Preface
Working in Partnership with Others
Interpretive Challenges and Opportunities
Resource Protection Challenges aned Opportunities
Existing Facilities for Visitor Use and
Park Operations
The Plan
Implementation Concepts
|
for Nez Perce National Historical Park and Big Hole National Battlefield
GOALS The following goals are based on the information gathered from the public scoping meetings and written comments. These goals describe the vision or desired future for Nez Perce National Historical Park as it will be 20 years from now. They provide the management philosophy and basic guidance for the park. Relationship of the Park to Contemporary Nez Perce Culture The National Park Service and the Nez Perce people, working together and in partnership with others toward common goals, manage Nez Perce National Historical Park as a place to commemorate and celebrate the continuum of the Nez Perce culture. Interpretation and Visitor Experience The Nez Perce story is told from the Nez Perce perspective. It stresses the complex dynamics in the Nez Perce cultural continuum, as reflected in today's Nez Perce communities and by conflicts between traditional resource use and modern-day conditions (for example, fishing versus dams). The interpretation of the events of 1877 seeks a balanced view, but the story is told primarily from the Nez Perce perspective. It is presented within the context of the entire continuum of Nez Perce culture, including prewar and postwar events and present-day implications. It includes insight into how the events fit within the spectrum of the Indian Wars and the nation's history. The interpretation is sensitive to Nez Perce cultural needs. People-to-people experiences are on Nez Perce terms. Information that should not be shared is kept confidential. Visitation is controlled to avoid intrusion on cultural sensitivities and the degradation of resources. Visitors come away from each site understanding how it fits into the overall history. They experience the integrity of the site through interpretive media where necessary and appropriate. Visitors receive enough information to be able to treat each site with respect. Operations, Management, and Partnerships The management and operation of the park maximize the benefits available through cooperative partnerships. Partners are fully integrated into park management functions, and they share resources. The management of the park and Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail are closely tied together. A well-staffed, properly trained, well-equipped park management team is in place, supporting a decentralized, sustainable approach to the management of park resources and the visitor experience. The team achieves a well-coordinated management structure that fosters communication and cooperation with communities and the Nez Perce people. The park's scattered sites are united through interpretation, communications, and partnerships. Land and Resource Protection Key elements and sites that are important to the Nez Perce people and the nation's history are preserved for present and future generations. Resources associated with the continuation of Nez Perce traditional uses and Nez Perce culture are preserved. Additional significant sites are being studied for possible inclusion in the park. Resource programs are cooperative and synergistic. The Nez Perce people are increasingly involved in resource management. An extension program provides technical assistance in the protection of resources and land for parties outside the National Park Service.
Implementation concepts describe steps that will be taken parkwide to achieve the goals or desired future. Specific actions related to particular sites are included in the site-specific discussion in later pages. Nez Perce National Historical Park will continue the existing general management philosophy and direction, but the rate of progress in reaching goals will be increased. The appropriate management techniques will be selected based on individual circumstances. Incremental steps will be taken to assure resource protection and provide visitor services. Interpretation Because visitors have difficulty recognizing that individual sites in Nez Perce National Historical Park are part of the larger park, many of the actions related to interpretation and visitor use are designed to unify the park sites and story.
Partnerships More cooperative agreements and other partnership mechanisms will be developed with agencies, organizations, and individuals, and will be tended in a focused fashion. The management and operation of Nez Perce National Historical Park will continue to rely heavily on such arrangements to protect and interpret resources. Enhancing these cooperative partnerships will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of resource protection and increase the availability of quality visitors' experiences. The involvement of greater numbers of partners will improve public support for the park mission, mandates, and operational needs.
Boundaries and Land Protection As a part of the current planning effort, boundaries for all 38 sites were identified based on criteria consistent with NPS management policy:
Establishing boundaries does not necessarily constitute a proposal to purchase the land within those boundaries. A variety of land protection methods are available within the authorized boundaries of the park units. In addition to fee simple acquisition, scenic, conservation and access easements might be acquired, or local zoning and cooperative planning and management can be employed.
Surveys, Studies, and Plans for Resource Protection Surveys and studies will be conducted as necessary to identify and protect cultural and natural resources and to amplify and correct the interpretive story. These studies would be based on clearly thought-out plans and priorities.
Park Operations and Management The National Park Service will retain the current decentralized park management structure that the park staff established in January 1994. Depending on specific needs, any or all of the following operational elements can be applied:
Existing facilities will be rehabilitated or expanded, and modest site development will be added at some locations to meet operational requirements. IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES The plan will be implemented incrementally over the next 15 to 20 years. Because this is a long-term plan, individual actions proposed have been divided into three priority categories to show the ideal order in which the actions will be funded and implemented. However, because of the unique partnership nature of this extended park, it must be noted that priorities can and will shift to take maximum advantage of partnership opportunities whenever possible. First Priority. The newly authorized sites will be included in the park, and current and correct interpretive information will be made available. This will include developing land protection strategies in a land protection plan and completing the comprehensive interpretive plan and a wayside exhibit plan. It also will include developing and installing interpretive exhibits at existing and authorized park sites. The cost of these items, in 1997 dollars, is estimated to be $1,510,579. Second Priority. Visitor contact facilities will be developed at Traditional Campsite near Wallowa, Oregon, Bear Paw Battlefield, and Blaine County Museum in Chinook, Montana, and in the Nespelem, Washington area. Improved visitor contact facilities at White Bird Battlefield and Heart of the Monster in Idaho, and Canyon Creek in Montana will be provided. The National Park Service will assist the city information center in Laurel, Montana. These items, in 1997 dollars, are estimated to cost $10,664,827. During implementation, the need, scale, and siting for any development will be carefully evaluated and will be subject to public review. Third Priority. The current visitor facilities at Spalding, Idaho, and Big Hole National Battlefield in Montana will be rehabilitated or expanded. Costs, in 1997 dollars, are estimated to be $5,609,414 for Spalding and $2,603,674 for Big Hole. Staffing. Implementation of this plan will require a total of 42.5 additional full-time equivalent positions for staffing, as follows:
|