|
North Cascades National Park
Service Complex Long-Term Ecological Monitoring Conceptual Plan |
||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract Monitoring Components:
Wildlife can provide critical insights into understanding and sustaining the integrity and functioning of ecological systems. Species differ in their environmental requirements and tolerances and can serve as sensitive indicators of environmental health. Within North Cascades National Park Service Complex some 300 species of mammals and birds have been documented. At least 8,000 species of arthropods occur within the park complex. Many wildlife species are charismatic and have high public visibility. Six species have federal protection and are listed as either "threatened" or "endangered". These species assemblages were selected for long-term monitoring because they represent a highly diverse group of taxa. Coupled with their varied biological and ecological activities, their diversity provides an extremely fine-grained reflection of the environmental conditions within the park, both natural and disturbed. Of primary importance to monitoring wildlife populations is understanding how these animals respond to natural processes. A baseline knowledge of natural variability enables a monitoring program to distinguish between this natural variability and human-induced disturbance effects. Wildlife are under massive, escalating, and accelerating assaults from multiple human agents and activities. The most pervasive threat to park faunal resources is deterioration and destruction of habitats in areas within and adjacent to park boundaries. Habitat fragmentation and the lack of habitat connectivity exacerbate the effects of these habitat losses. Wildlife species are recognized as sensitive indicators of environmental pollutants. As predators at the top of the food chain, some taxa concentrate pesticide toxins in their systems. Other stressors to wildlife resources and their processes include human-caused disturbance, both direct and indirect. These disturbances can cause population levels of species to fall below a minimum viable population level. Some of these disturbances include hunting/poaching, park operations, recreation and associated increases in road and trail densities, and fire management practices. The goals and objectives of the terrestrial fauna monitoring program are to provide three types of data. First is an estimate of the population size and trends for various species. Second is an estimate of the demographic parameters for at least some of those populations. And, third is habitat data to link the density and demographic parameters of populations to habitat characteristics. Use of population size as a measure of health of a species has been a common tool of biologists for many years. Population size, however, is only a retrospective tool. It tells only after the fact that a species has enjoyed an increase or suffered a decline. To ponder causes of changes, the biologist must couple information of population size with data on the internal composition of a population---its demographics. For example, data on sex ratio, age distribution, nesting success, survivorship, average weight, and population movements can all give valuable cues to factors or events regulating a population. Moreover, such primary population characters can provide early warning signals of population problems prior to actual declines. Many studies have used data such as these to describe the dynamics of various populations. Monitoring will select taxa representing a variety of functional attributes in habitats of high interest. Species selection will integrate various spatial and temporal scales. TopMonitoring Component: Mammals
Large Carnivores Monitoring/Research Questions: Are there resident populations inhabiting the
North Cascades Ecosystem? Does North Cascades NP contribute adequate prey-base populations
to support large carnivores? What is the status of black bear and cougar populations
within North Cascades NP? Stressors And Related Factors: What To Monitor: Where To Monitor: Justification And Other Information: Charismatic megafauna have high public
visibility. Both grizzly bear and gray wolf are on the Endangered Species list and are
believed to have critically low populations. Gray wolf status in Washington is unknown.
These species, requiring large areas of wilderness, are symbols of wild places and the
North Cascades provide one of the last refuges for these species. A network of interagency
partners is in place. Preliminary data have been collected (e.g., suitable habitat
analysis for grizzly bears). Black bears and cougars are subject to legal hunting within
both national recreation areas; both are subject to potential conflict with humans due to
sanitation problems, use of seasonal habitat, etc. No population data exist on black bears
and cougars for areas in or near the park that allow hunting. Monitoring Component: Mammals Mid-sized Carnivores Monitoring/Research Question: What are the status and distribution of wolverine, fisher, lynx, bobcat, and pine marten in North Cascades NP? Stressors And Related Factors: Habitat fragmentation of lands outside the North Cascades Ecosystem; lack of habitat connectivity; human disturbance; legal hunting (bobcat only) and poaching mortality; most of these species have small disjunct population sizes. What To Monitor: Presence/absence, distribution. Where To Monitor: In suitable habitat within park boundaries and/or work with other agencies to ensure monitoring occurs in cases where most suitable habitat is outside park boundaries. Justification and other information: Wolverine, fisher, and lynx are candidate species for listing; very few data exist for these species. Methods for monitoring have recently been established. There are many interagency opportunities. Bobcats are subject to legal hunting in the national recreation areas, despite lack of population data. TopMonitoring Component: Mammals Small Mammals Monitoring/Research Question: What are the status and distribution of small mammal populations within North Cascades NP? Stressors and Related Factors: Habitat loss and fragmentation in adjacent land jurisdictions; park development and operations; fire management activities; climatic change; disease. What To Monitor: Presence/absence and distribution; community diversity and species richness. Where To Monitor: Parkwide, stratified by habitat. Justification And Other Information: Standard methods for monitoring are well-established. Biological diversity is highly valued. There are direct linkages with higher trophic levels. TopMonitoring Component: Mammals Bats Monitoring/Research Question: What are the status and distribution of bat species within North Cascades NP? Stressors And Related Factors: Habitat loss in adjacent land jurisdictions and at specific sites within North Cascades NP (e.g., old mines). Disturbance from operations and recreational activities. Pesticide use and other mortality-related factors. Many bat species suffer from small populations. What To Monitor: Presence/absence, distribution, and relative abundance. Where To Monitor: Parkwide, in suitable habitat. Justification And Other Information: Bats are a diverse mammal group. Nearly half of the 12 bat species found in Pacific Northwest forests may be threatened with extinction. The Presidents Forest Plan has identified bats as being at risk from forest management practices. There are little knowledge and published information on bats in the Cascade Range of Washington. TopMonitoring Component: Mammals Mountain Goats Monitoring/Research Questions: What is the status of mountain goats in the North Cascades Ecosystem? What constitutes suitable summer mountain goat habitat? (A summer-habitat model exists for the park; this model should be tested and refined if necessary to include data from adjacent lands within the North Cascades Ecosystem). Stressors And Related Factors: Hunting, poaching, and other mortality related factors. What To Monitor: Abundance, distribution, and productivity (adult/kid ratios). Where To Monitor: Ecosystem-wide in suitable alpine habitats. This component relies on an interagency effort, because it appears that most suitable habitat and the majority of mountain goats reside outside North Cascades NP boundaries. Justification And Other Information: Initial baseline inventory of the Ross Lake drainage was completed in 1997. There are many interagency opportunities, e.g., the Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife is currently monitoring mountain goats. An initial summer habitat model for the North Cascades was completed in 1993. TopMonitoring Component: Birds Birds of Prey Bald Eagles Monitoring/Research Question: What is the status of the over-wintering bald eagle population? Stressors And Related Factors: Disturbance from park operations and recreational activities. Salmon escapement. High stream discharge and habitat availability. Pesticide use and other mortality related factors. Reproductive success. What To Monitor: Abundance and distribution, adult/subadult ratios, salmon escapement, winter flow levels, recreational river use. Where To Monitor: Skagit River mainstem and tributaries and other rivers and river deltas in north Puget Sound. Justification And Other Information: Major over-wintering area for bald eagles. Heroic species with high public visibility. Direct linkage with salmon escapement. Increasing population and demand for recreation may increase disturbance levels, thereby decreasing individual fitness of eagles and resulting in lower reproductive rates. Eagles may play an important role in transfer of nutrients (salmon carcasses) from streams throughout riparian areas. Contacts/Potential Partners: Related monitoring by The Nature Conservancy, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, other public agencies (including British Columbia) and private groups. Linkages: There are critical linkages with Aquatic Habitat (e.g., flow rate, gravel bars) and Aquatic Biota (e.g., salmon) components of LTEM monitoring. TopMonitoring Component: Birds Birds of Prey Northern Goshawk Monitoring/Research Question: What are the status and distribution of the goshawk population in North Cascades NP? Stressors And Related Factors: Habitat loss and fragmentation on adjacent lands. Disturbance from park operations and recreational activities. Pesticide use and other mortality related factors (includes competition and predation). Small population levels in the region. Poor reproductive success. What To Monitor: Presence/absence, distribution, and productivity. Where To Monitor: Parkwide, in forested habitat. Justification And Other Information: Standard methods and protocols are well-established. There are interagency opportunities. Goshawks are likely to placed on the Endangered Species list for federal protection. Goshawks are a potential indicator species. TopMonitoring Component: Birds Passerines Monitoring/Research Question: What is the status of breeding passerine bird populations within North Cascades NP? Stressors And Related Factors: Climatic change; adjacent land use and development, including habitat fragmentation and lack of connectivity; threats from exotic species (competition, predation, brood parasitism); effects on migratory species (weather, international land management, and policies). What To Monitor: Presence/absence, abundance, distribution, and community diversity (species richness by habitat). Where To Monitor: Parkwide, stratified by habitat. Justification And Other Information: Sampling methods are well-developed and easy to implement. the same methods can be used to monitor a wide array of species and guilds. There are opportunities for national and international partnerships. Passerines are potential indicators of stress. TopMonitoring Component: Birds Riverine Birds Monitoring/Research Question: What are the status and distribution of this guild of species in North Cascades NP (harlequin duck, common merganser, spotted sandpiper, American dipper)? Stressors And Related Factors: Disturbance from park operations (e.g., stream channel alterations) and recreational activities (e.g., rafting, fishing); high stream discharge and habitat availability; water quality; fire effects; naturally low reproductive success. What To Monitor: Presence/absence. Harlequin duck productivity (brood counts). Recreational use of park rivers. Where To Monitor: Parkwide rivers, streams, and creeks. Justification And Other Information: This approach uses a guild of wetland-related species with different life histories. Some of these species are indicators of riverine wetland condition. Harlequin ducks may be placed on the Endangered Species list for federal protection. There are interagency opportunities. There are linkages with the Aquatic Habitat component of the LTEM plan. TopMonitoring Component: Birds White-tailed Ptarmigan Monitoring / Research Question: What are the status and distribution of white-tailed ptarmigan across alpine habitats in the park? What are the key elements of a habitat model for white-tailed ptarmigan?Stressors And Related Factors: Climatic change, atmospheric deposition. What To Monitor: Presence/absence, distribution, and productivity. Where To Monitor: Parkwide, in alpine habitats. Justification And Other Information: The North Cascades are near the southern extent of the white-tailed ptarmigan range, and the species is potentially sensitive to ecological change. It is a potential indicator species. Most of its alpine habitat is located within park boundaries. TopMonitoring Component: Arthropods Monitoring/Research Questions: What are the status and distribution of various guilds of arthropods associated with a range of habitats in North Cascades NP? Which exotic arthropods could potentially affect park ecosystems? Stressors And Related Factors: Altered aquatic habitat, climatic change, fire and other disturbance effects. What To Monitor: Presence/absence and diversity of selected taxa. Where To Monitor: Focus on designated monitoring watersheds. Justification And Other Information: Arthropods are indicators of the condition of components of various ecosystems, especially stream habitat. There are linkages with the Aquatic Habitat and Terrestrial Habitat components of the LTEM program. Description of Recommended Action:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||