Activity 3B
Debate on Denying Cave Access
Students break into two groups and develop and present arguments in a
structured debate in favor of and against restricting access to certain
caves.
Duration:
Materials:
Procedure: 1. Split the class into two teams, perhaps combining groups that
visited caves together.
2. Each group will represent one side of the issue of whether or not
the National Park Service should deny the public access to certain caves
in the monument. They will have 20 minutes to develop their arguments.
The group should select one person to be the team scribe and record
ideas on a flip chart. They must decide among themselves who will
present each argument. Make sure that everyone takes a turn to speak,
rather than having just one spokesperson for each group.
While the groups are working, the teacher should circulate among
them and make sure they are on track. Some suggestions for points they
may want to make appear in the table on the following page.
3. The teacher will act as an impartial facilitator during the
debate. Give each team 2 minutes to present each of their arguments and
the other team 30 seconds to rebut. Team one should present their first
argument, followed by team 2's rebuttal. Then team two presents their
first argument, followed by team 1's rebuttal. They continue to
alternate until both sides have presented all of their arguments.
4. Take two confidential votes following the debate. Which team did
they think most powerfully and effectively argued their case? Then have
them vote on their personal beliefs, regardless of which team they were
on. Do they think that the National Park Service should deny access to
certain areas at Craters of the Moon (and other National Parks and
Monuments) to protect fragile resources?
harmed if entered are closed.
Objectives:
to Caves
to Cave