Please
direct
comments, questions and
suggestions pertaining to
this site to:
San Juan
Island NHP
P.O. Box 429
Friday Harbor, WA
98250
Telephone:
(360)378-2240
(360) 378-2902
(Wed.-Sun.)
FAX:
(360)378-2615
(360) 378-2996
E-mail:
Webmaster
Mike_Vouri@
nps.gov
For
comprehensive information about the National Park Service visit:

Privacy
Information
|
 |
In
mid-August 1859, a growing contingent of U.S. Army troops on San
Juan Island was confronted by three British warships mounting 70 guns.
The Americans had lugged ashore eight naval guns from the U.S.S. Massachusetts,
and had several field pieces at their disposal. But as local commander,
Lieutenant Colonel Silas Casey reported, “...With our present appliances
I find them rather difficult to manage.”
Getting
on in years and deeply religious, Casey was horrified by the prospect
of open hostilities with the British. He was well aware of the power of
the Royal Navy. “It is not pleasant to be at the mercy of any one
who is liable at any moment to become your open enemy,” he wrote Department
of Oregon commander, Brigadier General William Selby Harney in requesting
help with the guns.
Casey’s
forces had been dispatched to the island by Harney to protect United States
citizens from the British, who Harney believed were claiming sovereign
jurisdiction over a disputed territory.
The
long-festering issue had flared into armed confrontation in June when
an American settler had |
|
|
 |
|
shot
a pig belonging to the Hudson’s Bay Company. The company wanted
fair restitution. The settler thought they wanted to jail him.
Everyone overreacted — most especially Harney.
The
general took Casey at his word and on August 16 dispatched to San Juan
Island a 10-man detachment of Company A, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
commanded by Second Lieutenant Henry Martyn Robert. Robert was to
report to Casey, who would place him in charge of creating a fortification
for the naval guns, as per Harney’s instructions, which had been relayed
by the department’s acting Adjutant General, Captain Alfred Pleasanton
(later to achieve fame as a Union cavalry officer in the Civil War). “...Have
platforms made for your heavy guns, and cover your camp as much as possible
by entrenchment, placing your heavy guns in battery on the most exposed
approaches...select your position with the greatest care to avoid fire
from the British ship(s).” |
|
|
Casey
already had taken delivery of large quantities of lumber “fit for gun
platforms,” which the British Captain Hornby noted was being stockpiled
on the beach. The naval guns had been wrestled into place on the
ridge overlooking Griffin Bay, while the camp had been moved from the
exposed prairie above South Beach to just north of the Hudson’s Bay Company
farm.
Captain
James Prevost, commander of the HMS Satellite, reported that the
new camp “is very strongly placed in the most commanding position on this
end of the island, well sheltered in the rear and on one side by the Forest,
and on the other side by a Commanding eminence.”
Casey
said “...I shall put my heavy guns in position to bear upon the harbor,
and also on vessels which might take a position on the other side.
Shells from shipping may be able to reach us, and we may not be able to
protect the camp from them; but I shall try.” The sight of
these preliminary works alarmed Hornby enough to dash off a dispatch to
his superior, Rear Admiral R. Lambert Baynes, commander of the British
Pacific Station squadron based in Victoria.
“Six
of their heavy guns are placed on the ridge of the hill overlooking the
harbour; and by throwing up a parapet they would command the harbour;
even in their present position they would be difficult to silence,” Hornby
wrote. As the son of an Admiral-of-the-Fleet and an experienced 19th-century
military man in his own right, Hornby recognized how construction of a
formal field work could alter the situation on San Juan Island.
He knew that a fortress not only provided a means of last ditch defense,
but sited in a strategically dominant position, would permit a smaller
force -- even with inferior troops -- to resist a larger one long enough
for more substantial resistance to be mounted. Once dug in, the
Americans might never be uprooted and the island would be lost, politically
as well as militarily.
Robert
and his crew landed on August 21 and almost immediately went
to work, supplemented by details from Casey’s infantry and artillery companies.
According to the diary of William A. Peck, Jr., one of Robert’s soldiers,
the fort was “laid out of an irregular form 425 feet long above the natural
ground; ditch 20 feet wide, not less than 8 feet deep.” |
|
|
Peck
wrote that the earthwork had been altered two days later, but gave no
new
dimensions. When the historian Hubert Howe Bancroft visited the
site in 1887, he measured the work and jotted down essentially the
same dimensions as today: 350 feet on the west side, 100 on the southeast
and 150 on the northeast. Five gun platforms were completed, two
of them at the corners, with the parapet seven feet above the interior,
the exterior 25 to 40 feet, and ditch at the bottom from three to five
feet across. Robert, an 1857 graduate of West Point, built the work
based on knowledge gleaned during his studies at the academy under Professor
Denis Hart Mahan. Mahan had first published a book on the subject
in 1836 and had updated it over the years. The cadet curriculum
also included hands-on construction of model and full-sized fortifications.
From
the observations of British officers and members of the press from Victoria
and San Francisco, Robert followed the standard dictums: selecting his
ground to the best advantage, leveling the ground, and setting poles,
which would guide uniformity in establishing the height and breadth of
the ramparts (or walls).
As
Captain Prevost reported, “...the hill south of the American Camp,
has been marked out for fortifying, in several places it has been leveled,
and working parties have lately been employed in throwing up earthworks.”
The British Colonist estimated that at least 100 men were designated for
the task, including one British subject who had been apprehended for liquor
selling. It all was done with pick and shovel, which presented a
challenge for the men, who had to clear enormous rocks left in the wake
of glaciers that had receded thousands of years before.
For
all this back-breaking labor, the redoubt never fired a shot in anger.
In fact, only three guns were ever emplaced and these merely fired a salute
to Lieutenant General Winfield Scott when he visited Griffin Bay on November
7, 1859. The general had ordered work on the fortress stopped after
he and British Columbia Governor James Douglas agreed to reduce their
forces on the island.
In
ensuing years, the work became known as “Robert’s Gopher Hole.”
Nevertheless, as an instrument of policy -- however misguided that policy
may have been -- the redoubt had done its work. It had served notice
that the Americans intended to remain and spurred the British to time
and again reevaluate their options during the crisis.

|
|