The
Norbeck Dam is located 1.5 miles (2.4 km) north of the visitor center on
S.D. 87. The story of the Norbeck Dam is marked with irony. Named for U.S.
Senator from South Dakota Peter Norbeck who was instrumental in the development
of Wind Cave National Park, Custer State Park, and the scenic highways in
the Black Hills, the dam literally never held water. The dam was constructed
in 1930 with the purpose of providing a water supply for the game animals
in the Wind Cave Game Preserve. The Game Preserve, established in 1912 by
the Bureau of Biological Survey, adjoined Wind Cave National Park on the
north. The preserve became part of the park in 1935.
The dam is an earthen structure, approximately
300 feet (91 m) long, 34 feet (10.4 m) high and 200 feet (61m) wide
at the base. The dam was built across Cold Spring Creek, that flows
from the west. Material to build the dam was taken from areas just
upstream from the dam site. The earth was tamped to make a more impervious
structure.
The dam never held water. Several reasons were
offered, including poor design, poor construction, and permeable rock
layers beneath the base of the dam. In the years that followed, plans
for repairing or abandoning the dam were discussed. In 1988, a concrete
box culvert was installed in the base of the dam allowing continuous
drainage. This breach negates the integrity of the dam and the dam
is no longer of any historical significance. However, the crest of
the dam still serves as the base for S.D. 87.
The reservoir behind the dam was to be called Lake
Ti-Tan-Ka. Since the dam could not hold water, it was derisively referred
to as "Peter's Puddle", after Peter Norbeck. Some people
considered the dam critical for providing wildlife with needed water
and a place for visitors to view wildlife when the animals congregated
there. Others argued against the keeping the dam because it was artificial
and the likelihood a reservoir would attract non-native animals. The
latter is a much stronger argument and in keeping with the mission
and philosophies of the National Park System, such a structure would
never be built in a National Park area today. |
|