Yosemite National Park Merced Wild and Scenic River REvised Comprehensive Management Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

As a result of a 2004 court ruling, the National Park Service has prepared the Merced Wild and Scenic River Revised Comprehensive Management Plan and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS). This plan revises the June 2000 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (Merced River Plan/FEIS). For more information about Yosemite's Merced River management planning process, please visit www.nps.gov/yose/planning/mrp/revision/.

The specific purpose of this document is to address user capacities in the Merced River corridor, reassess the river boundary in El Portal, and amend the park's General Management Plan. The document can be viewed online as HTML or PDF files. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader (version 5 or better) to view the PDF files. Most computers come with the software already installed, but if you don't have it, you can obtain the necessary software free of charge at www.nps.gov/hfc/plugins/.

Record of Decision html (139k) | pdf (413k)

Letter from the Superintendent html (11k) | pdf (363k)

Abstract html (11k) | pdf (38k)

Summary of How This Document Has Changed
In Response to Public Comment html (14k) | pdf (67k)

Executive Summary html (104k) | pdf (802k)

Introduction

What is the purpose of this Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement?

User Capacity Management and the VERP Framework

What are the methods for managing user capacity?

How does Yosemite National Park currently manage user capacity?

What are the Proposed Alternatives?

Alternative 1: No Action

Alternative 2: VERP Program with Interim Limits (Preferred)

Alternative 3: VERP Program with Segment Limits

Alternative 4: VERP Program with Management Zone Limits

Environmental Analysis

Environmentally Preferable Alternative

Consultation and Coordination Process

Chapter I: Purpose of and Need for the Project html (97k) | pdf (1,200k)

Introduction

What is a Wild and Scenic River?

Merced Wild and Scenic River

Legal History

Project Background

Purpose of the Project

Need for the Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS

Planning Context

Relationship to Yosemite National Park Plans

Regulations and Policies

Public Comment Process

Issues and Concerns Addressed in this Document

Issues and Concerns Not Addressed in this Document

Organization of the Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS

Chapter I: Purpose of and Need for the Project

Chapter II: User Capacity Management Program

Chapter III: Alternatives

Chapter IV: Affected Environment

Chapter V: Environmental Consequences

Chapter VI: Consultation and Coordination

Chapter VII: List of Preparers

Chapter VIII: Glossary

Chapter IX: Bibliography

Appendices

Chapter II: User Capacity Management Program html (275k) | pdf (1,900k)

Introduction

What is User Capacity?

Background

User Capacity Assumptions

User Capacity Methods

Yosemite National Park's Existing User Capacity Management Program

Yosemite's Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) Program

Desired Conditions/Management Zones

Specific and Measurable Indicators and Standards

Monitoring

Enforcing VERP Limits through Management Actions

Overview of 2005 Standards and Indicators

How VERP Works

Chapter III: Alternatives html (380k) | pdf (1,200k)

Introduction

Relationship between the User Capacity and El Portal Boundary Elements

Organization of this Chapter

Elements Common to All Alternatives

Merced River Plan Management Elements

Wilderness Management

Private Land and Public Agency Easements

Administrative Uses

Traditional Uses by American Indian Tribes

Mitigation Measures Common to All Construction Projects within the Corridor

Descriptions of the Alternatives

Alternative 1: No Action

Alternative 2: VERP program with Interim Limits (Preferred)

Alternative 3: VERP program with Segment Limits

Alternative 4: VERP program with Management Zone Limits

Alternatives Considered but Dismissed from Further Analysis

User Capacity

El Portal Boundary

Comparison of the Alternatives

Environmentally Preferable Alternative

Chapter IV: Affected Environment html (988k) | pdf (1,000k)

Introduction

Impact Topics Considered in this Plan

Impact Topics Dismissed from Further Analysis

Regional Setting

Natural Resources

Geology, Geohazards, and Soils

Hydrology, Floodplains, and Water Quality

Wetlands

Vegetation

Wildlife

Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species

Air Quality

Noise

Cultural Resources

Overview of the Human Occupation of the Merced River Corridor

Archeological Resources

Traditional Cultural Resources

Historic Sites, Structures, and Landscapes

Visitor Experience

Recreation

Orientation and Interpretation

Visitor Services

Wilderness Experience

Social Resources

Land Use

Transportation

Scenic Resources

Socioeconomics

Park Operations and Facilities

Chapter V: Environmental Consequences html (1,900k) | pdf (2,800k)

Introduction

Cumulative Impacts

Impairment

Methodologies

Natural Resources

Visitor Experience

Social Resources

Alternative 1: No Action

Natural Resources

Cultural Resources

Visitor Experience

Social Resources

Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources

Relationship of Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity

Responsiveness of Alternative 1 to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' Direction on the Merced River Plan

Alternative 2: Interim Limits with VERP program

Natural Resources

Cultural Resources

Visitor Experience

Social Resources

Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources

Relationship of Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity

Responsiveness of Alternative 2 to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' Direction on the Merced River Plan

Alternative 3: VERP program with Segment Limits

Natural Resources

Cultural Resources

Visitor Experience

Social Resources

Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources

Relationship of Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity

Responsiveness of Alternative 3 to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' Direction on the Merced River Plan

Alternative 4: Management Zone Limits with VERP

Natural Resources

Cultural Resources

Visitor Experience

Social Resources

Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources

Relationship of Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity

Responsiveness of Alternative 4 to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' Direction on the Merced River Plan

Chapter VI: Consultation and Coordination html (48k) | pdf (133k)

Consultation

Scoping History

Public Review of Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS

Results of Draft Review Comments

Comment Analysis and Response Process

Coordination

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

California State Historic Preservation Officer

U.S. Forest Service

California Department of Transportation

Bureau of Land Management

American Indian Consultation

Gateway Communities

List of Agencies, Organizations, and Businesses that Received the Revised Merced River Plan/SEIS

Federal Agencies

United States Representatives

State Agencies

American Indian Tribes

County and Local Governments

Organizations and Businesses

Libraries

Newspapers

Radio

Television

Colleges and Universities

Chapter VII: List of Preparers html (59k) | pdf (52k)

Chapter VIII: Glossary html (104k) | pdf (155k)

Glossary of Terms

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Chapter IX: Bibliography html (124k) | pdf (197k)

References

Map Data

Appendix A: Governing Mandates html (24k) | pdf (98k)

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

Interagency (Secretarial) Guidelines on the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

Wilderness Act

1978 National Parks and Recreation Act

16 USC Section 1a-7

CFR (Title 36)

National Park Service Management Policies

Appendix B: Mitigation Measures Common to All Alternatives html (20k) | pdf (68k)

Prior to Construction

During Construction

Post-Construction

Appendix C: User Capacity Alternative Assumptions html (80k) | pdf (108k)

Appendix D: Special-Status Species html (480k) | pdf (185k)

Appendix E: Potential Cumulative Actions html (75k) | pdf (150k)

Reasonably Foreseeable Actions

Present Actions

Past Actions

Appendix F: Summary of Public Comments and Responses html (873k) | pdf (1,200k)

Introduction

Public Comments and Responses

Results of Draft Review Comments

How To Use This Document

Concerns, Comments, and Responses

Planning Process and Policy

Relationship to Other Planning Efforts

Implementation Plans and Projects

Applicable Laws and Regulations

Consultation and Coordination

Alternatives

Other Alternatives

Cumulative Effects Analysis

Park Resources

Visitor Experience and Resource Protection

Special Land Designations

Visitor Experience

Access

Visitor Services

Transportation

Socio-economic Environment

List of Figures

Figure I-1 Regional Map

Figure I-2 Revision Process for the Merced Wild and Scenic River Revised Comprehensive Management Plan

Figure I-4 Classifications and Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Merced Wild and Scenic River

Figure I-5 River Protection Overlay Cross-Sections

Figure II-1 VERP Framework

Figure II-2 Management Zones for the Merced Wild and Scenic River

Figure II-3 Yosemite Valley Management Zones for the Merced Wild and Scenic River

Figure II-4 Gorge Management Zones for the Merced Wild and Scenic River

Figure II-5 Wawona Management Zones for the Merced Wild and Scenic River

Figure II-6 Range of Potential Management Actions

Figure II-7 VERP Framework

Figure III-1 Alternative 1, El Portal Boundary

Figure III-2 Alternative 2, El Portal Boundary (Preferred)

Figure III-3 Alternative 3, El Portal Boundary

Figure III-4 Alternative 4, El Portal Boundary

Figure IV-1 YARTS Ridership along Highway 140 May 2000 through July 2000

Figure IV-2 Yosemite National Park Visitation by Bus

Figure IV-3 Percent of Annual Buses and Bus Visitors by Month

Figure IV-4 Annual Park Visitation 1980 to 2000

Figure IV-5 Average Monthly Park Visitation

List of Tables

Table ES-1 Existing User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table ES-2 Alternative 2: User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table ES-3 Alternative 2: Interim Limits on Facilities and Specific Activities

Table ES-4 Alternative 3: User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table ES-5 Alternative 4: User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table I-1 Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Merced River (Main Stem and South Fork)

Table II-1 Yosemite Wilderness Trailhead Quota System

Table II-2 Management Zone Prescription Summary

Table II-3 Management Action Toolbox

Table II-4 Possible Levels of NEPA Compliance for Various Management Actions

Table II-5 Yosemite's VERP Program: Indicators and Standards by Management Zone

Table III-1 Existing User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table III-2 Alternative 1: Existing Use Levels

Table III-3 Alternative 2: User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table III-4 Alternative 2: Interim Limits on Facilities and Specific Activities

Table III-5 Comparison of General Management Plan Visitor Use and Employee Housing Levels (1980) with Existing Conditions (2004) and Proposed Capacity Levels with Full Implementation of the General Management Plan

Table III-6 Comparison of Number of General Management Plan Facilities (1980) with Interim Facility Limits, and General Management Plan Facilities Proposed Facilities

Table III-7 Alternative 3: User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table III-8 Alternative 3: Segment and Corridorwide Limits

Table III-9 Alternative 4: User Capacity Management Program Overview

Table III-10 Alternative 4: Management Zone and Corridorwide Limits

Table III-11 Comparison of Alternatives and Key Assumptions

Table III-12 Summary of Environmental Consequences

Table IV-1 Summary of California Wildlife Habitat Relationship Types in the Merced River Corridor

Table IV-2 Air Basin Attainment/Nonattainment Designations

Table IV-3 Recent Ozone and PM-10 Concentration Data for Yosemite National Park and Vicinity

Table IV-4 Recreational Opportunities Typical within the Merced River Corridor

Table IV-5 Concessioner Stock Use

Table IV-6 Interpretive Programs

Table IV-7 Total YARTS Ridership along Highway 140, Merced to Yosemite Valley, May 2000 through July 2004

Table IV-8 Summary of Major Intrusions Within Each Scenic Category

Table IV-9 Population by County

Table IV-10 County Population Projections, 2000-2050

Table IV-11 1996 Employment by Major Industry Sector

Table IV-12 1996 Income by Major Industry Sector

Table IV-13 1996 Economic Output by County and Industry Sector

Table IV-14 1998-2002 Total Taxable Retail Sales by County

Table IV-15 Employee Housing at Selected Locations in Yosemite National Park

Table IV-16 Monthly Parkwide Visitation 1980 through 2004

Table IV-17 Local Overnight Visitors' Lodging Locations (Summer)

Table IV-18 Existing Lodging and Camping Capacity in the Yosemite Region (excluding National Park Service facilities)

Table IV-19 Average Daily Spending by Yosemite Visitors in the Affected Region

Table IV-20 Total Spending by Yosemite Visitor Population Categories in 1998

Table IV-21 Ethnicity of Yosemite Visitors and California and Yosemite Region Residents

Table IV-22 Annual Household Income of Yosemite Visitors, California and Yosemite Region Residents

Table IV-23 2003 Yosemite Valley Energy Consumption

Table V-1 Effect of Alternative 1 on the ORVs of the Merced River

Table V-2 Typical Noise Levels from Construction Equipment

Table V-3 Effect of Alternative 2 on the ORVs of the Merced River

Table V-4 Effect of Alternative 3 on the ORVs of the Merced River

Table V-5 Effect of Alternative 4 on the ORVs of the Merced River

Table C-1 Alternative 1: No Action Alternative

Table C-2 Alternative 2: Interim Limits on Facilities and Specific Activities

Table C-3 Comparison of GMP Visitor Use and Employee Housing Levels (1980) with Existing Conditions (2004) and GMP Proposed Levels at full implementation

Table C-4 Alternative 3: Segment and Corridorwide Limits

Table C-5 Alternative 4: Management Zone and Corridorwide Limits

Table D-1 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species Considered in this Analysis