| . |
.
Glacier
Research on Mount Rainier
Techniques
for studying glacier change
Glaciers
often appear static to the casual observer, but in fact
they advance or retreat in dramatic ways compared to
other geologic events. Various ways exist to measure
glacial changes. One approach is to measure changes
in their length and area. This has been a traditional
method dating from at least the 1800s and perhaps
earlier. Other methods estimate changes in volume, or
mass. Also, the rate of glacier movement can be measured.
The choice of which method or combination methods depend
on the question being asked, resources available and
tools in hand. Both the National Park Service and the
U.S. Geological survey have made systematic measurements
of Mt. Rainiers glaciers since the late 1890's,
making it one of the longest and most detailed records
of glacier change in the United States.
1)
Mapping the terminus of glaciers
Perhaps
the easiest approach to monitoring glacier change is
to record the position of a glacier terminus. The distance
to the ice front from a fixed position is the most common
method. With the advent of global position system instruments,
a locally fixed position may not be required. Also,
repeated photography, whether aerial, satellite, or
ground-based is another common method. Neighboring bedrock
features provide fixed references to scale the image
(c).
Several glaciers on Mt. Rainier have photographic records
that extend back over a century (c).
| |
Figure
1 - The lower portion of Nisqually Glacier, July
2001. The white outline shows the current location
of the glacier terminus. The red area shows the
terminus of the glacier in 1912 (based on a photograph
taken by Aashel Curtis). The estimated retreat is
1.5 kilometers (0.9 miles). |
2)
Determining glacier characteristics using remote imaging
and digital mapping technology.
Because
of the difficulty and expense of traveling to and on
glaciers, often glaciers are mapped using air photos
and/or satellite images. Such images large areas of
remote regions without the cost and time required for
ground mapping (c).
Furthermore, advances in digital processing technology
have greatly reduced the time required to interpret
the imagery and provided products that can rapidly be
rescaled to meet a variety of needs. . Combining these
images with digitized historical maps yield a history
of change in glacier length, area, debris cover, etc.
| |
Figure
2 - A map of Emmons Glacier produced using geographic
information system software, digitized glacier outlines
for 1913 and 1994, and a digital orthoquad. |
3)
Determining glacier volume
Glacier
volume is an important attribute because glaciers
are frozen reservoirs of water and are important
to water resource planning. However, the remote
location and size of many glaciers challenge attempts
to accurately determine glacier volume. One method
measures ice thickness using ice-penetrating radar,
which is a portable radar transmitter / receiver
that can be towed or carried across the glaciers
surface. As the unit travels over the surface,
it emits a radar pulse that passes through the
snow and ice until it reflected by various impurities
in the ice or the base of a glacier back to the
receiver. The ice thickness is calculated using
the speed of the radar wave and total travel time
to and from the unit. From the thickness map,
the volume of the glacier can be calculated (c).

Figure
3 - Operation of Ice Penetrating Radar
While
such ground surveys produce relatively accurate
measurements of glacier thickness and volume, they
tend to be expensive and time-consuming. Furthermore,
radar surveys are difficult in steep and crevassed
glacier surfaces. Aerial surveys are possible, but
they too are challenging on steep glaciers.
One
alternative is to estimate glacier volume from its
surface area, which can be measured remotely. Based
on known glacier volumes, measured by radar surveys,
mathematical relations have been developed that
relate glacier volume to its area. While this method
is imprecise compared to radar methods, it does
provide a reasonable way to estimate glacier volume
for many glaciers distributed over a broad region
(c).
4)
Monitoring glacier motion
On
Mount Rainier, elevation surveys of Nisqually
Glacier are regularly made to determine changes
in the elevation of the surface. Through these
surveys "bulges" have been tracked as
they travel down the glacier (c).
These bulges, called kinematic waves, form when
higher than normal snowfall builds up in the accumulation
area of the glacier (c).
As the bulge grows, it begins to move down the
slope, faster than the glacier ice itself. When
it reaches the bottom of the glacier, the terminus
advances drammatically. A time delay exists between
changes in snowfall, and the glacier advance because
of the time required for the kinematic wave to
move down glacier. Understanding kinematic waves
is an important process to consider when assessing
glacier response to climate change.
| |
Figure
4 - Time lapse diagram showing the development
and movement of a Kinematic wave in a glacier.
|
5)
Measuring mass balance
Mass
balance measurements quantify the mass changes of a
glacier. This is the most direct measure between climate
and glacier response. The climate usually determines
the mass change of a glacier. Winter snow accumulation
adds mass to the glacier and summer melt takes mass
away. The volume of a glacier over a years time
may be constant, yet the glacier in the accumulation
zone gains mass and loses mass in the ablation zone.
Thus, on a yearly basis, mass balance measurements will
indicate how much melt water is produced, whereas volume
measurements will not. Glacier advance and retreat (area
change) are the result of long-term (10 years) climatic
change because of the delay imposed by glacier dynamics.
Thus, mass balance measurements track the most direct
and immediate response of a glacier to changes in the
meteorological environment.
Currently,
there is no long term mass balance data for Mount Rainier,
a problem that the National Park Service is attempting
to rectify when it instituted a regular mass balance
program beginning in 2001(c).
| |
Figure
5 - Portland State University graduate student Thomas
Nylen placing an ablation stake in Nisqually Glacier. |
6)
Determining the extent of ancient glaciers using post-glacial
landforms
As
explained earlier, glaciers modify the landscape.
After the ice has disappeared we can use these features
to infer the former glacier position. For instance,
when a glacier occupies a stream valley it deepens
and widens the valley. When glaciers recede valleys
have a characteristic U-shape. Likewise, as glaciers
retreat they often leave behind moraines.
The date of the moraines can sometimes be inferred
from the age of trees or lichens growing on moraines
(c).
| |
Figure
6 - Evidence for previous position of Emmons Glacier.
The abrupt change in the slope of the valley wall
marks the top of the glacier more than 10,000
years ago (the Pleistocene). The ridge bordering
the lake is a terminal moraine showing where Emmons
glacier terminated during the "Little Ice
Age" ( 250 years ago). |
A
time line of glacier research on Mount Rainier
1857
- A team lead by August Kautz describes the location
of the terminus while climbing Mt. Rainier (c).
1870
- Geologists S. Emmons and A. Wilson collect information
about the geology and position of glaciers while climbing
to the summit of Mount Rainier (c).
1896
- Geologists G. Smith, B. Willis, and glacial geologist
I.C. Russell are sent by the U.S. Geological Survey
"explore the region... and determine the nature
and behavior of the glaciers" on Mt. Rainier.
Russell writes a detailed narrative of the glacial
geology he observed on the trip to summit. He also
suggested that Nisqually glacier be studied on a regular
basis by setting up photo stations along the glacier,
mapping the terminus of the glacier, and making measurements
of glacier flow rates (c).
1905
- University of California geologist J. LeConte made
measurements of Nisqually Glacier's flow rate (c).
1913
- F. Matthes (U.S.Geological Survey) creates a topographic
map of Mount Rainier, producing the first accurate
depiction of glacier location and size (c).
1930's
- The National Park Service under the supervision
of Schmoe, Bender, Brockman, and others make regular
measurement of the terminus of some glaciers on Mount
Rainier (c).
See Mapping the terminus of glaciers
for more information.
1931
- Tacoma City Light Department and the U.S. Geological
Survey initiated measurements of surface elevation
along profiles across Nisqually Glacier (c).
See Monitoring glacier motion
for more information.
1950's
to present day - A. Harrison, F. Veatch, and others
established photo stations near Nisqually Glacier
(c).
See Mapping the terminus of glaciers
for more information.
1960's
/ 1970's - Kiver and others map ices caves in the
glaciers of Mount Rainier (c).
Steven Hodge measures velocity and surface elevation
on several glaciers (c).
Austin Post and Carolyn Driedger (U.S. Geological
Survey) map historical terminus positions.
1970's/1980's
- D. Crandell and R. Miller (c)
investigate the Pleistocene glacial geology of Mt.
Rainier. Their work is supported by that of R. Sigafoos
and E. Hendricks (c)
who made age determinations on moraines using tree-ring
dating, and that of Steven Porter and D. Burbank (c)
who made moraine age determinations using lichen dating.
See Determining the extent of ancient
glaciers using post-glacial landforms for
more information. Paul Kennard and Carolyn Driedger
(c)
(U.S. Geological Survey) determine the thickness of
glaciers on Mt. Rainier and several other mountains
in the Cascade range. See Determining
glacier volume for more information.
1990's
- Jeremy Mennis (c)
(Portland State University) creates a GIS database
describing recent changes in the glaciers of Mount
Rainier. Thomas Nylen (c)
(also of PSU) extends this database pushing the glacial
record back to 1896. See Determining
glacier characteristics using remote imaging and digital
mapping technology for more information.
2000
- The National Park Service has initiated a long-term
monitoring program for the Nisqually and Emmons glaciers.
Surface elevation measurements are obtained annually
on the Nisqually glacier. Mass balance measurements
were intiated in 2001 on the Nisqually and Emmons
glaciers.
|
|
, |
|