|
|
|
Environmental Assessment Errata and ERRATA PART 1 - EA TEXT CORRECTIONS, ADDITIONS AND CLARIFICATION Pages 1 through 23 Pages 24 through 47 Errata Part II Lower Pines Campground Development of the Lower Pines campground modifications and related wetlands restoration would occur in a later phase of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campgrounds Improvement project. The wetlands at Lower Pines Campground include palustrine scrub shrub and riverine intermittent streambed. These wetlands flow to the Merced River . Alternative 3 would remove existing campsites and access roads in the River Protection Overlay. The redevelopment of Lower Pines Campground under Alternative 3 would avoid all wetland areas and enhance the Merced River corridor through the removal of built features adjacent to the river, potentially expanding the wetlands adjacent to the campsites being removed. The area of existing disturbed wetlands in Lower Pines affected by existing campsites planned for permanent removal as part of this project is approximately 1 . 0 acre. Removal of existing campsites from wetland habitat would have a local, long-term, moderate, beneficial impact to wetlands.
Summary of Alternative 3 Impacts. Alternative 3 would result in fill of approximately 0 . 015 acre of identified wetland areas. In addition to this long-term impact, construction activities would result in and local, short-term, minor, adverse construction impacts to wetlands. Removal of Southside Drive across Stoneman Meadow and removal of campsites in Lower Pines Campground and subsequent restoration of these areas would somewhat more than offset the identified wetland loss and degradation at Curry Village and Upper Pines associated with Alternative 3 . Additional wetland fill to accommodate the Mountain Shop would likewise be essentially offset by the preservation of similar wetland types in South Camp. Therefore, the localized long-term impacts to individual wetlands would be local, moderate, and adverse, and Alternative 3 would represent a net beneficial impact on wetland habitat and function . Cumulative Impacts Cumulative impacts to wetlands based on an analysis of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions in Yosemite Valley were discussed for Alternative 1 and are summarized below. Wetland and riparian systems of the Merced River corridor have been substantially altered by development and visitor activities. These changes have negatively influenced the size, form, and function of wetlands and the plants, wildlife, and aquatic species that inhabit them. Cumulative beneficial effects on wetlands include wetland restoration, rehabilitation projects, and ecosystem management. Cumulative adverse effects would be related to increased facilities, regional growth, and visitor demand such as those proposed by this project. Reasonably foreseeable future actions within Yosemite Valley are considered to have an overall beneficial effect on wetlands. For example, the Merced River Plan protects river-related natural resources through the application of management elements. Implementation of the Yosemite Valley Plan would result in a net gain of wetlands in Yosemite Valley through actions described under Alternative 1 . Some Yosemite Valley Plan projects, such as construction of a replacement footbridge at the Happy Isles area and construction of a vehicle bridge across Yosemite Creek near Yosemite Lodge, have the potential to adversely affect local wetlands. These projects would be designed to ensure the long-term protection of wetlands consistent with the Merced River Plan, the Clean Water Act, and Executive Order 11990: Protection of Wetlands. Full implementation of the Yosemite Valley Plan would result in a net gain of 118 acres of wetlands in Yosemite Valley through actions such as restoration of Upper River and a portion of Lower Pines Campgrounds to natural conditions; removal of roads through Stoneman and Ahwahnee Meadows; and removal of other bridges (e.g., Sugar Pine and possibly Stoneman) affecting the natural flow of the Merced River. Alternative 1 could minimize these benefits since utilities would remain in the restoration areas and utility repairs needed in the future could continue to have short term, localized, adverse impacts to these resources. Farther downstream, removal of the Cascades Diversion Dam would also remove an unnatural constriction to the free flow of the Merced River , thereby enhancing natural river dynamics including wetlands and aquatic systems below Yosemite Valley . Some Yosemite Valley Plan projects, such as construction of a replacement footbridge at the Happy Isles area, construction of a vehicle bridge across Yosemite Creek near Yosemite Lodge, and expansion of some campgrounds in Yosemite Valley , have the potential to adversely affect local wetlands. These projects would be designed to ensure the long-term protection of wetlands consistent with the Merced River Plan, the Clean Water Act, and Executive Order 11990 : Protection of Wetlands. Cumulative actions would have a long-term, moderate, beneficial cumulative effect on wetlands within Yosemite Valley due to wetland restoration efforts. Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in combination with the proposed action would have a net long-term, major, beneficial effect on wetlands in Yosemite Valley due to wetland restoration efforts.
Impairment Development under Alternative 3 would not result in impairment to the overall aquatic resources in Yosemite Valley . Minimal loss would occur, and these losses or other alterations to wetlands would not affect the larger aquatic systems in the local or regional setting. Alternative 3 would not impair wetland resources. The following information is provided to clarify and correct factual details concerning vehicle parking associated with each alternative. Factual errors concerning existing parking conditions were noted during the preparation of responses to comments on the environmental assessment. The corrections noted below are intended to provide readers with a more complete and accurate picture of existing parking accommodations. No errors associated with the number of proposed parking accommodations associated with the action alternatives were identified, and the corrections noted below do not result in any change to the analysis or conclusions presented in the environmental assessment. Changes to the environmental assessment text are as follows: 1 . Page II- 2 , change the third and fourth paragraphs addressing the no action alternative as follows: Under the No Action Alternative, land-use patterns would remain as they are today, and structures would neither be removed nor rehabilitated. Curry Village entrance loop road would remain two-way from Curry Village through the campgrounds, and Southside Drive would continue to bisect Stoneman Meadow. A total of 47 day-visitor and 628 overnight parking spaces would continue to be provided in Curry Village , and wilderness parking would continue to be provided east of Curry Village near the Happy Isles Loop Road (in the area proposed for location of the South Camp campgrounds). A total of 2 . Revise text on page II- 13 to clarify the relationship of proposed Curry Orchard parking to the existing wilderness parking area, as follows: The parking would generally match the location of overnight accommodations in Curry Village (figure II- 4 ). A total of 487 overnight parking spaces would be provided in Curry Village, in accordance with the Yosemite Valley Plan (see table II- 2 ). A total of 225 spaces would be located on the west side of Curry Village , while 262 spaces would be located on the east side of Curry Village . In addition to the overnight parking, 15 short-term parking spaces located immediately adjacent to the west end parking area would serve the registration area. The southern portion of the Curry Orchard would be developed for wilderness parking to replace existing wilderness parking in the South Camp area. No day-visitor parking would be provided. 3 . Revise text on page II- 39 to clarify the relationship of proposed Curry Orchard parking to the existing wilderness parking area, as follows: The parking would generally match the location of overnight accommodations in Curry Village (figure II- 13 ). A total of 487 overnight parking spaces would be provided in Curry Village, in accordance with the Yosemite Valley Plan (see table II- 3 ). A total of 225 spaces would be located on the west side of Curry Village , while 262 spaces would be located on the east side of Curry Village . In addition to the overnight parking, 15 short-term parking spaces located within the circular roadway would serve the registration area. The southern portion of the Curry Orchard would be developed for wilderness parking to replace existing wilderness parking in the South Camp area. No day-visitor parking would be provided. The following revisions to the EA provide text that more accurately represents the Yosemite Valley Plan treatment of Curry Orchard Parking. 1. Page ES- 3 , the third sentence of the third paragraph is revised as follows: The fruit trees in the historic Curry Orchard would be removed. 2. Page II- 5 , the sixth sentence of the last paragraph has been revised to read: The northern portion of the orchard would be restored to natural conditions 3. Page II- 14 , the first sentence at the top of the page has been replaced with the following:
4. Page II- 31 , the fourth paragraph has been revised to read: The northern portion of the orchard would be restored to natural conditions 5. Page II- 39 , the last sentence of paragraph four has been revised as follows:
6 . Page II- 72 , the following mitigation measure is added under Scenic Resources: • The final landscaping plan for the proposed wilderness parking area in the southern portion of the Curry Village Orchard will consider the installation of a combination of native deciduous and evergreen trees to reduce the appearance of an artificial pattern and enhance the effectiveness of visual screening of views from Glacier Point. An attempt will be made to vary the planting as much as feasible while accommodating the linear design of a parking area. The following text more specifically addresses protection of Native American resources. 1. Pg. IV- 108 , the last sentence of paragraph 1 is revised as follows: While the nature of these deposits is not known, testing prior to implementation of the project, coupled with monitoring would minimize the effects. Should significant resources be found, data recovery would be completed prior to campsite development. These activities would result in a local, permanent, minor, adverse impact . 2. Page IV- 188 , the last sentence of paragraph 2 is revised as follows: While the nature of these deposits is not known, testing prior to implementation of the project, coupled with monitoring would minimize the effects. Should significant resources be found, data recovery would be completed prior to campsite development. These activities would result in a local, permanent, minor, adverse impact . The following text clarifies the relationship of the day use corral to the project. 1 . Page II- 23 , the first paragraph under the South Camp heading has been revised as follows: A total of 40 new campsites ( 10 group and 30 walk-in) would be provided at South Camp (figure II- 8 ). South Camp would be accessed via the existing entrance to the area, which leads to existing dirt parking area (currently wilderness parking) in the vicinity of the old dump site and within the area designated for the day-use corral in the Yosemite Valley Plan. The South Camp campground layout anticipates the potential future siting of the corral in this area, and adequate setbacks have been incorporated in accordance with recreational health guidelines. The campsites and campground parking facilities would be located outside the boundary of the old dump site. Should further studies indicate that campsites are within the boundary of the dump site, the campsites will be relocated. 2. Page II- 49 , the third sentence of the fourth paragraph has been revised as follows: South Camp would be accessed via the existing entrance to the area, which leads to existing dirt parking are (currently wilderness parking) in the vicinity of the old dump site and within the area designated for the day-use corral in the Yosemite Valley Plan. The South Camp campground layout anticipates the potential future siting of the corral in this area, and adequate setbacks have been incorporated in accordance with recreational health guidelines. The campsites and campground parking facilities would be located outside the boundary of the old dump site. Should further studies indicate that campsites are within the boundary of the dump site, the campsites will be relocated. The following revision is necessary to correct a factual error identified in Table II-5 Page II- 79 , revise Table II- 5 as follows: • New 2 ,000 to 4 ,000 - 2 ,400 -square-foot campground check station at the east end of Curry Village . The following text clarifies the intent and location of the proposed security and support spaces. 1 . Page II- 18 , the second sentence under the heading “Emergency Services and Utilities” has been revised as follows: The 1,500 - to 1,800 -square-foot-facility would also house a security office for concessionaire-operated security administration purposes and support spaces for equipment and material storage . 2. Page II- 46 , the second sentence under the heading “Emergency Services and Utilities” has been revised as follows: The 1,500 - to 1,800 -square-foot-facility would also house a security office for concessionaire-operated security administration purposes and support spaces for equipment and material storage . The following text clarifies the relationship between concessionaire stable removal and proposed amphitheater development, and describes the rationale used to determine the amphitheater seating capacity. 1. Page ES- 3 , the paragraph describing the amphitheater has been revised as follows: A new 460 seat amphitheater would be constructed north of Clark 's Bridge. The new amphitheater would be reached by disabled-accessible paved trails. It would be sited on axis with Tenaya Canyon , which would allow a 360 -degree, unobstructed view of the eastern portion of Yosemite Valley . This element of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project would replace the existing amphitheater currently located at the Lower Pines campground that is planned for removal as part of this project, and occupies approximately the same footprint as that facility. The proposed site of the new amphitheater is currently occupied by a parking area associated with existing concessionaire stable facilities. Additional studies addressing the existing concessionaire stables as contributing elements of the Yosemite Valley Historic District and studies addressing potential sites for the relocation of stock operations are required prior to the finalization of park decisions concerning the potential removal of the stable facilities from this location. These decisions are needed before the proposed amphitheater could be developed at this location. All other elements of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project are independent of this project element, however, including the removal of the existing amphitheater from the Lower Pines Campground. Although the amphitheater would complement other elements of this alternative, it is not essential in order for the remaining elements of this alternative to be viable. If future studies conducted as part of the stables relocation project determine that the existing stables will remain at their current location, an alternative site for the amphitheater would be identified at that time. Should this occur, appropriate NEPA review of the alternative amphitheater site would be conducted as a separate action. 2. Page ES- 5 , the paragraph describing the amphitheater has been revised as follows: A new 460 seat amphitheater would be constructed north of Clark 's Bridge. The new amphitheater would be reached by disabled-accessible paved trails. It would be sited on axis with Tenaya Canyon , which would allow a 360 -degree, unobstructed view of the eastern portion of Yosemite Valley . This element of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project would replace the existing amphitheater currently located at the Lower Pines campground that is planned for removal as part of this project, and occupies approximately the same footprint as that facility. The proposed site of the new amphitheater is currently occupied by a parking area associated with existing concessionaire stable facilities. Additional studies addressing the existing concessionaire stables as contributing elements of the Yosemite Valley Historic District and studies addressing potential sites for the relocation of stock operations are required prior to the finalization of park decisions concerning the potential removal of the stable facilities from this location. These decisions are needed before the proposed amphitheater could be developed at this location. All other elements of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project are independent of this project element, however, including the removal of the existing amphitheater from the Lower Pines Campground. Although the amphitheater would complement other elements of this alternative, it is not essential in order for the remaining elements of this alternative to be viable. If future studies conducted as part of the stables relocation project determine that the existing stables will remain at their current location, an alternative site for the amphitheater would be identified at that time. Should this occur, appropriate NEPA review of the alternative amphitheater site would be conducted as a separate action. 3. Page II- 18 , the first paragraph describing the amphitheater has been revised as follows: A new 460 seat amphitheater would be constructed on the site of the concessionaire stable parking, north of Clark 's Bridge (figure II- 7 ) as proposed in the Yosemite Valley Plan . This element of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project would replace the existing amphitheater currently located at the Lower Pines campground that is to be removed as part of this project, and occupies approximately the same footprint as that facility. The new amphitheater is intended for use by National Park Service, the Park concessionaire, and the Yosemite Institute. It would be the primary venue for larger interpretive programs that would draw both campers and Curry Village guests, as well as other Valley visitors who would arrive via shuttle. The existing amphitheater at Curry Village would remain as a venue for more intimate gatherings and interpretive presentations oriented primarily towards Curry Village guests. The proposed site of the new amphitheater is currently occupied by a parking area associated with existing concessionaire stable facilities. Additional studies addressing the existing concessionaire stables as contributing elements of the Yosemite Valley Historic District and studies addressing potential sites for the relocation of stock operations are required prior to the finalization of park decisions concerning the potential removal of the stable facilities from this location. These decisions are needed before the proposed amphitheater could be developed at this location. All other elements of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project are independent of this project element, however, including the removal of the existing amphitheater from the Lower Pines Campground. Although the amphitheater would complement other elements of this alternative, it is not essential in order for the remaining elements of this alternative to be viable. If future studies conducted as part of the stables relocation project determine that the existing stables will remain at their current location, an alternative site for the amphitheater would be identified at that time. Should this occur, appropriate NEPA review of the alternative amphitheater site would be conducted as a separate action. 4. Page II- 46 , the first paragraph describing the amphitheater has been revised as follows: A new 460 seat amphitheater would be constructed on the site of the concessionaire stable parking, north of Clark 's Bridge (figure II- 7 ) as proposed in the Yosemite Valley Plan . This element of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project would replace the existing amphitheater currently located at the Lower Pines campground that is to be removed as part of this project, and occupies approximately the same footprint as that facility. The new amphitheater is intended for use by National Park Service, the Park concessionaire, and the Yosemite Institute. It would be the primary venue for larger interpretive programs that would draw both campers and Curry Village guests, as well as other Valley visitors who would arrive via shuttle. The existing amphitheater at Curry Village would remain as a venue for more intimate gatherings and interpretive presentations oriented primarily towards Curry Village guests. The proposed site of the new amphitheater is currently occupied by a parking area associated with existing concessionaire stable facilities. Additional studies addressing the existing concessionaire stables as contributing elements of the Yosemite Valley Historic District and studies addressing potential sites for the relocation of stock operations are required prior to the finalization of park decisions concerning the potential removal of the stable facilities from this location. These decisions are needed before the proposed amphitheater could be developed at this location. All other elements of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campground Improvements Project are independent of this project element, however, including the removal of the existing amphitheater from the Lower Pines Campground. Although the amphitheater would complement other elements of this alternative, it is not essential in order for the remaining elements of this alternative to be viable. If future studies conducted as part of the stables relocation project determine that the stables will remain at their current location, an alternative site for the amphitheater would be identified at that time. Should this occur, appropriate NEPA review of the alternative amphitheater site would be conducted as a separate action. 5. Page II- 61 , the paragraph describing the rejected alternative considering the use of the Lower Pines restroom to serve the new amphitheater has been revised as follows: This alternative was considered in an effort to keep all utilities on the south side of the Merced River . However, the distance from the restrooms to the amphitheater they would serve exceeded the National Park Service-supported policy of a two-minute maximum walking distance. Further, the dual usage by both campers and those attending amphitheater events would overburden the facility or require that it be expanded to a size out of context with the campground site. Finally, the existing The following text has been added to the discussion of “Alternatives Considered and Dismissed” to clarify the process regarding recreational vehicle hookups. Page II- 62 , Alternatives Considered but Dismissed the following discussion has been added as part of the Campground alternatives discussion: Recreational Vehicle Utility Hookups During the initial planning for the recreational vehicle hookups the issue of the types of hookups that would be included was discussed and a decision was reached to include electrical hookups to reduce noise as prescribed by the Yosemite Valley Plan . Other types of hookups such as water and sewer were not specifically required in the Yosemite Valley Plan and a decision was reached to not include these types of hookups to reduce overall project cost and reduce impacts associated with the installation of sewer and water pipelines. This was considered appropriate particularly in light of the planned installation of a new vehicle dump station near the planned recreational vehicle loops and installation of restrooms in those loops. The following table modification clarifies the campground parking ratios. Page 1 - 2 , Table I- 1 has been revised to state: Provide parking at a 1:1 ratio for walk-in campsites, a 2 : 1 ratio for new drive-in campsites (including recreational vehicle campsites) , and a 3:1 ratio for group campsites. The following text has been added to address the potential for using semi-pervious, non-asphalt surfacing. 1. Page II- 14 the following paragraph is added after paragraph 2 : Semi-pervious, non-asphalt surfacing will be considered for trails and parking areas that are not subjected to seasonal snow removal. It is a standard practice of Yosemite National Park to utilize asphalt/hard surfacing in all areas required to be maintained with snow removal and other heavy machinery. 2. Page II- 40 , the following paragraph is added after the first paragraph: Semi-pervious, non-asphalt surfacing will be considered for trails and parking areas that are not subjected to seasonal snow removal. It is a standard practice of Yosemite National Park to utilize asphalt/hard surfacing in all areas required to be maintained with snow removal and other heavy machinery. The following text has been added to provide requested information concerning wastewater treatment plant capacity. 1. Page III- 56 , paragraph 2 , add at the end of the paragraph: Sewer lines from the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campgrounds areas transport waste waters to the El Portal Wastewater Treatment Plant. This facility is permitted to treat 1 . 0 million gallons per day (mgd). Existing peak daily flows currently average from 0 . 4 to 0 . 6 mgd at this facility. 2. Page IV- 129 , paragraph 2 , add at the end of the paragraph: Wastewater volumes associated with the buildout of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley campgrounds improvements (including the new recreational vehicle dump station and other identified facilities) were included in the design volumes used in the East Yosemite Valley Utilities Improvement Plan. As addressed in that plan, these flows combined with all other Yosemite Valley wastewater flows will not exceed the permitted capacity of the existing El Portal Wastewater Treatment Facility. No expansion of that facility is required in connection with the development of Alternative 2 . 3. Page IV- 211 , paragraph 2 , add at the end of the paragraph: Wastewater volumes associated with the buildout of the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley campgrounds improvements (including the new recreational vehicle dump station and other identified facilities) were included in the design volumes used in the East Yosemite Valley Utilities Improvement Plan. As addressed in that plan, these flows combined with all other Yosemite Valley wastewater flows will not exceed the permitted capacity of the existing El Portal Wastewater Treatment Facility. No expansion of that facility is required in connection with the development of Alternative 3 . The following text provides the rationale for constructing new restrooms in Upper Pines Campground under Alternative 3. Page II- 50 , paragraph 3 under the Upper Pines Campground discussion is revised as follows: Two new restroom buildings would be constructed in the new loop. No shower facilities would be provided because campers would use the central shower facility. Throughout the remainder of the drive-in campsites, new restrooms would be provided to provide access for disabled persons, as well as encourage access along campground roadways thereby reducing resource damage and camper disturbance associated with informal trails across the campgrounds. Nine existing restroom buildings would be demolished and 10 new restrooms constructed to serve the drive-in campsites. One existing restroom building at the southeast corner of the campground would be upgraded. Some of the existing camper spurs would need to be modified or moved to allow for the relocated restrooms. One restroom would be located in the talus zone. The following provides information regarding impervious surface calculations for each of the alternatives. 1. Page II- 2 , the following sentence is added at the end of the second paragraph under Alternative 1 : No Action: Approximately 26.62 acres of impervious surfaces would continue to exist in Curry Village and the Campgrounds under Alternative 1. 2. Page II- 5 , the following sentence is added at the end of the second paragraph under Alternative 2 : Approximately 24 . 28 acres of impervious surface area would be developed in Curry Village and the campgrounds under Alternative 2 , a decrease of approximately 2 . 34 acres or 8 . 8 percent less than Alternative 1 . The decrease in impervious surfaces would primarily result from the removal of campsites and related roadways and facilities in the Lower Pines Campground, and removal of structures in Curry Village . 3. Page II- 31 , the following sentence is added at the end of the second paragraph under Alternative 3 (Preferred): Approximately 24 . 99 acres of impervious surface area would be developed in Curry Village and the Campgrounds under Alternative 3 , a decrease of approximately 1 . 63 acres or 6 . 1 percent less than Alternative 1 . The decrease in impervious surfaces would primarily result from the removal of campsites and related roadways and facilities in the Lower Pines Campground, and removal of structures in Curry Village . The following text clarifies impacts to the Curry Village and the Camp Curry Historic District associated with Alternative 3 (the Selected Alternative): 1. Page IV- 194 , second paragraph under “ Curry Village and the Camp Curry Historic District” has been revised as follows: The historic Curry Orchard, the Curry Orchard parking lot, and 253 historic guest tent cabins would be removed, resulting in a local, long-term, permanent adverse impact on the historic district. The intensity of this impact would be reduced to a moderate level through site design, and by retaining the general configuration of the remaining 174 tent cabins around the central core of the Village, in keeping with the historic design and extent of Camp Curry . 2. Page IV- 195 , first paragraph, the last two sentences have been revised as follows: Rehabilitation of the historic registration building, including removal of later additions, would have a local, permanent minor, beneficial impact on the historic district. Construction of a new registration building would have a permanent, adverse impact on the historic district that would be reduced to a moderate level through the use of compatible design in accordance with the Architectural Character and Site Design Guidelines for Yosemite National Park. Chapter V: Merced Wild and Scenic River Table V- 1 has been revised as follows: Page V- 15 , Biological, replace the last sentence in the effects column with the following two sentences: “The proposed action would result in a net reduction of the total number of visitor lodging accommodations at Curry Village . Although visitor use is considered to have a long-term, minor adverse impact on the biological Outstandingly Remarkable Value, this Outstandingly Remarkable Value would be protected on a segment-wide basis.” Page V- 15 , Cultural, replace the last sentence in the first paragraph in the effects column with the following two sentences: “Where appropriate, archaeological testing will be conducted and sites will be avoided wherever feasible. If site disturbance cannot be avoided, archaeological data recovery would be implemented in accordance with the 1999 Programmatic Agreement with the State Historic Preservation Officer to mitigate potential impacts prior to construction.” Page V- 16 , Hydrologic Processes, insert the following sentence immediately prior to the last sentence in the effects column: “The total number of visitor accommodations at Curry Village would be reduced by implementing either of the action alternatives.” Bibliography Additions Protection of Wetlands Executive Order Stantec Consulting, Inc. 1998g Procedural Manual # 77.1 : Wetland Protection, Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR- 98-203 . Figure II-8 South Camp Alternative 2 Figure II-9 Upper Pines Campground Alternative 2 Figure II-10 Lower Pines Campground Alternative 2 Figure II-17 South Camp Alternative 3 Figure II-18 Upper Pines Campground Alternative Figure II-19 Lower Pines Campground Alternative 3 Figure III-3a Jurisdictional Wetlands Figure III-5 NPS Scenic Rating Classification Appendix E The entire appendix is replaced with the Final Wetlands Statement of Findings, which is attached to the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campgrounds Improvement Project FONSI. Appendix F The entire appendix is replaced with the Final Floodplain Statement of Findings, which is attached to the Curry Village and East Yosemite Valley Campgrounds Improvement Project FONSI.
|
| Finding of No Significant Impact (main) - Letter from the Superintendent - Finding of No Significant Impact (table of contents) - Finding of No Significant Impact (document) - Wetland Statement of Findings - Floodplain Statement of Findings - Environmental Assessment Errata and Response to Substantive Comments |
