National Park Service home page Denver Service Center home page DSC Workflows In The News Publications Business With Us What We Do Who We Are  National Park Service home page  National Park Service home page
Publications >> Guiding Principles of Sustainable Design >> Chapter 3

DSC Technical Information Center

NPS Sales Publications

Guiding Principles of Sustainable Design

Contact Us

 

 

 

 

 

PHILOSOPHY/GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 
By their nature, park and tourism developments depend on close and intimate associations with the ecosystems around them. Instead of viewing from the outside, as in a museum, park visitors and ecotourists seek to participate, to join in, to experience, and to gain a better awareness, appreciation, and understanding of the ecological system. Because ecosystems have the innate, though not easily quantifiable, capacity to provide energy, space, and waste disposal to their components, joining in inevitably causes costs to and changes in the system. Sustainable use, planning, design, and development attempt to minimize these costs so that the system will continue to function indefinitely within an acceptable limit of change.

A basic premise of sustainable park and tourism development is that facilities must, to the fullest extent possible, function within the ecosystem and its processes rather than separately. Although it is not always readily apparent, ecosystems provide direct services to the human developments within them. Obvious ecological services are those such as vegetative screening, water/wastewater purification, self-maintenance, and continual recovery of the resource around a development (e.g., beaches, forests, reefs, and wildlife). If the ecosystem becomes overloaded or severely stressed, these services are jeopardized.

The following are essential considerations for the integration of park and ecotourism development with natural resources.

  • Natural Behavior Within an Ecosystem - A basic understanding of the natural behavior of an ecosystem is required before designing facilities to function sustainably within it. It is crucial to identify key resources on which ecotourism will be focused and to understand how these resources are linked. Geographic information system inventories of soils, hydrology, and plant and animal communities can aid in this understanding.
     
  • Links Between Ecosystems - There are links between ecosystems that may be geographically separate, e.g., between mountain forests and coastal mangroves, between mangroves and coral reefs. Changes in one ecosystem may have consequences in another; long-term resource protection involves planning and government controls on a wide geographical basis.
     
  • Fragmentation of Habitats - Whether due to a specific facility or throughout an ecosystem, habitat fragmentation causes loss of biological diversity and must be minimized.
     
  • Energy Subsidies for Ecosystems - Of all the varied ecosystems in which humans live, few still function totally without imported energy - food, fuel, even water - to sustain human needs. It is therefore unrealistic to expect park and tourism developments to function completely without imported energy. However, sustainable planning and design can keep that energy subsidy to a minimum by taking advantage of renewable energy resources within the local ecosystem. Questioning how the development can function (and even if it should) if the energy subsidy were unavailable will keep development more in harmony with existing resources and minimize the environmental impact of exporting energy from a distant ecosystem.
     
  • Human Demands on Ecosystems - The demands of human use on an ecosystem are cumulative. New proposals must account for the previous use of resources so that effects of the activity, the proposed development, and increased use do not exceed the ecosystem's capability. The scale and type of any potential development should be determined by the capability and resiliency of the ecosystem rather than by the physical capacity of the site.
     
  • Acceptable Limits of Change - Change in the system is  inevitable, but limits of acceptable environmental change should be established before development begins. Acceptable change should not approach the upper limit of capacity. Unpredictable events such as droughts and hurricanes, which could cause the whole system to collapse, should be considered. All parties should recognize and respect these limits and not attempt to extend them by simply importing more and more energy or creating other artificial support.
     
  • Ecosystem Monitoring - The effects on surrounding resources of developing and operating facilities should be routinely monitored and evaluated, and actions should be taken immediately to correct problems. This will ensure that the limits of acceptable change are not exceeded and will provide information about the behavior of the system. This information can be used for improved designs. Indicator species provide useful and efficient monitoring tools.

IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT ON NATURAL RESOURCES go to TOP
As a practical means of anticipating and minimizing possible negative impacts of park or tourism development on the environment, a matrix is provided (see table 2). Users of Guiding Principles of Sustainable Design should review the matrix before committing themselves to a particular approach. Once a potential development approach is identified from the matrix, it is possible to reference other sections of the guidebook or other sources where the approach may be examined in greater detail.

If a particular or development approach or activity in the body of the matrix is selected, it may lead to certain negative impacts on the environment. The potential impacts are arranged into three categories - pollution, physical processes, and biological systems. Under these categories are the resultant impacts of an approach or activity - e.g., noise increased, erosion increased, vegetation altered. A solid black dot indicates a negative impact.

Identifying negative impacts through the matrix is not intended to discourage or eliminate a certain development approach but rather to alert the designer/developer to aspects that may need further consideration or mitigation. Selecting one approach may dictate others. However, choosing a package of approaches that creates minimum impact at the lowest energy cost would probably result in the most appropriate design for sustainability.

View the chart: Interpretation and Sustainable Development go to TOP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Interpretation
Chapter 3: Natural Resources
Chapter 4:CulturalResources
Chapter 5: Site Design
Chapter 6: Building Design
Chapter 7: Energy Management
Chapter 8: Water Supply
Chapter 9: Waste Prevention
Chapter 10: Facility Maintenance and Operations
Bibliography

go to TOP