National Park Service LogoU.S. Department of the InteriorNational Park ServiceNational Park Service
National Park Service:  U.S. Department of the InteriorNational Park Service Arrowhead
Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail A replica of John Smith's shallop
view map
text size: largest larger normal
printer friendly
Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail
Park Planning
 

A new national trail takes shape through careful planning. In the initial years after designation of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail in 2006, the National Park Service led a comprehensive planning process to determine how the trail's resources can be managed and how visitors can best experience the trail. NPS enlisted broad involvement of the general public as well as federal agencies, state and local governments, nonprofit organizations, American Indian groups, businesses, and various other entities in order to develop the best framework for managing the trail over time.

Comprehensive Management Plan

The National Park Service completed the comprehensive management plan and environmental assessment (CMP/EA) for the trail in February 2011, following a two-year public planning process. The comprehensive management plan is required by the National Trails System Act. The environmental assessment is required by the National Environmental Policy Act. The CMP/EA:

  • Establishes how the trail will be developed and managed over the next 20 years
  • Assesses potential impacts on natural and cultural resources
  • Identifies the trail's significant places and stories and how to protect resources critical to the trail
  • Crafts meaningful visitor experiences on land and water
  • Defines management objectives and alternatives to meet those objectives
  • Recommends a preferred alternative for managing the trail.

The National Park Service issued a draft CMP/EA on September 30, 2010, for a 30-day public comment period. This CMP document describes four different alternative concepts for protecting, developing, and managing the trail and includes analysis of the impacts and consequences of implementing each alternative. Based on reviews and public comments the actions and programs in the NPS preferred alternative now constitute the comprehensive management plan for the Smith trail.

The complete CMP/EA as amended for final approval is available for download by chapter on the trail's website. The document includes a summary of the history of the trail, descriptions of resources associated with the trail, four alternative management concepts, and the preferred alternative.

The comprehensive management plan will guide decisions about the trail for the next 20 years. The plan will be implemented through a series of 3-5 year action plans, as funding becomes available.

Segment Planning

The comprehensive management plan determined that the trail can best be developed and managed in smaller segments, given the trail's 3,000-mile scope and diverse resources. Segment planning will be needed to effectively understand the local resources, opportunities, and partner capacities in each segment.

Segment plans will tier off the CMP and address a five-year timeframe. Plans will require approval by NPS, which has trail-wide responsibilities for administering the Smith trail. Initial trail management segments include: 

  • James River, Chickahominy River, Nansemond River, and Elizabeth River
  • Cape Charles and Lower Eastern Shore
  • Nanticoke River
  • Middle Bay
  • Patapsco River
  • Patuxent River
  • Potomac River
  • Head of the Bay
  • Susquehanna River and Sassafras River
  • Rappahannock River and Piankatank River
  • York River, Mattaponi River, and Pamunkey River

The James River segment is the first stretch of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake NHT to undergo segment planning. The National Park Service is working with the James River Association, Chesapeake Conservancy, and the Commonwealth of Virginia in a collaborative planning process to identify resources, specific actions, and partnerships required to develop and manage the trail in the segment between Richmond and the Route 17 Bridge, including the free-flowing tidal portion of the Chickahominy River.

Trail Advisory Council

The advisory council for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, initially appointed by the Secretary of the Interior in 2008, consists of representatives of federal and state agencies and Bay-related organizations. The council consults with the Secretary on matters relating to the trail and assists the National Park Service in planning, identifying significant trail resources, and other matters. For information on the Trail Advisory Council, see the Frequently Asked Questions page on the trail's website.

Public Involvement

Wide public participation is essential throughout the trail planning process. Input from the public helps guide the National Park Service in finding the best methods to manage, interpret, and access the trail. Through workshops, consultations, and the public comment process, the National Park Service asks the public to help shape the framework for long-term management and use of the trail. Throughout the comprehensive management planning process the public was informed and invited to comment through the National Park Service Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC)website.

To learn of opportunities to participate in public meetings or workshops as trail planning and development continue, contact us to be added to the email contact list.

Interpretive Plan

As part of the trail planning process the National Park Service has prepared an interpretive plan for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. The interpretive plan provides a vision for interpretive, educational, and recreational opportunities related to the trail, and defines short-and long-term goals for making meaningful connections between visitors and Chesapeake Bay resources.

A product of collaboration with Chesapeake Bay Gateways, agencies, tribes, community organizations, and others, the interpretive plan is a guiding document with reference information that trail partners can use to develop visitor experiences along the trail.

Download the Interpretive Plan (4 MB)

Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment

The current planning process builds upon early planning documents. The Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, published in July 2006, was an essential part of the trail designation process. The document, prepared by the National Park Service and available for public comment prior to publication, is the foundation for trail planning. You can read the document by selecting the files below.

Statement of Significance

The statement of significance for the John Smith Trail is a report on national significance used to determine whether the proposed trail meets criteria for designation as a national historic trail. You can read a brief overview or download the document in its entirety or in sections.

 

Chespeake Bay Special Resource Study

Responding to a request from Congress included within report language for the Fiscal Year 1999 Interior Appropriations Act, the National Park Service prepared the Chesapeake Bay Special Resource Study and Final Environmental Impact Statement (SRS/FEIS) to explore the potential for a new unit of the National Park System focused on the Chesapeake Bay. The SRS/FEIS examines: whether having additional Chesapeake Bay resources within the Naitonal Park System would meet NPS criteria and would advance partnership efforts to conserve and restore the Chesapeake Bay; defines alternative concepts for how the National Park System might best represent the resources and significance of the Chesapeake Bay; and identifies a preferred alternative.

Download the entire report - .pdf (17 MB) (Note: this is a very large file and will take a significant amount of time to download, especially for those on dial-up connections)

Download individual chapters and sections:

  • Abstract - .pdf (75 kb)
  • Executive Summary - .pdf (135 kb)
  • Table of Contents .pdf (48 kb)
  • Section 1- Purpose and Need For Action - .pdf (145 kb)
  • Section 2 - National Significance of the Chesapeake Bay - .pdf (176 kb)
  • Section 3 - Analysis of Opportunities - .pdf (188 kb)
  • Section 4 - Conceptual Alternatives - .pdf (1.1 MB)
  • Section 5 - Affected Environment - .pdf (350 kb)
  • Section 6 - Environmental Consequences - .pdf (302 kb)
  • Section 7 - Environmentally Preferred Alternative -.pdf (102 kb)
  • Section 8 - Consultation and Coordination - .pdf (187 kb)
  • Section 9 - References - .pdf (69 kb)
  • Appendix A - Sub-Themes Associated with the Chesapeake Bay - .pdf (75 kb)
  • Appendix B - Comments from Federal, State and Local Government Agencies and Nongovernmental Organizations - .pdf (15.4 MB)
  • Appendix C - Suggested Places Based on Public and Agency Comments - .pdf (76 kb)

Record of Decision: Chesapeake Bay Special Resource Study & Final Environmental Impact Statement - .pdf (144 kb)

 

You are exiting the National Park Service website

Thank you for visiting our site.

You will now be redirected to:

We hope your visit was informative and enjoyable.

A portion of the map drawn during Smith's voyages.

Did You Know?
The American Indian people of the Chesapeake region often relied on translators to work with the many languages and dialects that people spoke. Such translators were often instrumental in helping the Smith party communicate with people they met along their journeys.

Last Updated: December 20, 2011 at 12:45 MST