|
|||||||||||
|
Archival Research
Archival research often is very productive for investigations aimed at discovering and evaluating prehistoric and historic archeological sites. In areas where the archeological record is well recorded, the kinds and locations of known sites often help archeologists predict the likely locations of unreported sites. Archeologists conducting archival research will use documentary sources to build an historical framework based on previous research and archeological investigations as well as new research questions and strategies. Historical archeologists use a variety of documentary sources found in historical societies, libraries, government agencies, private collections and other repositories. Maps, official records, photographs, journals, tax records, diaries, private and official correspondence, and newspapers are among the many archival resources available to historical archeologists. Prehistoric archeologists and historical archeologists alike consult site reports, existing artifacts, and topographic maps to identify sites. Archeologists
must use archival data carefully, however. Archival resources may
be biased, incomplete, or nonexistent. To confirm whether an archeological
site exists in a location, fieldwork should be organized to test the
predicted pattern and to improve the efficiency of the investigation.
Oral history is historical tradition, such as genealogical information, which is passed by word of mouth. Oral histories may consist of a person's memories about his or her past experiences or knowledge or traditions passed from one generation to the next. Oral histories are the basis of cultural identity and knowledge for many groups and are a key element in understanding that group's experiences, perspectives, and culture. Oral histories can be an important resource for archeologists. People who have personal or traditional experience with a site may offer unique information about the site's use and meaning. However, because memories may be biased and fallible, oral histories should be used cautiously and in conjunction with other documentary or ethnographic research. The importance
of a site may change over time. Thus, oral histories must be compared
closely with ethnographies. Ethnographies tend to concentrate more
on the knowledge people have of a site or object in the present, or
how they look back on a historical or archeological site from the
present. Many sites, objects, or natural resources that had a subsistence
use in the past, for example, may be important to certain groups or
peoples today because of their educational value about the past.
|
|||||||||||
MJB/MDC