Ecological Effects of Stocked Trout
in Naturally Fishless High Mountain Lakes,
North Cascades National Park Service Complex, WA, USA


PHYTOPLANKTON

The taxonomic structure of phytoplankton assemblages in lakes located in mountainous regions and lakes at high latitudes have been shown to correspond to a variety of environmental, physical, and chemical variables such as climate, lake depth, lake area, water clarity, water quality, nutrients, and lake productivity (Pechlaner, 1971; Ilmavirta et al., 1984; Arvola, 1986; Earle et al., 1986; Earle et al., 1987; Knoechel and Cambell, 1988; Pinel-Alloul et al., 1990). Lakes in NOCA vary in water quality among the four main vegetation zones (alpine, subalpine, high forest and low forest). For example, alpine lakes have low water temperature and high concentrations of nitrate- nitrogen relative to low-forest lakes. Decreasing elevation and associated changes in vegetation zone tend to correspond with increases in water temperature, pH, alkalinity, conductivity, concentration of total nitrogen, and concentration of ammonia-nitrogen. Given this array of lake characteristics, a reasonable hypothesis was that characteristics of phytoplankton assemblages in NOCA lakes would correspond with the variation in physical and chemical conditions that exists among lakes in different vegetation zones. The objectives of this study were to:

(1) document the characteristics of phytoplankton assemblages of NOCA lakes;

(2) examine relationships between phytoplankton assemblages and the physical and chemical features of the lakes.

An additional objective was to assemble a phytoplankton data base to assess correspondence between the characteristics of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities. The third objective was addressed in the crustacean zooplankton section of this report.

METHODS

From June 1988 through September 1993, 182 phytoplankton samples were collected from 64 lakes in NOCA (Table 1). Phytoplankton samples were collected throughout the park from lakes in vegetation zones ranging from low-elevation forest to alpine. Most of the samples were collected between July and September (Table 1).

Table 1. Number of NOCA phytoplankton samples collected by month and year and the number of lakes sampled each year from 1988 to 1993.


YearMonthNumber of SamplesNumber of Lakes

1998July
August
September
11
6
10
27
27
1989June
July
August
September
5
19
15
22
61
57
1990June
July
August
September
1
9
13
8
31
18
1991May
June
July
August
September
2
4
14
10
9
39
19
1992August
September
9
9
18
10
1993July
August
September
1
3
2
6
3


Total


182



All samples were collected using a Van-Dorn-style water sampler from a depth of 1 m near the deepest portion of each lake. Each 1-liter phytoplankton sample was preserved in Lugol's solution. The phytoplankton in each sample were enumerated using an inverted microscope (Mclntire et al., 1993). In nearly all cases, 500 cells were counted per sample. Counts of only 100 cells were made in five of the samples because of the presence of large amounts of debris from glacial out-wash. A multiplier was estimated for each taxon based on cell diameter and was used to transform count data into estimates of cell biovolume.

Analysis of the phytoplankton data was conducted in two parts. The first was an analysis at the division level, or in the case of Chrysophyta, the class level of classification using data collected from 1988 through 1993. Acronyms for the division and class levels of classification were as follows: Chlorophyta (CHL), Chrysophyta (CHR), Bacillariophyta (BAC), Cyanophyta (CYN), Pyrrhophyta (PYR), Cryptophyta (CRY), Euglenophyta (EUG), and unknown (UNK). The second was an analysis of the phytoplankton at the lowest possible taxonomic level (usually at the species level) and included only the data collected in 1989. Ordinations of the data at the division and species levels were performed using detrended correspondence analysis and the program DECORANA (Hill and Gauch, 1980). Proportional abundances and biovolumes were calculated using the program AIDN (Overtone et al., 1987). A cluster analysis (Mclntire, 1973) was used to group the samples in ordination space. The SYSTAT (Wilkinson, 1987) program, MGLH, was used for multiple regression tests. Correlation analyses were run on the SYSTAT program, CORR.

RESULTS

Community Characteristics: 1988 - 1993

The phytoplankton samples processed during the six-year study contained a total of 153 taxa, which included 52 chlorophytes (Chlorophyta), 43 chrysophytes (Chrysophyceae), 28 diatoms (Bacillariophytceae), 18 cyanobacteria (Cyanophyta), 4 dinoflagellates (Pyrrhophyta), 4 cryptomonads (Cryptophyta), 1 euglenoid (Euglenophyta), and 3 unknown taxa (Table 2). Collectively for all samples with 500 cell counts, Chlorella sp. and Aphanocapsa delicatissima had the highest average proportional abundances at 0.171 and 0.156, respectively (Table 3). Twenty other taxa had average proportional abundances of between 0.01 and 0.06. The remaining 131 taxa (data not shown) had average proportional abundances of less than 0.01. The average proportional abundances of the taxa increased when the averages were calculated using data only from the lakes in which each taxon was found (Table 3).

Table 2. NOCA phytoplankton data: 1988-1993. List of taxa with division and codes.


Taxa I.D.DivisionName1

100CHRUNKNOWN
101CHLCHLORELLA sp.
102CYNDIOGENES(?) bean shape
103CHLOOCYSTIS SOLITARIA Wittrock
104CHRCHROMULINA sp.
105BACSTEPHANODISCUS sp.
106CYNAPHANOCAPSA DELICATISSIMA West & West
107CHRSTATOSPORE
108CHRCHROMULINA PARVULA Conr.
109CHRCHRYSOMONADALES (long flagella)
110CHRSTATOSPORE
111CHRSTATOSPORE (DINOBRYON?)
112CRYRHODOMONAS sp.
113CHROCHROMONAS OVALIS Dolf.
114CHRUNKNOWN
115CHROPHIOCYTIUM PARVULUM (Perty) A. Br.
116BACNAVICULA SUBATOMOIDES Hust.
117CYNAPHANOTHECE CLATHRATA West et West
118CHRCHRYSOIKOS SKUJAE Naunerck
119CYNGLOEOCAPSA GELATINOSA Kutz.
120PYRPERIDINIUM INCONSPICUUM Lemm.
121CHRPSEUDOKEPHYRION sp.
122CHRCHROMULINA sp.
123CHRCHROMULINA sp.(?)
124CHLCOSMARIUM sp.
125CHRDICERAS CHODATII(?)
126CHLVOLVOCALEAN
127CRYCHROOMONAS ACUTA
128CHRDINOBRYON BORGEI Lemm.
129CHRKEPHRION OVALE (Lackey) H-P
130CHLUNKNOWN (no flagella)
131BACGOMPHONEMA sp.
132BACMELOSIRA sp.
133UNKUNKNOWN
134BACSYNEDRA ULNA (Nitzsch) Ehr.
135CHLOOCYSTIS SUBMARINA Lagerheim
136CHROCHROMONAS sp.
137CHLCHLAMYDOMONAS GLOBOSA Snow
138CHRCHLOROCLOSTER-LIKE
139CHRMALLOMONAS
140CYNSYNECHOCYSTIS sp.
141UNKUNKNOWN
142CHLFRANCEIA DROESCHERI (Lemm) G.M. Smith
143CHRDINOBRYON/EPIPYXIS sp.
144CHRDINOBRYON BAVARICUM
145BACNITZSCHIA GRACILIS Hantz.
146CYNANABEANA sp.
147BACACHNANTHES sp.
148CHROCHROMONAS SPHAGNALIS Conrad
149CRYCRYPTOMONAS OVATA Ehren.
150BACCYCLOTELLA COMTA
151PYRAMPHIDINIUM LUTEUM
152CHRCHROMULINA sp.
153CHLUNKNOWN
154BACCYCLOTELLA STELLIGERA(?)
155CHLELAKATOTHRIX GELATINOSA Wille.
156CHLCRUCIGENIA TETRAPEDIA
157CHLOOCYSTIS PARVA West et West
158CHRCHROMULINA STATOSPORE
159PYRGYMNODINIUM-LIKE
160CHLTETRAEDRON MINIMUM (A. Braun) Hansgirg
161BACUNKNOWN
162BACNAVICULA sp.
163CHROPHIOCYTIUM COCHLEARE A. Br.
164PYRGYMNODINIUM sp.
165CHRDINOBRYON DIVERGENS Imhof
166BACNAVICULA sp.
167CHLUNKNOWN
168CHROCHROMONAS PINGUIS Conr.
169BACMELOSIRA GRANULATA (Ehr.) Ralfs
170BACSYNEDRA TENERA W. Smith
171CHRTRIBONEMA-LIKE
172BACCYMBELLA sp.
173BACSURIRELLA sp.
174CHLSCENEDESMUS DENTICULATUS var linearis Lagerheim
175CHRTRIBONEMA-LIKE
176CHRCHROMULINA-LIKE
177CYNDACTYLOCOCCOPSIS ACUCULARIS Lemm.
178CYNCHROOCOCUS MINIMUS (Keissl.) Lemm.
179CHLHAEMATOCOCCUS LACUSTRIS (Girod.) Rostafinski
180CHLTETRAEDRON sp.
181BACDIATOMA sp.
182BACHAN NAEA ARCUS (Ehr) Patr.
183CHRCH RYSIDIASTRU M CATENATUM Lauterbom
184CHLSPONDYLOSIUM sp.
185CHLSCHROEDERIA SETIGERA (Schroed.) Lemm.
186CHLSTAURASTRUM sp.
187CHLSCENEDESMUS ABUNDANS (Kirch.) Chodat
188CHLGLOEOCYSTIS PLANCTONICA (West & West) Lemm.
189CHLANKISTRODESMUS FALCATUS var MIRABILIS (West & West)
190CYNMERISMOPEDIA TENUISSIMA Lemm.
191CHLDINOBRYON SERTULARIA Ehr.
192CRYRHODOMONAS MINUTA var. NANOPLANTICA Skuja
193BACNAVICULA sp.
194CHRUNKNOWN STATOSPORE
195CYNRHABDODERMA LINEARE Schmidle & Lauterbom
196CHLOOCYSTIS APICULATA W. West
197CHLTETRADESMUS SMITHII Prescott
198CHLCHLAMYDOMONAS PSEUDOPERTYI Pascher
199CYNRHABDODERMA SIGMOIDEA fa. MINOR Moore & Carter
200CHLCHRYSIDIASTRUM sp.
201BACNAVICULA sp.
202CHLPEDIASTRUM BORYANUM (Turp.) Meneghini
203CYNRHABDODERMA like
204CHROPHIOCYTIUM CAPITATUM Wolle
205CYNDIMORPHOCOCCUS LUNATOS A. Braun
206CYNOSCILLATORIA ANGUSTA Koppe
207BACFRAGILARIA CROTONENSIS Kitton
208CHLMOUGEOTIA sp.
209BACPEN NATE
210CHLOOCYSTIS ELLIPTICA W. West
211CHRUNKNOWN STATOSPORE (6-7 microns)
212CHLCRUCIGENIA sp.
213EUGEUGLENA sp.
214BACTABELLARIA FLOCCULOSA (Roth.) Kutz.
215CHLHYDRODICTYON RETICULATUM (L.) Lagerheim
216CHLCOLEOCHAETE sp.
217CHLTREUBARIA SETIGERUM (Archer) G.M. Smith
218BACFRAGILARIA sp.
219CHLUNKNOWN
220CHLUNKNOWN
221CHRCHRYSAMOEBA RADIAN Klebs
222BACNITZSCHIA sp.
223CYNRAPHIDIOPSIS CURVATA Fritsch et Rich
224CHLUNKNOWN
225CHLCLOSTERIDIUM sp.
226CYNDACTYLOCOCCOPSIS SMITHII Chodat et Chodat
227CHRUNKNOWN STATOSPORE
228CYNLYNGBYA sp.
229CHRSTATOSPORE
230CHRTRIBONEMA-LIKE
231CHLSPERMATOZOOPIS sp.
232BACCYMBELLA sp.2
233CHLCARTERIA KLEBSII (Dang.) Dill
234CHLCOSMARIUM GRANATUM Breb.
235CHLKIRCHNERIELLA LUNARIS (Kirch.) Moebius
236BACNITZSCHIA OREGANA Soy.
237CYNAPHANOCAPSA ELACHISTA West & West
238UNKUNKNOWN
239CHRSTATOSPORE
240CHRSTATOSPORE
241CHLFRANCEIA OVALIS (France) Lemm.
242CHLCHLOROCOCCUM HUMICOLA (Naeg.) Rabenorst
243CHLANKISTRODESMUS FALCATUS (Corda) Ralfs
244CHLSTAURASTRUM sp.
245CHLMOUGEOTIA sp.
246CHRUNKNOWN
247BACFRUSTULIA sp.
248CHLSCENEDESMUS OBLIQUIS (Turp.) Kuetzing
249CHLSTAURASTRUM sp.
250CHRCHRYSIOKOS BICORNIS Willen
251CHRCHRYSAMOEBA sp.
252CHLSELENASTRUM WESTII G.M. Smith

1CHR = Chrysophyta
CHL = Chlorophyta
BAC = Bacillariophyta
CRY = Cryptophyta
CYN = Cyanophyta
EUG = Euglenophyta
PYR = Pyrrhophyta
UNK = Unknown

Table 3. Average proportional abundances ( 5%) for phytoplankton taxa in the 178 samples collected during the period from 1988 to 1993, number of samples in which each taxon was present, and average proportional abundance in all samples in which each taxon was present.


Taxa Number of Samples
Taxa Present
Average Proportional Abundance
All SamplesSamples Present

Chlorella sp.87.171.348
Aphanocapsa delicatissima72.156.385
Chromulina parvula62.060.170
Synechocystis sp.65.043.116
Chromulina sp.63.041.119
Ochromonas pinguis42.039.163
Unidentified chrysophyte164.033.091
Aphanothece clathrata19.031.289
Diogenes sp.27.031.199
Ochromonas sp.58.031.094
Chrysophyte statospore249.023.064
Unknown chrysophyte365.021.058
Chroococus minimu17.018.189
Oocystis solitaria42.016.068
Ochromonas ovalis18.016.155
Unidentified423.015.114
Gleocystis planctonica16.014.150
Rhodomonas sp.51.013.040
Gymondinium-like37.013.063
Unknown chlorophyte518.011.109
Chrysophyte statospore633.010.053
Pseudokephyrion sp.36.010.051

1Taxon I.D. No. 114
2Taxon I.D. No. 107
3Taxon I.D. No. 100
4Taxon I.D. No. 141
5Taxon I.D. No. 126
6Taxon I.D. No. 110

Collectively for all samples with 500 cell counts, cyanobacteria, chrysophytes, and chlorophytes were the dominant organisms (Table 4). Cyanophyta had the highest proportional cell densities, whereas the proportional cell biovolumes ere dominated by the Chrysophyta. Although low in number in the counts and proportional cell densities, dinoflagellates had the second highest proportional cell biovolume at 0.157.

Table 4. Proportional abundance in samples with 500 cell counts, proportional cell densities and cell biovolumes for each taxonomic division and class during the period between 1988 and 1993.


DivisionProportional
Sample
Count
Proportional
Cell
Density
Proportional
Cell
Biovolume

BAC0.0200.0070.052
CHL0.2700.1170.087
CHR0.2990.1040.597
CRY0.0270.0150.049
CYN0.3460.7500.057
EUG<0.001<0.001<0.001
PYR0.0170.0050.157
UNK0.0210.0020.002

The sample data were separated into alpine, subalpine, high-forest and low-forest vegetation zones based on the lake classification (Lomnicky et al., 1989; Liss et al., 1991). Subalpine and high-forest lakes had the largest number of taxa per sample, and alpine lakes had the smallest number (Table 5). However, taxa from each taxonomic division and class were found in each vegetation zone (Table 5). Alpine lakes contained a fairly even number of diatom, chlorophyte and chrysophyte taxa. Subalpine lakes and high-forest lakes were dominated by chrysophyte and chlorophyte taxa, where as chrysophyte taxa dominated low-forest lakes. The number of diatom taxa per sample was greatest in subalpine lakes, and the number of chlorophyte taxa was greatest in subalpine and high-forest lakes. The number of chrysophyte taxa per lake was highest in subalpine, high-forest and low-forest lakes. The numbers of Cryptophyta, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, and Pyrrhophyta taxa per lake were low, but evenly distributed among the four vegetation zones.

Table 5. Average number of phytoplankton taxa by taxonomic division and class in alpine, subalpine, high-forest and low-forest lakes during the period from 1988 to 1993.


Forest TypeBACCHLCHRCRY CYNEUGPYRUNKTotal

Alpine151718410 13169
Subalpine273634417 142125
High Forest213738414 143122
Low Forest102837413 143100

Representatives of the chlorophytes and chrysophytes were the dominant taxa in alpine lakes based on 500 cell counts (Table 6). Chlorophytes, chrysophytes, and cyanobacteria were the dominant taxa in subalpine lakes and high-forest lakes. Cyanobacteria were the dominant taxa in low-forest lakes. Similar results were found for proportional cell densities, except that cyanobacteria taxa dominated both high- forest and low-forest lakes (Table 6). Chrysophyte taxa dominated the proportional biovolumes of all lake types (Table 6). Dinoflagellate biovolumes were lowest in low-forest lakes, whereas diatom, chlorophyte and cryptophyte biovolumes were highest in alpine lakes. Taxa in the other divisions did not contribute substantially to the phytoplankton biovolumes of any lake type.

Table 6. Proportional abundance in samples with 500 cell counts and proportional cell densities and biovolumes by taxonomic division and class in alpine, subalping, high-forest, and low-forest lakes during the period between 1988 and 1993.

Alpine Lakes


DivisionProp.
Count
Prop.
Density
Prop.
Biovolume

BAC0.04360.06740.1597
CHL0.23440.27940.1644
CHR0.38940.30970.3675
CRY0.11360.16430.0895
CYN0.14240.11860.0024
EUG0.00140.00050.0000
PYR0.04260.02530.2089
UNK0.03260.03480.0075


Subalpine Lakes


DivisionProp.
Count
Prop.
Density
Prop.
Biovolume

BAC0.01880.01530.0526
CHL0.32520.33640.1091
CHR0.33610.24480.4775
CRY0.01400.01110.0195
CYN0.25520.36650.0180
EUG0.00010.00010.0000
PYR0.02280.01680.3186
UNK0.02780.00910.0047


High-Forest Lakes


DivisionProp.
Count
Prop.
Density
Prop.
Biovolume

BAC0.01010.00530.0221
CHL0.27730.16220.1005
CHR0.29440.19490.5260
CRY0.02350.02690.0788
CYN0.36460.59190.0263
EUG0.00000.00000.0000
PYR0.01290.01530.2447
UNK0.01710.00340.0017


Low-Forest Lakes


DivisionProp.
Count
Prop.
Density
Prop.
Biovolume

BAC0.02740.00590.0629
CHL0.16460.07440.0612
CHR0.22360.06470.7049
CRY0.03340.01160.0397
CYN0.53650.84150.0920
EUG0.00060.00000.0000
PYR0.00550.00140.0388
UNK0.00840.00040.0005

Vegetation zones were distributed in ordination space relative to the distribution of the organisms by taxonomic division or class to relate the scores of the first two axes to environmental and water quality variables (Fig. 1). The distribution of the phytoplankton divisions and classes corresponded to the distribution of the vegetation zones relative to the maximum proportional abundances of each division or class (Table 6). Although low in abundance, Cryptophyta (CRY) and Bacillariophyta (BAC) were at maximal proportional abundances in alpine lakes, whereas Cyanophyta (CYN) were abundant in low-forest lakes. The other divisions or classes (Euglenophyta and unknowns were deleted because they were rare) had maximal abundances in subalpine and alpine lakes. None of the divisions or classes had maximum proportional abundances in high-forest lakes. Increasing scores on axis one corresponded to increasing elevation and concentration of nitrate-nitrogen and decreasing water temperature, pH, alkalinity, conductivity, concentration of Kjeldahl-nitrogen, and concentration of ammonia-nitrogen (Figs. 2-4). Increasing scores on axis two corresponded to increasing concentrations of total phosphorus (Fig. 4).


Figure 1. Ordinations of the phytoplankton divisions and the four lake types (alpine, subalpine, high forest and low forest) relative to the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton at the division level during the period from 1988 to 1993.


Figure 2. Relationships among elevation, temperature and pH, and the scores of the X axis of the ordination of the four lake types (Fig. 1)


Figure 3. Relationships among alkalinity, conductivity and Kheldahl-nitrogen, and the scores of the X axis of the ordination of the four lake types (Fig. 1)


Figure 4. Relationships among ammonia-nitrogen and nitrate-nitrogen and the scores of the X axis, and the relationship between total phosphorus and scores of the Y axis of the ordination of the four lake types (Fig. 1).

Community Characteristics: 1989

Lake ordinations corresponding to species ordinations (data not shown) were used to relate the axis scores to environmental and water quality variables for samples collected in 1989 (Fig. 5). Increasing scores along axis one corresponded to increasing concentrations of Kjeldahl-nitrogen and a transition in vegetation zones from alpine to low-forest (multiple regression analysis, r2 = 0.606, p<0.01). Increasing scores on axis two corresponded to decreasing concentrations of orthophosphate-phosphorus and increasing water temperature (multiple regression analysis, r2 = 0.254, p<0.01). Seven regions of the lake ordination were identified by cluster analysis (Fig. 5, Table 7). With the exception of cluster 5, which included only east-side subalpine lakes, the clusters contained mixtures of lakes from several vegetation zones (Table 8). Nonetheless, cluster 3, which was located on the left-side of the graph, included six glacially influenced west-side alpine and subalpine lakes, and cluster 4, which was located on the right-side of the graph, contained two high-forest lakes and four low-forest west- side lakes. Environmental, physical, and chemical characteristics among lakes in the seven clusters are shown in Appendix 1.


Figure 5. Ordination of the phtyoplankton community assemblages by lake and the position of each cluster of lakes for samples collected in 1989.

Table 7. Samples in each cluster of the lake ordination relative to the taxonomic composition of phytoplankton in samples collected in 1989.


ClusterLake

1BATT, MORA, TRAP, MM11, MR132, SKYU, KETU, VULC, SWEE, REDO, THRM, MCAL, TAPW, LS1
2RAIN1, WADD1, PANL1, PYRA1, GRVW, EGG, COON, SKYM, NONA, PM53, MR2, MR3, EP6, MONO
3OUZE, KLAW, REVL, WILE, EILE, REVU
4THUN, WILL, NERT, HOZO, RIDL, LS2
5JUAN, TRIL, MR9
6DOUB, TAPM, TAPU, SILV, WILD, BEAR, LS3, THRL, COPP
7TRIU, PRICE, MP8, JEAN, TTAR

1Two samples each

Table 8. Number of alpine, subalpine, high-forest, and low-forest lakes relative to the eastside (E) and westside (W) of the park in each cluster of the lake ordination in 1989.


ClusterForest Type
ASAFHFLSum

1Total
W
E
2
2
0
7
4
3
5
2
3
0
0
0
14
8
6
2Total
W
E
0
0
0
7
4
3
4
2
2
3
2
1
141
8
6
3Total
W
E
4
4
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
0
4Total
W
E
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
4
4
0
6
6
0
5Total
W
E
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
6Total
W
E
1
1
0
7
6
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
8
1
7Total
W
E
1
1
0
3
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
4
1

1Duplicate samples from four lakes deleted.

Lakes in each cluster differed in terms of the dominant taxa and composition of particular taxonomic groups (Table 9). Lakes in cluster 3 were dominated by Chromulina parvula, and cyanobacteria were low in proportional abundance (<5%). Lakes in cluster 7 were dominated by two unidentified chlorophyte taxa. Lakes in cluster 1 were dominated by Chlorellas p. and Aphanocapsa delicatissima,and lakes in cluster 2 were dominated by A. delicatissima. Lakes in cluster 5 were dominated by Ochromonas sphagnalis and Diogenes sp. (a cyanobacterium). Lakes in cluster 6 were dominated by Diogenes, and lakes in cluster 4 were dominated by Aphanotheca clarthrata. Lakes in cluster 5 and cluster 1 had the lowest and highest species diversity, respectively. Variation in cell densities among the lakes in each cluster was high (Table 10). The average cell densities were highest in lakes in cluster 4 and second highest in lakes in cluster 5. Overall, the average number of taxa per lake was 18.6, with an average of 20.6 taxa in east-side lakes and 17.7 taxa in west-side lakes. Cluster 3 had the lowest average number of taxa at 10.8 per sample.

Table 9. Dominant phytoplankton taxa in each cluster of the lake ordination for samples collected in 1989.


Cluster 1Chlorella sp. (19.1),1 Aphanocapsa delicatissima (12.5), unknown chlorophyte (8.6), Diogenes (7.6), Ochromonas sp. (6.5), Synechocystis sp. (5.4), chlorophyte (5.0)
Cluster 2Aphanocapsa delicatissima (25.3), Chlorella sp. (11.2), Chromulina sp. (7.8), Synechocystis sp. (6.4)
Cluster 3Chromulina parvula (28.8), Chroomonas acuta (18.9), Ochromonas sp. (10.1), unknown (6.6), Chrysophyte (5.5), Pseudokephyrion sp. (5.3)
Cluster 4Aphanotheca clarthrata (51.4), Gleocopsa sp. (6.9)
Cluster 5Ochromonas sphagnalis (33.9), Diogenes sp. (33.4), Chromulina sp. (6.7), chlorophyte (5.0)
Cluster 6Diogenes sp. (23.1), Aphanocapsa delicatissima (12.6), Chlorella sp. (8.9), Chromulina sp. (7.1), Synechocystis sp. (6.5), unknown chrysophyte (5.7), Cyclotella stelligera (5.6)
Cluster 7Unknown chlorophyte (25.2), unknown chlorophyte (20.0), Chromulina parvula (9.0), Ochromonas pinguis (8.3), Chlorella sp. (8.2)

1Proportional abundance

Table 10. Average number of taxa and phtyoplankton cell densities per sample in each cluster of the lake ordination, east-side (E) lakes, west-side (W) lakes, and all lakes collectively for samples collected in 1989.


Cluster
or
location
n No. of
taxa
Cell Density
Average
(NO/cm3)
MinMax SD

11418.8158418335591061
21822.1286912567442258
3610.812906343771793
4618.5114223913892611422
5320.04677636105275188
6917.31334553139810
7516.61244992296893
E2020.62816125105372469
W4117.7307455389266453
All6118.6298955389265450

DISCUSSION

Several aspects of the results supported our hypothesis that the taxonomic compositions of phytoplankton assemblages in NOCA lakes would correspond with the different physical and chemical conditions that exist among lakes in the four vegetation zones. Based on the analysis of samples collected between 1988 and 1993, decreasing elevation and corresponding shifts in vegetation zone from alpine to low- forest were associated with increased water temperature, pH, alkalinity, conductivity, and concentrations of total nitrogen in NOCA lakes. Alpine lakes were high in total phosphorus and nitrate-nitrogen and low in other water quality variables. These lakes were dominated in density by chrysophyte and chlorophyte taxa, but the highest proportional abundances of Cryptophyta and Bacillariophyta also occurred in these lakes. Cyanobacteria were the dominant taxa in low-forest lakes, which were high in temperature, pH, alkalinity, conductivity, Kjeldahl-nitrogen, ammonia-nitrogen and total phosphorus. Chlorophytes, chrysophytes and cyanobacteria were the dominant taxa in subalpine and high-forest lakes. These lakes were intermediate in temperature, water quality, and concentrations of nutrients relative to alpine and low-forest lakes.

The distributions of phytoplankton taxa in the clusters of the ordination of the 1989 samples were not as consistent with the analysis of the data collected from 1988 through 1993 relative to vegetation zone. Most of the clusters contained lakes from different vegetation zones, especially contiguous zones. In no instance, however, were alpine lakes and low-forest lakes located in the same cluster. Nonetheless, there appears to be two extreme types of phytoplankton assemblages in NOCA lakes. Chrysophyte taxa (Chromulina and Ochromonas) were the dominant taxa, and Cryptophyta were subdominant taxa in the glacially influenced alpine and subalpine lakes in cluster 3. The four low-forest lakes and 2 high-forest lakes in cluster 4 were dominated by Aphanotheca. Lakes in the other clusters exhibited considerable variation relative to the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton assemblages. However, the effects of seasonal and annual changes of the climate on the phytoplankton assemblages in NOCA lakes remain unresolved because most of the lakes were sampled only once in 1989. Temporal patterns of the phytoplankton assemblages in the NOCA lakes will be addressed in the final report for Phase II of the project.

Phytoplankton assemblages in NOCA lakes were similar in total number of taxa, average number of taxa per sample, and ranges of cell densities relative to phytoplankton studies in lakes in Quebec (Pinel-Alloul et al., 1990), Finland (Arvola, 1986), Olympic National Park (Larson et al., 1991) and Mount Rainier National Park (Larson et al., In Press) (Table 11). Collectively, duration of the ice-free period, geographic location within a study area, lake size, flushing rate, transparency, water temperature, hardness, and nutrients were some of the variables shown to be important factors influencing the taxonomic structures of the phytoplankton assemblages in these other studies. In NOCA lakes, however, vegetation zone and associated water quality and concentrations of nutrients were the apparent factors influencing the taxonomic structures of the phytoplankton assemblages.

Table 11. Total number of phytoplankton taxa, average number of taxa per sample, and the ranges of cell densities in lakes in Quebec, Finland, Olympic National Park, Mount Rainier National Park, and NOCA (1989).


LocationTotal number
of taxa
Average
number of
taxa/sample
Range of
density
per ml
Author

Quebec (54 lakes)12924690-9163Pinel-Alloul et al. 1990
Finland (54 lakes)10318192-27726Arvol 1986
Olympic N.P. (7 lakes)172--211-5216Larson et al. 1991
Mt Rainier N.P. (27 lakes)203201047-5505Larson et al., in press
NOCA153191290-11422Present work

Pechlaner (1971) noted that phytoplankton assemblages in alpine and subalpine lakes were dominated by chrysophytes or dinoflagellates. Results from more recent studies have supported this generalization in some cases, but in other studies, the phytoplankton assemblages were dominated by chlorophytes, cyanobacteria, or cryptomonads (Table 12). Results from the NOCA studies supported the conclusion that phytoplankton assemblages in mountain lakes are more complex than originally determined by Pechlaner (1971).

Table 12. Dominant phytoplankton assemblages (proportional abundances) at the division level in lakes at high latitude or elevations.


LocationDominant taxaAuthor

FinlandCHR and CHLArvola 1986
Finland
      Clear oligotrophic
      Mesotrophic
CHR > CHL > CRY
CYN and CHL
Ilmavirta et al. 1984
Ilmavirta et al. 1984
Quebec
      Deep and clear
CHRPinel-Alloul et al. 1990
California (Castle Lake)
      Spring
      Summer
BAC and CHR
PYR, CYN, and small flagellates
Elser 1992
Elser 1992
Olympic National ParkCHR or CYNLarson et al. 1991
Mt. Rainier National ParkCHR, CHL, or CYNLarson et al., in press
AntarcticCRY or CHRPark et al. 1982

Table of Contents | Rotifers


http://www.nps.gov/noca/trout1e.htm
Last Updated: 26-Nov-1999