|
Public Comment Analysis
The comments from both the public meetings and
letters are grouped under the following headings and are summarized.
Resource Protection
Cultural Resources
Several commentors mentioned the importance of preserving
historic buildings.
Some suggested setting up an endowment fund for historic
preservation or donating time and money and using volunteers.
Others suggested using facade easements to help preserve
historic buildings along with land easements.
Someone asked how one finds the funding to maintain historic
buildings, such as barns, that are no longer needed but contribute to
the cultural landscape.
As an added preservation strategy for historic properties, the
Reserve should consider a tax abatement program at the town or county
level which would provide incentives to property owners through tax
credits or other incentives. The Reserve should also explore the
possibility of federal tax credits.
The Reserve should provide technical support for owners who
would like to upgrade their historic houses for energy efficiency, but
in keeping with historic regulations.
Natural Resources
The Reserve needs to develop a workable technical assistance
program for both natural and cultural resources.
Several commentors mentioned the importance of hedgerows and the
need to maintain them in cooperation with the county. Landowners who
protect them could be offered financial incentives.
The Reserve should protect botanical resources through easements
and eliminate noxious weeds such as poison hemlock.
A commentor mentioned the need to preserve or restore the
existing prairie fragments. The Reserve should first identify them and
then develop a plan to encourage landowners to preserve them.
The Reserve needs a formal arrangement with Seattle Pacific
University to continue to operate and maintain the tide gate. It needs
to be repaired so that it operates properly.
Someone asked about the role and management of fire.
In This Issue
|
Recreation
Most of the recreational comments were concerned about trail
use. Trails need to be carefully planned, implemented, and managed;
people need to be educated about appropriate trail uses.
Many would like to see the trail system enhanced with better
signage.
Trails could be developed across The Nature Conservancy's
property, and the north side of Crockett Lake (for bird watching).
A continuous multi-use, non-motorized trail could link with
existing Reserve, state, and county trails including Fort Ebey and Fort
Casey state parks, the Kettles Geological Park, Ebey's Landing bluff,
Crockett Blockhouse, Rhododendron Park and Coupeville.
Some trails need to be relocated and some uses prohibited at
certain locations (such as bicycling on the bluffs).
The Reserve should establish a trail for people with
disabilities.
A few commentors were concerned about noisy activities on Penn
Cove, specifically the use of personal watercrafts (jet skis) and
floatplanes.
Someone mentioned the need for better boat access to Penn
Cove.
The Reserve could have groups such as Whidbey Audubon lead
nature field trips within the Reserve.
Many people recognized the importance of bicycles in the
Reserve, both to reduce traffic and as the best way to see the Reserve.
This would involve having access to conveniently located and
well-designed bicycle racks.
Someone suggested that the Reserve subsidize a short-term
bicycle rental program in Coupeville until the idea becomes profitable
for the private sector.
The Reserve needs to better understand the sport requirements of
certain recreational activities, such as paragliding and horse back
riding and their impacts. Someone asked what types of uses are
appropriate within the Reserve and how they affect private
landowners.
Analysis continued >>>
|