their Original Beauty.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1983.
Labine, Clem, and Carolyn Flaherty (editors). The Old-House Journal
Compendium. Woodstock, New York: The Overlook Press, 1980.
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and
Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. Washington,
D.C.: Preservation Assistance Division, National Park Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, rev. 1983.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Rehabilitation
Guidelines, volume 111. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 1980-84.
Winkler, Gail Caskey, and Roger W. Moss. Victorian Interior Decoration:
American Interiors 1830-1900. New York: Henry Holt and Company,
1986.
This Preservation Brief is based on a discussion paper prepared
by the author for a National Park Service regional workshop held
in March, 1987, and on a paper written by Gary Hume, "Interior
Spaces in Historic Buildings," October, 1987. Appreciation
is extended to the staff of Technical Preservation Services Branch
and to the staff of NPS regional offices who reviewed the manuscript
and provided many useful suggestions.
Washington, D.C. October, 1988 This publication has been prepared pursuant to the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, which directs the Secretary
of the Interior to develop and make available information concerning historic
properties. Technical Preservation Services (TPS), Heritage Preservation
Services Division, National Park Service prepares standards, guidelines,
and other educational materials on responsible historic preservation treatments
for a broad public.
|