Peterson Prize Rules and Recommendations
- Students must perform all of the delineation or CAD
drawing. Professors and advisors may provide guidance,
but may not create any of the drawings.
- Final submissions must be on standard-sized HABS mylar:
19x24, 24x36, or 34x44. Any submission using sheets
of a non-standard size will not be accepted.
- If using CAD, the title block must be the official
HABS title block, which will be provided upon receipt
of the entry form. The lines of the title block may
not be altered in any manner. Any submission using a
non-standard title block will not be accepted. Even
if a program has received the CAD title block for a
previous project, a new title block should nonetheless
be requested for each new project.
- Name and location information should be verified with
the Peterson Prize Coordinator before being inked or
plotted. The HABS number should be left blank; this
will be assigned in the HABS office upon receipt of
the submission
- Submissions must consist only of black line drawings.
Any submission using color will not be accepted.
- Because HABS drawings are in the public domain, participants
who wish to use a copyrighted image (such as Google
Maps, etc.) must obtain the necessary copyright release
and include it with the submission of the drawings.
- CAD drawings must be plotted using a laser plotter.
Inkjet plots are not considered archival, and will not
be accepted.
- CAD entries must include a CD-ROM of the CAD files.
- Field notes should be folded to 8 ½ x 11 size. Each
field note sheet should be labeled with the name of
the structure.
- Students should consult the HABS
History Guidelines for information regarding the
HABS Short Format Historical Report (typically 1-5 pages).
All research and writing of the Historical Report must
be undertaken by students.
NOTE: The HABS staff is available to provide preliminary
review of Peterson Prize submissions for both drawings
and historical reports. Please contact the Peterson
Prize Coordinator if you wish to submit a draft set
for review.
|