| Project Narratives - PMIS 86662 |
Description
Abstract
A comprehensive survey of microbial species in the Timpanogos
Cave system is needed to understand their role in the cave�s
ecology. The Biotechnology Center at Western Kentucky University has
developed a "DNA fingerprinting" technique that allows many
different microorganisms to be surveyed in a single sample. The
growing database of DNA sequence and phylogenetic information along
with fragment sizes from the cave clone database provides a means
for recognizing and monitoring bacterial species in cave sediments,
without the need to isolate and culture the organisms.
|
Justifications
Problem
Statement
A comprehensive survey of microbial species in the Timpanogos
Cave system is needed to understand their role in the cave�s
ecology. It is known that microbes play a vital role in acid
production, which breaks down limestone caves over time. Microbes
are also a critical indicator species for the presence of human
waste, sewage, and petroleum in caves. The time consuming practice
of culturing organisms from the environment has had limited success
for only a few species, and most organisms cannot be grown in a lab.
The Biotechnology Center at Western Kentucky University has
developed a "DNA fingerprinting" technique that allows many
different microorganisms to be surveyed in a single sample. The
technique extracts DNA directly from cave sediments and amplifies
bacterial 16S rDNA using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with
specific primers. Genetic libraries of bacterial 16S rDNA have been
generated, and cloned 16S rDNA sequences from cave bacteria have
been analyzed by DNA sequencing and fragment analysis. Species are
being identified or taxonomically classified by phylogenetic
sequence analysis and comparison to electronic nucleic acid
databases, and characteristic fluorescent restriction fragment
lengths have been tabulated for cloned or cultured cave bacterial
16S rDNA and standards. The 16S rDNA sequence and fragment database
constitutes a reference to which DNA profiles of cave sediment
bacterial communities can be compared.
|
Measurable
Results
Methods
Genetic identification of environmental strains.
Using modern DNA technology, bacteria can be identified and
classified according to the sequences of their genes encoding 16S
ribosomal RNA (16S rDNA). Different species of bacteria possess
characteristic 16S rDNA sequences. Bacterial 16S rDNA sequences may
be selectively amplified from the mixture of DNA fragments extracted
from the environment to create many copies for more detailed
studies. With this technique, bacterial species can be identified
and their genetic relationships can be determined without the need
to culture individual strains in the laboratory. Furthermore,
environmental bacteria that cannot be grown in the laboratory can
still be detected by the presence of 16S rDNA (Siering, 1998; Angert
et al. 1998; Holmes et al. 2001).
Sampling and DNA extraction.
Sediment from Timpanogos Cave is scooped wearing latex gloves
into sterile centrifuge tubes and kept on ice shipped to the
BioTechnology Lab at Western Kentucky University. The DNA is
extracted from 1 gram of cave sediment using a simplified procedure,
and the mixed environmental nucleic acids are visualized by agarose
gel electrophoresis. Cave sediment contains many microorganisms,
including bacteria, fungi, protozoans, and even larger cave
invertebrates with small particles of dead plant and animal
material. All of these things contribute to the mixture of DNA
fragments that can be extracted directly from cave sediment.
Amplification of 16S rDNA.
To study the DNA of cave bacteria among all the DNA fragments
present, specific DNA sequences are amplified out of the mixture
using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific taxonomic
primers. For the test study that focuses on the bacterial community,
primers 27f and 1492r are used(Lane, 1991; Layton et al. 1994).
Cloning and Sequencing.
The amplified 16S rDNA are spliced into a cloning and sequencing
vector plasmid DNA. The circular recombinant plasmid molecules thus
produced are used to transform E. coli for studies of individual
copies of the environmental genes. A cave clone library of E. coli
host cells carrying cave DNA sequences was created that can be
compared to other cave samples. Other clones on file in the library
are related to Gram positive species, Planctomycetes, and various
uncharacterized bacteria commonly found soils. Some of the library
clone matches can raise ecological red flags by indicating the
presence of bacteria that derive energy through biodegradation of
petroleum, creosote, heavy metals, or sewage.
Fragment Analysis.
Rather than commit to cloning and sequencing from every cave
sample examined, a snapshot of bacterial diversity can be generated
easily and quickly for a larger number of samples by terminal
restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis. Snapshots
from environmental samples depict multiple types of bacteria within
the community in a given sediment sample, and the profile generated
is a �fingerprint� with information about the microorganisms present
and their relative abundance.
Budget
|
| Project Activities, Assets,
Emphasis Areas and GPRA
Goals - PMIS 86662 |
Activities
- Monitor Resources
- Natural Resource Research
- Research Resources
|
Assets
- Cave or Karst
- Water Resource, general or not listed
|
Emphasis
Areas
- Resource Protection
- Health and Human Safety
- I&M Environment Assessment
|
GPRA
Goals and Percent Values
- Park-Specific Cave Resources, 60%
- Water Quality (Servicewide), 20%
- Vital Signs, 20%
| |
| Project Prioritization
Information - PMIS 86662 |
| Unit Priority: 4 |
Unit Priority Band:
HIGH | |
| Related OFS Funding Requests
- PMIS 86662 |
Request ID: 7390 Request title: | |
Funding Component 86662A:
Monitoring Cave Microbial Diversity
|
|
| Funding Component
Description: |
| Component ID:
86662A |
Funding Request
Amount: $9,940.00, |
| Initial Planned FY:
2003 |
Requested Funding FY:
2003 |
| Review Status:
Region-reviewed on 04/29/2002 |
Funded Amount:
$9,900.00 |
| Date of Park
Submission: |
Submitted By: |
| Upper-level Review
Status: |
Fee-demo Submission
Number: |
| Programmed FY: 2003
|
Funded FY: 2003 |
| Formulation Program:
Other Program |
Funded PWE Accounts:
|
| Programmed Funding
Source: NRPP - Regional Small Park Block Allocations |
Funded Funding
Source: NRPP - Regional Small Park Block Allocations
|
| Estimated By:
Tica |
Date of
Estimate: 03/11/2002 |
| Estimate Good
Until: 09/30/2002 |
Class of
Estimate: B |
| Item |
Description |
Qty |
Unit |
Unit Cost |
Item Cost |
| Personnel Services |
|
1 |
Lump |
$4,095.00 |
$4,095.00 |
| Travel
and Transportation |
|
0 |
Each |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
| Contractor and Cooperator Costs |
|
1 |
Lump |
$5,605.00 |
$5,605.00 |
| Other
Costs |
|
1 |
Lump |
$240.00 |
$240.00 |
| Overhead Costs |
|
0 |
Each |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
| Component Funding Request |
$9,940.00 | |
Eligible Funding Sources
and Funding Priorities
| Funding Source |
Unit Priority at Formulation |
Regional Priority |
National Priority |
Year Unit-Prioritized |
| NRPP - Regional Small Park Block
Allocations |
4 |
10 |
|
2002
| |
|
Additional Criteria - PMIS 86662A
(The following text was truncated from the measurable
results block in November 2002, when the measurable results
field was shortened in the database):
windowtext 1.0pt;
border-left:none;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext
.5pt;mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt
0in 5.4pt'>
Cost |
|
DNA tests
for 25 samples -
$85/sample
(DNA
extraction, TRFLP restriction digest,
interpretation) |
$
2,125 |
|
Water
chemistry analysis for 6 samples per quarter @
$580/sample
($300
Anion/cation, $50 carbon analysis, $200 pescides, $30
Fecal/E.Coli count) |
$
3,480 |
|
Personnel
Support � RM Specialist GS-07 for 4 pp @
$1365/pp
(Sample
collection, additional interpretation, and report
writing) |
$
4,095 |
|
Supplies
(Centrifuge
tubes, cooler, shipping) |
$
240 |
|
Total |
$
9,940 |
Rating Criteria
Significance of the Resource or Issue to the
Park: How important is the resource or issue to the park
involved, relative to its other resources and issues?
The Timpanogos Cave system is the monument's primary resource and
subject of enabling legislation. The caves were set aside by
presidential proclamation because of "their scientific interests and
importance". This project initiates gaining a better understanding
to the role that microbes play in Timpanogos Cave system. (Score
Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
Severity & Urgency of Resource Threat, Problem, or
Need:
This project will measure the health of the cave ecosystem.
Currently, the extent of the cave watershed extends beyond the
boundary of the monument. Grazing, camping, ATV and off-road vehicle
use, and wildfire activity all occurs within the known cave
watershed. The scientific study of microbes is making great
discoveries that are impacting the whole world. New genera of
bacteria capable of expressing genes with medical and practical
applications have been discovered and are now the focus of many cave
microbial studies (Angert et al.1998; Holmes et al. 2001; Northtup
et al. 2000). This project may also lead to a vital sign indicator
to characterize the health of the cave ecosystem at its most basic
level. Any delay may lead to the extinction of some unknown cave
species that contains DNA for unique medical properties or research.
(Score Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
Problem Resolution: Will the proposed use of funds
contribute directly to decisions or actions that, when implemented,
will meaningfully resolve a management issue?
This project will provide a snapshot of the microbial species
present in the Timpanogos Cave system. If these species indicate the
presence of E. coli from human waste or sewage, petroleum products,
or large carbon particles then specific management actions will be
prescribed to restrict activities occuring within the cave
watershed, and protect the fragile non-renewable cave resources.
Future research on the caves microbes will also produce a larger DNA
sequence and phylogenetic database that can be described in even
greater detail. (Score Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
Scientific Resource Management: Is the proposal
scientifically and technically credible? This project clearly
demonstrates the techniques involved, information assembled, and
references. Rick Fowler and associates at the Biotechnology Center
at Western Kentucky University have been working sites within
Mammoth Cave NP, and surrounding areas, to test these methods. A DNA
sequence and phylogenetic database to interpret the results has been
created. The Biotechnology Center is looking forward to performing
all of the lab work for this project. They are excited to expand
their databases to include caves from across the country. (Score
Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
References
Amann, R.I., Stromely, J., Devereux, R., Key, R. & Stahl D.A.
(1992). Molecular and Microscopic Identification of Sulfate-Reducing
Bacteria in Multispecies Biofilms. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 58(2):
614-623.
Angert, E.R., Northrup, D.E., Resenbach, A-L., Peek, A.S.,
Goebel, B.M. & Pace, N.R. (1998). Molecular analysis of a
bacterial community in Sulphur River, Parker Cave, Kentucky.
American Mineralogist 83: 1583-1592.
Elliott, L., Wright, S., Coakley, T. & Groves, C. (2000).
Microbial Ecology of Conduit Stream Sediment Interstitial Fluids of
the South Central Kentucky Karst Aquifer: Impacts on Aquifer
Development, in Proceedings of Mammoth Cave National Park�s Eighth
Science Conference, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky, pp 57-60.
Holmes, A.J., Tujula, N.A., Holley, M., Contos, A., James, J.M.,
Rogers, P. & Gillings, M.R. (2001). Phylogenetic structure of
unusual aquatic microbial formations in Nullarbor caves, Australia.
Environmental Microbiology 3(4): 256-264.
Hugenholtz, P., Pitulle, C., Hershberger, K.L. & Pace, N.R.
(1998). Novel Division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone
hot spring. J. Bacteriology 180(2): 366-376.
Lane, D.J. (1991). 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing, in Nucleic Acid
Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, E. Stackenbrandt and M.
Goodfellow (eds), John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, pp115-148.
Layton, A.C., Lajoie, C.A., Easter, J.P., Jernigan, R.,
Sansaverino, J.& Sayler, G.S. (1994). Molecular Diagnostics and
Chemical Analysis for Assessing Biodegradation of Polychlorinated
Biphenyls in Contaminated Soils, J. Indust. Microbiol. 13: 392-401.
Minz, D., Fishbain, S., Green, S.J., Muyzer, G., Cohen Y.,
Rittman, B. & Stahl, D.A. (1999). Unexpected Poplulation
Distribution in a Microbial Mat Community: Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria
Localized to the Highly Oxic Chemocline in Contrast to a Eukaryotic
Preference for Anoxia, Appl. Env. Microbiol. 65(10): 4659-4665.
Moyer, C.L., Dobbs, F.C. & Karl, D.M. (1994). Estimation of
diversity and community structure through restriction fragment
length polymorphism distribution analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA
genes from a microbial mat at an active hydrothermal vent system,
Loihi Seamount, Hawaii, Appl. Env. Microbiol. 60(3): 871-879.
Northrup, D.E., Dahm, C.N., Melim, L.A., Spilde, M.N., Crossey,
L.J., Lavoie K.H., Mallory, L.M., Boston, P.J., Cunningham, K.I.
& Barns, S.M. (2000). Evidence for geomicrobiological
interactions in Guadalupe caves. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies
62(2): 80-90.
Rusterholtz, K.J. & Mallory, L.M. (1994). Density, Activity,
and Diversity of Bacteria Indigenous to a Karstic Aquifer. Microbial
Ecology 28:79-99.
Siering, P.L. (1998). The double helix meets the crystal lattice:
The power and pitfalls of nucleic acid approaches for
biomineralogical investigations. American Mineralogist 83: 1593-1607
(The following text was truncated from the measurable results
block in November 2002, when the measurable results field was
shortened in the database):
style='width:.75in;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;
border-left:none;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext
.5pt;mso-border-alt: solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in
5.4pt'>
Cost |
|
DNA tests for 25
samples -
$85/sample
(DNA extraction,
TRFLP restriction digest, interpretation) |
$
2,125 |
|
Water chemistry
analysis for 6 samples per quarter @
$580/sample
($300
Anion/cation, $50 carbon analysis, $200 pescides, $30 Fecal/E.Coli
count) |
$
3,480 |
|
Personnel
Support � RM Specialist GS-07 for 4 pp @
$1365/pp
(Sample
collection, additional interpretation, and report
writing) |
$
4,095 |
|
Supplies
(Centrifuge
tubes, cooler, shipping) |
$
240 |
|
Total |
$
9,940 |
Rating Criteria
Significance of the Resource or Issue to the Park: How
important is the resource or issue to the park involved, relative to its
other resources and issues?
The Timpanogos Cave system is the monument's primary resource and
subject of enabling legislation. The caves were set aside by presidential
proclamation because of "their scientific interests and importance". This
project initiates gaining a better understanding to the role that microbes
play in Timpanogos Cave system. (Score Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
Severity & Urgency of Resource Threat, Problem, or Need:
This project will measure the health of the cave ecosystem. Currently,
the extent of the cave watershed extends beyond the boundary of the
monument. Grazing, camping, ATV and off-road vehicle use, and wildfire
activity all occurs within the known cave watershed. The scientific study
of microbes is making great discoveries that are impacting the whole
world. New genera of bacteria capable of expressing genes with medical and
practical applications have been discovered and are now the focus of many
cave microbial studies (Angert et al.1998; Holmes et al. 2001; Northtup et
al. 2000). This project may also lead to a vital sign indicator to
characterize the health of the cave ecosystem at its most basic level. Any
delay may lead to the extinction of some unknown cave species that
contains DNA for unique medical properties or research. (Score Value=5)
(Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
Problem Resolution: Will the proposed use of funds
contribute directly to decisions or actions that, when implemented, will
meaningfully resolve a management issue?
This project will provide a snapshot of the microbial species present
in the Timpanogos Cave system. If these species indicate the presence of
E. coli from human waste or sewage, petroleum products, or large carbon
particles then specific management actions will be prescribed to restrict
activities occuring within the cave watershed, and protect the fragile
non-renewable cave resources. Future research on the caves microbes will
also produce a larger DNA sequence and phylogenetic database that can be
described in even greater detail. (Score Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 =
5
Scientific Resource Management: Is the proposal
scientifically and technically credible? This project clearly
demonstrates the techniques involved, information assembled, and
references. Rick Fowler and associates at the Biotechnology Center at
Western Kentucky University have been working sites within Mammoth Cave
NP, and surrounding areas, to test these methods. A DNA sequence and
phylogenetic database to interpret the results has been created. The
Biotechnology Center is looking forward to performing all of the lab work
for this project. They are excited to expand their databases to include
caves from across the country. (Score Value=5) (Weight=1) Total 5 x 1 = 5
References
Amann, R.I., Stromely, J., Devereux, R., Key, R. & Stahl D.A.
(1992). Molecular and Microscopic Identification of Sulfate-Reducing
Bacteria in Multispecies Biofilms. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 58(2): 614-623.
Angert, E.R., Northrup, D.E., Resenbach, A-L., Peek, A.S., Goebel, B.M.
& Pace, N.R. (1998). Molecular analysis of a bacterial community in
Sulphur River, Parker Cave, Kentucky. American Mineralogist 83: 1583-1592.
Elliott, L., Wright, S., Coakley, T. & Groves, C. (2000). Microbial
Ecology of Conduit Stream Sediment Interstitial Fluids of the South
Central Kentucky Karst Aquifer: Impacts on Aquifer Development, in
Proceedings of Mammoth Cave National Park�s Eighth Science Conference,
Mammoth Cave, Kentucky, pp 57-60.
Holmes, A.J., Tujula, N.A., Holley, M., Contos, A., James, J.M.,
Rogers, P. & Gillings, M.R. (2001). Phylogenetic structure of unusual
aquatic microbial formations in Nullarbor caves, Australia. Environmental
Microbiology 3(4): 256-264.
Hugenholtz, P., Pitulle, C., Hershberger, K.L. & Pace, N.R. (1998).
Novel Division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring. J.
Bacteriology 180(2): 366-376.
Lane, D.J. (1991). 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing, in Nucleic Acid Techniques
in Bacterial Systematics, E. Stackenbrandt and M. Goodfellow (eds), John
Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, pp115-148.
Layton, A.C., Lajoie, C.A., Easter, J.P., Jernigan, R., Sansaverino,
J.& Sayler, G.S. (1994). Molecular Diagnostics and Chemical Analysis
for Assessing Biodegradation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Contaminated
Soils, J. Indust. Microbiol. 13: 392-401.
Minz, D., Fishbain, S., Green, S.J., Muyzer, G., Cohen Y., Rittman, B.
& Stahl, D.A. (1999). Unexpected Poplulation Distribution in a
Microbial Mat Community: Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Localized to the Highly
Oxic Chemocline in Contrast to a Eukaryotic Preference for Anoxia, Appl.
Env. Microbiol. 65(10): 4659-4665.
Moyer, C.L., Dobbs, F.C. & Karl, D.M. (1994). Estimation of
diversity and community structure through restriction fragment length
polymorphism distribution analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA genes from a
microbial mat at an active hydrothermal vent system, Loihi Seamount,
Hawaii, Appl. Env. Microbiol. 60(3): 871-879.
Northrup, D.E., Dahm, C.N., Melim, L.A., Spilde, M.N., Crossey, L.J.,
Lavoie K.H., Mallory, L.M., Boston, P.J., Cunningham, K.I. & Barns,
S.M. (2000). Evidence for geomicrobiological interactions in Guadalupe
caves. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 62(2): 80-90.
Rusterholtz, K.J. & Mallory, L.M. (1994). Density, Activity, and
Diversity of Bacteria Indigenous to a Karstic Aquifer. Microbial Ecology
28:79-99.
Siering, P.L. (1998). The double helix meets the crystal lattice: The
power and pitfalls of nucleic acid approaches for biomineralogical
investigations. American Mineralogist 83: 1593-1607.
|