NPS
Swan Tarsometatarsus
Included among the 26 species of fossil birds found at Hagerman are 10 species which were first described based on Hagerman specimens. Hagerman has the distinction of having two of the most eminent avian paleontologists, or if you prefer paleo-ornithologist, study and describe its fossil birds. The first was Alexander Wetmore, Secretary of Smithsonian and leading student of fossil birds during the first three-quarters of this century. Fortunately for Hagerman the fossil bird bones collected during the Smithsonian expeditions did not remain forgotten in a drawer and in 1933 Wetmore described the bird material collected from 1929 to 1931 . After the last Smithsonian expedition in 1934 there was a lapse until the 1950's when Claude Hibbard of the University of Michigan began work in the area. Hibbard did not work on birds but rather small animals like mice and voles. However, Hibbard did appreciate the importance of the bird bones he and his students found and made arrangements for another famous paleo-ornithologist, Pierce Brodkorb, of the University of Florida to study the fossils. In 1958, 25 years after Wetmore's publication, the second paper on Hagerman's fossil birds appeared. Among the species described by Brodkorb was a new species of swan, Olor hibbardi, named after Claude Hibbard in recognition of his efforts at Hagerman.
Like many of the fossils found throughout Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument birds are often represented by single bones or the ends of bones. While it is true that the thin walls of the shaft of a bone are easily broken, the ends are often robust enough to remain intact and these are what we find on a regular basis. The part found by Hibbard and described by Brodkorb was the end of one of the bones of the lower leg, the tarsometatarsus, where the toe bones attach. While that may not sound like much to work with, it happens to have a very distinctive shape, since it has three points of attachment for those toe bones. Careful comparison of the fossil specimens to the same bone in modern swans and with other fossil swans showed that although there were similarities to the living Tundra Swan, the overall differences in size, proportions and general structure distinguished the bone from all known swans. Brodkorb felt it represented a distinct and new species. Since only the end of one bone was originally described there's not much we can say about Hibbard's swan except that we know it was present at Hagerman and its general size. At the moment Hibbard's swan may seem to be mute, but continued work at the monument will undoubtedly produce other bones that will fill out its skeleton and tell us more about this species. Perhaps one summer we will be able to trumpet a new discovery.
Return to Chart
This article originally appeared in The Fossil Record, Spring 1997