| Figure
1: |
Comparative
element recovery patterns for Kennewick, water-recovered remains,
reach-deposited remains, and canid scavenged remains
|
| Figure
2: |
Ordination
of the first three canonical scores for Howells populations, using
the 52 primary variables
|
| Figure
3: |
Ordination
of the first three principal component scores for Howells populations,
using the 52 primary variables
|
| Figure
4: |
Ordination
of the first three canonical scores for Howells populations, using
45 variables
|
| Figure
5: |
Ordination
of the first three principal component scores for Howells populations,
using 45 variables
|
| Figure
6: |
Ordination
of the first three canonical scores for Hanihara populations, using
13 variables
|
| Figure
7: |
Ordination
of the first three principal component scores for Hanihara populations,
using 13 variables
|
| Figure
8: |
Ordination
of the first three canonical scores for Howells populations, using
33 unreconstructed variables
|
| Figure
9: |
Ordination
of the first three principal component scores for Howells populations,
using 33 unreconstructed variables
|
| Figure
10: |
Ordination
of the first three principal component scores for 7 odontometric
variables
|
| Table
1: |
Mean observer
errors for the Kennewick cranial reconstruction
|
| Table
2: |
Listing
of Howells Variable Sets used in craniometric analysis
|
| Table
3: |
Bones showing
presence of animal gnaw marks, algae stain and red staining with
number showing the frequency of bones affected within the designated
group
|
| Table
4: |
Maximum difference
in frequency distributions and two-tailed probabilities for Komolgorov-Smirnoff
comparisons
|
| Table
5: |
Stature estimates
based on maximum lengths of upper arm elements
|
| Table
6: |
Estimates
of living stature based on the estimated length of the tibia
|
| Table
7: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in 22 modern populations (Howells
1989), based on inter-individual squared Mahalanobis' distances
derived from 52 craniometric variables
|
| Table
8: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in 22 modern populations (Howells
1989), based on inter-individual squared Mahalanobis' distances
derived from 45 craniometric variables
|
| Table
9: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in 183 Holocene populations
(Hanihara 1995) based on 13 size-corrected original variables
|
| Table
10: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in 183 Holocene populations
(Hanihara 1995), based on inter-individual squared Mahalanobis'
distances derived from 13 craniometric variables
|
| Table
11: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in 22 modern populations (Howells
1989), based on inter-individual Mahalanobis' squared distances
derived from 33 craniometric variables
|
| Table
12: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in modern (combined Howells
and Hanihara data) and 13 Archaic samples based on size-corrected
Mahalanobis' squared distances derived from 10 craniometric variables
|
| Table
13: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in 8 regional modern (combined
Howells and Hanihara data) and 13 Archaic samples based on size-corrected
Mahalanobis' squared distances derived from 10 craniometric variables
|
| Table
14: |
Probability
of group membership for Kennewick Man in seven modern populations
(Wolpoff 1972), based on seven buccolingual tooth dimensions
|
| Appendix
I: |
Cranial
Dimensions
|
| Appendix
II: |
Postcranial
Dimensions
|
![[NPS Arrowhead]](../IMAGES/Arrow.jpg){kind=icon}
