|
FAQs: The Merced River Plan
What is the Merced River Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement? The purpose of this document is to provide direction and guidance on how best to manage national park lands within the river corridor for the protection and enhancement of what the Act refers to as "Outstandingly Remarkable Values" (ORVs). Once completed, the Merced River Plan will become a foundation for future implementation plans. Like the 1980 Yosemite General Management Plan, the Merced River Plan will guide future management decisions. It does not propose specific actions. Why is the Merced River Plan important to me as a visitor? How will it affect my experience in Yosemite? This plan is important to all people in that the policies it establishes will protect and enhance the river for future generations. As future implementation plans arise, they must look to the Merced River Plan for guidance and direct their actions accordingly. Depending on the alternative selected, your visit will be affected primarily in terms of the types of recreational activities you enjoy in the river corridor. Some areas of the river may be zoned for less intensive types of visitor activity, affording more opportunities to experience natural quiet and reflection. Other areas may be zoned for bustling activity with frequent encounters with other visitors. Since the Merced’s Wild and Scenic River designation in 1987, park staff have been working on protecting the river through the development of a formal set of "outstandingly remarkable values" (ORVs), river corridor boundaries, and classifications. Boundaries and classifications were adopted in 1989. A formal set of ORVs were presented, along with the boundaries and classifications, in the 1996 Draft Yosemite Valley Housing Plan are used within the No Action Alternative of the Merced River Plan.
A further revision of ORVs is presented in the action alternatives of the Merced River Plan/FEIS. In response to public comment, they were revised to reflect the park’s greater understanding of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. ORVs must now meet two specific criteria:
Both of the above criteria must be satisfied in order for a resource to be included as an ORV. To comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, all of the action alternatives protect and restore the same set of revised ORVs. Trout populations are an example of a resource value removed from the list of 1996 Outstandingly Remarkable Values. In re-examining the list of values, the park asked the above questions and determined that while trout populations are obviously river-related, they were not unique to the region or the nation. As a result, trout were removed from the proposed ORVs for all action alternatives in the Merced River Plan/FEIS. What are "boundaries" and how have they been applied in the Merced River Plan/FEIS?Boundaries define the extent of the area to be included within the Wild and Scenic River corridor and vary by alternative. The alternatives in the Merced River Plan/FEIS test the implications of applying various boundary widths to provide a range of choices in the Merced River Plan. Two general widths are used: quarter-mile or 100-year floodplain.
What are "classifications"? Classifications are segments of the river that are designated as either "wild," "scenic," or "recreational," as defined by the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Classification represents the existing condition of the Wild and Scenic River corridor, not necessarily the desired future condition of the corridor. Wild river areas are pristine, free of impoundments, and generally inaccessible. Scenic areas are free of impoundments, generally undeveloped, and may be accessible by roads. Recreational areas are readily accessible by road, and may have undergone some diversion or impoundment in the past. The classifications for each segment remain constant throughout the alternatives with an exception in Alternatives 4 and 5. What is the River Protection Overlay? River Protection Overlay is a management tool used to help protect natural processes in the immediate river environment. It is generally a band that includes the river channel and a 100- or 150-foot buffer area (depending on location) on either side of the river. The width of the buffer was developed to allow woody debris to fall into the river providing nutrients and important wildlife habitat. In response to public comment, the Merced River Plan/FEIS outlines specific guidelines regarding future actions pertaining to the River Protection Overlay. What information is being used for the MRP? What new studies are being done? The best available current information was used to prepare the draft MRP. There is over 100 years of research and inventories of the Merced River and the Sierra Nevada ecosystem, which culminated in the 1996 Sierra Nevada Ecosystems Project (SNEP) report, which was used in the development of the Merced River Plan/FEIS. The professional expertise of biologists, hydrologists, ecologists, sociologists, landscape architects, planners, and others incorporated the latest understanding of their fields in relation to the Merced River. An extensive bibliography was developed as a reference source for the writing of the plan. No new studies were undertaken, except for the studies already underway such as transportation studies and analysis. Copies of all material listed in the bibliography are available in the park's Research Library. How does the Merced River Plan relate to the Highway 140 reconstruction work? Several months after road reconstruction began, the local chapter of the Sierra Club and the Mariposans for Environmentally Responsible Growth filed a lawsuit, attempting to halt construction. On July 12, 1999, U.S. District Court Judge Anthony Ishii provided an opinion that the NPS could continue work on the 6.4-mile section of the road where construction activities were in progress. In addition, he ordered that the NPS must complete a Comprehensive Management Plan for the Merced Wild and Scenic River and any related compliance documents before any new work that might potentially effect the river could begin. This postponed work on the 1.1-mile section of the road between Cascades Diversion Dam and Pohono Bridge as well as the removal of the Cascades Diversion Dam. These construction activities are no longer part of the current road project and are now being considered in the Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Once a Record of Decision on the Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement is signed, the park will have met the requirements of its court-directed deadline. Some comments addressed concerns regarding the proposed boundaries, classifications, Outstandingly Remarkable Values, and proposed River Protection Overlay. Other public comments included suggestions for changes to the management zoning to respond more directly to the protection of ORVs. Respondents also requested that the National Park Service provide more specific research and monitoring guidelines in the Merced River Plan/FEIS. In late-June, the Merced River Plan/FEIS was released, presenting a range of alternatives--including a preferred alternative--revised from the original draft plan. Following a 30-day required period of "no action," the Pacific West Regional Director of the National Park Service will select an alternative and will sign a "Record of Decision." How is carrying capacity being addressed? As it applies to the park, "carrying capacity" is the type and level of visitor use that can be accommodated while sustaining the desired resource and social conditions. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act requires the Merced River Plan to address "user capacities." The Merced River Plan/FEIS addresses this subject through an adaptive management tool known as the Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) framework. The VERP framework considers both the quality of visitor experiences and natural and cultural resources by focussing on impacts associated with visitor use. In other words, VERP interprets user capacity not as a prescription of numbers of people, but as a prescription of desired visitor experiences and resource conditions. As with other adaptive management techniques, the VERP framework assists park managers with decision-making; it does not, however, make decisions for the manager. VERP is intended to institutionalize an ongoing program in which park staff would continuously monitor visitors and resources, identify when discrepancies occurred between existing and desired visitor experiences and resource conditions, and take action to achieve desired conditions. In response to public comment, the Merced River Plan/FEIS contains detailed information regarding the VERP process and development of standards and indicators for future research and monitoring. Each of the action alternatives adopts the VERP framework. Some proposed Draft Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS actions include: • Removal of Cascades Diversion Dam to enhance the free flow of the river • Removal of development from the River Protection Overlay (a buffer zone that extends 150 feet on either side of the river in Yosemite Valley; 100 feet through El Portal) • Restoration of riparian and meadow habitat throughout the Merced River corridor Does the Merced River Plan allow the National Park Service to make decisions without further public comment? No, all significant changes or amendments to the plan will involve public comment. Special implementation actions, which will be covered in future plans, must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This act insures that environmental information is available to public officials and citizens before decisions are made and before actions are taken. However, in some rare instances, the superintendent can take immediate actions, but only for significant reasons (i.e. public safety). If this were to occur, all actions would be required to fall within specific guidelines. YNP/General The Planning Process  Changes from the Draft |
||||||||
Yosemite National Park Planning page http://www.nps.gov File created/updated Yosemite National Park Web Manager |
![]() |