A historic building is a product of the cultural heritage of its
region, the technology of its period, the skill of its builders,
and the materials used for its construction. To assist owners,
developers and managers of historic property in planning and completing
rehabilitation project work that will meet the Secretary's "Standards
for Rehabilitation"(36 CFR 67), the following planning process
has been developed by the National Park Service and is applicable
to all historic buildings. This planning process is a sequential
approach to the preservation of historic wood frame buildings.
Historic wood siding exhibits rich and varied surface textures. They range from hand-split clapboards of short lengths with feather-edged ends (shown here), to pit or mill sawn boards which can be beveled, rabbeted, or beaded. Photo: NPS files.
|
It begins with the premise that historic materials should be retained
wherever possible. When retention, including retention with some
repair, is not possible,then replacement of the irreparable historic
material can be considered. The purpose of this approach is to
determine the appropriate level of treatment for the preservation
of historic wood frame buildings. Standard 6 of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation states that "deteriorated architectural
features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity
of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature,
the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture,
and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials..."
The Guidelines further caution against "removing or radically
changing wood features which are important in defining the overall
historic character of the building so that, as a result, the character
is diminished."
The planning process has the
following four steps:
1. Identify and preserve those materials and features that are
important in defining the building's historic character. This
may include features such as wood siding, brackets, cornices,
window architraves, doorway pediments, and their finishes and
colors.
2. Undertake routine maintenance on historic materials and features.
Routine maintenance generally involves the least amount of work
needed to preserve the materials and features of the building.
For example, maintenance of a frame building would include caulking
and painting; or, where paint is extensively cracking and peeling,
its removal and the re-application of a protective paint coating.
3. Repair historic materials and features. For a historic material
such as wood siding, repair would generally involve patching and
piecing-in with new material according to recognized preservation
methods.
4. Replace severely damaged or deteriorated historic materials
and features in kind. Replacing sound or repairable historic material
is never recommended; however, if the historic material cannot
be repaired because of the extent of deterioration or damage,
then it will be necessary to replace an entire character-defining
feature such as the building's siding. The preferred treatment
is always replacement in kind, that is, with the same material.
Because this approach is not always feasible, provision is made
under the recommended treatment options in the Guidelines that
accompany the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to consider
the use of a compatible substitute material. A substitute material
should only be considered, however, if the form, detailing, and
overall appearance of the substitute material conveys the visual
appearance of the historic material, and the application of the
substitute material does not damage, destroy or obscure historic
features.
In many cases, the replacement of wood siding on a historic building
is proposed because little attention has been given to the retention
of historic materials. Instead, the decision to use a substitute
material is made because: (1) it is assumed that aluminum or vinyl
siding will be a maintenance-free material; and (2) there is the
desire to give a building a "remodeled" or "renovated"
appearance. A decision to replace historic material must, however,
be carefully considered for its impact on the historic resource--even
when the model planning process has been followed and the appropriate
treatment is replacement.
Therefore, this brief focuses on the visual and physical consequences
of using a substitute material such as aluminum or vinyl siding
for new siding installations on a wood frame historic building.
These concerns include the potential of damaging or destroying
historic material and features; the potential of obscuring historic
material and features; and, most important, the potential of diminishing
the historic character of the building.
The character or "identity" of a historic building is
established by its form, size, scale and decorative features.
It is also influenced by the choice of materials for the walls--by
the dimension, detailing, color, and other surface characteristics.
This is particularly true for wood frame buildings which are the
typical objects of aluminum or vinyl siding applications. Since
wood has always been present in abundance in America, it has been
a dominant building material in most parts of the country. Early
craftsmen used wood for almost every aspect of building construction:
for structural members such as posts, beams and rafters, and for
cladding materials and decorative details, such as trim, shakes,
and siding.
Aluminum and vinyl siding are available in a variety of widths and colors, but the optional wood graining is not characteristic of real wood siding. Photo: NPS files.
|
The variety of tools used, coupled with regional differences in
design and craftsmanship, has resulted in a richness and diversity
of wood sidings in America. For example, narrow boards with beveled,
lapped joints called "clapboards" were used on New England
frame dwellings. The size and shape of the "clapboards"
were determined by the process of hand splitting or "riving"
bolts of wood. The width, the short lengths, the beveled lapping,
the "feathered" horizontal joints, and the surface nailing
of the clapboards created a distinctive surface pattern that is
recognizable as an important part of the historic character of
these structures.
The sawn and hand-planed clapboards used throughout the Mid-Atlantic
and Southern states in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries,
by contrast, have a wide exposure--generally between six and eight
inches. The exposure of the siding, frequently coupled with a
beaded edge, created a very different play of light and shadow
on the wall surface, thus resulting in a different character.
The "German" or "Novelty siding"--a milled
siding that is thin above and thicker below with a concave bevel--was
used throughout many parts of the United States in the late nineteenth
and early twentieth century but with regional variations in material,
profile, and dimensions. One variation of this type of milled
siding was called "California siding" and was milled
with a rabbetted or shiplap edge to insure a tight installation
of the weather boards. Shingles were also commonly used as an
exterior cladding material, and in buildings such as the Bungalow
style houses, were often an important character-defining feature
of the exterior. Shingles were often applied in decorative patterns
by varying the lap, thus creating alternating rows of narrow exposures
and wide exposures. Shingles were also cut in geometric patterns
such as diamond shapes and applied in patterns. This treatment
was commonly used in the gable end of shingled houses. Siding
and wood shingles were often used in combination with materials
such as cobblestone and brick in Bungalow style buildings to create
a distinctive interplay of surfaces and materials.
When aluminum was installed on the house on
the right, the barge boards, scrollwork, columns, and railings were removed. The distinctive shingled gable and attic vent were covered, further compromising the building's architectural integrity. Photo: NPS files.
|
The primary concern, therefore, in considering replacement siding
on a historic building, is the potential loss of those features
such as the beaded edge, "drop" profile, and the patterns
of application. Replacing historic wood siding with new wood,
or aluminum or vinyl siding could severely diminish the unique
aspects of historic materials and craftsmanship. The inappropriate
use of substitute siding is especially dramatic where sufficient
care is not taken by the owner or applicator and the width of
the clapboards is altered, shadow reveals are reduced, and molding
or trim is changed or removed at the corners, at cornices or around
windows and doors. Because substitute siding is usually added
on top of existing siding, details around windows and doors may
appear set back from the siding rather than slightly projecting;
and if the relationship of molding or trim to the wall is changed,
it can result in the covering or removal of these historic features.
New substitute siding with embossed wood graining--intended to
simulate the texture of wood--is also visually inappropriate.
Exaggerated graining would have been undesirable on real wood
siding and is generally found only after sandblasting, a destructive
and totally unacceptable treatment for wood.
While this discussion focuses primarily on the historic character
of individual wood frame buildings, of equal importance is the
context of buildings that comprise a historic district or neighborhood.
Changes to the character-defining features of a building, such
as distinctive clapboarding and other wall surfaces and decorative
trim, always have an impact on more than just that building; they
also alter the historic visual relationship between the buildings
in the district. If character-defining weatherboards, clapboards
or shingles are replaced on a number of buildings in a historic
district, the historic character of the entire district may be
seriously damaged. Because of the potential impact some substitute
materials have on the character of a neighborhood or district,
many communities regulate their use through zoning ordinances
and design review boards. These ordinances and review boards usually
require review and approval of proposed alterations to a historic
building that could potentially impact the historic character
of the building or the district, including the application of
substitute materials, such as aluminum or vinyl siding.
Preservation of a building or district and its historic character
is based on the assumption that the retention of historic materials
and features and their craftsmanship are of primary importance.
Therefore, the underlying issue in any discussion of replacement
materials is whether or not the integrity of historic materials
and craftsmanship has been lost. Structures are historic because
the materials and craftsmanship reflected in their construction
are tangible and irreplaceable evidence of our cultural heritage.
To the degree that substitute materials destroy and/or conceal
the historic fabric, they will always subtract from the basic
integrity of historically and architecturally significant buildings.
The use of aluminum and vinyl siding really involves two separate
industries. The siding materials themselves, including a variety
of inside and outside corner pieces, trim and molding pieces and
panning for window and door frames, are produced by a comparatively
small number of manufacturers. The product information, advertising,
and any manufacturer's warranties on the product itself are handled
by this part of the industry. The installation of aluminum or
vinyl siding is generally carried out by independent contractors
or applicators, who are frequently called "home improvement"
contractors, and they are not affiliated with the manufacturers.
The manufacturer's warranties normally do not cover the installation,
or any damage or defect resulting from the installation process.
Since the manufacturer has little control over the quality of
the installation, both the quality of the work and the sensitivity
of the application are variable. This variation in quality has
traditionally been a problem in the industry and one which the
industry and its professional associations have attempted to correct
through publishing and disseminating information on the proper
application of vinyl and aluminum siding.
When a building is in need of maintenance, such as the house on the right which needs painting, some owners consider installing aluminum or vinyl siding. The result (see left) can be a complete loss of architectural character due to the covering of details and change of scale due to inappropriate siding dimensions. Photo: NPS files.
|
Although it is sometimes argued that an artificial siding application
is reversible since it can be removed, there is frequently irreversible
damage to historic building materials if decorative features or
trim are permitted to be cut down or destroyed, or removed by
applicators and discarded. The installation process requires that
the existing surface be flat and free of "obstructions"
so that the new siding will be smooth and even in appearance.
To achieve the requisite flat surface, furring strips are usually
placed over the wall surface (vertical furring strips for horizontal
aluminum or vinyl siding and vice-versa for vertical siding). The
potential danger in this type of surface preparation is that the
furring strips may change the relationship between the plane of
the wall and the projecting elements such as windows, door trim,
the cornice, or any other projecting trim or molding. Projecting
details may also cause a problem. To retain them, additional cutting
and fitting will usually be required. Further, additional or special
molding pieces, or "accessories" as they are called
by the industry, such as channels, inserts and drip caps, will
be needed to fit the siding around the architectural features.
This custom fitting of the siding will be more labor-intensive,
adding to the cost of the siding installation.
The existing wall fabric is further damaged by the nailing necessary
to apply siding. Either by nailing directly to the building fabric
or by nailing the furring strips to the old siding, the installation
of aluminum or vinyl siding will leave numerous holes in wood
siding, molding, trim, window and door frames. When applied to
brick or other masonry units, the nail penetrations attaching
the furring strips and siding can cause irreversible cracking
or spalling of the masonry. Although this reference to damaging
masonry is included as a point of fact, the application of aluminum
or vinyl siding is highly inappropriate to historic masonry buildings.
The maintenance and periodic painting of wood frame structures
is a time-consuming effort and often a substantial expense for
the homeowner. It is therefore understandable that a product which
promises relief from periodic painting and gives the building
a new exterior cladding would have considerable appeal. For these
reasons, aluminum and vinyl siding have been used extensively
in upgrading and rehabilitating the nation's stock of wood frame
residential buildings. For historic residential buildings, aluminum
or vinyl siding may be an acceptable alternative only if (1) the
existing siding is so deteriorated or damaged that it cannot be
repaired; (2) the substitute material can be installed without
irreversibly damaging or obscuring the architectural features
and trim of the building; and (3) the substitute material can
match the historic material in size, profile and finish so that
there is no change in the character of the historic building.
In cases where a non-historic artificial siding has been applied
to a building, the removal of such a siding, and the application
of aluminum or vinyl siding would, in most cases, be an acceptable
alternative, as long as the abovementioned first two conditions
are met.
There are, however, also certain disadvantages in the use of a
substitute material such as aluminum or vinyl siding, and these
factors should be carefully considered before a decision is made
to use such a material rather than the preferred replacement with
new wood siding duplicating the old.
Applying Siding without Dealing with Existing Problems
Since aluminum and vinyl sidings are typically marketed as home
improvement items, they are frequently applied to buildings in
need of maintenance and repair. This can result in concealing
problems which are the early warning signs of deterioration. Minor
uncorrected problems can progress to the point where expensive,
major repairs to the structure become necessary.
If there is a hidden source of water entry within the wall or
leakage from the roof, the installation of any new siding will
not solve problems of deterioration and rotting that are occurring
within the wall. If deferred maintenance has allowed water to
enter the wall through deteriorated gutters and downspouts, for
example, the cosmetic surface application of siding will not arrest
these problems. In fact, if the gutters and downspouts are not
repaired, such problems may become exaggerated because water may
be channeled behind the siding. In addition to drastically reducing
the efficiency of most types of wall insulation, such excessive
moisture levels within the wall can contribute to problems with
interior finishes such as paints or wallpaper, causing peeling,
blistering or staining of the finishes.
It cannot be overemphasized that a cosmetic treatment to hide
difficulties such as peeling paint, stains or other indications
of deterioration is not a sound preservation practice; it is no
substitute for proper care and maintenance. Aluminum and vinyl
siding are not directly at fault in these situations since property
owners should determine the nature and source of their problems,
then make appropriate repairs. The difficulty arises when owners
perceive the siding as the total solution to their required maintenance
and forgo other remedial action.
Durability and Cost
The questions of durability and relative costs of aluminum or
vinyl siding compared to the maintenance cost of historic materials
are complex. It is important to consider these questions carefully
because both types of siding are marketed as long lasting, low
maintenance materials. Assuming that the substitute sidings are
not damaged, and that they will weather and age normally, there
will be inevitable changes in color and gloss as time passes.
A normal application of aluminum or vinyl siding is likely to
cost from two to three times as much as a good paint job on wood
siding. A sensitive application, retaining existing trim, will
cost more. Therefore, to break even on expense, the new siding
should last as long as two or three paintings before requiring
maintenance. On wood two coats of good quality paint on a properly
prepared surface can last from 8 to 10 years, according to the
U.S. Department of Agriculture. If a conservative life of seven
years is assumed for paint on wood, then aluminum and vinyl siding
should last 15 to 21 years before requiring additional maintenance,
to break even with the maintenance cost for painting wood siding.
Once painted, the aluminum and vinyl siding will require repainting
with the same frequency as wood.
While aluminum siding can dent upon impact and the impact resistance
of vinyl siding decreases in low temperatures and, therefore,
is susceptible to cracking from sharp impact, these materials
are generally not more vulnerable than wood siding and shingles.
All siding materials are subject to damage from storm, fire, and
vandalism; however, there is a major difference in the repairability
of wood siding versus substitute materials such as aluminum and
vinyl. Although they can all be repaired, it is much easier to
repair wood siding and the repair, after painting, is generally
imperceptible. In addition, a major problem in the repairability
of aluminum and vinyl siding, as mentioned above, is matching
color since the factory finishes change with time. Matching the
paint for wood siding has a greater likelihood of success.
Energy
Because of high fuel costs, there is a concern for energy conservation
in historic materials as well as in substitute materials. Because
aluminum and vinyl siding can be produced with an insulating backing,
these products are sometimes marketed as improving the thermal
envelope of a historic building. The aluminum and vinyl material
themselves are not good insulators, and the thickness of any insulating
backing would, of necessity, be too small to add to the energy
efficiency of a historic building. What energy savings did accrue
as a result of a siding application would probably be as much
the result of the creation of an air space between the old and
new siding as the addition of insulating material. If the historic
wood siding were removed in the course of installing the aluminum
or vinyl siding (even with an insulating backing), the net result
would likely be a loss in overall thermal efficiency for the exterior
sheathing.
Preservation Briefs Number 3, "Conserving Energy in Historic
Buildings," notes that the primary sources of energy loss
in small frame buildings are the doors, windows and roof. It is,
therefore, more cost-effective to apply storm windows, weatherstripping
and attic insulation than to treat the sidewalls of these structures.
There are numerous publications on energy retrofitting which explain
techniques of determining cost-effectiveness based on utility costs,
R-factors or materials and initial cost of the treatment. Persons
interested in this approach may wish to read "Retrofitting
Existing Houses for Energy Conservation: An Economic Analysis"
published by the National Bureau of Standards, or the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development booklet "In the Bank or
Up the Chimney." One such study in Providence, Rhode Island,
determined that for a two-story house, twenty-five feet square,
the payback period for twenty-three storm windows, two storm doors
and six inches of attic insulation (R-20) was 4.4 years while the
payback period of aluminum siding with an R-factor of 2.5 was 29.96
years. Most of the information which is available supports the
position that aluminum or vinyl siding will not have a reasonable
payback on an energy-saving basis alone.
The intent of this brief has been to delineate issues that should
be considered when contemplating the use of aluminum or vinyl
sidings on historic buildings and assessing under what circumstances
substitute materials such as artificial siding may be used without
damaging the integrity of the historic building or adversely changing
its historic character. Many property owners are faced with decisions
weighing the historic value of their building and its maintenance
cost against the possible benefit of aluminum and vinyl siding
materials. To assist in making these decisions, "The Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines
for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings" have been published
and are available from National Park Service Regional Offices
and State Historic Preservation Offices. Further, since rehabilitation
projects for income-producing historic buildings often seek tax
benefits under the 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act, as amended,
it is essential that all work, such as the replacement of exterior
siding, be carried out in conformance with the Standards and be
consistent with the building's historic character to insure that
the tax benefits are not denied.
The inappropriate siding applied to the house on the right has altered the character of the urban setting. Photo: NPS files.
|
As stated earlier, the application of aluminum and vinyl siding
is frequently considered as an alternative to the maintenance
of the original historic material. The implication is that the
new material is an economical and long-lasting alternative and
therefore somehow superior to the historic material. In reality,
historic building materials such as wood, brick and stone, when
properly maintained, are generally durable and serviceable materials.
Their widespread existence on tens of thousands of old buildings
after many decades in serviceable condition is proof that they
are the original economic and long-lasting alternatives. All materials,
including aluminum and vinyl siding can fall into disrepair if
abused or neglected; however, the maintenance, repair and retention
of historic materials are always the most architecturally appropriate
and usually the most economically sound measures when the objective
is to preserve the unique qualities of historic buildings.
The appropriate preservation decision on the use of a substitute
material in the rehabilitation of a historic building must always
center on two principal concerns: the possible damage or destruction
of historic building materials; and, the possible negative impact
on the historic character of the building and the historic district
or setting in which the building is located. Because applications
of substitute materials such as aluminum and vinyl siding can
either destroy or conceal historic building material and features
and, in consequence, result in the loss of a building's historic
character, they are not recommended by the National Park Service.
Such destruction or concealment of historic materials and features
confuses the public perception of that which is truly historic
and that which is imitative.
"Condensation Problems in Your House: Prevention and Solution."
Information Bulletin No. 373. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 1974.
Kiefer, Matthew J. "Vinyl and Aluminum Siding: Pro and Con."
Report to the Ashmont Hill Study Committee. Boston, Massachusetts:
The Boston Landmarks Commission, 1977.
"Landmark and Historic District Commission." Vol. 4.
No. 5. Washington, D.C.: National Trust for Historic Preservation.
October 1978.
"Moisture Conditions in Walls and Ceilings of a Simulated
Older Home in Winter." Madison, Wisconsin: Forest Products
Laboratory USDA, 1977.
"Performance Criteria for Exterior Wall Systems." Washington,
D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1974.
"Rehab Right." Oakland, California: City of Oakland
Planning Department, 1978.
Skoda, Leopold F. "Performance of Residential Siding Materials."
Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1972.
Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. Washington, D.C.:
Forest Products Laboratory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1974.
Acknowledgements
This Preservation Brief was written by John H. Myers, Historical
Architect, formerly with Technical Preservation Services, and
was published first in 1979. The Brief was substantially revised
in 1984 by Gary L. Hume, Deputy Division Chief, Preservation Assistance
Division. H. Ward Jandl, Chief, Technical Preservation Services
Branch, and the following Branch staff members are to be thanked
for reviewing the manuscript and making suggestions that were
incorporated into the final text: Emogene A. Bevitt, Kay Davidson
Weeks, and Susan Dynes. Washington, D.C. October, 1984.
Home page logo: Drawing: "A Tribute to Vinyl Siding. (Igloo)" reproduced from David Macaulay's Great Moments in Architecture. Copyright 1978 by David Macaulay and reprinted permission of Houghton Mifflin Company.