![]() |
|||||||
Please
direct
Telephone: FAX: E-mail: |
Cattle Point Road | Click
on flag logo to return home |
![]() |
||||
| Relocation Project | |||||||
| The
county road that traverses the American Camp unit of San Juan Island National
Historical Park is in danger of failing due to the naturally-eroding coastline.
This road provides access to the Park and other public lands and is the
only access for the 250-plus residents who live in Cape San Juan and Cattle
Point Estates. On February 18, 2004, the National Park Service (NPS), San
Juan County, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) hosted meetings
at the Mullis Community Senior Center in Friday Harbor, Washington to update
the public on the status of the proposed Cattle Point Road relocation project
and to get further input from citizens about the project. Forty-five people
attended the afternoon meeting and about 15 attended the evening meeting.
An earlier scoping effort for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project was completed in early in 2002. However, the NPS and San Juan County have since agreed that the project needed to be re-examined to more fully consider protection of park resources and to look at other potential funding sources. Funding was earmarked by Congress in 2003 to complete the EIS using modified alternatives. The NPS and FHWA are now co-lead agencies for the project. The Western Federal Lands Division of FHWA will oversee expanded scoping for the EIS, and provide engineering services to examine possible modified design alternatives. The NPS, San Juan County, and the State Department of Natural Resources (which holds land adjacent to the park that may be affected by the project) are all cooperating agencies on the proposed project. Agency
representatives at the meetings gave short presentations about the expanded
scoping process, the purpose and needs statement upon which the project
is based, and the draft schedule. They offered conceptual drawings of
five potential road corridors and descriptions of several possible engineering
solutions. (Those drawings and descriptions as well as the purpose and
needs statement are available on this web page.) The public was invited
to submit scoping comments at the meeting or by letter until March 19,
2004. There will be additional opportunities to comment in later stages
of the EIS process. |
|||||||
| Corridor
#1 Existing Alignment Corridor #2 Minor Realignment Corridor #3Mid-slope Realignment Corridor #4 Ridgeline Realignment Corridor #5 North-side Alignment |
![]() |
||||||
Click
above for pdf image of alternatives |
|||||||
|
Alternative
1NB (No Build) Alternative
1SS (Slope Stabilization) Alternative
1BR (Bridge) Alternative
2RA (Realignment) Alternative
2TU(Tunnel on minor realignment using cut and cover construction) Corridor #3Mid-slope Realignment Alternative
3RA(Mid-slope alignment) Corridor #4 Ridgeline Realignment Alternative
4RA(Ridgeline alignment) Corridor #5 North-side Alignment Alternative
5RA(North-side alignment) |
|||||||