|
Architects for Social Responsibility |
The very nature of the environment appears to be changing greatly because of the interactive effects of cars, coal, nuclear power, exploitation of forestry, destruction of habitat, global warming, and other factors. Basic human needs are not being met.
How well are humans interacting with Earth? How can more acceptable relationships with the world be developed? Below is a list of current indicators that reveal how very distant a balanced relationship is with the environment (Curtis Brown, Ltd. 1988).
These global conditions parallel David Wann's observations in his book Biologic, "that environmental deterioration is a lack of relevant information . . . [and that] poor design is responsible for many, if not most, of our environmental problems."
The statistics presented above also seem to support the
statement of World Bank Economist Herman Daly that "we are
treating the Earth as if it were a business in liquidation." The
word "development" has evolved from improving the quality of life
for humans to "an economic activity that fed the belief in
endless growth."
|
Brown, Flavin, and Postel |
The concept of sustainable design has come to the forefront in the last 20 years. It is a concept that recognizes that human civilization is an integral part of the natural world and that nature must be preserved and perpetuated if the human community itself is to survive. Sustainable design articulates this idea through developments that exemplify the principles of conservation and encourage the application of those principles in our daily lives.
A corollary concept, and one that supports sustainable design, is that of bioregionalism - the idea that all life is established and maintained on a functional community basis and that all of these distinctive communities (bioregions) have mutually supporting life systems that are generally self-sustaining. The concept of sustainable design holds that future technologies must function primarily within bioregional patterns and scales. They must maintain biological diversity and environmental integrity, contribute to the health of air, water, and soils, incorporate design and construction that reflect bioregional conditions, and reduce the impacts of human use.
Sustainable design, sustainable development, design with nature,
environmentally sensitive design, holistic resource management -
regardless of what it's called, "sustainability," the capability
of natural and cultural systems being continued over time, is
key.
Sustainability does not require a loss in the quality of life, but does require a change in mind-set, a change in values toward less consumptive lifestyles. These changes must embrace global interdependence, environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and economic viability.
Sustainable design must use an alternative approach to traditional design that incorporates these changes in mind-set. The new design approach must recognize the impacts of every design choice on the natural and cultural resources of the local, regional, and global environments.
A model of the new design principles necessary for sustainability is exemplified by the "Hannover Principles" or "Bill of Rights for the Planet," developed by William McDonough Architects for EXPO 2000 to be held in Hannover, Germany.
These principles were adopted by the World Congress of the International Union of Architects (UIA) in June 1993 at the American Institute of Architect's (AIA) Expo 93 in Chicago. Further, the AIA and UIA signed a "Declaration of Interdependence for a Sustainable Future." In summary, the declaration states that today's society is degrading its environment and that the AIA, UIA, and their members are committed to:
In addition, the Interprofessional Council on Environmental Design (ICED), a coalition of architectural, landscape architectural, and engineering organizations, developed a vision statement in an attempt to foster a team approach to sustainable design. ICED states: The ethics, education and practices of our professions will be directed to shape a sustainable future. . . . To achieve this vision we will join . . . as a multidisciplinary partnership."
These activities are an indication that the concept of
sustainable design is being supported on a global and
interprofessional scale and that the ultimate goal is to become
more environmentally responsive. The world needs facilities that
are more energy efficient and that promote conservation and
recycling of natural and economic resources.
Two events in particular were instrumental in the adoption of the National Park Service's Sustainable Design Initiative.
National Park Service Vail Symposium. In October 1991, five working groups studied "the state of the parks" as part of the organizational renewal activities associated with the 75th Anniversary of the National Park Service. They found that National Park Service is being stressed by a variety of factors:
The concept of sustainable design was mentioned frequently, as it covers a wide range of topics. It integrates principles that enable humans to live in harmony with the rest of the natural world, protecting biodiversity and sharing habitats with other species.
Virgin Islands National Park, Maho Bay Resort. In November 1991 the Sustainable Development Initiative was officially launched with a workshop in Maho Bay. This partnership forum included participants from the American Institute of Architects (AIA), American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), the Ecotourism Society, National Parks and Conservation Association, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Greenpeace, local representatives from the Virgin Islands, private architectural and engineering (A/E) firms, and ecotourism resort operators. Representatives from various NPS offices included professionals and managers from parks, regional offices, Washington office, and the Denver Service Center.
The participants brought diverse perspectives and ideas to the
workshop and subsequently produced the following guiding
principles for the application of sustainability to the
management of natural and cultural resource-sensitive areas
Guiding Principles of Sustainable Design is intended to direct park management philosophy. Its goal is to provide a basis for achieving sustainability in facility planning and design, emphasize the importance of biodiversity, and encourage responsible decisions.
Sustainable development in this document refers only to park and ecotourism areas. When sustainable development and ecotourism are merged, they offer an opportunity for affecting visitor perceptions of the natural and cultural world. Ecotourism offers an unparalleled opportunity for more conversation-oriented values. A merger of ecotourism and sustainability would clearly distinguish sustainable development from traditional tourist development.
This guidebook articulates principles to be used in the design and management of tourist facilities that emphasize environmental sensitivity in construction, use of nontoxic materials, resource conservation, recycling, and integration of visitors with natural and cultural settings.
Sustainability principles have been developed for nine topics: interpretation, natural resources, cultural resources, site design, building design, energy management, water supply, waste prevention, and facility maintenance and operations. Although material is presented in separate sections, the application of these principles must be interdisciplinary and reflect the interconnection of all systems and resources.