Writ of Habeas Corpus is suspended by President Lincoln.

Overall Rating

Add your review
Grade Level:
Ninth Grade-Twelfth Grade
Civil War, Constitutional Law
45 minutes
Group Size:
Up to 36
National/State Standards:
U. S. History, Government, Informal Writing


Students will explore original source materials illuminating the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War. Students will examine Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the non-judicial detention of Southern sympathizers during the Civil War.


Focus Question for the Lesson: Was the rule of law and the Constitution respected in the Union during the Civil War?


Students will explore original source materials illuminating the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War. Students will examine Lincoln's suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the non-judicial detention of Southern sympathizers during the Civil War. Students will need direct instruction prior to this lesson on the meaning and history of the writ of habeas corpus and the vocabulary words set out below and on the basic facts of occurrences in April, 1861. This direct instruction should include all of the following material. Limit this mini-lesson to a firm 5 minutes.

Habeas corpus is often called the Great Writ. A writ is a formal court order. In
this case, it is an order from a court to some officer, usually from the Executive
Branch of government, to justify holding a particular individual in custody. It is
considered the citizen's great protection against arbitrary arrest by government
agents because government officials must either obey the court or look like they
are disrespecting the rule of law.

The U.S. Constitution provides, in Article I, section 9, "The privilege of the Writ
of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or
Invasion the public Safety may require it."

On April 15, 1861, Confederate forces in Charleston, S.C., opened fire on Fort
Sumter, forcing its surrender. President Lincoln immediately called for the states
to send troops to join the army to put down the armed rebellion of the Confederate
states. On April 19, 1861, a riot broke out in Baltimore when part of a regiment
of Massachusetts troops arrived by train in Baltimore and attempted to march
through the city by way of Pratt Street on their way to Washington, D.C. Many of
the leading people in Baltimore either failed to control the rioters or actively
assisted them, including the city's mayor and the head of the police commission.
Partly in response to this, President Lincoln on April 27, 1861, issued an
Executive Order authorizing General Scott, the Chief of Staff of the Army, or any
officer General Scott might designate, to suspend the writ of habeas corpus in
order to protect the rail line leading from the north through Baltimore to


One each per student
Sufficient copies of Newspaper source analysis tools, Manuscript source analysis tools for
classroom use; chart paper & colored markers, together with appropriate copies of Primary
Sources listed below.

1. "Local Matters The Habeas Corpus Refusal" May 6, 1861 The Baltimore Sun, Maryland
State Historical Society
2. Leonis, Maj. W.W., Letter to Judge William Fell Giles, May 6, 1861; Ms 1977, Maryland
Military Affairs Documents 1818-1887, Folder 1860's, Doc. C and transcription,
Maryland State Historical Society

Additional Documents for Teachers:

Lincoln's Order suspending the writ of habeas corpus, 27 April 1861, found at


1) Motivation

Discussion question for class opening; Should people have the same rights to protest and disagree with the government in a time of war as in a time of peace? Allow 5 minutes for this discussion. If students bring up present events, encourage them to hold those thoughts for later. Students may talk about absolute rights or limits on protest itself or about differences in time/place/manner restrictions.

2) Guided Practice

Students will be divided into heterogeneous cooperative groups of three. Students will each receive a copy of the Newspaper source analysis tool and a copy of the Local Matters article for analysis. Teacher will guide the class by column on the analysis tool to extract the meat from this article. Allot no more than 10 minutes, firm, out of 45 for this portion of the lesson.

Please Note:
The teacher should note the appearance of the photocopy. Note that there are no illustrations. Note also that this is a photocopy out of the center of the page but that the type size and column size are accurate. Among the style and appearance questions should be "Why are there no illustrations." "Would you have expected to see photographs in a newspaper in 1861?

The teacher should ask content questions, such as:
"The text between the lines in the article is the actual text of Judge Giles' formal ruling
and supporting argument in this case. What is he ordering?"
" To whom is the order directed?"
"The judge says there is '…no state of affairs existing as would authorize its
suspension…' Does that give you any idea as to his thoughts about the Civil War?"
"What '…more immediate action…' is the judge hinting he might take?"
"Why do you think the newspaper printed the whole decision? Do you think the editors
of the paper agreed with the judge? Do you think they favored the South or the North?"
"What can we not learn from this source?"
"In column 3 of your Newspaper source analysis tool you are asked what other
information you would like to have to better understand this story. Write out a question
you think a reader in 1861 would want answered and then another question that we want
answered in 2010."

Finish this portion of the lesson by calling for responses from column 3 and writing them on the board.

3) Independent Practice

Each group of three students is given a packet containing Major Leonis' letter to Judge Giles, together with the Manuscript source analysis tool. Students will then take about 5 minutes to perform an initial analysis of the primary source document assigned.
At about the five minute mark, check for student understanding and ability to mine the
document for information. At that time, offer copies of the transcripts of the letter and allow
another five minutes to complete analysis of the content.
At the completion of this second five minutes with the Leonis letter, do a round-robin
report out for all three columns. Look to get at least three items highlighted for each column. Students will also need to have their own notebooks to make notes on the findings of the other students that were not discovered in their own groups.

Be certain that student analysis has included understandings of:
Who the author of the letter is, an officer in the U.S. Army;
Why he wrote to the judge:
What this document tells us about the times and about the author;
Limits of this document; what it does not tell us and why it may not be completely reliable


Write a BCR on the prompt: Judge Giles and Major Leonis disagreed over the
question 'Whether the civil rights guaranteed in the Constitution may be set aside in times
of emergency?' Who had the stronger argument? Support your answer by referring to
specific language in the documents. Turn this in with your Manuscript and Newspaper source analysis tools.

Do you believe this restriction on civil liberties was unique to the Civil War? What
other occasions in American History do you know of where similar or related restrictions

ACCOMMODATIONS: Students with literacy deficits should be allowed to begin with the
typed excerpts rather than with the photocopies of the originals.


Is there a parallel to this situation in today's "War on Terrorism"?
Compare Ex parte Merryman 17 F. Cas 144 (1861) with Hamdan v Rumsfeld 548 US
557 (2006) with Korematsu v US , 323 US 214 (1944).
Students may assess the use of Merryman as precedent to Korematsu and both of these
as precedent to Hamdan. Students may choose to compare the severity of the crisis as perceived at the time for two or all of these cases. Students may also be asked to reflect forward to 2060 and consider what historians at that time may say about our society's perception of crisis today.


Habeas Corpus