|
The Science of the Lewis and Clark
Expedition
It
has been described as "the greatest camping trip of all time," a
voyage of high adventure, an exercise in manifest destiny which
carried the American flag overland to the Pacific. The Lewis and
Clark Expedition was all of this and more. However, it is astounding
that the expedition is rarely discussed in terms of its scientific
achievements, for the Lewis and Clark Expedition was one of the
first systematic scientific evaluations of a region ever conducted.
President Thomas Jefferson soft-pedaled the scientific aspects of
the expedition when he asked Congress for money in 1803. The purposes
of the expedition were twofold, Jefferson claimed, but only the
first purpose was of any real consequence - the diplomatic mission
of contacting Indian nations, establishing the United States as
sovereign over the region and as a major player in the fur trade.
He made the second purpose, the scientific one, seem like an
inconsequential afterthought. Jefferson knew that diplomacy, especially
with the goal of increased commerce, could be sold to Congress;
scientific discovery and description could not. One seemed practical,
the other less so.
Yet, as Jefferson wrote letters of introduction
for his 29-year-old personal secretary, Meriwether Lewis, to the
most distinguished American scientists of the day, he accentuated
that second goal. Jefferson told the men of science that Lewis would
not only explore but map and chronicle everything of interest. Jefferson
was himself an amateur scientist who must stand with the foremost
men of his time. Notes on the State of Virginia, his only book,
was one of the first examples of Scientific Geography, preceding
the work of Humboldt by 50 years, and drawing upon Bernhard Varenius'
Geographia generalis (1650). By 1803, Jefferson was probably the
most informed American on the totality of the geography of the American
West, and had the largest library anywhere on this subject.
Between 1804 and 1806, Lewis and Clark made
the first systematic reports, based on scientific measurement and
observations, of the Missouri River - not only its course, but its
flora and fauna, depth and current, tributaries and inhabitants.
They continued onward to document
their observations in the Rocky Mountains and the Pacific Northwest.
Lewis and Clark described for science at least 120 mammals, birds,
reptiles and fish, as well as at least 182 plant species. They made
the first attempt at a systematic record of the meteorology of the
West, and less successfully attempted to determine the latitude
and longitude of significant geographical points.
These facts set them apart from other contemporary
expeditions, most notably those of Zebulon Pike, which made no new
scientific discoveries. There is a reason that such wonderful, Enlightenment-influenced
scientific work was possible on the Voyage of Discovery - and that
reason was Meriwether Lewis. If not for Lewis' incredible intelligence,
background knowledge of the rudimentary science of his day, powers
of observation and his ability to apply this knowledge in the field,
the significance of the Lewis and Clark Expedition would be greatly
diminished. It was Lewis alone of the expedition members who stood
closest to being a man of science, both during and after the expedition.
On February 27, 1803, President Jefferson confided in a letter to
Benjamin Smith Barton, a physician and naturalist at the University
of Pennsylvania, why he chose Lewis to head the expedition, saying
that "It was impossible to find a character who to a compleat science
in botany, natural history, mineralogy & astronomy, joined the firmness
of constitution & character, prudence, habits
adopted to the woods, & a familiarity with the Indian manners &
character, requisite for this undertaking. . . . Altho' no regular
botanist he possesses a remarkable store of accurate observation
on all the subjects of the three kingdoms, & will therefore readily
single out whatever presents itself new to him in either." Jefferson
ended his letter by asking Barton to train Lewis, and continued:
"I make no apology for this trouble, because I know that the same
wish to promote science which has induced me to bring forward this
proposition, will induce you to aid in promoting it." Jefferson
wrote similar letters to the other prominent American scientists
of the day: Andrew Ellicott, Robert Patterson, Caspar Wistar and
Dr. Benjamin Rush. The deaths of Benjamin Franklin and David Rittenhouse
left these five men, along with Jefferson, as the leaders of the
American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia, the primary scientific
society in America at that time.
In 1803 Lewis traveled to Philadelphia to
study with Dr. Barton, a professor of botany at the University of
Pennsylvania, who instructed Lewis in botany and zoology. Barton
was the first professor of natural sciences in the United States
and wrote the first U.S. textbook on botany. It is not known whether
it was Barton or Jefferson who taught Lewis how to prepare and label
plant and animal specimens; either was capable of doing so. Lewis
took 10 or 12 natural science reference books with him all the way
to the Pacific Ocean and back, including Barton's botany textbook.
Dr. Caspar Wistar rounded out Lewis' instruction
in the natural sciences. After teaching chemistry and physiology
at the College of Pennsylvania for many years, he was given the
chair of anatomy at the University of Pennsylvania's medical school.
Wistar published the first U.S. book on anatomy, and was honored
by the English-born botanist Thomas Nuttall, who named the vine
"Wisteria" after him. Wistar was a specialist at "comparative anatomy."
Wistar drew up a list of questions for Lewis involving the natural
history of each region of the West. Unfortunately, this original
list has never been found.
During the winter spent in the St. Louis
area, Lewis and Clark were busy with training their crew, obtaining
supplies and finding out all they could about the territory ahead.
But the work of scientific inquiry continued, even in the heart
of St. Louis, as Lewis sat in the garden of Pierre Chouteau on March
26, 1804. In the stone-walled enclosure, Chouteau had a specimen
of the Osage Orange tree growing. The tree's natural range then
extended only to about 300 miles West of St. Louis. Chouteau allowed
Lewis to take cuttings to send back to Jefferson. Even in the midst
of a domestic garden, Lewis noticed an unusual tree and described
it for science. This was chronologically the very first of the over
300 plants and animals described by Lewis and Clark over the subsequent
2½ years.
As the expedition began to move up the Missouri
River, Lewis focussed on the details - the animals, the type of
rocks, the trees and grasses - along the route. How fast was the
current? How high the cliffs? Was that bird or plant different from
one known in the East? Lewis went on to describe some of the animals,
including the eastern wood rat - the first animal new to science
encountered on the voyage - in what is today Osage County, Missouri.
By this time the
tone had been set and the tasks defined for this incredible scientific
mission. For, more than a mere stunt to see if the continent could
be crossed and conquered, more than a diplomatic mission to Indian
peoples, the Lewis and Clark Expedition was a scientific foray.
Jefferson charged Lewis with chronicling "the animals of the country
generally, & especially those not known in the U.S. the remains
and accounts of any which may [be] deemed rare or extinct . . .
[observe] the face of the country, it's growth and vegetable productions;
especially those not of the U.S. . . ." He was told to make these
observations "with great pains & accuracy, to be entered distinctly
& intelligibly for others as well as yourself." It is this aspect
of the expedition, fulfilled in every sense, which sets the Lewis
and Clark Expedition apart and plays a major role in its resonance
200 years later.
|