 |
PICKING THE RIGHT MOMENT
While it is often the case that a specific act or moment is
dictated (the raising of the flag at Iwo lima for instance),
I have often found the most compelling sculptures to be depictions
of the "everyday circumstance" of historical figures.
Depicting the tired and determined faces of men ~ a battle
is often more effective than showing the battle itself in
conveying how it must have felt and how it impacts the soul
of a man. And, I believe art should touch the soul if it is
to be effective.
Often, the scene desired dictates the timing and the moment
chosen. Charles Drury , for instance, in commissioning the
statues now in the lobby of this hotel, wanted to show Lewis,
Clark, Sacagawea and her baby in a cradle board. This narrowed
the the time frame to the Spring or early Summer of 1805 because
the famous native American guide did not join the party until
after they wintered at the Mandan villages and would have
been carrying her baby by the end of that stay. And, since
the scenery in the background was of considerable interest
to the entire display we picked the White Cliffs region of
the upper Missouri River. This further specified the time
to early May. We knew that frequent stops for formal observation
were made along the way and we selected a hypothetical one
of these for our scene. Clark had primary responsibility for
mapping the river while Lewis made astronomical/navigational
sights. Sacagawea was known for locating roots and other edibles
for the party. Using this information, we tried to portray
a "typical" afternoon's stop to observe. We show
Lewis and Clark intent upon the faithful observation and recording
of the landscape while Sacagawea is nearby climbing out of
the water with Lewis' dog, Seaman. She is with the party but
it is obvious to the careful onlooker that she has a personal
agenda Quite different than that of Lewis and Clark. She looks
west with some hope of returning to her home after an enforced
absence of six years.
AVOIDING TECHNICAL MISTAKES
We went to considerable lengths to insure that our depiction
of the party was accurate or at leastfeasible. We read several
books about the period in general and the Lewis and Clark
expedition in particular. We consulted historians who specialized
in the subject of dress and equipment and wherever possible
used clothing and equipment known to have been owned by the
men in the party. Inevitably, we had to make judgments and
informed guesses as to how these men looked. One source we
learned not to trust was previously accepted illustrations
by artists working several decades after the expedition was
already legend. The most reliable information coupled with
good judgment was our best guide.
|