Main . Abstract . Executive Summary. Letter From The Superintendent . Table of Contents

Purpose and Need . Alternatives . Affected Environment . Environmental ConsequencesMerced Wild and Scenic River . Consultation and Coordination 

List of Preparers and Reviewers . Glossary . Bibliography . Appendices

Yosemite Home . Yosemite Planning Page

 

Chapter VI: Consultation and Coordination

Compliance History

Environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the protection of resources did not exist when the Cascades Diversion Dam was constructed in 1917. Environmental compliance for Cascades Diversion Dam began in 1982, when alternatives for managing the future of the hydroelectric generating facility were considered. An overview of environmental compliance documents completed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act that relate to Cascades Diversion Dam are presented below.

Hydroelectric Power System Environmental Assessment (NPS 1982). The purpose of this document was to study and evaluate alternatives for approaching the future of the then 62-year-old hydroelectric generating facility. Alternatives included retaining, replacing, enlarging, and abandoning the system. The preferred alternative proposed repairs, replacements, and a slight increase in capacity.

Electrical Distribution System Replacement and Cascades Dam Removal Environmental Assessment (NPS 1987b). The purpose of this document was to consider alternative proposals for the removal of the abandoned Cascades Diversion Dam and the restoration of the dam site to natural conditions.

Addendum to the Electrical Distribution System Replacement and Cascades Dam Removal Environmental Assessment (NPS 1987a). This document provided additional data on the removal of Cascades Diversion Dam. The addendum concluded that further environmental analysis would be required to make an informed decision on the method and extent of dam removal. Consequently, removal of the dam was eliminated from the project.

Finding of No Significant Impact, Phase II Replacement of the Electrical Distribution System in Yosemite Valley (NPS 1987c). The Finding of No Significant Impact described replacement of the electrical distribution system within Yosemite Valley.

Finding of No Significant Impact, Electrical Distribution System Replacement (NPS 1988). The Finding of No Significant Impact presented the preferred alternative described in the Electrical Distribution System Replacement and Cascades Dam Removal Environmental Assessment (NPS 1987b), excluding removal of Cascades Diversion Dam and attendant structures.

Merced Wild and ScenicRiver Comprehensive Management Plan (Merced River Plan) (NPS 2001a). The Merced River Plan applies seven management elements to prescribe desired future conditions, typical visitor activities and experiences, and park facilities and management activities allowed in the river corridor. The Merced River Plan applies to any project that is within the Wild and Scenic River boundary, or that would affect the Outstandingly Remarkable Values or free-flowing condition of the river. Removal of the Cascades Diversion Dam complies with the intent of the Merced River Plan to protect and enhance free-flowing conditions.


Yosemite Valley Plan (NPS 2000a). The National Park Service recently developed the Yosemite Valley Plan to implement the goals of the General Management Plan in Yosemite Valley. The Yosemite Valley Plan is designed to meet the resource preservation and visitor experience goals in Yosemite Valley, and calls out specific actions to meet these goals. Among the actions identified in the Yosemite Valley Plan is removal of Cascades Diversion Dam.

Scoping History

On April 18, 2001, the National Park Service held an informal public scoping meeting to discuss the potential removal of Cascades Diversion Dam. The meeting included project orientation, group discussion, and a visit to the dam site to view the existing conditions. The purpose of the informal public scoping meeting was to: (1) provide participants with an overview of existing conditions and the proposed action; (2) ask participants to identify key issues that should be analyzed during the environmental review and compliance process; and (3) provide an opportunity for participants to ask questions regarding project alternatives and the overall environmental review and compliance process. Public scoping comments were accepted through April 27, 2001.

Over 75 public scoping comments were received. All comments were reviewed and analyzed to determine public concerns. In addition, the National Park Service posts a project fact sheet and project planning updates on the park’s web site. Project planning updates have also been presented at ongoing open house meetings and in the park’s planning update newsletter. Based on public scoping comments and applicable federal law, regulations, and executive orders, the National Park Service determined that an environmental assessment (not an en environmental impact statement) would be the appropriate level of compliance for the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project. Public scoping comments and issues raised by National Park Service staff were used in the alternatives development process and the analysis presented in this document.

Agency Consultation

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a Special Site Permit for the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project in conjunction with preparation of the El Portal Road Improvements Environmental Assessment in 1997. In December 2002, the National Park Service requested an extension on the timeline of the permit for dam removal activities. The extended permit would be valid only for actions related to dam removal and not for future El Portal Road improvements. In addition, the National Park Service notified the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project was a discrete project from the future El Portal Road Improvement Project and would not include road improvements. The extended permit would be in place prior to implementation of the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project.

Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

The National Park Service is currently coordinating with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain required permits. The National Park Service may be required to submit a report of waste discharge, and obtain Waste Discharge Requirements or an individual waiver. Copies of the existing waste discharge waiver are on file at YosemiteNational Park. The permit would be in place prior to implementation of the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 United States Code 1531 et seq.), requires all federal agencies to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by the agency does not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species or critical habitat. The National Park Service requested a list of federally listed endangered and threatened species that may be present in the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project area from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on September 23, 2002. The list received from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on September 27, 2002 was used as a basis for the special-status analysis in this environmental assessment (see Appendix D, Special-Status Species Evaluation). Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will continue, as defined by Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as environmental compliance for the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project is finalized.

California State Historic Preservation Officer/Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

Cascades Diversion Dam has been the subject of previous evaluation and mitigation actions, as described at the beginning of this chapter. In 1986, the National Park Service evaluated the impacts associated with the demolition, relocation, and/or rehabilitation of all components of the Yosemite Hydroelectric Power Plant (also known as the Cascades Powerhouse). This evaluation included the removal of the dam. With the completion of this evaluation, the National Park Service completed the consultation process associated with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. As part of this process, the National Park Service signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the California State Historic Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. A copy of the memorandum is located at the end of this chapter. The memorandum identified stipulations for dam removal, including the preparation of Historic American Engineering Report documentation, the submittal of archival photographs and narrative to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Fresno Metropolitan Museum, and the development of an accurate scale model of the entire Merced River hydroelectric system. The National Park Service has complied with the various stipulations of the Memorandum of Agreement and has sent a letter to the State Historic Preservation Officer indicating that the Section 106 consultation process is complete.

In addition to compliance with stipulations of the 1986 Memorandum of Agreement, removal of the dam would also comply with the requirements in Appendix E (Adverse Effects and Standard Mitigation Measures for Historical Properties) of the Yosemite Valley Plan. These requirements are included in the 1999 Programmatic Agreement between the National Park Service, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the “Resolution of Adverse Effects” associated with planning, construction, operations, and maintenance activities within Yosemite National Park.


American Indian Consultation

As part of the development of the Draft and Final Yosemite Valley Plan/SEIS, the National Park Service consulted with the following park-associated, federally recognized tribes and nonfederally recognized American Indian communities who refer to themselves as “tribes”: the American Indian Council of Mariposa County, Inc.; the North Fork Mono Rancheria; the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians; the Chukchansi Tribal Government; the Mono Lake Indian Community; the Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony; and the Bishop Paiute Tribal Council. These consultations were ongoing throughout the planning process for the Yosemite Valley Implementation Plan/SEIS and will continue through the design and implementation phases for activities taking place under the Yosemite Valley Plan. At present, the National Park Service is consulting with seven American Indian tribes and groups regarding such as issues access for traditional use, gathering of traditional materials, protection and mitigation of impacts to traditional cultural resources, and preservation and management of important cultural places.

Between June 28, 2000 and July 17, 2000, National Park Service representatives met with representatives from seven tribal groups associated with Yosemite National Park. Since July of 2000, tribal consultation has been ongoing regarding concerns associated with the proposed project. Recently, the National Park Service requested that the Southern Sierra Miwok identify concerns regarding plant gathering within the river corridor between Cascades Diversion Dam and Cascades Picnic Area.

Future Information

Updated information about various aspects of the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project will be periodically distributed via newsletters, mailings, the Yosemite National Park web site (www.nps.gov/yose/planning), and regional and local news media. There will be a 30-day public comment period on the environmental assessment.

Written comments regarding this document should be directed to:

Mail:          Superintendent, Yosemite National Park

                    ATTN.:  Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project

                    P.O. Box 577

                    Yosemite, California  95389

 

Fax:            209/379-1294

Email:        Yose_Planning@nps.gov

 

Written comments will also be accepted at the National Park Service planning open house held on February 26, 2003 (2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) at the Yosemite Valley Visitor Center East Auditorium. Planning teams will be on hand to answer questions and provide more information regarding the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project, as well as several other Yosemite National Park planning efforts.

To request a printed copy, refer to the information directly above or phone 209/379-1365.


List of Agencies, Organizations, and Businesses that Received the Cascades Diversion Dam Removal Project Environmental Assessment


Acton – Agua Dulce Trails Council

ADA Compliance Service

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

AIA California Council

Alameda County Public Library

All Seasons Groveland Inn

American Alpine Club

American Hiking Society

American Indian Council of Mariposa, Inc.

American River Club

American Whitewater

Ansel Adams Gallery

Antelope Valley Press

Associated Press

Automobile Club of Southern California

Backcountry Horsemen of California

Bakersfield Californian

Bassett Memorial Library

Biophilia Society

Bishop Chamber of Commerce

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

California Department of Boating and Waterways

California Department of Fish and Game

California Department of Parks and Recreation

California Department of Justice,
Attorney General

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)

Caltrans, Transportation Planning Branch

Caltrans Central Regional Environmental Analysis Office

Caltrans District 9

Caltrans District 6

Caltrans Division of Transportation Planning, MS32

Caltrans Environmental Planning

Caltrans New Technology and Research

Caltrans Planning

California Native American Heritage Commission

California Office of Historic Preservation

California Office of Planning and Research

California Regional Water Quality Control Board

California State Clearinghouse

California State Department of Justice

California State Mining and Mineral Museum

California State Resources Agency

California State Senate

California Trade and Commerce Agency

California Trout Inc, Sierra Nevada Office

California Bicycle Coalition

California Preservation Foundation

California State Automobile Association

California State Library

California Wilderness Coalition

Californians for Western Wilderness

Canyonlands National Park

Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center

California Native Plant Society Sequoia Chapter

Coconino National Forest

Coldwell Banker – Dan Blough & Associates

Columbia College Library

Comfort Inn

Congressman George Miller

Conservation Study Institute

Contra Costa Times

Council of Fresno County Governments

California State University Fresno, Henry Madden Library

California State University Sacramento

California State University Stanislaus

Cycle California! Magazine

David Evans & Associates, Inc.

Delaware North Corporation

Department of Defense U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Earth First! –Santa Cruz

Earth Island Institute

Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund

East Bay Bicycle Coalition

Eastern Madera County Chamber of Commerce

ECO News

Economic Development Council

El Portal Chevron

El Portal Homeowners Association

El Portal Market

El Portal Town Planning Advisory Committee

Environment & Natural Resources

Environment Now

Environmental Defense Fund

Environmental Science Associates

Federal Emergency Management Association

Fish Camp Advisory Council

Fish Camp Property Owners Association

Foothill Resources

Foresta Preservation Association

Fresno Chamber of Commerce

Fresno County Board of Supervisors

Fresno County Planning and Resource Management

Fresno County City Planning Department

Fresno Flats Historical Library, SHSA

Fresno Visitors Bureau

Friends of the Earth

Friends of the River

Friends of the River/American Rivers

Friends of Yosemite Valley

George Radanovich, Representative

Groveland Branch Library

Groveland Community Services District

Groveland Ranger District

Groveland Rotary

HA Lewis, Inc

Heritage Trails

Highway 120 Association

Highways Magazine

Host Communications

Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest

Inyo County Planning Department

Inyo National Forest

John T. Doolittle, Representative

KCBS-AM Radio

KCRA TV

KFBK Radio

KFIV Radio

KGO Radio

KMJ Radio

KMPH Radio

KOVR TV

KQED Radio

KTVU

KUHL/KZSQ Radio

KVML, KZSQ, & KKBN

KXTV

Los Angeles City Public Library

Los Angeles Times

Madera County

Madera County Board of Supervisors

Madera County Chuckchansi Tribal Government

Madera County North Fork Mono Indian Museum

Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce

Marin County Public Library

Mariposa County

Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors

Mariposa County Chamber of Commerce

Mariposa County Department of Public Works

Mariposa County High School

Mariposa County Planning Department

Mariposa County Public Library

Mariposa County Unified School District

Mariposa County Visitors Bureau

Mariposa Gazette

Mariposa Horse Association

Mariposa Public Utility District

Mariposa Superintendent of Public Schools

Mariposa Tribune

Merced Conference and Visitor Center

Merced County Association of Governments

Merced County Planning Commission

Merced County Planning Department

Merced Irrigation District

Merced Sun Star

MERG

MIG-Berkeley

Minarets Ranger District

Modesto County City Planning Department

Modesto County Planning Department

Mono County Board of Supervisors

Mono County Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony

Mono County Community Development Department

Mono County Mono Lake Indian Community

Mono County Planning Department

Monograph Acquisition Services

Mountain Light Photography

National Tour Association

National Trust for Historic Preservation

Native Habitats

Natural Resources Council

Natural Resources Defense Council

NBC News

NBC TV

Newsweek

North Fork Rancheria

Northcoast Environmental Center

National Parks and Conservation Association, National Office

National Park Service (NPS)

NPS – Air Resources Division

NPS – Columbia Cascades Seattle Office

NPS – Denver Service Center

NPS – Pacific West Region

NPS – Pacific Great Basin Support Office

NPS – Water Resources Division

NPS – Office of Legislative and Congressional Affairs

Oakhurst Public Library

Oakland Tribune

Office of Assemblyman Dave Cogdill

Official Trip Reports

SBC Pacific Bell

Pacific Gas and Electric Public Affairs

Pacific Legal Foundation

Planning and Conservation League

Pacific Southwest Region Forest and Range Experimental Station

Ramada Limited Oakhurst

Royston, Hanamoto Alley & Abey

Robert Crown Law Library

Royal Robbins, Inc.

Sacramento County Public Library

Salazar Library, Sonoma State University

San Bernardino County Public Library

San Francisco Chronicle

San Francisco City Public Library

San Francisco Examiner

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, Hetch Hetchy Water & Power

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

San Jose City Public Library

San Jose Mercury News

Santa Cruz County Library

Save-the-Redwoods League

Saving Yosemite

Scotty’s B&B/Cabin Rentals

Service Employees International Union Local 535

Sequoia Alliance

Sierra Club

Sierra Club Condor Group

Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter

Sierra Club Merced Group

Sierra Club National Office

Sierra Club Range of Light, Toiyabe Chapter

Sierra Club Tuolumne Group

Sierra Club Yosemite Committee

Sierra Communications

Sierra National Forest

Sierra Railroad Company

Sierra Star

Sierra Telephone

Sonoma County Library

Sonora Union Democrat

Soroptomist International of Groveland

Saint Patrick-Saint Vincent High School

Stanford University Green Library

Stanislaus County Environmental Review Committee

Stanislaus Council of Government

Stanislaus County Library

Stanislaus National Forest

State Water Resources Control Board

Stockton Record

Teamsters 386

The Access Fund

The Fresno Bee

The Modesto Bee

The Mountain Democrat Newspaper

The Redwoods in Yosemite

The Sacramento Bee

The Trust for Public Land

Theroux Environmental

Tioga Lodge

The Nature Conservancy Weed Program

Tuolumne County

Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors

Tuolumne County Chamber of Commerce

Tuolumne County Community Development

Tuolumne County Department of Public Works

Tuolumne County Planning Commission

Tuolumne County Tuolumne Me-wuk Tribal Council

Tuolumne County Visitor Bureau

University of California Berkeley Bancroft Library

University of California Davis Shields Library

University of California Water Resources Center Archives

University of California Los Angeles Maps and Government Information Library

University of California Los Angeles Young Research Library

United States Attorney’s Office

University of California Library Tech Services

University of Minnesota Forestry Library

URS

U.S. Congress

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)

U.S. Post Office

USA Media

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service

U.S. Department of the Interior Library

USGS Publications Department

USGS Water Resources Division, Western Region

Via Adventures

Wawona Area Property Owners Association

Wawona Town Plan Advisory Committee

Wild Earth Advocates

Wild Wilderness

Wilderness Society

Wilderness Watch

Wildlands Center for Preventing Roads

Yosemite Association Board of Trustees

Yosemite Area Audubon

Yosemite Association

Yosemite Bug Hostel

Yosemite Campers Association

Yosemite Campers Coalition

Yosemite Concession Services

Yosemite Fund

Yosemite Guides

Yosemite Institute

Yosemite Mobilization Committee

Yosemite Motels

Yosemite Mountaineering School

Yosemite Partners GMP

Yosemite Pines

Yosemite Research Center

Yosemite Research Library

Yosemite Restoration Trust

Yosemite Sierra Visitors Bureau

Yosemite Sightseeing Tours

Yosemite Valley Railroad Company

Yosemite Valley School

Yosemite West Group

Yosemite West Home Owners

Yosemite West Real Estate


INSERT ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
DATED JUNE 6, 1996 (4 PAGES)

 

Main . Abstract . Executive Summary. Letter From The Superintendent . Table of Contents

Purpose and Need . Alternatives . Affected Environment . Environmental ConsequencesMerced Wild and Scenic River . Consultation and Coordination 

List of Preparers and Reviewers . Glossary . Bibliography . Appendices

Yosemite Home . Yosemite Planning Page